Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 161
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 02 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  3. 28 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 27 4月, 2018 2 次提交
  7. 17 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 13 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  11. 08 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  13. 28 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  15. 08 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  17. 02 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • G
      License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license · b2441318
      由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于 
      Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.

By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.

Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier.  The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.

This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.

How this work was done:

Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
 - file had no licensing information it it.
 - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
 - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,

Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.

The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne.  Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.

The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed.  Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
 - Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
 - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
   lines of source
 - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
   lines).

All documentation files were explicitly excluded.

The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.

 - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
   considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
   COPYING file license applied.

   For non */uapi/* files that summary was:

   SPDX license identifier                            # files
   ---------------------------------------------------|-------
   GPL-2.0                                              11139

   and resulted in the first patch in this series.

   If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
   Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0".  Results of that was:

   SPDX license identifier                            # files
   ---------------------------------------------------|-------
   GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        930

   and resulted in the second patch in this series.

 - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
   of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
   any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
   it (per prior point).  Results summary:

   SPDX license identifier                            # files
   ---------------------------------------------------|------
   GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                       270
   GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      169
   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause)    21
   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    17
   LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      15
   GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       14
   ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    5
   LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       4
   LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        3
   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT)              3
   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT)             1

   and that resulted in the third patch in this series.

 - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
   the concluded license(s).

 - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
   license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
   licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.

 - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
   resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
   which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).

 - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
   confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

 - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
   the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
   in time.

In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights.  The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.

Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.

In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.

Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
 - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
   license ids and scores
 - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
   files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
 - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
   was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
   SPDX license was correct

This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction.  This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.

These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg.  Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected.  This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.)  Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: NKate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NPhilippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      b2441318
  19. 20 9月, 2017 2 次提交
  21. 11 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  23. 04 8月, 2017 1 次提交
    • W
      test: add msg_zerocopy test · 07b65c5b
      由 Willem de Bruijn 提交于 
      Introduce regression test for msg_zerocopy feature. Send traffic from
one process to another with and without zerocopy.

Evaluate tcp, udp, raw and packet sockets, including variants
- udp: corking and corking with mixed copy/zerocopy calls
- raw: with and without hdrincl
- packet: at both raw and dgram level

Test on both ipv4 and ipv6, optionally with ethtool changes to
disable scatter-gather, tx checksum or tso offload. All of these
can affect zerocopy behavior.

The regression test can be run on a single machine if over a veth
pair. Then skb_orphan_frags_rx must be modified to be identical to
skb_orphan_frags to allow forwarding zerocopy locally.

The msg_zerocopy.sh script will setup the veth pair in network
namespaces and run all tests.
Signed-off-by: NWillem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      07b65c5b
  25. 24 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  27. 05 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  29. 06 1月, 2017 2 次提交
  31. 23 10月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      reuseport, bpf: add test case for bpf_get_numa_node_id · 3c2c3c16
      由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于 
      The test case is very similar to reuseport_bpf_cpu, only that here
we select socket members based on current numa node id.

  # numactl -H
  available: 2 nodes (0-1)
  node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 12 13 14 15 16 17
  node 0 size: 128867 MB
  node 0 free: 120080 MB
  node 1 cpus: 6 7 8 9 10 11 18 19 20 21 22 23
  node 1 size: 96765 MB
  node 1 free: 87504 MB
  node distances:
  node   0   1
    0:  10  20
    1:  20  10

  # ./reuseport_bpf_numa
  ---- IPv4 UDP ----
  send node 0, receive socket 0
  send node 1, receive socket 1
  send node 1, receive socket 1
  send node 0, receive socket 0
  ---- IPv6 UDP ----
  send node 0, receive socket 0
  send node 1, receive socket 1
  send node 1, receive socket 1
  send node 0, receive socket 0
  ---- IPv4 TCP ----
  send node 0, receive socket 0
  send node 1, receive socket 1
  send node 1, receive socket 1
  send node 0, receive socket 0
  ---- IPv6 TCP ----
  send node 0, receive socket 0
  send node 1, receive socket 1
  send node 1, receive socket 1
  send node 0, receive socket 0
  SUCCESS
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      3c2c3c16
  33. 15 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  35. 11 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  37. 05 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  39. 20 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  41. 14 3月, 2015 2 次提交
    • M
      selftests: Add install target · 32dcfba6
      由 Michael Ellerman 提交于 
      This adds make install support to selftests. The basic usage is:

$ cd tools/testing/selftests
$ make install

That installs into tools/testing/selftests/install, which can then be
copied where ever necessary.

