This reverts commit e306dfd0.

With this patch applied, we were the only architecture making this sort
of adjustment to the PC calculation in the unwinder. This causes
problems for ftrace, where the PC values are matched against the
contents of the stack frames in the callchain and fail to match any
records after the address adjustment.

Whilst there has been some effort to change ftrace to workaround this,
those patches are not yet ready for mainline and, since we're the odd
architecture in this regard, let's just step in line with other
architectures (like arch/arm/) for now.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Use the global current_stack_pointer to get the value of the stack pointer.
This change supports being able to compile the kernel with both gcc and clang.
Signed-off-by: NBehan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Charlebois <charlebm@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NJan-Simon Möller <dl9pf@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

walk_stackframe() calls unwind_frame(), and if walk_stackframe() is
"notrace", unwind_frame() should be also "notrace".
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The frame PC value in the unwind code used to just take the saved LR
value and use that.  That's incorrect as a stack trace, since it shows
the return path stack, not the call path stack.

In particular, it shows faulty information in case the bl is done as
the very last instruction of one label, since the return point will be
in the next label. That can easily be seen with tail calls to panic(),
which is marked __noreturn and thus doesn't have anything useful after it.

Easiest here is to just correct the unwind code and do a -4, to get the
actual call site for the backtrace instead of the return site.
Signed-off-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

We need at least 24 bytes above frame pointer.
Signed-off-by: NKonstantin Khlebnikov <k.khlebnikov@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

The patch contains the exception entry code (kernel/entry.S), pt_regs
structure and related accessors, undefined instruction trapping and
stack tracing.

AArch64 Linux kernel (including kernel threads) runs in EL1 mode using
the SP1 stack. The vectors don't have a fixed address, only alignment
(2^11) requirements.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

This patch implements process/thread related codes. Backtrace and stacktrace are here.
Signed-off-by: NGuan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Reviewed-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Rabin Vincent reports:
| On SMP, this BUG() in save_stack_trace_tsk() can be easily triggered
| from user space by reading /proc/$PID/stack, where $PID is any pid but
| the current process:
|
|	if (tsk != current) {
| #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|		/*
|		 * What guarantees do we have here that 'tsk'
|		 * is not running on another CPU?
|		 */
|		BUG();
| #else

Fix this by replacing the BUG() with an entry to terminate the stack
trace, returning an empty trace - I'd rather not expose the dwarf
unwinder to a volatile stack of a running thread.
Reported-by: NRabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
Tested-by: NRabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

When unwinding stack frames we must take care not to unwind
areas of memory that lie outside of the known extent of the stack.

This patch fixes an incorrect calculation of the stack base where
THREAD_SIZE is added to the stack pointer after it has already
been aligned to this value. Since the ALIGN macro performs this
addition internally, we end up overshooting the base by 8k.
Acked-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

As __builtin_return_address(n) doesn't work for ARM with n > 0, the
kernel needs its own implementation.

This fixes many warnings saying:

	warning: unsupported argument to '__builtin_return_address'

The new methods and walk_stackframe must not be instrumented because
CALLER_ADDRESSx is used in the various tracers and tracing the tracer is
a bad idea.

What's currently missing is an implementation using unwind tables.  This
is not fatal though, it's just that the tracers don't get enough
information to be really useful.

Note that if both ARM_UNWIND and FRAME_POINTER are enabled,
walk_stackframe uses unwind information.  So in this case the same
implementation is used as when FRAME_POINTER is disabled.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

This patch changes the walk_stacktrace and its callers for easier
integration of stack unwinding. The arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.h file is
also moved to arch/arm/include/asm/stacktrace.h.
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Andrew Morton reported this against linux-next:

ERROR: ".save_stack_trace" [tests/backtracetest.ko] undefined!
Reported-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Available for !SMP only at the moment.

From Russell:

|Basically, if a thread is running on a CPU, thread_saved_fp() is invalid.
|So, the question is: what guarantees do we have here that 'tsk' is not
|running on another CPU?
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com>
Tested-by: NLennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: NLennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com>

Fix an oops in the stacktrace code, caused by improper range checking.
We subtract 12 off 'fp' before testing to see if it's below the low
bound.  However, if 'fp' were zero before, it becomes a very large
positive number, causing this test to succeed where it should fail.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

oprofile depends on having it
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

ab1b6f03 said

 - remove the unused task argument to save_stack_trace, it's always current

then broke arm:

arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c:56: error: conflicting types for 'save_stack_trace'
include/linux/stacktrace.h:11: error: previous declaration of 'save_stack_trace' was here
arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c:56: error: conflicting types for 'save_stack_trace'
include/linux/stacktrace.h:11: error: previous declaration of 'save_stack_trace' was here

Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Add support for stacktrace.  Use the new stacktrace code with
oprofile instead of it's version; there's no point having
multiple versions of stacktracing in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>