- 01 9月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in btrfs_balance Code for updating fs_info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in btrfs_balance() lacks raid56 support. Reason: Above code was wroten in 2012-08-01, together with btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures()'s first version. Then, btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures() got updated later to support raid56, but code in btrfs_balance() was not updated together. Fix: Merge above similar code to a common function: btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures() and make it support both case. It can fix this bug with a bonus of cleanup, and make these code never in above no-sync state from now on. Suggested-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
1: Use ARRAY_SIZE(types) to replace a static-value variant: int num_types = 4; 2: Use 'continue' on condition to reduce one level tab if (!XXX) { code; ... } -> if (XXX) continue; code; ... 3: Put setting 'num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 2' to (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 2) condition to make make logic neat. if (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 0 && XXX) num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 0; else if (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 1) { if (XXX) num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 1; else if (XXX) num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 2; -> if (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 0 && XXX) num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 0; if (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 1 && XXX) num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = ; if (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 2 && XXX) num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 2; 4: Remove comment of: num_mirrors - 1: if RAID1 or RAID10 is configured and more than 2 mirrors are used. which is not fit with code. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
These variables are not used from introduced version, remove them. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
Because btrfs support scrub raid56 parity stripe now. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 22 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
bio->bi_css and bio->bi_ioc don't exist when block cgroups are not on. This adds an ifdef around them. It's not perfect, but our use of bi_ioc is being removed in the 4.3 merge window. The bi_css usage really should go into bio_clone, but I want to make sure that doesn't introduce problems for other bio_clone use cases. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 20 8月, 2015 6 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If we partially clone one extent of a file into a lower offset of the file, fsync the file, power fail and then mount the fs to trigger log replay, we can get multiple checksum items in the csum tree that overlap each other and result in checksum lookup failures later. Those failures can make file data read requests assume a checksum value of 0, but they will not return an error (-EIO for example) to userspace exactly because the expected checksum value 0 is a special value that makes the read bio endio callback return success and set all the bytes of the corresponding page with the value 0x01 (at fs/btrfs/inode.c:__readpage_endio_check()). From a userspace perspective this is equivalent to file corruption because we are not returning what was written to the file. Details about how this can happen, and why, are included inline in the following reproducer test case for fstests and the comment added to tree-log.c. seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { _cleanup_flakey rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter . ./common/dmflakey # real QA test starts here _need_to_be_root _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _require_dm_flakey _require_cloner _require_metadata_journaling $SCRATCH_DEV rm -f $seqres.full _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _init_flakey _mount_flakey # Create our test file with a single 100K extent starting at file # offset 800K. We fsync the file here to make the fsync log tree gets # a single csum item that covers the whole 100K extent, which causes # the second fsync, done after the cloning operation below, to not # leave in the log tree two csum items covering two sub-ranges # ([0, 20K[ and [20K, 100K[)) of our extent. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 800K 100K" \ -c "fsync" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Now clone part of our extent into file offset 400K. This adds a file # extent item to our inode's metadata that points to the 100K extent # we created before, using a data offset of 20K and a data length of # 20K, so that it refers to the sub-range [20K, 40K[ of our original # extent. $CLONER_PROG -s $((800 * 1024 + 20 * 1024)) -d $((400 * 1024)) \ -l $((20 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/foo # Now fsync our file to make sure the extent cloning is durably # persisted. This fsync will not add a second csum item to the log # tree containing the checksums for the blocks in the sub-range # [20K, 40K[ of our extent, because there was already a csum item in # the log tree covering the whole extent, added by the first fsync # we did before. