- 05 2月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Instances of struct device_type are never modified, make them const. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Ilan Peer 提交于
Fix the following issues in reg_process_hint(): 1. Add verification that wiphy is valid before processing NL80211_REGDOMAIN_SET_BY_COUNTRY_IE. 2. Free the request in case of invalid initiator. 3. Remove WARN_ON check on reg_request->alpha2 as it is not a pointer. Signed-off-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 14 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
The REGULATORY_CUSTOM_REG can be used during early init with the goal of overriding the wiphy's default regulatory settings in case the alpha2 of the device is not known. In the case that the alpha2 becomes known lets avoid having drivers having to clear the REGULATORY_CUSTOM_REG flag by doing it for them when regulatory_hint() is used. Cc: Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 03 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
This can be used outside of the regulatory context for any checks on the DFS region. The central cfg80211 dfs_region is always used and if it does not match with the wiphy a debug print is issued. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 26 11月, 2013 27 次提交
-
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
This lets us later reuse the more generic reg_dfs_region_str(). Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
Only allow DFS to be set if the DFS regions agree. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
u8 was used in some other places, just stick to the enum, this forces us to express the values that are expected. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
Certain vendors may want to disable the processing of country IEs so that they can continue using the regulatory domain the driver or user has set. Currently there is no way to stop the core from processing country IEs, so add support to the core to ignore country IE hints. Cc: Mihir Shete <smihir@qti.qualcomm.com> Cc: Henri Bahini <hbahini@qca.qualcomm.com> Cc: Tushnim Bhattacharyya <tushnimb@qca.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
802.11 cards may have different country IE parsing behavioural preferences and vendors may want to support these. These preferences were managed by the REGULATORY_CUSTOM_REG and the REGULATORY_STRICT_REG flags and their combination. Instead of using this existing notation, split out the country IE behavioural preferences as a new flag. This will allow us to add more customizations easily and make the code more maintainable. Cc: Mihir Shete <smihir@qti.qualcomm.com> Cc: Henri Bahini <hbahini@qca.qualcomm.com> Cc: Tushnim Bhattacharyya <tushnimb@qca.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> [fix up conflicts] Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
We'll expand this later, this will make it easier to classify and review what things are related to regulatory or not. Coccinelle only missed 4 hits, which I had to do manually, supplying the SmPL in case of merge conflicts. @@ struct wiphy *wiphy; @@ -wiphy->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY +wiphy->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_CUSTOM_REG @@ expression e; @@ -e->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY +e->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_CUSTOM_REG @@ struct wiphy *wiphy; @@ -wiphy->flags &= ~WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY +wiphy->regulatory_flags &= ~REGULATORY_CUSTOM_REG @@ struct wiphy *wiphy; @@ -wiphy->flags & WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY +wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_CUSTOM_REG @@ struct wiphy *wiphy; @@ -wiphy->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_STRICT_REGULATORY +wiphy->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_STRICT_REG @@ expression e; @@ -e->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_STRICT_REGULATORY +e->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_STRICT_REG @@ struct wiphy *wiphy; @@ -wiphy->flags &= ~WIPHY_FLAG_STRICT_REGULATORY +wiphy->regulatory_flags &= ~REGULATORY_STRICT_REG @@ struct wiphy *wiphy; @@ -wiphy->flags & WIPHY_FLAG_STRICT_REGULATORY +wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_STRICT_REG @@ struct wiphy *wiphy; @@ -wiphy->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS +wiphy->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS @@ expression e; @@ -e->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS +e->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS @@ struct wiphy *wiphy; @@ -wiphy->flags &= ~WIPHY_FLAG_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS +wiphy->regulatory_flags &= ~REGULATORY_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS @@ struct wiphy *wiphy; @@ -wiphy->flags & WIPHY_FLAG_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS +wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS Generated-by: Coccinelle SmPL Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> Cc: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com> Cc: Mihir Shete <smihir@qti.qualcomm.com> Cc: Henri Bahini <hbahini@qca.qualcomm.com> Cc: Tushnim Bhattacharyya <tushnimb@qca.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> [fix up whitespace damage, overly long lines] Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
This reflects that case is now completely separated. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
This splits up the driver regulatory update on its own, this helps simplify the reading the case. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
This splits out the user regulatory update on its own, this helps simplify reading the case. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
This splits up the core regulatory update to be set on its own helper. This should make it easier to read exactly what type of requests should be expected there. In this case its clear that NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_CORE is only used by the core for updating the world regulatory domain. This is consistant with the nl80211.h documentation. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> [add warning to default switch case to avoid compiler warning] Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
last_request is RCU protected, since we're getting it on set_regdom() we might as well pass it to ensure the same request is being processed, otherwise there is a small race it could have changed. This makes processing of the request atomic. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
Drivers that set the WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY skip the core world regulatory domain updates, but do want their reg_notifier() called. Move the check for this closer to the source of the check that detected skipped was required and while at it add a helper for the notifier calling. This has no functional changes. This brings together the place where we call the reg_notifier() will be called. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
It seems some out of tree drivers were using a regulatory_hint("00") to trigger off the wiphy regulatory notifier, for those cases just setting the WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY would suffice to call the reg_notifier() for a world regulatory domain update. If drivers find other needs for calling the reg_notifier() a proper implemenation is preferred. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
All the regulatory request process routines use the same pattern. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
This enforces proper RCU APIs accross the code. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
This is common code, this reduces the chance of making a mistake of how we free it. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
