- 23 5月, 2006 5 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
We don't need the upper layers to deal with the physical offset. It's _always_ c->nextblock->offset + c->sector_size - c->nextblock->free_size so we might as well just let the actual write functions deal with that. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 Joern Engel 提交于
o Add a flag MTD_BIT_WRITEABLE for devices that allow single bits to be cleared. o Replace MTD_PROGRAM_REGIONS with a cleared MTD_BIT_WRITEABLE flag for STMicro and Intel Sibley flashes with internal ECC. Those flashes disallow clearing of single bits, unlike regular NOR flashes, so the new flag models their behaviour better. o Remove MTD_ECC. After the STMicro/Sibley merge, this flag is only set and never checked. Signed-off-by: NJoern Engel <joern@wh.fh-wedel.de>
-
由 Joern Engel 提交于
In 2002, STMicro started producing NOR flashes with internal ECC protection for small blocks (8 or 16 bytes). Support for those flashes was added by me. In 2005, Intel Sibley flashes copied this strategy and Nico added support for those. Merge the code for both. Signed-off-by: NJoern Engel <joern@wh.fh-wedel.de>
-
由 Joern Engel 提交于
At least two flashes exists that have the concept of a minimum write unit, similar to NAND pages, but no other NAND characteristics. Therefore, rename the minimum write unit to "writesize" for all flashes, including NAND. Signed-off-by: NJoern Engel <joern@wh.fh-wedel.de>
-
由 Joern Engel 提交于
Two flags exist to decide whether a device is writeable or not. None of those two flags is checked for independently, so they are clearly redundant, if not an invitation to bugs. This patch removed both of them, replacing them with a single new flag. Signed-off-by: NJoern Engel <joern@wh.fh-wedel.de>
-
- 22 5月, 2006 10 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
We'll be using a proper list of nodes in the jffs2_xattr_datum and jffs2_xattr_ref structures, because the existing code to overwrite them is just broken. Put it in the common part at the front of the structure which is shared with the jffs2_inode_cache, so that the jffs2_link_node_ref() function can do the right thing. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
In a couple of places, we assume that what's at the end of the ->next_in_ino list is a struct jffs2_inode_cache. Let's check for that, since we expect it to change soon. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Let's avoid the potential for forgetting to set ref->next_in_ino, by doing it within jffs2_link_node_ref() instead. This highlights the ugliness of what we're currently doing with xattr_datum and xattr_ref structures -- we should find a nicer way of dealing with that. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
When filing REF_OBSOLETE nodes, we'd add their size to the global 'dirty_size' count, but then to the eraseblock's 'used_size' count. That's not clever. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
I added an argument to the real function... Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
The previous code wouldn't work correctly on architectures which have a non-empty MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX, and this version is neater if slightly less optimal in the built-in case. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 Jonathan McDowell 提交于
The patch below adds support for the NAND device on the Amstrad Delta. This is a 32MiB 8bit Toshiba device, with the data bus connected to the OMAP MPUIO pins and ALE, CLE, NCE, NRE, NWE and NWP all connected to the Delta's latch2 16bit latch. Signed-Off-By: NJonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
- 21 5月, 2006 14 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Well, almost. We'll actually keep a 'TEST_TOTLEN' macro set for now, and keep doing some paranoia checks to make sure it's all working correctly. But if TEST_TOTLEN is unset, the size of struct jffs2_raw_node_ref drops from 16 bytes to 12 on 32-bit machines. That's a saving of about half a megabyte of memory on the OLPC prototype board, with 125K or so nodes in its 512MiB of flash. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
We can't use jffs2_scan_dirty_space() because it doesn't do any locking; it's only for use at scan time -- hence the 'scan' in the name. Also, don't allocate refs while we have c->erase_completion_lock held. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
We don't allocate this locally any more -- it's given to us and owner by our caller. Also improve the debug messages a little. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Next step in ongoing campaign to file a struct jffs2_raw_node_ref for every piece of dirty space in the system, so that __totlen can be killed off.... Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
If __totlen is going away, we need to pass the length in separately. Also stop callers from needlessly setting ref->next_phys to NULL, since that's done for them... and since that'll also be going away soon. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Make sure we allocate a ref for any dirty space which exists between nodes which we find in an eraseblock summary. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
