- 07 10月, 2013 9 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The return value of mgmt_remote_name() function is not used and so just change it to return void. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The return value of mgmt_device_found() function is not used and so just change it to return void. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The return value of mgmt_device_disconnected() function is not used and so just change it to return void. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The return value of mgmt_device_connected() function is not used and so just change it to return void. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The return value of mgmt_connect_failed() function is not used so change it to just return void. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The return value of mgmt_disconnect_failed() function is not used so change it to just return void. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The return value of mgmt_set_powered_failed() function is never used and so make the function just return void. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The return value from mgmt_index_added() and mgmt_index_removed() functions is never used. So do not pretend that returning an error would actually be handled and just make both functions return void. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
In case the current value of pairable is already configured, do not send a new settings event indicating that something has changed while in reality everything is the same. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 06 10月, 2013 20 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The helper function mgmt_valid_hdev() is more obfuscating the code then it makes it easier to read. So intead of this helper, use the direct check for BR/EDR device type. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The mgmt_new_settings() function was only needed to handle the error case when re-enabling advertising failed. Since that is now handled internally inside the management core, this function is not needed anymore. So just remove it. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When the all LE connections have been disconneted, then it is up to the host to re-enable advertising at that point. To ensure that the correct advertising parameters are used, force the usage of the common helper to enable advertising. The change just moves the manual enabling of advertising from the event handler into the management core so that the helper can be actually shared. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The LE advertising parameters can only be modified when advertising is disabled. So before enabling it, make sure the controller has all the right parameters. Right now all default values are used and thus this does no change any existing behavior. One minor exception is that in case of single mode LE-only controllers without a public address, now the random address is used for advertising. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The tasks of enabling and disabling advertising are required in many cases. So refactor the actual HCI operations into two common helpers to make the code simpler. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
This is not a functional change, just change the code to make it easy to understand that advertising gets disabled before LE support will be turned off. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
For single mode LE-only controllers, it is possible that they come without a public address. If a public address is not available, then use the random address for connection establishment and scanning. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When counting the number for AMP controllers, a positive check is used. To be consistent, use the same check when actually adding the data for the AMP contollers. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The BR/EDR and LE setup procedures apply only to BR/EDR device types and so check for that explicitly. Checking that it is not an AMP controller is dangerous in case there will be ever a third device type. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
In case of a single mode LE-only controller it is possible that no public address is used. These type of controllers require a random address to be configured. Without a configured static random address, such a controller is not functional. So reject powering on the controller in this case until it gets configured with a random address. The controller setup stage is still run since it is the only way to determinate if a public address is available or not. So it is similar on how RFKILL gets handled during initial setup of the controller. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Within the AMP discover response, all controllers that are not the primary BR/EDR controller are valid. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The check if a L2CAP connection is AMP capable was a little bit complicated. This changes the code to make it simpler and more readable. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The hci_amp_capable() function has only a single user inside the L2CAP core. Instead of exporting the function, place it next to its user. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The number of controllers for the AMP discover response has already been calculated. And since the hci_dev_list lock is held, it can not change. So there is no need for any extra checks. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The inline function for BR/EDR controller AMP discover response info is rather useless. Just include the code into the function that builds the whole response. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The AMP controller status constants need to be actually used to avoid crypted hardcoded numbers. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The special AMP controller id 0 is reserved for the BR/EDR controller that has the main link. It is a fixed value and so use a constant for this throughout the code to make it more visible when the handling is for the BR/EDR channel or when it is for the AMP channel. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
There are two defined HCI device types. One is for BR/EDR controllers and the other is for AMP controllers. The HCI device type is not the same as the AMP controller type. It just happens that currently the defined types match, but that is not guaranteed. Split the usage of AMP controller type into its own domain so that it is possible to separate between BR/EDR controllers, 802.11 AMP controllers and any other AMP technology that might be defined in the future. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The list of controllers can be counted ahead of time and inline inside the AMP discover handling. There is no need to export such a function at all. In addition just count the AMP controller and only allocated space for a single mandatory BR/EDR controller. No need to allocate more space than needed. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The AMP discover response should list exactly one BR/EDR controller and ignore all other BR/EDR controller. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 05 10月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
LE controllers will automatically disable advertising whenever they accept a new connection. In order not to fall out of sync with the advertising setting we need to re-enable advertising whenever the last LE connection drops. A failure to re-enable advertising should cause the setting to be disabled, so this patch also calls mgmt_new_settings() when this happens. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
A function is needed so that the HCI event processing can ask the mgmt code to emit a new settings event. This is necessary e.g. when the event processing does updates to mgmt related states without any dependency of actual mgmt commands. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
This flag is used to indicate whether we want to have advertising enabled or not, so give it a more suitable name. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 04 10月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andre Guedes 提交于
This patch moves some hci_conn fields initialization from hci_le_ create_connection() to hci_connect_le(). It makes more sense to initialize these fields within the function that creates the hci_ conn object. Signed-off-by: NAndre Guedes <andre.guedes@openbossa.org> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Andre Guedes 提交于
This patch simply rename the hci_conn variable "le" to "conn" since it is a better name. Signed-off-by: NAndre Guedes <andre.guedes@openbossa.org> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 03 10月, 2013 6 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Bluetooth specification makes it clear that only one command should be present in the L2CAP LE signalling packet. So tighten the checks here and restrict it to exactly one command. This is different from L2CAP BR/EDR signalling where multiple commands can be part of the same packet. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When SMP packets are received, make sure they contain at least 1 byte header for the opcode. If not, drop the packet and disconnect the link. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The ATT fixed channel is only valid when using LE connections. On BR/EDR it is required to go through L2CAP connection oriented channel for ATT. Drop ATT packets when they are received on a BR/EDR connection. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When receiving connectionless packets on a LE connection, just drop the packet. There is no concept of connectionless channels for LE. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When receiving SMP packets on a BR/EDR connection, then just drop the packet and do not try to process it. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The L2CAP raw sockets are only used for BR/EDR signalling. Packets on LE links should not be forwarded there. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-