1. 22 5月, 2011 2 次提交
    • Y
      PCI/e1000e: Add and use pci_disable_link_state_locked() · 9f728f53
      Yinghai Lu 提交于
      Need to use it in _e1000e_disable_aspm.  This routine is used for error
      recovery, where the pci_bus_sem is already held, and we don't want
      pci_disable_link_state to try to take it again.  So add a locked variant
      for use in cases like this.
      
      Found lock up:
      
      [ 2374.654557] kworker/32:1    D ffff881027f6b0f0     0  6075      2 0x00000000
      [ 2374.654816]  ffff88503f099a68 0000000000000046 ffff88503f098000 0000000000004000
      [ 2374.654837]  00000000001d1ec0 ffff88503f099fd8 00000000001d1ec0 ffff88503f099fd8
      [ 2374.654860]  0000000000004000 00000000001d1ec0 ffff88503dcc8000 ffff88503f090000
      [ 2374.654880] Call Trace:
      [ 2374.654898]  [<ffffffff810b1302>] ? __lock_acquired+0x3a/0x224
      [ 2374.654914]  [<ffffffff81c2b59c>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x36
      [ 2374.654925]  [<ffffffff810b069d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x1f/0x178
      [ 2374.654936]  [<ffffffff81c2ab24>] rwsem_down_failed_common+0xd3/0x103
      [ 2374.654945]  [<ffffffff810b158f>] ? __lock_contended+0x3a/0x2a2
      [ 2374.654955]  [<ffffffff81c2ab7b>] rwsem_down_read_failed+0x12/0x14
      [ 2374.654967]  [<ffffffff813371e4>] call_rwsem_down_read_failed+0x14/0x30
      [ 2374.654981]  [<ffffffff8135df20>] ? pci_disable_link_state+0x5f/0xf5
      [ 2374.654990]  [<ffffffff81c2a0e6>] ? down_read+0x7e/0x91
      [ 2374.654999]  [<ffffffff8135df20>] ? pci_disable_link_state+0x5f/0xf5
      [ 2374.655008]  [<ffffffff8135df20>] pci_disable_link_state+0x5f/0xf5
      [ 2374.655024]  [<ffffffff81661796>] e1000e_disable_aspm+0x55/0x5a
      [ 2374.655037]  [<ffffffff816677eb>] e1000_io_slot_reset+0x59/0xea
      [ 2374.655048]  [<ffffffff8135fe0d>] ? report_mmio_enabled+0x5d/0x5d
      [ 2374.655057]  [<ffffffff8135fe3b>] report_slot_reset+0x2e/0x5d
      [ 2374.655072]  [<ffffffff8135369e>] pci_walk_bus+0x8a/0xb7
      [ 2374.655081]  [<ffffffff8135fe0d>] ? report_mmio_enabled+0x5d/0x5d
      [ 2374.655091]  [<ffffffff813603be>] broadcast_error_message+0xa4/0xb2
      [ 2374.655101]  [<ffffffff81352c71>] ? pci_bus_read_config_dword+0x72/0x80
      [ 2374.655110]  [<ffffffff813606df>] do_recovery+0x9e/0xf9
      [ 2374.655120]  [<ffffffff81360786>] handle_error_source+0x4c/0x51
      [ 2374.655129]  [<ffffffff81360974>] aer_isr_one_error+0x1e9/0x21a
      [ 2374.655138]  [<ffffffff81360a6c>] aer_isr+0xc7/0xcc
      [ 2374.655147]  [<ffffffff813609a5>] ? aer_isr_one_error+0x21a/0x21a
      [ 2374.655159]  [<ffffffff81096d9f>] process_one_work+0x237/0x3ec
      [ 2374.655168]  [<ffffffff81096d10>] ? process_one_work+0x1a8/0x3ec
      [ 2374.655178]  [<ffffffff8109728d>] worker_thread+0x17c/0x240
      [ 2374.655186]  [<ffffffff810b0803>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
      [ 2374.655196]  [<ffffffff81097111>] ? manage_workers+0xab/0xab
      [ 2374.655209]  [<ffffffff8109c8ed>] kthread+0xa0/0xa8
      [ 2374.655223]  [<ffffffff81c332d4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
      [ 2374.655232]  [<ffffffff81c2b880>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
      [ 2374.655243]  [<ffffffff8109c84d>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x5b/0x5b
      [ 2374.655252]  [<ffffffff81c332d0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
      
      when aer happens,
      pci_walk_bus already have down_read(&pci_bus_sem)...
      then report_slot_reset
              ==> e1000_io_slot_reset
                      ==> e1000e_disable_aspm
                              ==> pci_disable_link_state...
      
      We can not use pci_disable_link_state, and it will try to hold pci_bus_sem again.
      
      Try to have __pci_disable_link_state that will not need to hold pci_bus_sem.
      
      -v2: change name to pci_disable_link_state_locked() according to Jesse.
      
      [jbarnes: make sure new function is exported for modules]
      Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      9f728f53
    • J
      x86/PCI: derive pcibios_last_bus from ACPI MCFG · a3170c1f
      Jan Beulich 提交于
      On various newer Intel systems the PCI bus(ses) the non-core devices
      live on aren't getting announced by ACPI except through the bus range
      covered by mmconfig. At least the i7core-edac driver depends on these
      devices getting detected.
      
      Mauro, could you check whether with this change the Xeon 55xx hack in
      that driver can go away altogether, and with it the bogus exporting of
      pcibios_scan_specific_bus()?
      Signed-off-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
      Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
      Cc: Aristeu Sergio <arozansk@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      a3170c1f
  2. 12 5月, 2011 4 次提交
  3. 11 5月, 2011 13 次提交
  4. 20 4月, 2011 17 次提交
  5. 19 4月, 2011 4 次提交