- 23 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Define flags and allocate space in on-disk journal structures to support checksumming of journal metadata. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 14 3月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Normally, we have to issue a cache flush before we can update journal tail in journal superblock, effectively wiping out old transactions from the journal. So use the fact that during transaction commit we issue cache flush anyway and opportunistically push journal tail as far as we can. Since update of journal superblock is still costly (we have to use WRITE_FUA), we update log tail only if we can free significant amount of space. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When we reach jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail(), there is no guarantee that checkpointed buffers are on a stable storage - especially if buffers were written out by jbd2_log_do_checkpoint(), they are likely to be only in disk's caches. Thus when we update journal superblock effectively removing old transaction from journal, this write of superblock can get to stable storage before those checkpointed buffers which can result in filesystem corruption after a crash. Thus we must unconditionally issue a cache flush before we update journal superblock in these cases. A similar problem can also occur if journal superblock is written only in disk's caches, other transaction starts reusing space of the transaction cleaned from the log and power failure happens. Subsequent journal replay would still try to replay the old transaction but some of it's blocks may be already overwritten by the new transaction. For this reason we must use WRITE_FUA when updating log tail and we must first write new log tail to disk and update in-memory information only after that. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
There are three case of updating journal superblock. In the first case, we want to mark journal as empty (setting s_sequence to 0), in the second case we want to update log tail, in the third case we want to update s_errno. Split these cases into separate functions. It makes the code slightly more straightforward and later patches will make the distinction even more important. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 21 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yongqiang Yang 提交于
There is normally only a handful of these active at any one time, but putting them in a separate slab cache makes debugging memory corruption problems easier. Manish Katiyar also wanted this make it easier to test memory failure scenarios in the jbd2 layer. Cc: Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 29 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yongqiang Yang 提交于
Currently, we clear revoked flag only when a block is reused. However, this can tigger a false journal error. Consider a situation when a block is used as a meta block and is deleted(revoked) in ordered mode, then the block is allocated as a data block to a file. At this moment, user changes the file's journal mode from ordered to journaled and truncates the file. The block will be considered re-revoked by journal because it has revoked flag still pending from the last transaction and an assertion triggers. We fix the problem by keeping the revoked status more uptodate - we clear revoked flag when switching revoke tables to reflect there is no revoked buffers in current transaction any more. Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 27 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The state bits and the lock functions of jbd and jbd2 are identical. Share them. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 04 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
This silences some Sparse warnings: fs/jbd2/transaction.c:135:69: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) fs/jbd2/transaction.c:135:69: expected restricted gfp_t [usertype] flags fs/jbd2/transaction.c:135:69: got int [signed] gfp_mask Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 11 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Using function calls in TP_printk causes perf heartburn, so print the MAJOR/MINOR device numbers instead. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 14 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
jbd2_journal_remove_journal_head() can oops when trying to access journal_head returned by bh2jh(). This is caused for example by the following race: TASK1 TASK2 jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() ... processing t_forget list __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer(jh); if (!jh->b_transaction) { jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh); jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers() jbd2_journal_grab_journal_head(bh) jbd_lock_bh_state(bh) __journal_try_to_free_buffer() jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(jh) jbd2_journal_remove_journal_head(bh); jbd2_journal_put_journal_head() in TASK2 sees that b_jcount == 0 and buffer is not part of any transaction and thus frees journal_head before TASK1 gets to doing so. Note that even buffer_head can be released by try_to_free_buffers() after jbd2_journal_put_journal_head() which adds even larger opportunity for oops (but I didn't see this happen in reality). Fix the problem by making transactions hold their own journal_head reference (in b_jcount). That way we don't have to remove journal_head explicitely via jbd2_journal_remove_journal_head() and instead just remove journal_head when b_jcount drops to zero. The result of this is that [__]jbd2_journal_refile_buffer(), [__]jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer(), and __jdb2_journal_remove_checkpoint() can free journal_head which needs modification of a few callers. Also we have to be careful because once journal_head is removed, buffer_head might be freed as well. So we have to get our own buffer_head reference where it matters. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 24 5月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Provide a function which returns whether a transaction with given tid will send a flush to the filesystem device. The function will be used by ext4 to detect whether fsync needs to send a separate flush or not. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
In data=ordered mode, it's theoretically possible (however rare) that an inode is filed to transaction's t_inode_list and a flusher thread writes all the data and inode is reclaimed before the transaction starts to commit. In such a case, we could erroneously omit sending a flush to file system device when it is different from the journal device (because data can still be in disk cache only). Fix the problem by setting a flag in a transaction when some inode is added to it and then send disk flush in the commit code when the flag is set. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 21 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Amir Goldstein 提交于