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo echo "File digest before power failure:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_scratch # Silently drop all writes and ummount to simulate a crash/power # failure. _load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_DROP_WRITES _unmount_flakey # Allow writes again, mount to trigger log replay and validate file # contents. # The fsync log replay first processes the file extent item # corresponding to the file offset 400K (the one which refers to the # [20K, 40K[ sub-range of our 100K extent) and then processes the file # extent item for file offset 800K. It used to happen that when # processing the later, it erroneously left in the csum tree 2 csum # items that overlapped each other, 1 for the sub-range [20K, 40K[ and # 1 for the whole range of our extent. This introduced a problem where # subsequent lookups for the checksums of blocks within the range # [40K, 100K[ of our extent would not find anything because lookups in # the csum tree ended up looking only at the smaller csum item, the # one covering the subrange [20K, 40K[. This made read requests assume # an expected checksum with a value of 0 for those blocks, which caused # checksum verification failure when the read operations finished. # However those checksum failure did not result in read requests # returning an error to user space (like -EIO for e.g.) because the # expected checksum value had the special value 0, and in that case # btrfs set all bytes of the corresponding pages with the value 0x01 # and produce the following warning in dmesg/syslog: # # "BTRFS warning (device dm-0): csum failed ino 257 off 917504 csum\ # 1322675045 expected csum 0" # _load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_ALLOW_WRITES _mount_flakey echo "File digest after log replay:" # Must match the same digest he had after cloning the extent and # before the power failure happened. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_scratch _unmount_flakey status=0 exit Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
While we are committing a transaction, it's possible the previous one is still finishing its commit and therefore we wait for it to finish first. However we were not checking if that previous transaction ended up getting aborted after we waited for it to commit, so we ended up committing the current transaction which can lead to fs corruption because the new superblock can point to trees that have had one or more nodes/leafs that were never durably persisted. The following sequence diagram exemplifies how this is possible: CPU 0 CPU 1 transaction N starts (...) btrfs_commit_transaction(N) cur_trans->state = TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START; (...) cur_trans->state = TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING; (...) cur_trans->state = TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED; root->fs_info->running_transaction = NULL; btrfs_start_transaction() --> starts transaction N + 1 btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction(trans, root); --> starts writing all new or COWed ebs created at transaction N creates some new ebs, COWs some existing ebs but doesn't COW or deletes eb X btrfs_commit_transaction(N + 1) (...) cur_trans->state = TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START; (...) wait_for_commit(root, prev_trans); --> prev_trans == transaction N btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction() continues writing ebs --> fails writing eb X, we abort transaction N and set bit BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR on fs_info->fs_state, so no new transactions can start after setting that bit cleanup_transaction() btrfs_cleanup_one_transaction() wakes up task at CPU 1 continues, doesn't abort because cur_trans->aborted (transaction N + 1) is zero, and no checks for bit BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR in fs_info->fs_state are made btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction(trans, root); --> succeeds, no errors during writeback write_ctree_super(trans, root, 0); --> succeeds --> we have now a superblock that points us to some root that uses eb X, which was never written to disk In this scenario future attempts to read eb X from disk results in an error message like "parent transid verify failed on X wanted Y found Z". So fix this by aborting the current transaction if after waiting for the previous transaction we verify that it was aborted. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Michal Hocko 提交于
alloc_btrfs_bio relies on GFP_NOFS allocation when committing the transaction but this allocation context is rather weak wrt. reclaim capabilities. The page allocator currently tries hard to not fail these allocations if they are small (<=PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) but it can still fail if the _current_ process is the OOM killer victim. Moreover there is an attempt to move away from the default no-fail behavior and allow these allocation to fail more eagerly. This would lead to: [ 37.928625] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4045 which is clearly undesirable and the nofail behavior should be explicit if the allocation failure cannot be tolerated. Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Michal Hocko 提交于
Btrfs relies on GFP_NOFS allocation when committing the transaction but this allocation context is rather weak wrt. reclaim capabilities. The page allocator currently tries hard to not fail these allocations if they are small (<=PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) so this is not a problem currently but there is an attempt to move away from the default no-fail behavior and allow these allocation to fail more eagerly. And this would lead to a pre-mature transaction abort as follows: [ 55.328093] Call Trace: [ 55.328890] [<ffffffff8154e6f0>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b [ 55.330518] [<ffffffff8108fa28>] ? console_unlock+0x334/0x363 [ 55.332738] [<ffffffff8110873e>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x81d/0x8d4 [ 55.334910] [<ffffffff81100752>] pagecache_get_page+0x10e/0x20c [ 55.336844] [<ffffffffa007d916>] alloc_extent_buffer+0xd0/0x350 [btrfs] [ 