Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 155
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 21 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  3. 19 6月, 2010 1 次提交
    • V
      cfq-iosched: Fixed boot warning with BLK_CGROUP=y and CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED=n · e98ef89b
      由 Vivek Goyal 提交于 
      Hi Jens,

Few days back Ingo noticed a CFQ boot time warning. This patch fixes it.
The issue here is that with CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED=n, CFQ should not really
be making blkio stat related calls.

> Hm, it's still not entirely fixed, as of 2.6.35-rc2-00131-g7908a9e5. With
> some
> configs i get bad spinlock warnings during bootup:
>
> [   28.968013] initcall net_olddevs_init+0x0/0x82 returned 0 after 93750
> usecs
> [   28.972003] calling  b44_init+0x0/0x55 @ 1
> [   28.976009] bus: 'pci': add driver b44
> [   28.976374]  sda:
> [   28.978157] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#1, async/0/117
> [   28.980000]  lock: 7e1c5bbc, .magic: 00000000, .owner: <none>/-1, +.owner_cpu: 0
> [   28.980000] Pid: 117, comm: async/0 Not tainted +2.6.35-rc2-tip-01092-g010e7ef-dirty #8183
> [   28.980000] Call Trace:
> [   28.980000]  [<41ba6d55>] ? printk+0x20/0x24
> [   28.980000]  [<4134b7b7>] spin_bug+0x7c/0x87
> [   28.980000]  [<4134b853>] do_raw_spin_lock+0x1e/0x123
> [   28.980000]  [<41ba92ca>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x12/0x20
> [   28.980000]  [<41ba92d2>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1a/0x20
> [   28.980000]  [<4133476f>] blkiocg_update_io_add_stats+0x25/0xfb
> [   28.980000]  [<41335dae>] ? cfq_prio_tree_add+0xb1/0xc1
> [   28.980000]  [<41337bc7>] cfq_insert_request+0x8c/0x425
Signed-off-by: NVivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
      e98ef89b
  5. 18 6月, 2010 1 次提交
    • J
      cfq: Don't allow queue merges for queues that have no process references · c10b61f0
      由 Jeff Moyer 提交于 
      Hi,

A user reported a kernel bug when running a particular program that did
the following:

created 32 threads
- each thread took a mutex, grabbed a global offset, added a buffer size
  to that offset, released the lock
- read from the given offset in the file
- created a new thread to do the same
- exited

The result is that cfq's close cooperator logic would trigger, as the
threads were issuing I/O within the mean seek distance of one another.
This workload managed to routinely trigger a use after free bug when
walking the list of merge candidates for a particular cfqq
(cfqq->new_cfqq).  The logic used for merging queues looks like this:

static void cfq_setup_merge(struct cfq_queue *cfqq, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq)
{
	int process_refs, new_process_refs;
	struct cfq_queue *__cfqq;

	/* Avoid a circular list and skip interim queue merges */
	while ((__cfqq = new_cfqq->new_cfqq)) {
		if (__cfqq == cfqq)
			return;
		new_cfqq = __cfqq;
	}

	process_refs = cfqq_process_refs(cfqq);
	/*
	 * If the process for the cfqq has gone away, there is no
	 * sense in merging the queues.
	 */
	if (process_refs == 0)
		return;

	/*
	 * Merge in the direction of the lesser amount of work.
	 */
	new_process_refs = cfqq_process_refs(new_cfqq);
	if (new_process_refs >= process_refs) {
		cfqq->new_cfqq = new_cfqq;
		atomic_add(process_refs, &new_cfqq->ref);
	} else {
		new_cfqq->new_cfqq = cfqq;
		atomic_add(new_process_refs, &cfqq->ref);
	}
}

When a merge candidate is found, we add the process references for the
queue with less references to the queue with more.  The actual merging
of queues happens when a new request is issued for a given cfqq.  In the
case of the test program, it only does a single pread call to read in
1MB, so the actual merge never happens.

Normally, this is fine, as when the queue exits, we simply drop the
references we took on the other cfqqs in the merge chain:

	/*
	 * If this queue was scheduled to merge with another queue, be
	 * sure to drop the reference taken on that queue (and others in
	 * the merge chain).  See cfq_setup_merge and cfq_merge_cfqqs.
	 */
	__cfqq = cfqq->new_cfqq;
	while (__cfqq) {
		if (__cfqq == cfqq) {
			WARN(1, "cfqq->new_cfqq loop detected\n");
			break;
		}
		next = __cfqq->new_cfqq;
		cfq_put_queue(__cfqq);
		__cfqq = next;
	}

However, there is a hole in this logic.  Consider the following (and
keep in mind that each I/O keeps a reference to the cfqq):

q1->new_cfqq = q2   // q2 now has 2 process references
q3->new_cfqq = q2   // q2 now has 3 process references

// the process associated with q2 exits
// q2 now has 2 process references

// queue 1 exits, drops its reference on q2
// q2 now has 1 process reference

// q3 exits, so has 0 process references, and hence drops its references
// to q2, which leaves q2 also with 0 process references

q4 comes along and wants to merge with q3

q3->new_cfqq still points at q2!  We follow that link and end up at an
already freed cfqq.

So, the fix is to not follow a merge chain if the top-most queue does
not have a process reference, otherwise any queue in the chain could be
already freed.  I also changed the logic to disallow merging with a
queue that does not have any process references.  Previously, we did
this check for one of the merge candidates, but not the other.  That
doesn't really make sense.

Without the attached patch, my system would BUG within a couple of
seconds of running the reproducer program.  With the patch applied, my
system ran the program for over an hour without issues.

This addresses the following bugzilla:
    https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16217

Thanks a ton to Phil Carns for providing the bug report and an excellent
reproducer.

[ Note for stable: this applies to 2.6.32/33/34 ].
Signed-off-by: NJeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Reported-by: NPhil Carns <carns@mcs.anl.gov>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
      c10b61f0
  7. 17 6月, 2010 1 次提交
    • C
      block: fix DISCARD_BARRIER requests · fbbf0556
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      Filesystems assume that DISCARD_BARRIER are full barriers, so that they
don't have to track in-progress discard operation when submitting new I/O.
But currently we only treat them as elevator barriers, which don't
actually do the nessecary queue drains.

Also remove the unlikely around both the DISCARD and BARRIER requests -
the happen far too often for a static mispredict.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
      fbbf0556
  9. 15 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  11. 14 6月, 2010 4 次提交
  13. 12 6月, 2010 27 次提交
  15. 11 6月, 2010 4 次提交