Fix cut & paste oversight:

  s/pull_rt_task/pull_dl_task
Signed-off-by: NT.Zhou <t1zhou@163.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161123004832.GA2983@geoSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

In the comment:

        /*
         * The task might have changed its scheduling policy to something
         * different than SCHED_DEADLINE (through switched_fromd_dl()).
         */

s/fromd/from/
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5408b3b3f9ee197a7b7f10fb834341100a4f2c88.1478599881.git.bristot@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The dl task will be replenished after dl task timer fire and start a
new period. It will be enqueued and to re-evaluate its dependency on
the tick in order to restart it. However, if the CPU is hot-unplugged,
irq_work_queue will splash since the target CPU is offline.

As a result we get:

    WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at kernel/irq_work.c:69 irq_work_queue_on+0xad/0xe0
    Call Trace:
     dump_stack+0x99/0xd0
     __warn+0xd1/0xf0
     warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
     irq_work_queue_on+0xad/0xe0
     tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu+0x44/0x50
     tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu+0x74/0xb0
     enqueue_task_dl+0x226/0x480
     activate_task+0x5c/0xa0
     dl_task_timer+0x19b/0x2c0
     ? push_dl_task.part.31+0x190/0x190

This can be triggered by hot-unplugging the full dynticks CPU which dl
task is running on.

We enqueue the dl task on the offline CPU, because we need to do
replenish for start_dl_timer(). So, as Juri pointed out, we would
need to do is calling replenish_dl_entity() directly, instead of
enqueue_task_dl(). pi_se shouldn't be a problem as the task shouldn't
be boosted if it was throttled.

This patch fixes it by avoiding the whole enqueue+dequeue+enqueue story, by
first migrating (set_task_cpu()) and then doing 1 enqueue.
Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472639264-3932-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

These 2 exercise independent code paths and need different arguments.

After this change, you call:

  cpudl_clear(cp, cpu);
  cpudl_set(cp, cpu, dl);

instead of:

  cpudl_set(cp, cpu, 0 /* dl */, 0 /* is_valid */);
  cpudl_set(cp, cpu, dl, 1 /* is_valid */);
Signed-off-by: NTommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NLuca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Reviewed-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-dl@retis.sssup.it
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471184828-12644-4-git-send-email-tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.itSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

All of the callers of cpufreq_update_util() pass rq_clock(rq) to it
as the time argument and some of them check whether or not cpu_of(rq)
is equal to smp_processor_id() before calling it, so rework it to
take a runqueue pointer as the argument and move the rq_clock(rq)
evaluation into it.

Additionally, provide a wrapper checking cpu_of(rq) against
smp_processor_id() for the cpufreq_update_util() callers that
need it.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

It is useful to know the reason why cpufreq_update_util() has just
been called and that can be passed as flags to cpufreq_update_util()
and to the ->func() callback in struct update_util_data.  However,
doing that in addition to passing the util and max arguments they
already take would be clumsy, so avoid it.

Instead, use the observation that the schedutil governor is part
of the scheduler proper, so it can access scheduler data directly.
This allows the util and max arguments of cpufreq_update_util()
and the ->func() callback in struct update_util_data to be replaced
with a flags one, but schedutil has to be modified to follow.

Thus make the schedutil governor obtain the CFS utilization
information from the scheduler and use the "RT" and "DL" flags
instead of the special utilization value of ULONG_MAX to track
updates from the RT and DL sched classes.  Make it non-modular
too to avoid having to export scheduler variables to modules at
large.

Next, update all of the other users of cpufreq_update_util()
and the ->func() callback in struct update_util_data accordingly.
Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

setup_new_dl_entity() takes two parameters, but it only actually uses
one of them, under a different name, to setup a new dl_entity, after:

  2f9f3fdc928 "sched/deadline: Remove dl_new from struct sched_dl_entity"

as we currently do:

  setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl, &p->dl)

However, before Luca's change we were doing:

  setup_new_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se)

in update_dl_entity() for a dl_se->new entity: we were using pi_se's
parameters (the potential PI donor) for setting up a new entity.

This change removes the useless second parameter of setup_new_dl_entity().

