- 12 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Again, these checks are better in the xdr code. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 11 10月, 2011 6 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
I'd rather put more of these sorts of checks into standardized xdr decoders for the various types rather than have them cluttering up the core logic in nfs4proc.c and nfs4state.c. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We don't use WANT bits yet--and sending them can probably trigger a BUG() further down. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Michal Schmidt 提交于
sunrpc implements the rpc_pipefs filesystem type. Add the alias to have the module requested automatically by the kernel when the filesystem is mounted. Signed-off-by: NMichal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
These comments are mostly out of date. Reported-by: NBryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
In response to some review comments, get rid of the somewhat obscure for-loop with bitops, and improve a comment. Reported-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
In commit 5ec094c1 "nfsd4: extend state lock over seqid replay logic" I modified the exit logic of all the seqid-based procedures except nfsd4_locku(). Fix the oversight. The result of the bug was a double-unlock while handling the LOCKU procedure, and a warning like: [ 142.150014] WARNING: at kernel/mutex-debug.c:78 debug_mutex_unlock+0xda/0xe0() ... [ 142.152927] Pid: 742, comm: nfsd Not tainted 3.1.0-rc1-SLIM+ #9 [ 142.152927] Call Trace: [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff8105fa4f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff8105faaa>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff810960ca>] debug_mutex_unlock+0xda/0xe0 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff813e4200>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x80/0x140 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff813e42ce>] mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffffa03bd3f5>] nfs4_lock_state+0x35/0x40 [nfsd] [ 142.152927] [<ffffffffa03b0b71>] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x2a1/0x690 [nfsd] [ 142.152927] [<ffffffffa039f9fb>] nfsd_dispatch+0xeb/0x230 [nfsd] [ 142.152927] [<ffffffffa02b1055>] svc_process_common+0x345/0x690 [sunrpc] [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff81058d10>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x280/0x280 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffffa02b16e2>] svc_process+0x102/0x150 [sunrpc] [ 142.152927] [<ffffffffa039f0bd>] nfsd+0xbd/0x160 [nfsd] [ 142.152927] [<ffffffffa039f000>] ? 0xffffffffa039efff [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff8108230c>] kthread+0x8c/0xa0 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff813e8694>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff81082280>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x190/0x190 [ 142.152927] [<ffffffff813e8690>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13 Reported-by: NBryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com> Tested-by: NBryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 27 9月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Use a separate stateid idr per client, and lookup a stateid by first finding the client, then looking up the stateid relative to that client. Also some minor refactoring. This allows us to improve error returns: we can return expired when the clientid is not found and bad_stateid when the clientid is found but not the stateid, as opposed to returning expired for both cases. I hope this will also help to replace the state lock mostly by a per-client lock, but that hasn't been done yet. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Test_stateid is 4.1-only and only allowed after a sequence operation, so this check is unnecessary. Cc: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The idr system is designed exactly for generating id and looking up integer id's. Thanks to Trond for pointing it out. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
This will be convenient. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 21 9月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Eventually we should probably do the same thing to the file operations as well. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
I'm not sure why I used a new field for this originally. Also, the differences between some of these flags are a little subtle; add some comments to explain. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Yet another open-management regression: - nfs4_file_downgrade() doesn't remove the BOTH access bit on downgrade, so the server's idea of the stateid's access gets out of sync with the client's. If we want to keep an O_RDWR open in this case, we should do that in the file_put_access logic rather than here. - We forgot to convert v4 access to an open mode here. This logic has proven too hard to get right. In the future we may consider: - reexamining the lock/openowner relationship (locks probably don't really need to take their own references here). - adding open upgrade/downgrade support to the vfs. - removing the atomic operations. They're redundant as long as this is all under some other lock. Also, maybe some kind of additional static checking would help catch O_/NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS confusion. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 19 9月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Look up closed stateid's in the stateid hash like any other stateid rather than searching the close lru. This is simpler, and fixes a bug: currently we handle only the case of a close that is the last close for a given stateowner, but not the case of a close for a stateowner that still has active opens on other files. Thus in a case like: open(owner, file1) open(owner, file2) close(owner, file2) close(owner, file2) the final close won't be recognized as a retransmission. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Including the full clientid in the on-the-wire stateid allows more reliable detection of bad vs. expired stateid's, simplifies code, and ensures we won't reuse the opaque part of the stateid (as we currently do when the same openowner closes and reopens the same file). Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 17 9月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We no longer need is_deleg_stateid, for example. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Keep around an unhashed copy of the final stateid after the last close using an openowner, and when identifying a replay, match against that stateid instead of just against the open owner id. Free it the next time the seqid is bumped or the stateowner is destroyed. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
I want at least one more bit here. So, let's haul out the caps lock key and add a flags field. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 16 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mi Jinlong 提交于
For checking the size of reply before calling a operation, we need try to get maxsize of the operation's reply. v3: using new method as Bruce said, "we could handle operations in two different ways: - For operations that actually change something (write, rename, open, close, ...), do it the way we're doing it now: be very careful to estimate the size of the response before even processing the operation. - For operations that don't change anything (read, getattr, ...) just go ahead and do the operation. If you realize after the fact that the response is too large, then return the error at that point. So we'd add another flag to op_flags: say, OP_MODIFIES_SOMETHING. And for operations with OP_MODIFIES_SOMETHING set, we'd do the first thing. For operations without it set, we'd do the second." Signed-off-by: NMi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com> [bfields@redhat.com: crash, don't attempt to handle, undefined op_rsize_bop] Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 14 9月, 2011 18 次提交
-
-
由 Mi Jinlong 提交于
For ipv6 link-local addresses, sunrpc do not compare those scope id. This patch let sunrpc compares scope id only on link-local addresses. Signed-off-by: NMi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Mi Jinlong 提交于
For IPv6 local address, lockd can not callback to client for missing scope id when binding address at inet6_bind: 324 if (addr_type & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL) { 325 if (addr_len >= sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6) && 326 addr->sin6_scope_id) { 327 /* Override any existing binding, if another one 328 * is supplied by user. 329 */ 330 sk->sk_bound_dev_if = addr->sin6_scope_id; 331 } 332 333 /* Binding to link-local address requires an interface */ 334 if (!sk->sk_bound_dev_if) { 335 err = -EINVAL; 336 goto out_unlock; 337 } Replacing svc_addr_u by sockaddr_storage, let rqstp->rq_daddr contains more info besides address. Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> [ cel: since this is server-side, use nfsd4_ prefix instead of nfs4_ prefix. ] [ cel: implement S_ISVTX filter in bfields-normal form ] Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
There are no more users... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The current code is sort of hackish in that it assumes a referral is always matched to an export. When we add support for junctions that may not be the case. We can replace nfsd4_path() with a function that encodes the components directly from the dentries. Since nfsd4_path is currently the only user of the 'ex_pathname' field in struct svc_export, this has the added benefit of allowing us to get rid of that. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
First, we shouldn't care here about the structure of the opaque part of the stateid. Second, this hash is really dumb. (I'm not sure the replacement is much better, though--to look at it another patch.) Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Test_stateid should handle delegation stateid's as well. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
It's simpler to look up delegation stateid's in the same hash table as any other stateid. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We want delegations to share more with open/lock stateid's, so first we'll pull out some of the common stuff we want to share. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Note this is actually open-stateid specific. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We're only using those flags to choose lock or open stateid's at this point. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Move most of this into helper functions. Also move the non-CONFIRM case into caller, providing a helper function for that purpose. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Minor cleanup. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 07 9月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We'll use this elsewhere. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The stateowner has some fields that only make sense for openowners, and some that only make sense for lockowners, and I find it a lot clearer if those are separated out. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-