We should prefer `struct pci_device_id` over `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to
meet kernel coding style guidelines.  This issue was reported by checkpatch.

A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as
follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/):

// <smpl>

@@
identifier i;
declarer name DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE;
initializer z;
@@

- DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(i)
+ const struct pci_device_id i[]
= z;

// </smpl>

[bhelgaas: add semantic patch]
Signed-off-by: NBenoit Taine <benoit.taine@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

No-one has yet had time to move this to debugfs as discussed during
the last merge window.  Until this happens, hide the option to make
it clear it's not going to be here forever.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

We have another version of it implemented in SW, however, that version
isn't serialised with normal PGRAPH operation and can possibly clobber
the enables for another context.

This is the same method that's implemented by the NVIDIA binary driver.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

... and hope that the defaults are good enough.  This was always
supposed to be a read/modify/write thing anyway, so we're writing
very wrong stuff for some boards already.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Should be the same values as before, except:

GF117 has smaller buffer allocated, as per register setup.
GK20A now uses values from Tegra driver, not GK104's.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Removes need for fixed buffer indices, and allows the functions
utilising them to also be run outside of context generation.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Default ZBC table is compatible with binary driver defaults.

Userspace will need to be updated to take full advantage of this
feature, however, some applications will see a performance boost
without updated drivers.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

One of the next commits will remove some of the class IDs, leaving only
the ones used by NVIDIA which, presumably, mark where functionality
changes actually happened.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The indirect method has been left in-place here as a fallback path, as
it may not be possible to map the non-PAGE_SIZE aligned control areas
across some chipset+interface combinations.

This isn't a problem for the primary use-case where the core and drm
are linked together in kernel-land, but across a VM or (in the case
where it applies now) between the core in the kernel and a userspace
test tool.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>