Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 157
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 04 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 28 11月, 2012 24 次提交
  5. 30 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  7. 25 10月, 2012 3 次提交
    • J
      i7300_edac: Fix error flag testing · 7e06b7a3
      由 Jean Delvare 提交于 
      * Right-shift the values in GET_FBD_FAT_IDX and GET_FBD_NF_IDX, so
  that the callers get the result they expect.
* Fix definition of FERR_FAT_FBD_ERR_MASK.
* Call GET_FBD_NF_IDX, not GET_FBD_FAT_IDX, when operating on
  register FERR_NF_FBD. We were lucky they have the same definition.

This fixes kernel bug #44131:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44131Signed-off-by: NJean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Cc: Doug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
      7e06b7a3
    • M
      edac: Fix the dimm filling for csrows-based layouts · 24bef66e
      由 Mauro Carvalho Chehab 提交于 
      The driver is currently filling data in a wrong way, on drivers
for csrows-based memory controller, when the first layer is a
csrow.

This is not easily to notice, as, in general, memories are
filed in dual, interleaved, symetric mode, as very few memory
controllers support asymetric modes.

While digging into a bug for i82795_edac driver, the asymetric
mode there is now working, allowing us to fill the machine with
4x1GB ranks at channel 0, and 2x512GB at channel 1:

Channel 0 ranks:
EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A0: from page 0x00000000 to 0x0003ffff (size: 0x00040000 pages)
EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A1: from page 0x00040000 to 0x0007ffff (size: 0x00040000 pages)
EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A2: from page 0x00080000 to 0x000bffff (size: 0x00040000 pages)
EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A3: from page 0x000c0000 to 0x000fffff (size: 0x00040000 pages)

Channel 1 ranks:
EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM B0: from page 0x00100000 to 0x0011ffff (size: 0x00020000 pages)
EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM B1: from page 0x00120000 to 0x0013ffff (size: 0x00020000 pages)

Instead of properly showing the memories as such, before this patch, it
shows the memory layout as:

          +-----------------------------------+
          |                mc0                |
          |  csrow0   |  csrow1   |  csrow2   |
----------+-----------------------------------+
channel1: |  1024 MB  |  1024 MB  |   512 MB  |
channel0: |  1024 MB  |  1024 MB  |   512 MB  |
----------+-----------------------------------+

as if both channels were symetric, grouping the DIMMs on a wrong
layout.

After this patch, the memory is correctly represented.
So, for csrows at layers[0], it shows:

          +-----------------------------------------------+
          |                      mc0                      |
          |  csrow0   |  csrow1   |  csrow2   |  csrow3   |
----------+-----------------------------------------------+
channel1: |   512 MB  |   512 MB  |     0 MB  |     0 MB  |
channel0: |  1024 MB  |  1024 MB  |  1024 MB  |  1024 MB  |
----------+-----------------------------------------------+

For csrows at layers[1], it shows:

        +-----------------------+
        |          mc0          |
        | channel0  | channel1  |
--------+-----------------------+
csrow3: |  1024 MB  |     0 MB  |
csrow2: |  1024 MB  |     0 MB  |
--------+-----------------------+
csrow1: |  1024 MB  |   512 MB  |
csrow0: |  1024 MB  |   512 MB  |
--------+-----------------------+

So, no matter of what comes first, the information between
channel and csrow will be properly represented.
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
      24bef66e
    • M
      i82975x_edac: Fix dimm label initialization · 47969684
      由 Mauro Carvalho Chehab 提交于 
      The driver has only 4 hardcoded labels, but allows much more memory.
Fix it by removing the hardcoded logic, using snprintf() instead.

