1. 24 3月, 2011 2 次提交
  2. 12 3月, 2011 13 次提交
  3. 11 3月, 2011 4 次提交
    • A
      NFSv4.1 reclaim complete must wait for completion · c34c32ea
      Andy Adamson 提交于
      Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
      [Trond: fix whitespace errors]
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      c34c32ea
    • R
      NFSv4.1: Retry CREATE_SESSION on NFS4ERR_DELAY · 7d6d63d6
      Ricardo Labiaga 提交于
      Fix bug where we currently retry the EXCHANGEID call again, eventhough
      we already have a valid clientid.  Instead, delay and retry the CREATE_SESSION
      call.
      Signed-off-by: NRicardo Labiaga <Ricardo.Labiaga@netapp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      7d6d63d6
    • J
      nfs: fix compilation warning · 43b7c3f0
      Jovi Zhang 提交于
      this commit fix compilation warning as following:
      linux-2.6/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c:3265: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
      Signed-off-by: NJovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      43b7c3f0
    • T
      SUNRPC: Close a race in __rpc_wait_for_completion_task() · bf294b41
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      Although they run as rpciod background tasks, under normal operation
      (i.e. no SIGKILL), functions like nfs_sillyrename(), nfs4_proc_unlck()
      and nfs4_do_close() want to be fully synchronous. This means that when we
      exit, we want all references to the rpc_task to be gone, and we want
      any dentry references etc. held by that task to be released.
      
      For this reason these functions call __rpc_wait_for_completion_task(),
      followed by rpc_put_task() in the expectation that the latter will be
      releasing the last reference to the rpc_task, and thus ensuring that the
      callback_ops->rpc_release() has been called synchronously.
      
      This patch fixes a race which exists due to the fact that
      rpciod calls rpc_complete_task() (in order to wake up the callers of
      __rpc_wait_for_completion_task()) and then subsequently calls
      rpc_put_task() without ensuring that these two steps are done atomically.
      
      In order to avoid adding new spin locks, the patch uses the existing
      waitqueue spin lock to order the rpc_task reference count releases between
      the waiting process and rpciod.
      The common case where nobody is waiting for completion is optimised for by
      checking if the RPC_TASK_ASYNC flag is cleared and/or if the rpc_task
      reference count is 1: in those cases we drop trying to grab the spin lock,
      and immediately free up the rpc_task.
      
      Those few processes that need to put the rpc_task from inside an
      asynchronous context and that do not care about ordering are given a new
      helper: rpc_put_task_async().
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      bf294b41
  4. 05 3月, 2011 1 次提交
    • N
      nfs4: Ensure that ACL pages sent over NFS were not allocated from the slab (v3) · e9e3d724
      Neil Horman 提交于
      The "bad_page()" page allocator sanity check was reported recently (call
      chain as follows):
      
        bad_page+0x69/0x91
        free_hot_cold_page+0x81/0x144
        skb_release_data+0x5f/0x98
        __kfree_skb+0x11/0x1a
        tcp_ack+0x6a3/0x1868
        tcp_rcv_established+0x7a6/0x8b9
        tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x2a/0x2fa
        tcp_v4_rcv+0x9a2/0x9f6
        do_timer+0x2df/0x52c
        ip_local_deliver+0x19d/0x263
        ip_rcv+0x539/0x57c
        netif_receive_skb+0x470/0x49f
        :virtio_net:virtnet_poll+0x46b/0x5c5
        net_rx_action+0xac/0x1b3
        __do_softirq+0x89/0x133
        call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
        do_softirq+0x2c/0x7d
        do_IRQ+0xec/0xf5
        default_idle+0x0/0x50
        ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
        default_idle+0x29/0x50
        cpu_idle+0x95/0xb8
        start_kernel+0x220/0x225
        _sinittext+0x22f/0x236
      
      It occurs because an skb with a fraglist was freed from the tcp
      retransmit queue when it was acked, but a page on that fraglist had
      PG_Slab set (indicating it was allocated from the Slab allocator (which
      means the free path above can't safely free it via put_page.
      
      We tracked this back to an nfsv4 setacl operation, in which the nfs code
      attempted to fill convert the passed in buffer to an array of pages in
      __nfs4_proc_set_acl, which gets used by the skb->frags list in
      xs_sendpages.  __nfs4_proc_set_acl just converts each page in the buffer
      to a page struct via virt_to_page, but the vfs allocates the buffer via
      kmalloc, meaning the PG_slab bit is set.  We can't create a buffer with
      kmalloc and free it later in the tcp ack path with put_page, so we need
      to either:
      
      1) ensure that when we create the list of pages, no page struct has
         PG_Slab set
      
       or
      
      2) not use a page list to send this data
      
      Given that these buffers can be multiple pages and arbitrarily sized, I
      think (1) is the right way to go.  I've written the below patch to
      allocate a page from the buddy allocator directly and copy the data over
      to it.  This ensures that we have a put_page free-able page for every
      entry that winds up on an skb frag list, so it can be safely freed when
      the frame is acked.  We do a put page on each entry after the
      rpc_call_sync call so as to drop our own reference count to the page,
      leaving only the ref count taken by tcp_sendpages.  This way the data
      will be properly freed when the ack comes in
      
      Successfully tested by myself to solve the above oops.
      
      Note, as this is the result of a setacl operation that exceeded a page
      of data, I think this amounts to a local DOS triggerable by an
      uprivlidged user, so I'm CCing security on this as well.
      Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
      CC: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      CC: security@kernel.org
      CC: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      e9e3d724
  5. 26 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  6. 12 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  7. 07 1月, 2011 7 次提交
  8. 05 1月, 2011 2 次提交
  9. 22 12月, 2010 2 次提交
  10. 08 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  11. 16 11月, 2010 1 次提交
  12. 29 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  13. 26 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  14. 25 10月, 2010 3 次提交