While we are at it we also optimize things further calling setup_new_dl_
entity() only for already queued tasks, since (as pointed out by Xunlei)
we already do the very same update at tasks wakeup time anyway. By doing
so, we don't need to worry about a potential PI donor anymore, as
rt_mutex_setprio() takes care of that already for us.
Signed-off-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470409675-20935-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The following warning can be triggered by hot-unplugging the CPU
on which an active SCHED_DEADLINE task is running on:

  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3531 lock_release+0x690/0x6a0
  releasing a pinned lock
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x99/0xd0
   __warn+0xd1/0xf0
   ? dl_task_timer+0x1a1/0x2b0
   warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4f/0x60
   ? sched_clock+0x13/0x20
   lock_release+0x690/0x6a0
   ? enqueue_pushable_dl_task+0x9b/0xa0
   ? enqueue_task_dl+0x1ca/0x480
   _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40
   dl_task_timer+0x1a1/0x2b0
   ? push_dl_task.part.31+0x190/0x190
  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3649 lock_unpin_lock+0x181/0x1a0
  unpinning an unpinned lock
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x99/0xd0
   __warn+0xd1/0xf0
   warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4f/0x60
   lock_unpin_lock+0x181/0x1a0
   dl_task_timer+0x127/0x2b0
   ? push_dl_task.part.31+0x190/0x190

As per the comment before this code, its safe to drop the RQ lock
here, and since we (potentially) change rq, unpin and repin to avoid
the splat.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
[ Rewrote changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470274940-17976-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

tsk_nr_cpus_allowed() is an accessor for task->nr_cpus_allowed which allows
us to change the representation of ->nr_cpus_allowed if required.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1462969411-17735-2-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Use the future-safe accessor for struct task_struct's.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1462969411-17735-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

We got this warning:

    WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2468 at kernel/sched/core.c:1161 set_task_cpu+0x1af/0x1c0
    [...]
    Call Trace:

    dump_stack+0x63/0x87
    __warn+0xd1/0xf0
    warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
    set_task_cpu+0x1af/0x1c0
    push_dl_task.part.34+0xea/0x180
    push_dl_tasks+0x17/0x30
    __balance_callback+0x45/0x5c
    __sched_setscheduler+0x906/0xb90
    SyS_sched_setattr+0x150/0x190
    do_syscall_64+0x62/0x110
    entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25

This corresponds to:

    WARN_ON_ONCE(p->state == TASK_RUNNING &&
             p->sched_class == &fair_sched_class &&
             (p->on_rq && !task_on_rq_migrating(p)))

It happens because in find_lock_later_rq(), the task whose scheduling
class was changed to fair class is still pushed away as if it were
a deadline task ...

So, check in find_lock_later_rq() after double_lock_balance(), if the
scheduling class of the deadline task was changed, break and retry.

Apply the same logic to RT tasks.
Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1462767091-1215-1-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The problem with the existing lock pinning is that each pin is of
value 1; this mean you can simply unpin if you know its pinned,
without having any extra information.

This scheme generates a random (16 bit) cookie for each pin and
requires this same cookie to unpin. This means you have to keep the
cookie in context.

No objsize difference for !LOCKDEP kernels.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

In order to be able to pass around more than just the IRQ flags in the
future, add a rq_flags structure.

No difference in code generation for the x86_64-defconfig build I
tested.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Sometimes delta_exec is 0 due to update_curr() is called multiple times,
this is captured by:

	u64 delta_exec = rq_clock_task(rq) - curr->se.exec_start;

This patch optimizes the cpufreq update kicker by bailing out when nothing
changed, it will benefit the upcoming schedutil, since otherwise it will
(over)react to the special util/max combination.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461316044-9520-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Introduce a mechanism by which parts of the cpufreq subsystem
("setpolicy" drivers or the core) can register callbacks to be
executed from cpufreq_update_util() which is invoked by the
scheduler's update_load_avg() on CPU utilization changes.

This allows the "setpolicy" drivers to dispense with their timers
and do all of the computations they need and frequency/voltage
adjustments in the update_load_avg() code path, among other things.

The update_load_avg() changes were suggested by Peter Zijlstra.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The dl_new field of struct sched_dl_entity is currently used to
identify new deadline tasks, so that their deadline and runtime
can be properly initialised.