[   19.833972] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
[   19.837733] Modules linked in: i82975x_edac(+) edac_core firewire_ohci firewire_core crc_itu_t nouveau mxm_wmi wmi video i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper ttm drm i2c_core
[   19.837733] CPU 0
[   19.837733] Pid: 390, comm: udevd Not tainted 3.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.debug #1 Dell Inc.                 Precision WorkStation 390    /0MY510
[   19.837733] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813463a8>]  [<ffffffff813463a8>] strncpy+0x18/0x30
[   19.837733] RSP: 0018:ffff880078535b68  EFLAGS: 00010202
[   19.837733] RAX: ffff880069fa9708 RBX: ffff880078588000 RCX: ffff880069fa9708
[   19.837733] RDX: 000000000000001f RSI: 5f706f5f63616465 RDI: ffff880069fa9708
[   19.837733] RBP: ffff880078535b68 R08: ffff880069fa9727 R09: 000000000000fffe
[   19.837733] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000003
[   19.837733] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff880069fa9290 R15: ffff880079624a80
[   19.837733] FS:  00007f3de01ee840(0000) GS:ffff88007c400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[   19.837733] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[   19.837733] CR2: 00007f3de00b9000 CR3: 0000000078dbc000 CR4: 00000000000007f0
[   19.837733] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[   19.837733] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[   19.837733] Process udevd (pid: 390, threadinfo ffff880078534000, task ffff880079642450)
[   19.837733] Stack:
[   19.837733]  ffff880078535c18 ffffffffa017c6b8 00040000816d627f ffff880079624a88
[   19.837733]  ffffc90004cd6000 ffff880079624520 ffff88007ac21148 0000000000000000
[   19.837733]  0000000000000000 0004000000000000 feda000078535bc8 ffffffff810d696d
[   19.837733] Call Trace:
[   19.837733]  [<ffffffffa017c6b8>] i82975x_init_one+0x2e6/0x3e6 [i82975x_edac]
...

Fix bug reported at:
	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848149
And, very likely:
	https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=148033
	https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47171

Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
      47969684
  9. 24 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 25 9月, 2012 3 次提交
    • M
      sb_edac: Avoid overflow errors at memory size calculation · deb09dda
      由 Mauro Carvalho Chehab 提交于 
      Sandy bridge EDAC is calculating the memory size with overflow.
Basically, the size field and the integer calculation is using 32 bits.
More bits are needed, when the DIMM memories have high density.

The net result is that memories are improperly reported there, when
high-density DIMMs are used:

EDAC DEBUG: in drivers/edac/sb_edac.c, line at 591: mc#0: channel 0, dimm 0, -16384 Mb (-4194304 pages) bank: 8, rank: 2, row: 0x10000, col: 0x800
EDAC DEBUG: in drivers/edac/sb_edac.c, line at 591: mc#0: channel 1, dimm 0, -16384 Mb (-4194304 pages) bank: 8, rank: 2, row: 0x10000, col: 0x800

As the number of pages value is handled at the EDAC core as unsigned
ints, the driver shows the 16 GB memories at sysfs interface as 16760832
MB! The fix is simple: calculate the number of pages as unsigned 64-bits
integer.

After the patch, the memory size (16 GB) is properly detected:

EDAC DEBUG: in drivers/edac/sb_edac.c, line at 592: mc#0: channel 0, dimm 0, 16384 Mb (4194304 pages) bank: 8, rank: 2, row: 0x10000, col: 0x800
EDAC DEBUG: in drivers/edac/sb_edac.c, line at 592: mc#0: channel 1, dimm 0, 16384 Mb (4194304 pages) bank: 8, rank: 2, row: 0x10000, col: 0x800

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
      deb09dda
    • M
      i5000: Fix the memory size calculation with 2R memories · b70f8333
      由 Mauro Carvalho Chehab 提交于 
      When 2R memories are found, the memory size should be multiplied
by two, otherwise, it will report half of the memory size:

       +-----------------------------------------------+
       |                      mc0                      |
       |        branch0        |        branch1        |
       | channel0  | channel1  | channel0  | channel1  |
-------+-----------------------------------------------+
slot3: |     0 MB  |     0 MB  |     0 MB  |     0 MB  |
slot2: |     0 MB  |     0 MB  |     0 MB  |     0 MB  |
-------+-----------------------------------------------+
slot1: |     0 MB  |     0 MB  |     0 MB  |     0 MB  |
slot0: |  1024 MB  |  1024 MB  |  1024 MB  |  1024 MB  |
-------+-----------------------------------------------+

(the above machine have 4 x 2GB 2R memories)
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
      b70f8333
    • M
      i3200_edac: Fix memory rank size · 582a8996
      由 Mauro Carvalho Chehab 提交于 
      commit a895bf8b incorrectly
changed the logic that fills the memory bank size. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
      582a8996
  13. 24 9月, 2012 2 次提交
    • S
      edac_mc: edac_mc_free() cannot assume mem_ctl_info is registered in sysfs. · faa2ad09
      由 Shaun Ruffell 提交于 
      Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in edac_unregister_sysfs() on
system boot introduced in 3.6-rc1.

Since commit 7a623c03 ("edac: rewrite the sysfs code to use struct
device") edac_mc_alloc() no longer initializes embedded kobjects in
struct mem_ctl_info.  Therefore edac_mc_free() can no longer simply
decrement a kobject reference count to free the allocated memory unless
the memory controller driver module had also called edac_mc_add_mc().

