commit 03110a5cb2161690ae5ac04994d47ed0cd6cef75 upstream.

Our futex implementation makes use of LDXR/STXR loops to perform atomic
updates to user memory from atomic context. This can lead to latency
problems if we end up spinning around the LL/SC sequence at the expense
of doing something useful.

Rework our futex atomic operations so that we return -EAGAIN if we fail
to update the futex word after 128 attempts. The core futex code will
reschedule if necessary and we'll try again later.

Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Fixes: 6170a974 ("arm64: Atomic operations")
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit ff8acf929014b7f87315588e0daf8597c8aa9d1c upstream.

Commit 045afc24124d ("arm64: futex: Fix FUTEX_WAKE_OP atomic ops with
non-zero result value") removed oldval's zero initialization in
arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser because it is not necessary. Unfortunately,
Android's arm64 GCC 4.9.4 [1] does not agree:

../kernel/futex.c: In function 'do_futex':
../kernel/futex.c:1658:17: warning: 'oldval' may be used uninitialized
in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
   return oldval == cmparg;
                 ^
In file included from ../kernel/futex.c:73:0:
../arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h:53:6: note: 'oldval' was declared here
  int oldval, ret, tmp;
      ^

GCC fails to follow that when ret is non-zero, futex_atomic_op_inuser
returns right away, avoiding the uninitialized use that it claims.
Restoring the zero initialization works around this issue.

[1]: https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/aarch64/aarch64-linux-android-4.9/

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 045afc24124d ("arm64: futex: Fix FUTEX_WAKE_OP atomic ops with non-zero result value")
Reviewed-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NNathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 045afc24124d80c6998d9c770844c67912083506 upstream.

Rather embarrassingly, our futex() FUTEX_WAKE_OP implementation doesn't
explicitly set the return value on the non-faulting path and instead
leaves it holding the result of the underlying atomic operation. This
means that any FUTEX_WAKE_OP atomic operation which computes a non-zero
value will be reported as having failed. Regrettably, I wrote the buggy
code back in 2011 and it was upstreamed as part of the initial arm64
support in 2012.

The reasons we appear to get away with this are:

  1. FUTEX_WAKE_OP is rarely used and therefore doesn't appear to get
     exercised by futex() test applications

  2. If the result of the atomic operation is zero, the system call
     behaves correctly

  3. Prior to version 2.25, the only operation used by GLIBC set the
     futex to zero, and therefore worked as expected. From 2.25 onwards,
     FUTEX_WAKE_OP is not used by GLIBC at all.

Fix the implementation by ensuring that the return value is either 0
to indicate that the atomic operation completed successfully, or -EFAULT
if we encountered a fault when accessing the user mapping.

Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Fixes: 6170a974 ("arm64: Atomic operations")
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The arm64 futex code has some explicit dereferencing of user pointers
where performing atomic operations in response to a futex command. This
patch uses masking to limit any speculative futex operations to within
the user address space.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

There is code duplicated over all architecture's headers for
futex_atomic_op_inuser. Namely op decoding, access_ok check for uaddr,
and comparison of the result.

Remove this duplication and leave up to the arches only the needed
assembly which is now in arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser.

This effectively distributes the Will Deacon's arm64 fix for undefined
behaviour reported by UBSAN to all architectures. The fix was done in
commit 5f16a046 (arm64: futex: Fix undefined behaviour with
FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT usage). Look there for an example dump.

And as suggested by Thomas, check for negative oparg too, because it was
also reported to cause undefined behaviour report.

Note that s390 removed access_ok check in d12a2970 ("s390/uaccess:
remove pointless access_ok() checks") as access_ok there returns true.
We introduce it back to the helper for the sake of simplicity (it gets
optimized away anyway).
Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> [s390]
Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> [for tile]
Reviewed-by: NDarren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> [core/arm64]
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>
Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170824073105.3901-1-jslaby@suse.cz

FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT instructs the futex code to treat the 12-bit oparg
field as a shift value, potentially leading to a left shift value that
is negative or with an absolute value that is significantly larger then
the size of the type. UBSAN chokes with:

