- 20 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We normally want to update the stateid and then retry, Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 25 7月, 2016 12 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
It's not visible yet, and won't be until after we grab the inode->i_lock. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
...instead of splitting the initialisation over init_lseg() and pnfs_layout_process(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The layout stateid will be invalidated once it holds no more layout segments anyway. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
That's already being taken care of in pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the server changed the layout stateid's "other" field, then we should treat the old layout as being completely gone. In that case, we want to clear the metadata such as scheduled layoutreturns. Do this by calling pnfs_mark_layout_stateid_invalid(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure nfs42_layoutstat_done() layoutget don't open code layout stateid invalidation. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When determining which layout segments to return, we do want pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return to check that they match the layout sequence id. This ensures that we don't waste time if the server is replaying a layout recall that has already been satisfied. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In cases where we need to send a layoutreturn in order to propagate an error, we should not tie that to a specific layout stateid. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When we return NFS_OK to the CB_LAYOUTRECALL, we are required to send a layoutreturn that "completes" that layout recall request, using the correct stateid. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Currently, pnfs_set_layout_stateid() will update the layout sequence id barrier only if the stateid itself is newer than the current layout stateid. However in a situation where multiple LAYOUTGET calls and a LAYOUTRETURN raced, it is entirely possible for one of the LAYOUTGET to set the current stateid to something newer than the LAYOUTRETURN that needs to set the barrier. The fix is to allow the "update_barrier" flag to force a check as to whether or not the barrier needs to be updated. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the layout stateid is invalid, then pnfs_set_layout_stateid() must always initialise it. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure that we don't carry over layoutreturn info from a previous incarnation of this layout. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 20 7月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Instead of giving up altogether and falling back to doing I/O through the MDS, which may make the situation worse, wait for 2 lease periods for the callback to resolve itself, and then try destroying the existing layout. Only if this was an attempt at getting a first layout, do we give up altogether, as the server is clearly crazy. Fixes: 183d9e7b ("pnfs: rework LAYOUTGET retry handling") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7 Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
They are not the same error, and need to be handled differently. Fixes: 183d9e7b ("pnfs: rework LAYOUTGET retry handling") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7 Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The non-retry error path is currently broken and ends up releasing the reference to the layout twice. It also can end up clearing the NFS_LAYOUT_FIRST_LAYOUTGET flag twice, causing a race. In addition, the retry path will fail to decrement the plh_outstanding counter. Fixes: 183d9e7b ("pnfs: rework LAYOUTGET retry handling") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7 Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
-
- 06 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
So ensure that we mark the layout for commit once the write is done, and then ensure that the commit to ds is finished before sending layoutcommit. Note that by doing this, we're able to optimise away the commit for the case of servers that don't need layoutcommit in order to return updated attributes. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 25 6月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
According to RFC5661, section 12.5.3. the layout stateid is no longer valid once the client no longer holds any layout segments. Ensure that we mark it invalid. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 26 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Haynes 提交于
As flexfiles has FF_FLAGS_NO_READ_IO, there is a need to generically support enforcing that a IOMODE_RW segment will not allow READ I/O. Signed-off-by: NTom Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 18 5月, 2016 8 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
It can return NULL if layoutgets are blocked currently. Fix it to return -EAGAIN in that case, so we can properly handle it in pnfs_update_layout. Also, clean up and simplify the error handling -- eliminate "status" and just use "lseg". Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
