Currently struct cpu_hw_events stores data on events running on a
PMU associated with a CPU. As this data is general enough to be used
for system PMUs, this name is a misnomer, and may cause confusion when
it is used for system PMUs.

Additionally, 'armpmu' is commonly used as a parameter name for an
instance of struct arm_pmu. The name is also used for a global instance
which represents the CPU's PMU.

As cpu_hw_events is now not tied to CPU PMUs, it is renamed to
pmu_hw_events, with instances of it renamed similarly. As the global
'armpmu' is CPU-specfic, it is renamed to cpu_pmu. This should make it
clearer which code is generic, and which is coupled with the CPU.
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
Reviewed-by: NAshwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Currently mapping an event type to a hardware configuration value
depends on the data being pointed to from struct arm_pmu. These fields
(cache_map, event_map, raw_event_mask) are currently specific to CPU
PMUs, and do not serve the general case well.

This patch replaces the event map pointers on struct arm_pmu with a new
'map_event' function pointer. Small shim functions are used to reuse
the existing common code.
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
Reviewed-by: NAshwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Currently, a single lock serialises access to CPU PMU registers. This
global locking is unnecessary as PMU registers are local to the CPU
they monitor.

This patch replaces the global lock with a per-CPU lock. As the lock is
in struct cpu_hw_events, PMUs providing a single cpu_hw_events instance
can be locked globally.
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
Reviewed-by: NAshwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Currently, pmu_hw_events::active_mask is used to keep track of which
events are active in hardware. As we can stop counters and their
interrupts, this is unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
Reviewed-by: NAshwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Now that the ARMv7 PMU backend indexes event counters from zero, follow
suit and do the same for ARMv6 and Xscale.
Acked-by: NJamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
Reviewed-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

This patch removes const qualifiers from instances of struct arm_pmu,
and functions initialising them, in preparation for generalising
arm_pmu usage to system (AKA uncore) PMUs.

This will allow for dynamically modifiable structures (locks,
struct pmu) to be added as members of struct arm_pmu.
Acked-by: NJamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
Reviewed-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Add a NODE level to the generic cache events which is used to measure
local vs remote memory accesses. Like all other cache events, an
ACCESS is HIT+MISS, if there is no way to distinguish between reads
and writes do reads only etc..

The below needs filling out for !x86 (which I filled out with
unsupported events).

I'm fairly sure ARM can leave it like that since it doesn't strike me as
an architecture that even has NUMA support. SH might have something since
it does appear to have some NUMA bits.

Sparc64, PowerPC and MIPS certainly want a good look there since they
clearly are NUMA capable.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1303508226.4865.8.camel@laptopSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

The nmi parameter indicated if we could do wakeups from the current
context, if not, we would set some state and self-IPI and let the
resulting interrupt do the wakeup.

For the various event classes:

  - hardware: nmi=0; PMI is in fact an NMI or we run irq_work_run from
    the PMI-tail (ARM etc.)
  - tracepoint: nmi=0; since tracepoint could be from NMI context.
  - software: nmi=[0,1]; some, like the schedule thing cannot
    perform wakeups, and hence need 0.

As one can see, there is very little nmi=1 usage, and the down-side of
not using it is that on some platforms some software events can have a
jiffy delay in wakeup (when arch_irq_work_raise isn't implemented).

The up-side however is that we can remove the nmi parameter and save a
bunch of conditionals in fast paths.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-agjev8eu666tvknpb3iaj0fg@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

If a counter overflows during a perf stat profiling run it may overtake
the last known value of the counter:

    0        prev     new                0xffffffff
    |----------|-------|----------------------|

In this case, the number of events that have occurred is
(0xffffffff - prev) + new. Unfortunately, the event update code will
not realise an overflow has occurred and will instead report the event
delta as (new - prev) which may be considerably smaller than the real
count.

This patch adds an extra argument to armpmu_event_update which indicates
whether or not an overflow has occurred. If an overflow has occurred
then we use the maximum period of the counter to calculate the elapsed
events.
Acked-by: NJamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
Reported-by: NAshwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

For kernels built with PREEMPT_RT, critical sections protected
by standard spinlocks are preemptible. This is not acceptable
on perf as (a) we may be scheduled onto a different CPU whilst
reading/writing banked PMU registers and (b) the latency when
reading the PMU registers becomes unpredictable.

This patch upgrades the pmu_lock spinlock to a raw_spinlock
instead.
Reported-by: NJamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Russell reported a number of warnings coming from sparse when
checking the ARM perf_event.c files:

| perf_event.c seems to also have problems too:
|
|   CHECK   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:37:1: warning: symbol 'pmu_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:70:1: warning: symbol 'cpu_hw_events' was not declared. Should it be static?
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:1006:1: warning: symbol 'armv6pmu_enable_event' was not declared. Should it be static?
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:1113:1: warning: symbol 'armv6pmu_stop' was not declared. Should it be static?
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:1956:6: warning: symbol 'armv7pmu_enable_event' was not declared. Should it be static?
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3072:14: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3072:14:    expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:1>*<noident>
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3072:14:    got struct frame_tail *tail
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3074:49: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3074:49:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:1>*from
|   arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3074:49:    got struct frame_tail *tail

This patch resolves these issues so we can live in silence
again.
Reported-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

The ARM perf_event.c file contains all PMU backends and, as new PMUs
are introduced, will continue to grow.

This patch follows the example of x86 and splits the PMU implementations
into separate files which are then #included back into the main
file. Compile-time guards are added to each PMU file to avoid compiling
in code that is not relevant for the version of the architecture which
we are targetting.
Acked-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>