55.338973] [<ffffffffa0059d8c>] btrfs_find_create_tree_block+0x15/0x17 [btrfs] [ 55.341329] [<ffffffffa004f728>] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x18c/0x405 [btrfs] [ 55.343566] [<ffffffffa003fa34>] split_leaf+0x1e4/0x6a6 [btrfs] [ 55.345577] [<ffffffffa0040567>] btrfs_search_slot+0x671/0x831 [btrfs] [ 55.347679] [<ffffffff810682d7>] ? get_parent_ip+0xe/0x3e [ 55.349434] [<ffffffffa0041cb2>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x5d/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 55.351681] [<ffffffffa004ecfb>] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x7a6/0xf35 [btrfs] [ 55.353979] [<ffffffffa00512ea>] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x6e/0x226 [btrfs] [ 55.356212] [<ffffffffa0060e21>] ? start_transaction+0x192/0x534 [btrfs] [ 55.358378] [<ffffffffa0060e21>] ? start_transaction+0x192/0x534 [btrfs] [ 55.360626] [<ffffffffa0060221>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4c/0xaba [btrfs] [ 55.362894] [<ffffffffa0060e21>] ? start_transaction+0x192/0x534 [btrfs] [ 55.365221] [<ffffffffa0073428>] btrfs_sync_file+0x29c/0x310 [btrfs] [ 55.367273] [<ffffffff81186808>] vfs_fsync_range+0x8f/0x9e [ 55.369047] [<ffffffff81186833>] vfs_fsync+0x1c/0x1e [ 55.370654] [<ffffffff81186869>] do_fsync+0x34/0x4e [ 55.372246] [<ffffffff81186ab3>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x14 [ 55.373851] [<ffffffff81554f97>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6f [ 55.381070] BTRFS: error (device hdb1) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2821: errno=-12 Out of memory [ 55.382431] BTRFS warning (device hdb1): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. [ 55.382433] BTRFS warning (device hdb1): cleanup_transaction:1692: Aborting unused transaction(IO failure). [ 55.384280] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 55.384312] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3010 at fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c:438 btrfs_select_ref_head+0xd9/0xfe [btrfs]() [...] [ 55.384337] Call Trace: [ 55.384353] [<ffffffff8154e6f0>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b [ 55.384357] [<ffffffff8107f717>] ? down_trylock+0x2d/0x37 [ 55.384359] [<ffffffff81046977>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb [ 55.384398] [<ffffffffa00a1d6b>] ? btrfs_select_ref_head+0xd9/0xfe [btrfs] [ 55.384400] [<ffffffff81046a34>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [ 55.384423] [<ffffffffa00a1d6b>] btrfs_select_ref_head+0xd9/0xfe [btrfs] [ 55.384446] [<ffffffffa004e5f7>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xa2/0xf35 [btrfs] [ 55.384455] [<ffffffffa004e600>] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xab/0xf35 [btrfs] [ 55.384476] [<ffffffffa00512ea>] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x6e/0x226 [btrfs] [ 55.384499] [<ffffffffa0060e21>] ? start_transaction+0x192/0x534 [btrfs] [ 55.384521] [<ffffffffa0060e21>] ? start_transaction+0x192/0x534 [btrfs] [ 55.384543] [<ffffffffa0060221>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4c/0xaba [btrfs] [ 55.384565] [<ffffffffa0060e21>] ? start_transaction+0x192/0x534 [btrfs] [ 55.384588] [<ffffffffa0073428>] btrfs_sync_file+0x29c/0x310 [btrfs] [ 55.384591] [<ffffffff81186808>] vfs_fsync_range+0x8f/0x9e [ 55.384592] [<ffffffff81186833>] vfs_fsync+0x1c/0x1e [ 55.384593] [<ffffffff81186869>] do_fsync+0x34/0x4e [ 55.384594] [<ffffffff81186ab3>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x14 [ 55.384595] [<ffffffff81554f97>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6f [...] [ 55.384608] ---[ end trace c29799da1d4dd621 ]--- [ 55.437323] BTRFS info (device hdb1): forced readonly [ 55.438815] BTRFS info (device hdb1): delayed_refs has NO entry Fix this by being explicit about the no-fail behavior of this allocation path and use __GFP_NOFAIL. Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
Following arguments are not used in tree-log.c: insert_one_name(): path, type wait_log_commit(): trans wait_for_writer(): trans This patch remove them. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> reported a smatch warning for start_log_trans(): fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:178 start_log_trans() warn: we tested 'root->log_root' before and it was 'false' fs/btrfs/tree-log.c 147 if (root->log_root) { We test "root->log_root" here. ... Reason: Condition of: fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:178: if (!root->log_root) { is not necessary after commit: 7237f183 It caused a smatch warning, and no functionally error. Fix: Deleting above condition will make smatch shut up, but a better way is to do cleanup for start_log_trans() to remove duplicated code and make code more readable. Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 09 8月, 2015 29 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
This attaches accounting information to bios as we submit them so the new blkio controllers can throttle on btrfs filesystems. Not much is required, we're just associating bios with blkcgs during clone, calling wbc_init_bio()/wbc_account_io() during writepages submission, and attaching the bios to the current context during direct IO. Finally if we are splitting bios during btrfs_map_bio, this attaches accounting information to the split. The end result is able to throttle nicely on single disk filesystems. A little more work is required for multi-device filesystems. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Byongho Lee 提交于
The code using 'ordered_extent_flush_mutex' mutex has removed by below commit. - 8d875f95 btrfs: disable strict file flushes for renames and truncates But the mutex still lives in struct 'btrfs_fs_info'. So, this patch removes the mutex from struct 'btrfs_fs_info' and its initialization code. Signed-off-by: NByongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