By dealing with non country IE conficts first we can shift the code that deals with the conflict to the left. This has no functional changes. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
This is the last split up of the old unified __regultory_hint() processing set of functionality, it moves the country IE processing all on its own. This makes it easier to follow and read what exactly is going on for the case of processing country IEs. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
This makes the code easier to read and follow. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
This makes the code path easier to read and lets us split out some functionality that is only user specific, that makes it easier to read the other types of requests. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
This makes the code path easier to read for the core case. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> [add warning to default case in switch to avoid compile warning] Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
Currently nl80211 allows userspace to send the kernel a bogus regulatory domain with at most 32 rules set and it won't reject it until after its allocated memory. Let's be smart about it and take advantage that the last_request is now available under RTNL and check if the alpha2 matches an expected request and reject any bogus userspace requests prior to hitting the memory allocator. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
If a custom regulatory domain is passed and if a rule for a channel indicates it should be disabled that channel should always remain disabled as per its documentation and design. Likewise if WIPHY_FLAG_STRICT_REGULATORY flag is set and a regulatory_hint() is issued if a channel is disabled that channel should remain disabled. Without this change only drivers that set the _orig flags appropriately on their own would ensure disallowed channels remaind disabled. This helps drivers save code by relying on the APIS provided to entrust channels that should not be enabled be respected by only having to use wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory() or regulatory_hint() with the WIPHY_FLAG_STRICT_REGULATORY set. If wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory() is used together with WIPHY_FLAG_STRICT_REGULATORY and a regulatory_hint() issued later, the incoming regulatory domain can override previously set _orig parameters from the initial custom regulatory setting. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
The iniator is already available to us, so use it. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory() implies WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY but we never enforced it, do that now and warn if the driver didn't set it. All drivers should be following this today already. Having WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY does not however mean you will use wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory() though, you may have your own _orig value set up tools / helpers. The intel drivers are examples of this type of driver. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
These two flags are used for the same purpose, just combine them into a no-ir flag to annotate no initiating radiation is allowed. Old userspace sending either flag will have it treated as the no-ir flag. To be considerate to older userspace we also send both the no-ir flag and the old no-ibss flags. Newer userspace will have to be aware of older kernels. Update all places in the tree using these flags with the following semantic patch: @@ @@ -NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR @@ @@ -NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR @@ @@ -IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR @@ @@ -IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR @@ @@ -NL80211_RRF_NO_IR | NL80211_RRF_NO_IR +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR @@ @@ -IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR | IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR @@ @@ -(NL80211_RRF_NO_IR) +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR @@ @@ -(IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR) +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR Along with some hand-optimisations in documentation, to remove duplicates and to fix some indentation. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> [do all the driver updates in one go] Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 28 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
Drivers can now use this to parse the regulatory request and be more verbose when needed. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 19 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
Drivers can now use this to parse the regulatory request and be more verbose when needed. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 11 10月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
This makes it easier to read. Cc: smihir@qti.qualcomm.com Cc: tushnimb@qca.qualcomm.com Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
If we have a wiphy with an ISO3166-alpha2 regulatory domain programmed with the strict flag set we wait until the wiphy gets its wiphy->regd programmed before allowing regulatory domains hints other than country IE hints from processing on the wiphy. The existing check however discards the possibility of custom regulatory domains having also used the strict flag and these will not have the wiphy->regd set. Custom strict regulatory domains never set the wiphy->regd though as such currently all regulatory hints other than country IE hints are being ignored on these wiphys. All custom strict regulatory domains set the wiphy with the WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY and use wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory(). Enhance the check for the strict ISO3166-alpha2 regulatory domain case by exempting the WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY case. This will enable other regulatory hints to be processed now for these strict custom regulatory domains. Cc: smihir@qti.qualcomm.com Cc: tushnimb@qca.qualcomm.com Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 09 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
It is incorrect to refer to this as 11d as 802.11d was just a proposed amendment, 802.11d was merged to the standard so use proper terminology. Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 01 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
If allowed in a country, these channels typically require DFS so mark them as such. Channel 144 is a bit special, it's coming into use now to allow more VHT 80 channels, but world roaming with passive scanning is acceptable anyway. It seems fairly unlikely that it'll be used as the control channel for a VHT AP, but it needs to be present to allow a full VHT connection to an AP that uses it as one of the secondary channels. Also enable VHT 160 on these channels, and also for channels 36-48 to be able to use VHT 160 there. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 25 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arik Nemtsov 提交于
The current regdomain was not always set by the core. This causes cards with a custom regulatory domain to ignore user initiated changes if done before the card was registered. Signed-off-by: NArik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com> Acked-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 16 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
restore_regulatory_settings() requires the RTNL to be held, add the missing locking in reg_timeout_work(). Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 04 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
get_reg_request_treatment() returns 0 in one case but is defined to return an enum, use the proper value REG_REQ_OK. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-