The incoming ref_totlen() calculation is going to rely on the existence of nodes which cover all dirty space. We can't just tweak the accounting data any more; we have to call jffs2_scan_dirty_space() to do it. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
To eliminate the __totlen field from struct jffs2_raw_node_ref, we need to allocate nodes for dirty space instead of just tweaking the accounting data. Introduce jffs2_scan_dirty_space() in preparation for that. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
For RWCOMPAT and ROCOMPAT nodes, we should still allow the mount to succeed. Just abandon the summary and fall through to the full scan. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
If we had to allocate extra space for the summary node, we weren't correctly freeing it when jffs2_sum_scan_sumnode() returned nonzero -- which is both the success and the failure case. Only when it returned zero, which means fall through to the full scan, were we correctly freeing the buffer. Document the meaning of those return codes while we're at it. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
We should preserve these when we come to garbage collect them, not let them get erased. Use jffs2_garbage_collect_pristine() for this, and make sure the summary code copes -- just refrain from writing a summary for any block which contains a node we don't understand. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
It should all be counted as dirty space, not wasted and _definitely_ not unchecked. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
The same sequence of code was repeated in many places, to add a new struct jffs2_raw_node_ref to an eraseblock and adjust the space accounting accordingly. Move it out-of-line. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
git://git.infradead.org/jffs2-xattr-2.6由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
- 20 5月, 2006 6 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
We were calling ref_totlen() 18 times. Even before that becomes a real function rather than just a dereference, apparently some compilers still suck anyway. It'll _certainly_ suck after ref_totlen() becomes more complicated, so calculate it once and don't rely on CSE. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
This improves the time to mount 512MiB of NAND flash on my OLPC prototype by about 4%. We used to read the last page of the eraseblock twice -- once to find the offset of the summary node, and again to actually _read_ the summary node. Now we read the last page only once, and read more only if we need to. We also don't allocate a new buffer just for the summary code -- we use the buffer which was already allocated for the scan. Better still, if the 'buffer' for the scan is actually just a pointer directly into NOR flash, we use that too, avoiding the memcpy() which we used to do. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
WARNING: "__moddi3" [drivers/mtd/mtdconcat.ko] undefined! Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
drivers/mtd/devices/docprobe.c: In function `DoC_Probe': drivers/mtd/devices/docprobe.c:338: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type drivers/mtd/devices/docprobe.c:341: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 Ferenc Havasi 提交于
Remove forgotten lines from jffs2_scan_eraseblock() which were unnecessary and may cause problem in some environments. Thanks to Alexander Belyakov <alexander.belyakov@intel.com>. Signed-off-by: NFerenc Havasi <havasi@inf.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
- 19 5月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Device node major/minor numbers are just stored in the payload of a single data node. Just extend that to 4 bytes and use new_encode_dev() for it. We only use the 4-byte format if we _need_ to, if !old_valid_dev(foo). This preserves backwards compatibility with older code as much as possible. If we do make devices with major or minor numbers above 255, and then mount the file system with the old code, it'll just read the first two bytes and get the numbers wrong. If it comes to garbage-collect it, it'll then write back those wrong numbers. But that's about the best we can expect. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
- 18 5月, 2006 3 次提交
-
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
- 17 5月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Belyakov 提交于
There is a second revision of "mtdconcat NAND/Sibley" patch. I hope the patch will not get damaged as I'm posting it from gmail account, thanks to Jorn. The patch adds previously missing concat_writev(), concat_writev_ecc(), concat_block_isbad(), concat_block_markbad() functions to make concatenation layer compatible with Sibley and NAND chips. Patch has been cleared from whitespaces, fixed some lines of code as requested. Also I have added code for alignment check that should support Jorn's "writesize" patch. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Belyakov <alexander.belyakov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-