Now edac_mc_free() will check if the newly embedded struct device has
been registered with sysfs before using either the standard device
release functions or freeing the data structures itself with logic
pulled out of the error path of edac_mc_alloc().

The BUG this patch resolves for me:

  BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at   (null)
  EIP is at __wake_up_common+0x1a/0x6a
  Process modprobe (pid: 933, ti=f3dc6000 task=f3db9520 task.ti=f3dc6000)
  Call Trace:
    complete_all+0x3f/0x50
    device_pm_remove+0x23/0xa2
    device_del+0x34/0x142
    edac_unregister_sysfs+0x3b/0x5c [edac_core]
    edac_mc_free+0x29/0x2f [edac_core]
    e7xxx_probe1+0x268/0x311 [e7xxx_edac]
    e7xxx_init_one+0x56/0x61 [e7xxx_edac]
    local_pci_probe+0x13/0x15
  ...

Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaun Ruffell <sruffell@digium.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      faa2ad09
    • F
      edac_mc: fix messy kfree calls in the error path · ef6e7816
      由 Fengguang Wu 提交于 
      coccinelle warns about:

+ drivers/edac/edac_mc.c:429:9-23: ERROR: reference preceded by free on line 429

   421         if (mci->csrows) {
 > 422                 for (chn = 0; chn < tot_channels; chn++) {
   423                         csr = mci->csrows[chn];
   424                         if (csr) {
 > 425                                 for (chn = 0; chn < tot_channels; chn++)
   426                                          kfree(csr->channels[chn]);
   427                                  kfree(csr);
   428                          }
 > 429                          kfree(mci->csrows[i]);
   430                  }
   431                  kfree(mci->csrows);
   432          }

and that code block seem to mess things up in several ways (double free, memory
leak, out-of-bound reads etc.):

L422: The iterator "chn" and bound "tot_channels" are totally wrong. Should be
      "row" and "tot_csrows" respectively. Which means either memory leak, or
      out-of-bound reads (which if does not trigger an immediate page fault
      error, will further lead to kfree() on random addresses).

L425: The inner loop is reusing the same iterator "chn" as the outer loop,
      which could lead to premature end of the outer loop, and hence memory leak.

L429: The array index 'i' in mci->csrows[i] is a temporary value used in
      previous loops, and won't change at all in the current loop. Which
      means either out-of-bound read and possibly kfree(random number), or the
      same mci->csrows[i] get freed once and again, and possibly double free
      for the kfree(csr) in L427.

L426/L427: a kfree(csr->channels) is needed in between to avoid leaking the memory.

The buggy code was introduced by commit de3910eb ("edac: change the mem
allocation scheme to make Documentation/kobject.txt happy") in the 3.6-rc1
merge window. Fix it by freeing up resources in this order:

  free csrows[i]->channels[j]
  free csrows[i]->channels
  free csrows[i]
  free csrows

CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
CC: Shaun Ruffell <sruffell@digium.com>
Signed-off-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ef6e7816
  15. 13 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  17. 14 8月, 2012 1 次提交
    • T
      workqueue: use mod_delayed_work() instead of cancel + queue · 41f63c53
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      Convert delayed_work users doing cancel_delayed_work() followed by
queue_delayed_work() to mod_delayed_work().

Most conversions are straight-forward.  Ones worth mentioning are,

* drivers/edac/edac_mc.c: edac_mc_workq_setup() converted to always
  use mod_delayed_work() and cancel loop in
  edac_mc_reset_delay_period() is dropped.

* drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c: No need to remember whether
  watchdog is active or not.  @fan_watchdog_active and related code
  dropped.

* drivers/power/charger-manager.c: Seemingly a lot of
  delayed_work_pending() abuse going on here.
  [delayed_]work_pending() are unsynchronized and racy when used like
  this.  I converted one instance in fullbatt_handler().  Please
  conver the rest so that it invokes workqueue APIs for the intended
  target state rather than trying to game work item pending state
  transitions.  e.g. if timer should be modified - call
  mod_delayed_work(), canceled - call cancel_delayed_work[_sync]().

* drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c: thermal_zone_device_set_polling()
  simplified.  Note that round_jiffies() calls in this function are
  meaningless.  round_jiffies() work on absolute jiffies not delta
  delay used by delayed_work.

v2: Tomi pointed out that __cancel_delayed_work() users can't be
    safely converted to mod_delayed_work().  They could be calling it
    from irq context and if that happens while delayed_work_timer_fn()
    is running, it could deadlock.  __cancel_delayed_work() users are
    dropped.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NAnton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Doug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
      41f63c53
  19. 27 6月, 2012 3 次提交