================================================================================
UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ./arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h:60:13
shift exponent -1 is negative
CPU: 1 PID: 1449 Comm: syz-executor0 Not tainted 4.11.0-rc4-00005-g977eb52-dirty #11
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Call trace:
[<ffff200008094778>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x538 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:73
[<ffff200008094cd0>] show_stack+0x20/0x30 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:228
[<ffff200008c194a8>] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:16 [inline]
[<ffff200008c194a8>] dump_stack+0x120/0x188 lib/dump_stack.c:52
[<ffff200008cc24b8>] ubsan_epilogue+0x18/0x98 lib/ubsan.c:164
[<ffff200008cc3098>] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x250/0x294 lib/ubsan.c:421
[<ffff20000832002c>] futex_atomic_op_inuser arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h:60 [inline]
[<ffff20000832002c>] futex_wake_op kernel/futex.c:1489 [inline]
[<ffff20000832002c>] do_futex+0x137c/0x1740 kernel/futex.c:3231
[<ffff200008320504>] SYSC_futex kernel/futex.c:3281 [inline]
[<ffff200008320504>] SyS_futex+0x114/0x268 kernel/futex.c:3249
[<ffff200008084770>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
================================================================================
syz-executor1 uses obsolete (PF_INET,SOCK_PACKET)
sock: process `syz-executor0' is using obsolete setsockopt SO_BSDCOMPAT

This patch attempts to fix some of this by:

  * Making encoded_op an unsigned type, so we can shift it left even if
    the top bit is set.

  * Casting to signed prior to shifting right when extracting oparg
    and cmparg

  * Consider only the bottom 5 bits of oparg when using it as a left-shift
    value.

Whilst I think this catches all of the issues, I'd much prefer to remove
this stuff, as I think it's unused and the bugs are copy-pasted between
a bunch of architectures.
Reviewed-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

This patch moves the directly coded alternatives for turning PAN on/off
into separate uaccess_{enable,disable} macros or functions. The asm
macros take a few arguments which will be used in subsequent patches.

Note that any (unlikely) access that the compiler might generate between
uaccess_enable() and uaccess_disable(), other than those explicitly
specified by the user access code, will not be protected by PAN.

Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Instead of using absolute addresses for both the exception location
and the fixup, use offsets relative to the exception table entry values.
Not only does this cut the size of the exception table in half, it is
also a prerequisite for KASLR, since absolute exception table entries
are subject to dynamic relocation, which is incompatible with the sorting
of the exception table that occurs at build time.

This patch also introduces the _ASM_EXTABLE preprocessor macro (which
exists on x86 as well) and its _asm_extable assembly counterpart, as
shorthands to emit exception table entries.
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

futex.h's futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() does not use the
__futex_atomic_op() macro and needs its own PAN toggling. This was missed
when the feature was implemented.

Fixes: 338d4f49 ("arm64: kernel: Add support for Privileged Access Never")
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The cost of changing a cacheline from shared to exclusive state can be
significant, especially when this is triggered by an exclusive store,
since it may result in having to retry the transaction.

This patch makes use of prfm to prefetch cachelines for write prior to
ldxr/stxr loops when using the ll/sc atomic routines.
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

'Privileged Access Never' is a new arm8.1 feature which prevents
privileged code from accessing any virtual address where read or write
access is also permitted at EL0.

This patch enables the PAN feature on all CPUs, and modifies {get,put}_user
helpers temporarily to permit access.

This will catch kernel bugs where user memory is accessed directly.
'Unprivileged loads and stores' using ldtrb et al are unaffected by PAN.
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
[will: use ALTERNATIVE in asm and tidy up pan_enable check]
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

As arm64 and arc have no special implementations for !CONFIG_SMP, mutual
exclusion doesn't seem to rely on preemption.

Let's make it clear in the comments that preemption doesn't have to be
disabled when accessing user space in the futex code, so we can remove
preempt_disable() from pagefault_disable().
Reviewed-and-tested-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: David.Laight@ACULAB.COM
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: airlied@linux.ie
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Cc: daniel.vetter@intel.com
Cc: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Cc: hocko@suse.cz
Cc: hughd@google.com
Cc: mst@redhat.com
Cc: paulus@samba.org
Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org
Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Cc: yang.shi@windriver.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431359540-32227-13-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

cbnz/tbnz don't update the condition flags, so remove the "cc" clobbers
from inline asm blocks that only use these instructions to implement
conditional branches.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Linux requires a number of atomic operations to provide full barrier
semantics, that is no memory accesses after the operation can be
observed before any accesses up to and including the operation in
program order.