Add fields needed for the copy-on-write ext4 development work. The h_cowing flag is used by ext4 snapshots code to mark the task in COWING state. The h_XXX_credits fields are used to track buffer credits usage (accounted by COW and non-COW operations). The h_cow_XXX fields are used as per task debugging counters. Merging this commit into mainline will allow users to test ext4 snapshots as a standalone module, without the need to patch and install a development kernel. Signed-off-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sf.net> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 11 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Replace the jbd2_inode structure (which is 48 bytes) with a pointer and only allocate the jbd2_inode when it is needed --- that is, when the file system has a journal present and the inode has been opened for writing. This allows us to further slim down the ext4_inode_info structure. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 28 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Brian King 提交于
This fixes a hang seen in jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode on a lot of Power 6 systems running with ext4. When we get in the hung state, all I/O to the disk in question gets blocked where we stay indefinitely. Looking at the task list, I can see we are stuck in jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode waiting on a wake up. I added some debug code to detect this scenario and dump additional data if we were stuck in jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode for longer than 30 minutes. When it hit, I was able to see that i_flags was 0, suggesting we missed the wake up. This patch changes i_flags to be an unsigned long, uses bit operators to access it, and adds barriers around the accesses. Prior to applying this patch, we were regularly hitting this hang on numerous systems in our test environment. After applying the patch, the hangs no longer occur. Signed-off-by: NBrian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 04 8月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This should remove the last exclusive lock from start_this_handle(), so that we should now be able to start multiple transactions at the same time on large SMP systems. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Lockstat reports have shown that j_state_lock is a major source of lock contention, especially on systems with more than 4 CPU cores. So change it to be a read/write spinlock. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 02 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
By using an atomic_t for t_updates and t_outstanding credits, this should allow us to not need to take transaction t_handle_lock in jbd2_journal_stop(). Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 27 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
__GFP_NOFAIL is going away, so add our own retry loop. Also add jbd2__journal_start() and jbd2__journal_restart() which take a gfp mask, so that file systems can optionally (re)start transaction handles using GFP_KERNEL. If they do this, then they need to be prepared to handle receiving an PTR_ERR(-ENOMEM) error, and be ready to reflect that error up to userspace. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 16 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
OCFS2 uses t_commit trigger to compute and store checksum of the just committed blocks. When a buffer has b_frozen_data, checksum is computed for it instead of b_data but this can result in an old checksum being written to the filesystem in the following scenario: 1) transaction1 is opened 2) handle1 is opened 3) journal_access(handle1, bh) - This sets jh->b_transaction to transaction1 4) modify(bh) 5) journal_dirty(handle1, bh) 6) handle1 is closed 7) start committing transaction1, opening transaction2 8) handle2 is opened 9) journal_access(handle2, bh) - This copies off b_frozen_data to make it safe for transaction1 to commit. jh->b_next_transaction is set to transaction2. 10) jbd2_journal_write_metadata() checksums b_frozen_data 11) the journal correctly writes b_frozen_data to the disk journal 12) handle2 is closed - There was no dirty call for the bh on handle2, so it is never queued for any more journal operation 13) Checkpointing finally happens, and it just spools the bh via normal buffer writeback. This will write b_data, which was never triggered on and thus contains a wrong (old) checksum. This patch fixes the problem by calling the trigger at the moment data is frozen for journal commit - i.e., either when b_frozen_data is created by do_get_write_access or just before we write a buffer to the log if b_frozen_data does not exist. We also rename the trigger to t_frozen as that better describes when it is called. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
-
- 05 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Egger 提交于
CONFIG_BUFFER_DEBUG seems to have been removed from the documentation somewhere around 2.4.15 and seemingly hasn't been available even longer. It is, however, still referenced at one place from the jbd code (one is a copy of the other header). Time to clean it up Signed-off-by: NChristoph Egger <siccegge@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 23 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This is a bit complicated because we are trying to optimize when we send barriers to the fs data disk. We could just throw in an extra barrier to the data disk whenever we send a barrier to the journal disk, but that's not always strictly necessary. We only need to send a barrier during a commit when there are data blocks which are must be written out due to an inode written in ordered mode, or if fsync() depends on the commit to force data blocks to disk. Finally, before we drop transactions from the beginning of the journal during a checkpoint operation, we need to guarantee that any blocks that were flushed out to the data disk are firmly on the rust platter before we drop the transaction from the journal. Thanks to Oleg Drokin for pointing out this flaw in ext3/ext4. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 07 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Now that the SLUB seems to be fixed so that it respects the requested alignment, use kmem_cache_alloc() to allocator if the block size of the buffer heads to be allocated is less than the page size. Previously, we were using 16k page on a Power system for each buffer, even when the file system was using 1k or 4k block size. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 30 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The /proc/fs/jbd2/<dev>/history was maintained manually; by using tracepoints, we can get all of the existing functionality of the /proc file plus extra capabilities thanks to the ftrace infrastructure. We save memory as a bonus. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 18 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 H Hartley Sweeten 提交于
