1. 02 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  2. 30 7月, 2014 1 次提交
    • W
      net: remove deprecated syststamp timestamp · 4d276eb6
      Willem de Bruijn 提交于
      The SO_TIMESTAMPING API defines three types of timestamps: software,
      hardware in raw format (hwtstamp) and hardware converted to system
      format (syststamp). The last has been deprecated in favor of combining
      hwtstamp with a PTP clock driver. There are no active users in the
      kernel.
      
      The option was device driver dependent. If set, but without hardware
      support, the correct behavior is to return zero in the relevant field
      in the SCM_TIMESTAMPING ancillary message. Without device drivers
      implementing the option, this field is effectively always zero.
      
      Remove the internal plumbing to dissuage new drivers from implementing
      the feature. Keep the SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SYS_HARDWARE flag, however, to
      avoid breaking existing applications that request the timestamp.
      Signed-off-by: NWillem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4d276eb6
  3. 16 7月, 2014 1 次提交
    • W
      net-timestamp: document deprecated syststamp · 26c4fdb0
      Willem de Bruijn 提交于
      The SO_TIMESTAMPING API defines option SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SYS_HW.
      This feature is deprecated. It should not be implemented by new
      device drivers. Existing drivers do not implement it, either --
      with one exception.
      
      Driver developers are encouraged to expose the NIC hw clock as a
      PTP HW clock source, instead, and synchronize system time to the
      HW source.
      
      The control flag cannot be removed due to being part of the ABI, nor
      can the structure scm_timestamping that is returned. Due to the one
      legacy driver, the internal datapath and structure are not removed.
      
      This patch only clearly marks the interface as deprecated. Device
      drivers should always return a syststamp value of zero.
      Signed-off-by: NWillem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
      
      ----
      
      We can consider adding a WARN_ON_ONCE in__sock_recv_timestamp
      if non-zero syststamp is encountered
      Acked-by: NRichard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      26c4fdb0
  4. 19 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 07 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  6. 20 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 19 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  8. 08 4月, 2010 1 次提交
  9. 16 2月, 2009 2 次提交