However, these tasks can be easily identified by checking if
their deadline is smaller than the current time when they switch
to SCHED_DEADLINE. So, dl_new can be removed by introducing this
check in switched_to_dl(); this allows to simplify the
SCHED_DEADLINE code.
Signed-off-by: NLuca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1457350024-7825-2-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.itSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

	if (A || B) {

	} else if (A && !B) {

	}

If A we'll take the first branch, if !A we will not satisfy the second.
Therefore the second branch will never be taken.
Reported-by: Nluca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160225140149.GK6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Steven noticed that occasionally a sched_yield() call would not result
in a wait for the next period edge as expected.

It turns out that when we call update_curr_dl() and end up with
delta_exec <= 0, we will bail early and fail to throttle.

Further inspection of the yield code revealed that yield_task_dl()
clearing dl.runtime is wrong too, it will not account the last bit of
runtime which could result in dl.runtime < 0, which in turn means that
replenish would gift us with too much runtime.

Fix both issues by not relying on the dl.runtime value for yield.
Reported-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Tested-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160223122822.GP6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

It's "too much" not "to much".
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160210120422.4ca77e68@gandalf.local.homeSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

earliest_dl.next should cache deadline of the earliest ready task that
is also enqueued in the pushable rbtree, as pull algorithm uses this
information to find candidates for migration: if the earliest_dl.next
deadline of source rq is earlier than the earliest_dl.curr deadline of
destination rq, the task from the source rq can be pulled.

However, current implementation only guarantees that earliest_dl.next is
the deadline of the next ready task instead of the next pushable task;
which will result in potentially holding both rqs' lock and find nothing
to migrate because of affinity constraints. In addition, current logic
doesn't update the next candidate for pushing in pick_next_task_dl(),
even if the running task is never eligible.

This patch fixes both problems by updating earliest_dl.next when
pushable dl task is enqueued/dequeued, similar to what we already do for
RT.
Tested-by: NLuca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449135730-27202-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Luca and Wanpeng reported two missing annotations that led to
false lockdep complaints. Add the missing annotations.
Reported-by: NLuca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Reported-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: cbce1a68 ("sched,lockdep: Employ lock pinning")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151023095008.GY17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Commit:

  9d514262 ("sched/deadline: Reduce rq lock contention by eliminating locking of non-feasible target")

broke select_task_rq_dl() and find_lock_later_rq(), because it introduced
a comparison between the local task's deadline and dl.earliest_dl.curr of
the remote queue.

However, if the remote runqueue does not contain any SCHED_DEADLINE
task its earliest_dl.curr is 0 (always smaller than the deadline of
the local task) and the remote runqueue is not selected for pushing.

As a result, if an application creates multiple SCHED_DEADLINE
threads, they will never be pushed to runqueues that do not already
contain SCHED_DEADLINE tasks.

This patch fixes the issue by checking if dl.dl_nr_running == 0.
Signed-off-by: NLuca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: 9d514262 ("sched/deadline: Reduce rq lock contention by eliminating locking of non-feasible target")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444982781-15608-1-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.itSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The "dl_boosted" flag is set by comparing *absolute* deadlines
(c.f., rt_mutex_setprio()).
Signed-off-by: NAndrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438782979-9057-2-git-send-email-parri.andrea@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The comment is "misleading"; fix it by adapting a comment from
push_rt_tasks().
Signed-off-by: NAndrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438782979-9057-1-git-send-email-parri.andrea@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Change the calling context of sched_class::set_cpus_allowed() such
that we can assume the task is inactive.

This allows us to easily make changes that affect accounting done by
enqueue/dequeue. This does in fact completely remove
set_cpus_allowed_rt() and greatly reduces set_cpus_allowed_dl().
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: juri.lelli@arm.com
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: riel@redhat.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150515154833.667516139@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Give every class a set_cpus_allowed() method, this enables some small
optimization in the RT,DL implementation by avoiding a double
cpumask_weight() call.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: juri.lelli@arm.com
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: riel@redhat.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150515154833.614517487@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

'p' has been already queued at this point, so "!task_running(rq, p)"
and "p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1" imply that "has_pushable_dl_tasks(rq)"
is true, so it can be removed.
Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1435995563-3723-2-git-send-email-xlpang@126.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Sine commit 269ad801 ("sched/deadline: Avoid double-accounting in
case of missed deadlines), parameter 'rq' is no longer used, so
remove it.
Signed-off-by: NZhiqiang Zhang <zhangzhiqiang.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1434338120-43773-1-git-send-email-zhangzhiqiang.zhang@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

This patch adds a check that prevents futile attempts to move DL tasks
to a CPU with active tasks of equal or earlier deadline. The same
behavior as commit 80e3d87b ("sched/rt: Reduce rq lock contention
by eliminating locking of non-feasible target") for rt class.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431496867-4194-3-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

It's a bootstrap function, make init_sched_dl_class() __init.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431496867-4194-2-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

pull_dl_task() uses pick_next_earliest_dl_task() to select a migration
candidate; this is sub-optimal since the next earliest task -- as per
the regular runqueue -- might not be migratable at all. This could
result in iterating the entire runqueue looking for a task.

