I plan to usurp the short name of struct fence for a core kernel struct,
and so I need to rename the specialised fence/timeline for DMA
operations to make room.

A consensus was reached in
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-July/113083.html
that making clear this fence applies to DMA operations was a good thing.
Since then the patch has grown a bit as usage increases, so hopefully it
remains a good thing!

(v2...: rebase, rerun spatch)
v3: Compile on msm, spotted a manual fixup that I broke.
v4: Try again for msm, sorry Daniel

coccinelle script:
@@

@@
- struct fence
+ struct dma_fence
@@

@@
- struct fence_ops
+ struct dma_fence_ops
@@

@@
- struct fence_cb
+ struct dma_fence_cb
@@

@@
- struct fence_array
+ struct dma_fence_array
@@

@@
- enum fence_flag_bits
+ enum dma_fence_flag_bits
@@

@@
(
- fence_init
+ dma_fence_init
|
- fence_release
+ dma_fence_release
|
- fence_free
+ dma_fence_free
|
- fence_get
+ dma_fence_get
|
- fence_get_rcu
+ dma_fence_get_rcu
|
- fence_put
+ dma_fence_put
|
- fence_signal
+ dma_fence_signal
|
- fence_signal_locked
+ dma_fence_signal_locked
|
- fence_default_wait
+ dma_fence_default_wait
|
- fence_add_callback
+ dma_fence_add_callback
|
- fence_remove_callback
+ dma_fence_remove_callback
|
- fence_enable_sw_signaling
+ dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling
|
- fence_is_signaled_locked
+ dma_fence_is_signaled_locked
|
- fence_is_signaled
+ dma_fence_is_signaled
|
- fence_is_later
+ dma_fence_is_later
|
- fence_later
+ dma_fence_later
|
- fence_wait_timeout
+ dma_fence_wait_timeout
|
- fence_wait_any_timeout
+ dma_fence_wait_any_timeout
|
- fence_wait
+ dma_fence_wait
|
- fence_context_alloc
+ dma_fence_context_alloc
|
- fence_array_create
+ dma_fence_array_create
|
- to_fence_array
+ to_dma_fence_array
|
- fence_is_array
+ dma_fence_is_array
|
- trace_fence_emit
+ trace_dma_fence_emit
|
- FENCE_TRACE
+ DMA_FENCE_TRACE
|
- FENCE_WARN
+ DMA_FENCE_WARN
|
- FENCE_ERR
+ DMA_FENCE_ERR
)
 (
 ...
 )
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Acked-by: NSumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161025120045.28839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

This is really a core kernel struct in disguise until we can finally
place it in kernel/. There is an immediate need for a fence collection
mechanism that is more flexible than fence-array, in particular being
able to easily drive request submission via events (and not just
interrupt driven). The same mechanism would be useful for handling
nonblocking and asynchronous atomic modesets, parallel execution and
more, but for the time being just create a local sw fence for execbuf.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160909131201.16673-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk