Now that CRTC's have a primary plane, there's no need to track the
framebuffer in the CRTC.  Replace all references to the CRTC fb with the
primary plane's fb.

This patch was generated by the Coccinelle semantic patching tool using
the following rules:

        @@ struct drm_crtc C; @@
        -   (C).fb
        +   C.primary->fb

        @@ struct drm_crtc *C; @@
        -   (C)->fb
        +   C->primary->fb

v3: Generate patch via coccinelle.  Actual removal of crtc->fb has been
    moved to a subsequent patch.

v2: Fixup several lingering crtc->fb instances that were missed in the
    first patch iteration.  [Rob Clark]
Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>

Use drm_universal_plane_init() and drm_crtc_init_with_planes() rather
than the legacy drm_plane_init() / drm_crtc_init().  This will ensure
that the proper primary plane is registered with the DRM (and eventually
exposed to userspace in future patches).

Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>

Make things recover a bit more gracefully if we get stuck with no vblank
irq ever coming.
Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>

It seems we need to update all cursor registers from vblank.  This
appears to be the cause of intermittent underflows when enabling/
disabling cursor.
Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>

Backport a few fixes found in the course of getting mdp5 working.
There is a window of time after pageflip is requested, before we
start scanning out the new fb (ie. while we are waiting for gpu).
During that time we need to continue holding a reference to the
still-current scanout fb, to avoid the backing gem bo's from being
destroyed.

Possibly a common mdp_crtc parent class could be useful to share
some of this logic between mdp4_crtc and mdp5_crtc.  OTOH, this
all can be removed from the driver once atomic is in place, as
plane/crtc updates get deferred until all fb's are ready before
calling in to .page_flip(), etc.
Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>

Small typo I noticed in the mdp4_plane code.. no consequence because
PIPE_SRC_XY and PIPE_DST_XY have same register layout.
Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>

Add support for the new MDP5 display controller block.  The mapping
between parts of the display controller and KMS is:

  plane   -> PIPE{RGBn,VIGn}             \
  crtc    -> LM (layer mixer)            |-> MDP "device"
  encoder -> INTF                        /
  connector -> HDMI/DSI/eDP/etc          --> other device(s)

Unlike MDP4, it appears we can get by with a single encoder, rather
than needing a different implementation for DTV, DSI, etc.  (Ie. the
register interface is same, just different bases.)

Also unlike MDP4, all the IRQs for other blocks (HDMI, DSI, etc) are
routed through MDP.

And finally, MDP5 has this "Shared Memory Pool" (called "SMP"), from
which blocks need to be allocated to the active pipes based on fetch
stride.
Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>

The HDMI block is basically the same between older SoC's with mdp4
display controller, and newer ones with mdp5.

So mostly this consists of better abstracting out the different sets of
regulators, clks, etc.  In particular, for regulators and clks we can
split it up by what is needed for hot plug detect to work, and what is
needed to light up the display.

Also, 8x74 has a new phy.. a very simple one, but split out into a
different mmio space.  And with mdp5, the irq is shared with mdp, so we
don't directly register our own irq handler.
Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>

We'll want basically the same thing for mdp5, so refactor it out so it
can be shared.
Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>

This can be shared between mdp4 and mdp5.  Both use the same set of
parameters to describe the format to the hw.
Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>

resync to latest envytools db, add mdp5 registers
Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>

There are some little bits and pieces that mdp4 and mdp5 can share, so
move things around so that we can have both in a common parent
directory.
Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>