1. 12 10月, 2008 11 次提交
  2. 11 10月, 2008 10 次提交
  3. 10 10月, 2008 7 次提交
  4. 09 10月, 2008 1 次提交
    • J
      xen: use spin_lock_nest_lock when pinning a pagetable · eefb47f6
      Jeremy Fitzhardinge 提交于
      When pinning/unpinning a pagetable with split pte locks, we can end up
      holding multiple pte locks at once (we need to hold the locks while
      there's a pending batched hypercall affecting the pte page).  Because
      all the pte locks are in the same lock class, lockdep thinks that
      we're potentially taking a lock recursively.
      
      This warning is spurious because we always take the pte locks while
      holding mm->page_table_lock.  lockdep now has spin_lock_nest_lock to
      express this kind of dominant lock use, so use it here so that lockdep
      knows what's going on.
      Signed-off-by: NJeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      eefb47f6
  5. 08 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  6. 07 10月, 2008 4 次提交
  7. 06 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  8. 05 10月, 2008 4 次提交