Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 15 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  3. 25 10月, 2011 3 次提交
    • B
      ore: RAID5 Write · 769ba8d9
      由 Boaz Harrosh 提交于 
      This is finally the RAID5 Write support.

The bigger part of this patch is not the XOR engine itself, But the
read4write logic, which is a complete mini prepare_for_striping
reading engine that can read scattered pages of a stripe into cache
so it can be used for XOR calculation. That is, if the write was not
stripe aligned.

The main algorithm behind the XOR engine is the 2 dimensional array:
	struct __stripe_pages_2d.
A drawing might save 1000 words
---

__stripe_pages_2d
       |
 n = pages_in_stripe_unit;
 w = group_width - parity;
       |                            pages array presented to the XOR lib
       |                                                |
       V                                                |
 __1_page_stripe[0].pages --> [c0][c1]..[cw][c_par] <---|
       |                                                |
 __1_page_stripe[1].pages --> [c0][c1]..[cw][c_par] <---
       |
...    |                         ...
       |
 __1_page_stripe[n].pages --> [c0][c1]..[cw][c_par]
                               ^
                               |
           data added columns first then row

---
The pages are put on this array columns first. .i.e:
	p0-of-c0, p1-of-c0, ... pn-of-c0, p0-of-c1, ...
So we are doing a corner turn of the pages.

Note that pages will zigzag down and left. but are put sequentially
in growing order. So when the time comes to XOR the stripe, only the
beginning and end of the array need be checked. We scan the array
and any NULL spot will be field by pages-to-be-read.

The FS that wants to support RAID5 needs to supply an
operations-vector that searches a given page in cache, and specifies
if the page is uptodate or need reading. All these pages to be read
are put on a slave ore_io_state and synchronously read. All the pages
of a stripe are read in one IO, using the scatter gather mechanism.

In write we constrain our IO to only be incomplete on a single
stripe. Meaning either the complete IO is within a single stripe so
we might have pages to read from both beginning  or end of the
strip. Or we have some reading to do at beginning but end at strip
boundary. The left over pages are pushed to the next IO by the API
already established by previous work, where an IO offset/length
combination presented to the ORE might get the length truncated and
the user must re-submit the leftover pages. (Both exofs and NFS
support this)

But any ORE user should make it's best effort to align it's IO
before hand and avoid complications. A cached ore_layout->stripe_size
member can be used for that calculation. (NOTE: that ORE demands
that stripe_size may not be bigger then 32bit)

What else? Well read it and tell me.
Signed-off-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
      769ba8d9
    • B
      ore: RAID5 read · a1fec1db
      由 Boaz Harrosh 提交于 
      This patch introduces the first stage of RAID5 support
mainly the skip-over-raid-units when reading. For
writes it inserts BLANK units, into where XOR blocks
should be calculated and written to.

It introduces the new "general raid maths", and the main
additional parameters and components needed for raid5.

Since at this stage it could corrupt future version that
actually do support raid5. The enablement of raid5
mounting and setting of parity-count > 0 is disabled. So
the raid5 code will never be used. Mounting of raid5 is
only enabled later once the basic XOR write is also in.
But if the patch "enable RAID5" is applied this code has
been tested to be able to properly read raid5 volumes
and is according to standard.

Also it has been tested that the new maths still properly
supports RAID0 and grouping code just as before.
(BTW: I have found more bugs in the pnfs-obj RAID math
 fixed here)

The ore.c file is getting too big, so new ore_raid.[hc]
files are added that will include the special raid stuff
that are not used in striping and mirrors. In future write
support these will get bigger.
When adding the ore_raid.c to Kbuild file I was forced to
rename ore.ko to libore.ko. Is it possible to keep source
file, say ore.c and module file ore.ko the same even if there
are multiple files inside ore.ko?
Signed-off-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
      a1fec1db
    • B
      ore: Make ore_calc_stripe_info EXPORT_SYMBOL · 611d7a5d
      由 Boaz Harrosh 提交于 
      ore_calc_stripe_info is needed by exofs::export.c
for the layout calculations. Make it exportable
Signed-off-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
      611d7a5d
  5. 20 10月, 2011 3 次提交
  7. 16 10月, 2011 2 次提交
  9. 15 10月, 2011 4 次提交
    • B
      ore/exofs: Change ore_check_io API · 4b46c9f5
      由 Boaz Harrosh 提交于 
      Current ore_check_io API receives a residual
pointer, to report partial IO. But it is actually
not used, because in a multiple devices IO there
is never a linearity in the IO failure.

On the other hand if every failing device is reported
through a received callback measures can be taken to
handle only failed devices. One at a time.

This will also be needed by the objects-layout-driver
for it's error reporting facility.

Exofs is not currently using the new information and
keeps the old behaviour of failing the complete IO in
case of an error. (No partial completion)

TODO: Use an ore_check_io callback to set_page_error only
the failing pages. And re-dirty write pages.
Signed-off-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
      4b46c9f5
    • B
      ore/exofs: Define new ore_verify_layout · 5a51c0c7
      由 Boaz Harrosh 提交于 
      All users of the ore will need to check if current code
supports the given layout. For example RAID5/6 is not
currently supported.