On arm64, these operations have been incorrectly implemented as follows:

	// A, B, C are independent memory locations

	<Access [A]>

	// atomic_op (B)
1:	ldaxr	x0, [B]		// Exclusive load with acquire
	<op(B)>
	stlxr	w1, x0, [B]	// Exclusive store with release
	cbnz	w1, 1b

	<Access [C]>

The assumption here being that two half barriers are equivalent to a
full barrier, so the only permitted ordering would be A -> B -> C
(where B is the atomic operation involving both a load and a store).

Unfortunately, this is not the case by the letter of the architecture
and, in fact, the accesses to A and C are permitted to pass their
nearest half barrier resulting in orderings such as Bl -> A -> C -> Bs
or Bl -> C -> A -> Bs (where Bl is the load-acquire on B and Bs is the
store-release on B). This is a clear violation of the full barrier
requirement.

The simple way to fix this is to implement the same algorithm as ARMv7
using explicit barriers:

	<Access [A]>

	// atomic_op (B)
	dmb	ish		// Full barrier
1:	ldxr	x0, [B]		// Exclusive load
	<op(B)>
	stxr	w1, x0, [B]	// Exclusive store
	cbnz	w1, 1b
	dmb	ish		// Full barrier

	<Access [C]>

but this has the undesirable effect of introducing *two* full barrier
instructions. A better approach is actually the following, non-intuitive
sequence:

	<Access [A]>

	// atomic_op (B)
1:	ldxr	x0, [B]		// Exclusive load
	<op(B)>
	stlxr	w1, x0, [B]	// Exclusive store with release
	cbnz	w1, 1b
	dmb	ish		// Full barrier

	<Access [C]>

The simple observations here are:

  - The dmb ensures that no subsequent accesses (e.g. the access to C)
    can enter or pass the atomic sequence.

  - The dmb also ensures that no prior accesses (e.g. the access to A)
    can pass the atomic sequence.

  - Therefore, no prior access can pass a subsequent access, or
    vice-versa (i.e. A is strictly ordered before C).

  - The stlxr ensures that no prior access can pass the store component
    of the atomic operation.

The only tricky part remaining is the ordering between the ldxr and the
access to A, since the absence of the first dmb means that we're now
permitting re-ordering between the ldxr and any prior accesses.

From an (arbitrary) observer's point of view, there are two scenarios:

  1. We have observed the ldxr. This means that if we perform a store to
     [B], the ldxr will still return older data. If we can observe the
     ldxr, then we can potentially observe the permitted re-ordering
     with the access to A, which is clearly an issue when compared to
     the dmb variant of the code. Thankfully, the exclusive monitor will
     save us here since it will be cleared as a result of the store and
     the ldxr will retry. Notice that any use of a later memory
     observation to imply observation of the ldxr will also imply
     observation of the access to A, since the stlxr/dmb ensure strict
     ordering.

  2. We have not observed the ldxr. This means we can perform a store
     and influence the later ldxr. However, that doesn't actually tell
     us anything about the access to [A], so we've not lost anything
     here either when compared to the dmb variant.

This patch implements this solution for our barriered atomic operations,
ensuring that we satisfy the full barrier requirements where they are
needed.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

AArch64 instructions must be 4-byte aligned, so make sure this is true
for the futex .fixup section.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Our uses of inline asm constraints for atomic operations are fairly
wild and varied. We basically need to guarantee the following:

  1. Any instructions with barrier implications
     (load-acquire/store-release) have a "memory" clobber

  2. When performing exclusive accesses, the addresing mode is generated
     using the "Q" constraint

  3. Atomic blocks which use the condition flags, have a "cc" clobber

This patch addresses these concerns which, as well as fixing the
semantics of the code, stops GCC complaining about impossible asm
constraints.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

This patch introduces the atomic, mutex and futex operations. Many
atomic operations use the load-acquire and store-release operations
which imply barriers, avoiding the need for explicit DMB.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>