There are several problems in the way a stateid is selected for a LAYOUTGET operation: We pick a stateid to use in the RPC prepare op, but that makes it difficult to serialize LAYOUTGETs that use the open stateid. That serialization is done in pnfs_update_layout, which occurs well before the rpc_prepare operation. Between those two events, the i_lock is dropped and reacquired. pnfs_update_layout can find that the list has lsegs in it and not do any serialization, but then later pnfs_choose_layoutget_stateid ends up choosing the open stateid. This patch changes the client to select the stateid to use in the LAYOUTGET earlier, when we're searching for a usable layout segment. This way we can do it all while holding the i_lock the first time, and ensure that we serialize any LAYOUTGET call that uses a non-layout stateid. This also means a rework of how LAYOUTGET replies are handled, as we must now get the latest stateid if we want to retransmit in response to a retryable error. Most of those errors boil down to the fact that the layout state has changed in some fashion. Thus, what we really want to do is to re-search for a layout when it fails with a retryable error, so that we can avoid reissuing the RPC at all if possible. While the LAYOUTGET RPC is async, the initiating thread always waits for it to complete, so it's effectively synchronous anyway. Currently, when we need to retry a LAYOUTGET because of an error, we drive that retry via the rpc state machine. This means that once the call has been submitted, it runs until it completes. So, we must move the error handling for this RPC out of the rpc_call_done operation and into the caller. In order to handle errors like NFS4ERR_DELAY properly, we must also pass a pointer to the sliding timeout, which is now moved to the stack in pnfs_update_layout. The complicating errors are -NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT and -NFS4ERR_LAYOUTTRYLATER, as those involve a timeout after which we give up and return NULL back to the caller. So, there is some special handling for those errors to ensure that the layers driving the retries can handle that appropriately. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
If we get back something like NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID, that will be translated into -EAGAIN, and the do/while loop in send_layoutget will drive the call again. This is not quite what we want, I think. An error like that is a sign that something has changed. That something could have been a concurrent LAYOUTGET that would give us a usable lseg. Lift the retry logic into pnfs_update_layout instead. That allows us to redo the layout search, and may spare us from having to issue an RPC. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Currently, the code will clear the fail bit if we get back a fatal error. I don't think that's correct -- we want to clear that bit if we do not get a fatal error. Fixes: 0bcbf039 (nfs: handle request add failure properly) Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
LAYOUTRETURN is "special" in that servers and clients are expected to work with old stateids. When the client sends a LAYOUTRETURN with an old stateid in it then the server is expected to only tear down layout segments that were present when that seqid was current. Ensure that the client handles its accounting accordingly. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
When we want to selectively do a LAYOUTRETURN, we need to specify a stateid that represents most recent layout acquisition that is to be returned. When we mark a layout stateid to be returned, we update the return sequence number in the layout header with that value, if it's newer than the existing one. Then, when we go to do a LAYOUTRETURN on layout header put, we overwrite the seqid in the stateid with the saved one, and then zero it out. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
In later patches, we're going to teach the client to be more selective about how it returns layouts. This means keeping a record of what the stateid's seqid was at the time that the server handed out a layout segment. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 09 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Like other resend paths, mark the (old) hdr as NFS_IOHDR_REDO. This ensures the hdr completion function will not count the (old) hdr as good bytes. Also, vector the error back through the hdr->task.tk_status like other retry calls. This fixes a bug with the FlexFiles layout where libaio was reporting more bytes read than requested. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 23 2月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Replace another case where the layout 'plh_block_lgets' can trigger infinite loops in send_layoutget(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the server reboots while there is a layoutget outstanding, then the call to pnfs_choose_layoutget_stateid() will fail with an EAGAIN error, which causes an infinite loop in send_layoutget(). The reason why we never break out of the loop is that the layout 'plh_block_lgets' field is never cleared. Fix is to replace plh_block_lgets with NFS_LAYOUT_INVALID_STID, which can be reset after a new layoutget. Fixes: ab7d763e ("pNFS: Ensure nfs4_layoutget_prepare returns...") Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 16 2月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When setting the layout return mode, we must always also set the NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED flag to ensure that we send a layoutreturn. Otherwise pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return() could set the mode, but fail to send the layoutreturn because another is already in flight. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We don't need to schedule a layoutreturn if the layout segment can be freed immediately. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 28 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_BEFORE_CLOSE is being used to signal that a layoutreturn is needed, either due to a layout recall or to a layout error. Rename it to NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED in order to clarify its purpose. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 27 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The layoutreturn code currently relies on pnfs_put_lseg() to initiate the RPC call when conditions are right. A problem arises when we want to free the layout segment from inside an inode->i_lock section (e.g. in pnfs_clear_request_commit()), since we cannot sleep. The workaround is to move the actual call to pnfs_send_layoutreturn() to pnfs_put_layout_hdr(), which doesn't have this restriction. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 05 1月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Make it more obvious what we're returning... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-