This fixes sparse noise: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield Signed-off-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz>
-
- 17 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 14 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The revoke records must be written using the same way as the rest of the blocks during the commit process; that is, either marked as synchronous writes or as asynchornous writes. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 26 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If a commit is triggered by fsync(), set a flag indicating the journal blocks associated with the transaction should be flushed out using WRITE_SYNC. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 11 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
If we race with commit code setting i_transaction to NULL, we could possibly dereference it. Proper locking requires the journal pointer (to access journal->j_list_lock), which we don't have. So we have to change the prototype of the function so that filesystem passes us the journal pointer. Also add a more detailed comment about why the function jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate() does what it does and how it should be used. Thanks to Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> for pointing to the suspitious code. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Acked-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> CC: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org CC: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com CC: mfasheh@suse.de CC: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Otherwise it can be very confusing to find a "EXT3-fs: " failure in the middle of EXT4-fs failures, and it makes it harder to track the source of the failure. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 06 1月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Filesystems often to do compute intensive operation on some metadata. If this operation is repeated many times, it can be very expensive. It would be much nicer if the operation could be performed once before a buffer goes to disk. This adds triggers to jbd2 buffer heads. Just before writing a metadata buffer to the journal, jbd2 will optionally call a commit trigger associated with the buffer. If the journal is aborted, an abort trigger will be called on any dirty buffers as they are dropped from pending transactions. ocfs2 will use this feature. Initially I tried to come up with a more generic trigger that could be used for non-buffer-related events like transaction completion. It doesn't tie nicely, because the information a buffer trigger needs (specific to a journal_head) isn't the same as what a transaction trigger needs (specific to a tranaction_t or perhaps journal_t). So I implemented a buffer set, with the understanding that journal/transaction wide triggers should be implemented separately. There is only one trigger set allowed per buffer. I can't think of any reason to attach more than one set. Contrast this with a journal or transaction in which multiple places may want to watch the entire transaction separately. The trigger sets are considered static allocation from the jbd2 perspective. ocfs2 will just have one trigger set per block type, setting the same set on every bh of the same type. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
Add this so that file systems using JBD2 can safely allocate unused b_state bits. In this case, we add it so that Ocfs2 can define a single bit for tracking the validation state of a buffer. Acked-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
- 07 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This code has been obsolete in quite some time, since the supported method for adding a journal inode is to use tune2fs (or to creating new filesystem with a journal via mke2fs or mkfs.ext4). Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 07 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
Avoid freeing the transaction in __jbd2_journal_drop_transaction() so the journal commit callback can run without holding j_list_lock, to avoid lock contention on this spinlock. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 05 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint()n is one of the kernel's largest stack users. Move the array of buffer head's from the stack of jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() to the in-core journal structure. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 04 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Add new mount options, min_batch_time and max_batch_time, which controls how long the jbd2 layer should wait for additional filesystem operations to get batched with a synchronous write transaction. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 26 11月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This patch removes the static sleep time in favor of a more self optimizing approach where we measure the average amount of time it takes to commit a transaction to disk and the ammount of time a transaction has been running. If somebody does a sync write or an fsync() traditionally we would sleep for 1 jiffies, which depending on the value of HZ could be a significant amount of time compared to how long it takes to commit a transaction to the underlying storage. With this patch instead of sleeping for a jiffie, we check to see if the amount of time this transaction has been running is less than the average commit time, and if it is we sleep for the delta using schedule_hrtimeout to give us a higher precision sleep time. This greatly benefits high end storage where you could end up sleeping for longer than it takes to commit the transaction and therefore sitting idle instead of allowing the transaction to be committed by keeping the sleep time to a minimum so you are sure to always be doing something. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
Add this so that file systems using JBD2 can safely allocate unused b_state bits. In this case, we add it so that Ocfs2 can define a single bit for tracking the validation state of a buffer. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 17 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The multiblock allocator needs to be able to release blocks (and issue a blkdev discard request) when the transaction which freed those blocks is committed. Previously this was done via a polling mechanism when blocks are allocated or freed. A much better way of doing things is to create a jbd2 callback function and attaching the list of blocks to be freed directly to the transaction structure. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-