The install destination is also configurable using eg:

$ INSTALL_PATH=/mnt/selftests make install

The implementation uses two targets in the child makefiles. The first
"install" is expected to install all files into $(INSTALL_PATH).

The second, "emit_tests", is expected to emit the test instructions (ie.
bash script) on stdout. Separating this from install means the child
makefiles need no knowledge of the location of the test script.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NShuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
      32dcfba6
    • M
      selftests: Introduce minimal shared logic for running tests · 5e29a910
      由 Michael Ellerman 提交于 
      This adds a Make include file which most selftests can then include to
get the run_tests logic.

On its own this has the advantage of some reduction in repetition, and
also means the pass/fail message is defined in fewer places.

However the key advantage is it will allow us to implement install very
simply in a subsequent patch.

The default implementation just executes each program in $(TEST_PROGS).

We use a variable to hold the default implementation of $(RUN_TESTS)
because that gives us a clean way to override it if necessary, ie. using
override. The mount, memory-hotplug and mqueue tests use that to provide
a different implementation.

Tests are not run via /bin/bash, so if they are scripts they must be
executable, we add a+x to several.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NShuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
      5e29a910
  43. 05 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  45. 12 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  47. 08 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • D
      selftests: net: add PF_PACKET TPACKET v1/v2/v3 selftests · 23a95442
      由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于 
      This patch adds a simple test case that probes the packet socket's
TPACKET_V1, TPACKET_V2 and TPACKET_V3 behavior regarding mmap(2)'ed
I/O for a small burst of 100 packets. The test currently runs for ...

  TPACKET_V1: RX_RING, TX_RING
  TPACKET_V2: RX_RING, TX_RING
  TPACKET_V3: RX_RING

... and will output on success:

  test: TPACKET_V1 with PACKET_RX_RING .................... 100 pkts (9600 bytes)
  test: TPACKET_V1 with PACKET_TX_RING .................... 100 pkts (9600 bytes)
  test: TPACKET_V2 with PACKET_RX_RING .................... 100 pkts (9600 bytes)
  test: TPACKET_V2 with PACKET_TX_RING .................... 100 pkts (9600 bytes)
  test: TPACKET_V3 with PACKET_RX_RING .................... 100 pkts (9600 bytes)
  OK. All tests passed

Reusable parts of psock_fanout.c have been put into a psock_lib.h
file for common usage. Test case successfully tested on x86_64.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      23a95442
  49. 21 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  51. 20 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • W
      packet: packet fanout rollover during socket overload · 77f65ebd
      由 Willem de Bruijn 提交于 
      Changes:
  v3->v2: rebase (no other changes)
          passes selftest
  v2->v1: read f->num_members only once
          fix bug: test rollover mode + flag

Minimize packet drop in a fanout group. If one socket is full,
roll over packets to another from the group. Maintain flow
affinity during normal load using an rxhash fanout policy, while
dispersing unexpected traffic storms that hit a single cpu, such
as spoofed-source DoS flows. Rollover breaks affinity for flows
arriving at saturated sockets during those conditions.

The patch adds a fanout policy ROLLOVER that rotates between sockets,
filling each socket before moving to the next. It also adds a fanout
flag ROLLOVER. If passed along with any other fanout policy, the
primary policy is applied until the chosen socket is full. Then,
rollover selects another socket, to delay packet drop until the
entire system is saturated.

Probing sockets is not free. Selecting the last used socket, as
rollover does, is a greedy approach that maximizes chance of
success, at the cost of extreme load imbalance. In practice, with
sufficiently long queues to absorb bursts, sockets are drained in
parallel and load balance looks uniform in `top`.

To avoid contention, scales counters with number of sockets and
accesses them lockfree. Values are bounds checked to ensure
correctness.

Tested using an application with 9 threads pinned to CPUs, one socket
per thread and sufficient busywork per packet operation to limits each
thread to handling 32 Kpps. When sent 500 Kpps single UDP stream
packets, a FANOUT_CPU setup processes 32 Kpps in total without this
patch, 270 Kpps with the patch. Tested with read() and with a packet
ring (V1).

Also, passes psock_fanout.c unit test added to selftests.
Signed-off-by: NWillem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      77f65ebd