Instead iterate the pushable queue -- this queue only contains tasks
that have at least 2 cpus set in their cpus_allowed mask.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
[ Improved the changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431496867-4194-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Employ the new lockdep lock pinning annotation to ensure no
'accidental' lock-breaks happen with rq->lock.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124744.003233193@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

We still have a few pending issues with the deadline code, one of which
is that switching between scheduling classes can 'leak' CBS state.

Close the hole by retaining the current CBS state when leaving
SCHED_DEADLINE and unconditionally programming the deadline timer.
The timer will then reset the CBS state if the task is still
!SCHED_DEADLINE by the time it hits.

If the task left SCHED_DEADLINE it will not call task_dead_dl() and
we'll not cancel the hrtimer, leaving us a pending timer in free
space. Avoid this by giving the timer a task reference, this avoids
littering the task exit path for this rather uncommon case.

In order to do this, I had to move dl_task_offline_migration() below
the replenishment, such that the task_rq()->lock fully covers that.
While doing this, I noticed that it (was) buggy in assuming a task is
enqueued and or we need to enqueue the task now. Fixing this means
select_task_rq_dl() might encounter an offline rq -- look into that.

As a result this kills cancel_dl_timer() which included a rq->lock
break.

Fixes: 40767b0d ("sched/deadline: Fix deadline parameter modification handling")
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124743.574192138@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Remove the direct {push,pull} balancing operations from
switched_{from,to}_dl() / prio_changed_dl() and use the balance
callback queue.

Again, err on the side of too many reschedules; since too few is a
hard bug while too many is just annoying.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124742.968262663@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

In order to be able to use pull_dl_task() from a callback, we need to
do away with the return value.

Since the return value indicates if we should reschedule, do this
inside the function. Since not all callers currently do this, this can
increase the number of reschedules due rt balancing.

Too many reschedules is not a correctness issues, too few are.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124742.859398977@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Generalize the post_schedule() stuff into a balance callback list.
This allows us to more easily use it outside of schedule() and cross
sched_class.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124742.424032725@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

ACCESS_ONCE doesn't work reliably on non-scalar types. This patch removes
the rest of the existing usages of ACCESS_ONCE() in the scheduler, and use
the new READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() APIs as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NWaiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430251224-5764-2-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

hrtimer_start() does not longer defer already expired timers to the
softirq. Get rid of the __hrtimer_start_range_ns() invocation.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203502.627353666@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

I observed that DL tasks can't be migrated to other CPUs during CPU
hotplug, in addition, task may/may not be running again if CPU is
added back.

The root cause which I found is that DL tasks will be throtted and
removed from the DL rq after comsuming all their budget, which
leads to the situation that stop task can't pick them up from the
DL rq and migrate them to other CPUs during hotplug.

The method to reproduce:

  schedtool -E -t 50000:100000 -e ./test

Actually './test' is just a simple for loop. Then observe which CPU the
test task is on and offline it:

  echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/online

This patch adds the DL task migration during CPU hotplug by finding a
most suitable later deadline rq after DL timer fires if current rq is
offline.

If it fails to find a suitable later deadline rq then it falls back to
any eligible online CPU in so that the deadline task will come back
to us, and the push/pull mechanism should then move it around properly.
Suggested-and-Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427411315-4298-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

dl_task_timer() may fire on a different rq from where a task was removed
after throttling. Since the call path is:

  dl_task_timer() ->
    enqueue_task_dl() ->
      enqueue_dl_entity() ->
        replenish_dl_entity()

and replenish_dl_entity() uses dl_se's rq, we can't use current's rq
in dl_task_timer(), but we need to lock the task's previous one.
Tested-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Fixes: 3960c8c0 ("sched: Make dl_task_time() use task_rq_lock()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427792017-7356-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>