V2: the signaled items on the LRU maintain their order
Signed-off-by: NChunming Zhou <David1.Zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Signed-off-by: NNils Wallménius <nils.wallmenius@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

It is only used locally in amdgpu_get_bios
Signed-off-by: NNils Wallménius <nils.wallmenius@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Signed-off-by: NNils Wallménius <nils.wallmenius@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Signed-off-by: NChunming Zhou <David1.Zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

Signed-off-by: NLeo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

and revert fix following it accordingly

Revert "drm/amdgpu: stop trying to suspend UVD sessions v2"
Revert "drm/amdgpu: fix the UVD suspend sequence order"
Signed-off-by: NLeo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.

This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.

We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.

Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.

Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
not.

The changes are pretty straight-forward:

 - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};

 - page_cache_get() -> get_page();

 - page_cache_release() -> put_page();

This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.

The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.

There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.

virtual patch

@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK

@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

since the rcu slot was initialized to be num_hw_submission,
if command submission doesn't use scheduler, this limitation
will be invalid like uvd test.
Signed-off-by: NChunming Zhou <David1.Zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

This fixes a memory leak when we can't register the callback on a fence.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

We have the info, so use it rather than reporting just DDR.
Reviewed-by: NHarish Kasiviswanathan <Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

The offset changed on Fiji.
Reviewed-by: NHarish Kasiviswanathan <Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

early_init gets called before atom asic init so on non-posted
cards, the vram type is not initialized.
Reviewed-by: NHarish Kasiviswanathan <Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Without this, since the conversion from drm_vblank_pre/post_modeset to
drm_vblank_on/off, the vblank interrupt could never be disabled after
userspace triggered enabling it.
Signed-off-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Make sure powerplay initialized properly before enabling
debugfs pm files.
Signed-off-by: NRex Zhu <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>
Reviewed- by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

We don't support the dpm parameter in powerplay.
Signed-off-by: NRex Zhu <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Signed-off-by: NRex Zhu <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Signed-off-by: NRex Zhu <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NJunwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

This allows us to ditch a ton of ugly #ifdefs from a bunch of drm modeset
drivers.

v2: Make the dummy function actually return a sane value, spotted by
Ville.

v3: Because the patch is still in limbo there's no more drivers to
convert, noticed by Emil.

v4: Rebase once more, because hooray. I'll just go ahead an apply this
one later on to drm-misc.

Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NEmil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The purpose of pinning is to prevent a buffer from moving.
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Tested-by: NRex Zhu <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Otherwise we can run into problems with the writeback code.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

This reverts commit c02196834456f2d5fad334088b70e98ce4967c34.

In the meantime we moved get_user_pages() outside of the reservation lock,
so that shouldn't be an issue any more
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Signed-off-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com.
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

when preemption feature lands, the SA bo should rely on sched
fence, because hw fence will be invalid after its job preempted
or skipped.
Signed-off-by: NMonk Liu <Monk.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Signed-off-by: NMonk Liu <Monk.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

thus amdgpu_ib_free() can hook sched fence to SA manager
in later patches.

BTW:
for amdgpu_free_job(), it should only fence_put() the
fence of the last ib once, so fix it as well in this patch.
Signed-off-by: NMonk Liu <Monk.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Signed-off-by: NKen Wang <Qingqing.Wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

We don't need to extend them to 64bits any more, so avoid the extra overhead.

v2: update commit message.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>

It's just overhead to check the fence value
when we signal them directly anyway.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>

Amdgpu doesn't support using scratch registers for fences any more.
So we won't see values like 0xdeadbeef as fence value any more.

v2: reschedule timer even if no change detected
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>

Because of the scheduler we need to signal all fences immediately
anyway, so try to avoid the waitqueue overhead.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>

Just wait for last fence instead of waiting for the sequence manually.

v2: don't use amdgpu_sched_jobs for the mask
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>

Just keep all HW fences in a RCU protected array as a
first step to replace the wait queue.

v2: update commit message, move fixes into separate patch.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>

Make this a parameter instead of using the global variable directly.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>

Fences must be freed RCU protected, otherwise the reservation_object_*_rcu()
functions can run into problems.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

No need to keep the two separate any more.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>

The comment about the loop counter was never valid, even when you have
multiple threads this loop only runs as long as the sequence increases.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>

No need to have that in the header file any more.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Not used any more.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>