So move all the checks from exofs/super.c to a new
ore_verify_layout() to be used by ore users.

Note that any new layout should be passed through the
ore_verify_layout() because the ore engine will prepare
and verify some internal members of ore_layout, and
assumes it's called.
Signed-off-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
      5a51c0c7
    • B
      ore: Support for partial component table · 3bd98568
      由 Boaz Harrosh 提交于 
      Users like the objlayout-driver would like to only pass
a partial device table that covers the IO in question.
For example exofs divides the file into raid-group-sized
chunks and only serves group_width number of devices at
a time.

The partiality is communicated by setting
ore_componets->first_dev and the array covers all logical
devices from oc->first_dev upto (oc->first_dev + oc->numdevs)

The ore_comp_dev() API receives a logical device index
and returns the actual present device in the table.
An out-of-range dev_index will BUG.

Logical device index is the theoretical device index as if
all the devices of a file are present. .i.e:
	total_devs = group_width * mirror_p1 * group_count
	0 <= dev_index < total_devs
Signed-off-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
      3bd98568
    • B
      ore: cleanup: Embed an ore_striping_info inside ore_io_state · 98260754
      由 Boaz Harrosh 提交于 
      Now that each ore_io_state covers only a single raid group.
A single striping_info math is needed. Embed one inside
ore_io_state to cache the calculation results and eliminate
an extra call.

Also the outer _prepare_for_striping is removed since it does nothing.
Signed-off-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
      98260754
  11. 04 10月, 2011 1 次提交
    • B
      ore/exofs: Change the type of the devices array (API change) · d866d875
      由 Boaz Harrosh 提交于 
      In the pNFS obj-LD the device table at the layout level needs
to point to a device_cache node, where it is possible and likely
that many layouts will point to the same device-nodes.

In Exofs we have a more orderly structure where we have a single
array of devices that repeats twice for a round-robin view of the
device table

This patch moves to a model that can be used by the pNFS obj-LD
where struct ore_components holds an array of ore_dev-pointers.
(ore_dev is newly defined and contains a struct osd_dev *od
 member)

Each pointer in the array of pointers will point to a bigger
user-defined dev_struct. That can be accessed by use of the
container_of macro.

In Exofs an __alloc_dev_table() function allocates the
ore_dev-pointers array as well as an exofs_dev array, in one
allocation and does the addresses dance to set everything pointing
correctly. It still keeps the double allocation trick for the
inodes round-robin view of the table.

The device table is always allocated dynamically, also for the
single device case. So it is unconditionally freed at umount.
Signed-off-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
      d866d875
  13. 03 10月, 2011 10 次提交
  15. 22 9月, 2011 1 次提交
    • D
      [SCSI] libsas: sgpio write support · 8ec6552f
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      Add SFF-8485 v0.7 / SAS-1 smp-write-gpio register support to libsas.
Defer SAS-2 support unless/until it defines an sgpio interface.

Minimum implementation needed to get the lights blinking.
try_test_sas_gpio_gp_bit() provides a common method to parse the
incoming write data (raw bitstream), and the to_sas_gpio_gp_bit() helper
routine can be used as a basis for the set/clear operations for the
'read' implementation.  Host implementations parse as many bits
(ODx.[012]) as are locally supported and report the number of registers
successfully written.  If the submitted data overruns the internal
number of registers available report the write as a success with the
number of bytes remaining reported in ->resid_len.

Example (assuming an active backplane) set the "identify" pattern for
the first 21 devices:

smp_write_gpio --count=2 --data=92,49,24,92,24,92,49,24 -t 4 --index=1 /dev/bsg/sas_hostX
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
      8ec6552f
  17. 31 8月, 2011 2 次提交
  19. 29 8月, 2011 1 次提交
    • M
      [SCSI] scsi scan: don't fail scans when host is in recovery · 76e4e12f
      由 Mike Christie 提交于 
      The problem is that if we are doing a scsi scan then the device goes
into recovery then we will wait for the recovery to complete. It waits
because scsi-ml will send inquiries or report luns and the queueing code
will have been blocked due to the host not being ready. However, if we
are in recovery and then a scan is started the scan will silently fail
and some devices will not be added.

It is easy to hit the problem where devices do not show up with
FC where we are doing tests that disrupt the target controllers.
When the controller is disruprted (reboot, or setting firmware, etc),
and we cause the dev loss tmo to fire then devices will be removed
Then when the problem has been fixed, the rport will be scanned and
devices should be added back. But if we cause another disruption before
scanning has started then devices will not get added back. If the problem
is not started until the scan is started then the devices will be added
back.

This patch fixes that problem by not failing scans when the host
is in recovery. We will let scsi-ml send the IO and let the queueing
and scsi error handling deal with it like is done if we went into
recovery while scanning.

For recovery cases where the host is being torn down then with the
patch we will still fail the scan since there is not point in scanning.
Signed-off-by: NMike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
      76e4e12f
  21. 27 8月, 2011 12 次提交