When testing the previous patch, Zhao Lei reported a similar bug when attempting to scrub a degraded RAID 5/6 filesystem with a missing device, leading to NULL pointer dereferences from the RAID 5/6 parity scrubbing code. The first cause was the same as in the previous patch: attempting to call bio_add_page() on a missing block device. To fix this, scrub_extent_for_parity() can just mark the sectors on the missing device as errors instead of attempting to read from it. Additionally, the code uses scrub_remap_extent() to map the extent of the corresponding data stripe, but the extent wasn't already mapped. If scrub_remap_extent() finds a missing block device, it doesn't initialize extent_dev, so we're left with a NULL struct btrfs_device. The solution is to use btrfs_map_block() directly. Reported-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
The original implementation of device replace on RAID 5/6 seems to have missed support for replacing a missing device. When this is attempted, we end up calling bio_add_page() on a bio with a NULL ->bi_bdev, which crashes when we try to dereference it. This happens because btrfs_map_block() has no choice but to return us the missing device because RAID 5/6 don't have any alternate mirrors to read from, and a missing device has a NULL bdev. The idea implemented here is to handle the missing device case separately, which better only happen when we're replacing a missing RAID 5/6 device. We use the new BTRFS_RBIO_REBUILD_MISSING operation to reconstruct the data from parity, check it with scrub_recheck_block_checksum(), and write it out with scrub_write_block_to_dev_replace(). Reported-by: NPhilip <bugzilla@philip-seeger.de> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96141Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
The current RAID 5/6 recovery code isn't quite prepared to handle missing devices. In particular, it expects a bio that we previously attempted to use in the read path, meaning that it has valid pages allocated. However, missing devices have a NULL blkdev, and we can't call bio_add_page() on a bio with a NULL blkdev. We could do manual manipulation of bio->bi_io_vec, but that's pretty gross. So instead, add a separate path that allows us to manually add pages to the rbio. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
Commit 5fbc7c59 ("Btrfs: fix unfinished readahead thread for raid5/6 degraded mounting") fixed a problem where we would skip a missing device when we shouldn't have because there are no other mirrors to read from in RAID 5/6. After commit 2c8cdd6e ("Btrfs, replace: write dirty pages into the replace target device"), the fix doesn't work when we're doing a missing device replace on RAID 5/6 because the replace device is counted as a mirror so we're tricked into thinking we can safely skip the missing device. The fix is to count only the real stripes and decide based on that. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
scrub_submit() claims that it can handle a bio with a NULL block device, but this is misleading, as calling bio_add_page() on a bio with a NULL ->bi_bdev would've already crashed. Delete this, as we're about to properly handle a missing block device. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
Clone and extent same lock their source and target inodes in opposite order. In addition to this, the range locking in clone doesn't take ordering into account. Fix this by having clone use the same locking helpers as btrfs-extent-same. In addition, I do a small cleanup of the locking helpers, removing a case (both inodes being the same) which was poorly accounted for and never actually used by the callers. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
The file layout is [extent 1]...[extent n][4k extent][HOLE][extent x] extent 1~n and 4k extent can be merged during defrag, and the whole defrag bytes is larger than our defrag thresh(256k), 4k extent as a tail is left unmerged since we check if its next extent can be merged (the next one is a hole, so the check will fail), the layout thus can be [new extent][4k extent][HOLE][extent x] (1~n) To fix it, beside looking at the next one, this also looks at the previous one by checking @defrag_end, which is set to 0 when we decide to stop merging contiguous extents, otherwise, we can merge the previous one with our extent. Also, this makes btrfs behave consistent with how xfs and ext4 do. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
When we do backref walking, we search firstly in queued delayed refs and then the on-disk backrefs, but we parse differently for shared references, for delayed refs we also add 'ref->root' while for on-disk backrefs we don't, this can prevent us from merging refs indexed by the same bytenr and cause find_parent_nodes() to throw a warning at 'WARN_ON(ref->count < 0)', for example, when we have a shared data extent with 'ref_cnt=1' and a delayed shared data with a BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF, that happens. For shared references, no matter if it's delayed or on-disk, ref->root is not at all used, instead it's ref->parent that really matters, so this has delayed refs handled as the same way as on-disk refs. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
When a task trying to double lock a extent buffer, there are no lockdep warning about it because this lock may be in "blocking_lock" state, and make us hard to debug. This patch add a WARN_ON() for above condition, it can not report all deadlock cases(as lock between tasks), but at least helps us some. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
Because it is never used. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
These wrong comment was copyed from another function(expired) from init, this patch fixed them. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
