Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 158
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 15 1月, 2008 5 次提交
    • N
      MAINTAINERS: email update and add missing entry · 8f4c79ce
      由 Nicolas Ferre 提交于 
       - MAINTAINERS email update
 - add atmel_lcdfb entry
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      8f4c79ce
    • D
      TPM: fix suspend and resume failure · 2490c681
      由 David Smith 提交于 
      The savestate command structure was being overwritten by the result of
running the TPM_SaveState command after one run, so make it a local
variable to the function instead of a global variable that gets
overwritten.
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Kent Yoder <shpedoikal@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcel Selhorst <tpm@selhorst.net>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      2490c681
    • S
      Kick CPUS that might be sleeping in cpus_idle_wait · 40d6a146
      由 Steven Rostedt 提交于 
      Sometimes cpu_idle_wait gets stuck because it might miss CPUS that are
already in idle, have no tasks waiting to run and have no interrupts going
to them.  This is common on bootup when switching cpu idle governors.

This patch gives those CPUS that don't check in an IPI kick.

 Background:
 -----------
I notice this while developing the mcount patches, that every once in a
while the system would hang. Looking deeper, the hang was always at boot
up when registering init_menu of the cpu_idle menu governor. Talking
with Thomas Gliexner, we discovered that one of the CPUS had no timer
events scheduled for it and it was in idle (running with NO_HZ). So the
CPU would not set the cpu_idle_state bit.

Hitting sysrq-t a few times would eventually route the interrupt to the
stuck CPU and the system would continue.

Note, I would have used the PDA isidle but that is set after the
cpu_idle_state bit is cleared, and would leave a window open where we
may miss being kicked.

hmm, looking closer at this, we still have a small race window between
clearing the cpu_idle_state and disabling interrupts (hence the RFC).

    CPU0:                          CPU 1:
  ---------                       ---------
 cpu_idle_wait():                 cpu_idle():
      |                           __cpu_cpu_var(is_idle) = 1;
      |                           if (__get_cpu_var(cpu_idle_state)) /* == 0 */
 per_cpu(cpu_idle_state, 1) = 1;         |
 if (per_cpu(is_idle, 1)) /* == 1 */     |
 smp_call_function(1)                    |
      |                             receives ipi and runs do_nothing.
 wait on map == empty               idle();
   /* waits forever */

So really we need interrupts off for most of this then. One might think
that we could simply clear the cpu_idle_state from do_nothing, but I'm
assuming that cpu_idle governors can be removed, and this might cause a
race that a governor might be used after the module was removed.

Venki said:

  I think your RFC patch is the right solution here.  As I see it, there is
  no race with your RFC patch.  As long as you call a dummy smp_call_function
  on all CPUs, we should be OK.  We can get rid of cpu_idle_state and the
  current wait forever logic altogether with dummy smp_call_function.  And so
  there wont be any wait forever scenario.

  The whole point of cpu_idle_wait() is to make all CPUs come out of idle
  loop atleast once.  The caller will use cpu_idle_wait something like this.

  // Want to change idle handler

  - Switch global idle handler to always present default_idle

  - call cpu_idle_wait so that all cpus come out of idle for an instant
    and stop using old idle pointer and start using default idle

  - Change the idle handler to a new handler

  - optional cpu_idle_wait if you want all cpus to start using the new
    handler immediately.

Maybe the below 1s patch is safe bet for .24.  But for .25, I would say we
just replace all complicated logic by simple dummy smp_call_function and
remove cpu_idle_state altogether.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      40d6a146
    • E
      w1: decrement slave counter only in ->release() callback · a2a6c74d
      由 Evgeniy Polyakov 提交于 
      Decrement the slave counter only in ->release() callback instead of both
in ->release() and w1 control.

Patch is based on debug work and preliminary patch made by Henri Laakso.
Henri noticed in debug that this counter becomes negative after w1 slave
device is physically removed.
Signed-off-by: NEvgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Cc: Henri Laakso <henri.laakso@wapice.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      a2a6c74d
    • R
      modules: de-mutex more symbol lookup paths in the module code · cb2a5205
      由 Rusty Russell 提交于 
      Kyle McMartin reports sysrq_timer_list_show() can hit the module mutex
from hard interrupt context.  These paths don't need to though, since we
long ago changed all the module list manipulation to occur via
stop_machine().

Disabling preemption is enough.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      cb2a5205
  3. 14 1月, 2008 6 次提交
  5. 13 1月, 2008 21 次提交
  7. 12 1月, 2008 8 次提交