When btrfs_reloc_cow_block() failed in __btrfs_cow_block(), current code just return a err-value to caller, but leave new_created extent buffer exist and locked. Then subsequent code (in relocate) try to lock above eb again, and caused deadlock without any dmesg. (eb lock use wait_event(), so no lockdep message) It is hard to do recover work in __btrfs_cow_block() at this error point, but we can abort transaction to avoid deadlock and operate on unstable state.a It also helps developer to find wrong place quickly. (better than a frozen fs without any dmesg before patch) Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
These arguments are not used in functions, remove them for cleanup and make kernel stack happy. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
Remove chunk_objectid argument from btrfs_relocate_chunk() because it is not necessary, it can also cleanup some code in caller for prepare its value. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
objectid's init-value is not used in any case, remove it. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
We need error checking code for get_ref_objectid_v0() in relocate_block_group(), to avoid unpredictable result, especially for accessing uninitialized value(when function failed) after this line. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
xfstests btrfs/070 sometimes failed. In my test machine, its fail rate is about 30%. In another vm(vmware), its fail rate is about 50%. Reason: btrfs/070 do replace and defrag with fsstress simultaneously, after above operation, checksum error is found by scrub. Actually, it have no relationship with defrag operation, only replace with fsstress can trigger this bug. New data writen to target device have possibility rewrited by old data from source device by replace code in debug, to avoid above problem, we can set target block group to readonly in replace period, so new data requested by other operation will not write to same place with replace code. Before patch(4.1-rc3): 30% failed in 100 xfstests. After patch: 0% failed in 300 xfstests. It also happened in btrfs/071 as it's another scrub with IO load tests. Reported-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
Use new intruduced scrub_pause_on/off() can make this code block clean and more readable. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
It can reduce current duplicated code which is similar to scrub_blocked_if_needed() but can not call it because little different. It also used by my next patch which is in same case. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
More than one code call set_block_group_ro() and restore rw in fail. Old code use bool bit to save blockgroup's ro state, it can not support parallel case(it is confirmd exist in my debug log). This patch use ref count to store ro state, and rename set_block_group_ro/set_block_group_rw to inc_block_group_ro/dec_block_group_ro. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
When we access extent_root in scrub_stripe() and scrub_raid56_parity(), we need bypass unrelated tree item firstly before using its contents to do other condition. It is not a bug fix, only making code sequence in logic. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
We need not load csum of whole strip in scrub because strip is trimed before use, it is to say, what we really need to calculate csum is data between [extent_logical, extent_len). This patch changed to use above segment for btrfs_lookup_csums_range() in scrub_stripe() Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
For example, in scrub_raid56_parity(), following lines are used to judge is all data processed: place1: if (key.objectid > logic_end) ... place2: if (logic_start >= logic_end) ... ... (place2 is typo, is should be ">", it is copied from other place, where logic_end's meaning is different, long story...) We can fix above typo directly, but the root reason is ambiguous meaning of logic_end in scrub raid56 parity. In other place, XXX_end is pointed to data which is not included, and we need to process segment of [XXX_start, XXX_end). But for scrub raid56 parity, logic_end is pointed to lattest data need to process, and introduced many "+ 1" and "- 1" in code as below: length = sparity->logic_end - sparity->logic_start + 1 logic_end - logic_start + 1 stripe_logical + increment - 1 This patch changed logic_end's meaning to make it in normal understanding in raid56 parity functions and data struct alone with above bugfix. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
When scrub_extent() failed, we need to free previois created checksum list. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
Old code checking cancel and pause request inside scrub stripe operation, like: loop() { if (parity) { scrub_parity_stripe(); continue; } check_cancel_and_pause() scrub_normal_stripe(); } Reason is when introduce raid56 stripe scrub, new code is inserted simplely to front of loop. Better to: loop() { check_cancel_and_pause() if (parity) scrub_parity_stripe(); else scrub_normal_stripe(); } This patch adjusted code place to realize above sequence. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
When mount failed because missing device, we can see following dmesg: [ 1060.267743] BTRFS: too many missing devices, writeable mount is not allowed [ 1060.273158] BTRFS: open_ctree failed This patch add missing_device_number and tolerated_missing_device_number to above output, to let user know what really happened, and helps bug-report and debug. dmesg after patch: [ 127.050367] BTRFS: missing devices(1) exceeds the limit(0), writeable mount is not allowed [ 127.056099] BTRFS: open_ctree failed Changelog v1->v2: 1: Changed to more clear description, suggested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Suggested-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-