Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 170
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 15 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  3. 13 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 10 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 09 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 08 7月, 2016 2 次提交
  11. 01 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  13. 27 6月, 2016 3 次提交
    • A
      x86/efi: Remove the unused efi_get_time() function · b684e9bc
      由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于 
      Nothing calls the efi_get_time() function on x86, but it does suffer
from the 32-bit time_t overflow in 2038.

This removes the function, we can always put it back in case we need
it later.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Acked-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466839230-12781-8-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.ukSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      b684e9bc
    • A
      x86/efi: Update efi_thunk() to use the the arch_efi_call_virt*() macros · 21f86625
      由 Alex Thorlton 提交于 
      Currently, the efi_thunk macro has some semi-duplicated code in it that
can be replaced with the arch_efi_call_virt_setup/teardown macros. This
commit simply replaces the duplicated code with those macros.
Suggested-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roy Franz <roy.franz@linaro.org>
Cc: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466839230-12781-7-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk
[ Renamed variables to the standard __ prefix. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      21f86625
    • A
      x86/uv: Update uv_bios_call() to use efi_call_virt_pointer() · d1be84a2
      由 Alex Thorlton 提交于 
      Now that the efi_call_virt() macro has been generalized to be able to
use EFI system tables besides efi.systab, we are able to convert our
uv_bios_call() wrapper to use this standard EFI callback mechanism.

This simple change is part of a much larger effort to recover from some
issues with the way we were mapping in some of our MMRs, and the way
that we were doing our BIOS callbacks, which were uncovered by commit
67a9108e ("x86/efi: Build our own page table structures").

The first issue that this uncovered was that we were relying on the EFI
memory mapping mechanism to map in our MMR space for us, which, while
reliable, was technically a bug, as it relied on "undefined" behavior in
the mapping code.

The reason we were able to piggyback on the EFI memory mapping code to
map in our MMRs was because, previously, EFI code used the
trampoline_pgd, which shares a few entries with the main kernel pgd.  It
just so happened, that the memory range containing our MMRs was inside
one of those shared regions, which kept our code working without issue
for quite a while.

Anyways, once we discovered this problem, we brought back our original
code to map in the MMRs with commit:

  08914f43 ("x86/platform/UV: Bring back the call to map_low_mmrs in uv_system_init")

This got our systems a little further along, but we were still running
into trouble with our EFI callbacks, which prevented us from booting
all the way up.

Our first step towards fixing the BIOS callbacks was to get our
uv_bios_call() wrapper updated to use efi_call_virt() instead of the plain
efi_call().  The previous patch took care of the effort needed to make
that possible.  Along the way, we hit a major issue with some confusion
about how to properly pull arguments higher than number 6 off the stack
in the efi_call() code, which resulted in the following commit from Linus:

  683ad809 ("x86/efi: Fix 7-parameter efi_call()s")

Now that all of those issues are out of the way, we're able to make this
simple change to use the new efi_call_virt_pointer() in uv_bios_call()
which gets our machines booting, running properly, and able to execute our
callbacks with 6+ arguments.

Note that, since we are now using the EFI page table when we make our
function call, we are no longer able to make the call using the __va()
of our function pointer, since the memory range containing that address
isn't mapped into the EFI page table.  For now, we will use the physical
address of the function directly, since that is mapped into the EFI page
table.  In the near future, we're going to get some code added in to
properly update our function pointer to its virtual address during
SetVirtualAddressMap.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roy Franz <roy.franz@linaro.org>
Cc: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466839230-12781-6-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.ukSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      d1be84a2
  15. 25 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  17. 15 6月, 2016 2 次提交
  19. 14 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  21. 08 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  23. 17 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • L
      x86/efi: Fix 7-parameter efi_call()s · 683ad809
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      Alex Thorlton reported that the SGI/UV code crashes in the efi_call()
code when invoked with 7 parameters, due to:

        mov (%rsp), %rax
        mov 8(%rax), %rax
        ...
        mov %rax, 40(%rsp)

Offset 8 is only true if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS is disabled,
with frame pointers enabled it should be 16.

Furthermore, the SAVE_XMM code saves the old stack pointer, but
that's just crazy. It saves the stack pointer *AFTER* we've done
the:

        FRAME_BEGIN

... which will have *changed* the stack pointer, depending on whether
stack frames are enabled or not.

So when the code then does:

        mov (%rsp), %rax

... we now move that old stack pointer into %rax, but the offset off that
stack pointer will depend on whether that FRAME_BEGIN saved off %rbp
or not.

So that whole 8-vs-16 offset confusion depends on the frame pointer!
If frame pointers were enabled, it will be 16. If they weren't, it
will be 8.

The right fix is to just get rid of that silly conditional frame
pointer thing, and always use frame pointers in this stub function.
And then we don't need that (odd) load to get the old stack
pointer into %rax - we can just use the frame pointer.
Reported-by: NAlex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Tested-by: NAlex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA%2B55aFzBS2v%3DWnEH83cUDg7XkOremFqJ30BJwF40dCYjReBkUQ@mail.gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      683ad809
  25. 04 5月, 2016 3 次提交
  27. 28 4月, 2016 5 次提交
  29. 09 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  31. 01 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      x86/platform/uv: Disable UV BAU by default · 1c532e00
      由 Alex Thorlton 提交于 
      For several years, the common practice has been to boot UVs with the
"nobau" parameter on the command line, to disable the BAU.  We've
decided that it makes more sense to just disable the BAU by default in
the kernel, and provide the option to turn it on, if desired.

For now, having the on/off switch doesn't buy us any more than just
reversing the logic would, but we're working towards having the BAU
enabled by default on UV4.  When those changes are in place, having the
on/off switch will make more sense than an enable flag, since the
default behavior will be different depending on the system version.

I've also added a bit of documentation for the new parameter to
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Reviewed-by: NHedi Berriche <hedi@sgi.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1459451909-121845-1-git-send-email-athorlton@sgi.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      1c532e00
  33. 12 3月, 2016 1 次提交
    • M
      x86/efi: Fix boot crash by always mapping boot service regions into new EFI page tables · 452308de
      由 Matt Fleming 提交于 
      Some machines have EFI regions in page zero (physical address
0x00000000) and historically that region has been added to the e820
map via trim_bios_range(), and ultimately mapped into the kernel page
tables. It was not mapped via efi_map_regions() as one would expect.

Alexis reports that with the new separate EFI page tables some boot
services regions, such as page zero, are not mapped. This triggers an
oops during the SetVirtualAddressMap() runtime call.

For the EFI boot services quirk on x86 we need to memblock_reserve()
boot services regions until after SetVirtualAddressMap(). Doing that
while respecting the ownership of regions that may have already been
reserved by the kernel was the motivation behind this commit:

  7d68dc3f ("x86, efi: Do not reserve boot services regions within reserved areas")

That patch was merged at a time when the EFI runtime virtual mappings
were inserted into the kernel page tables as described above, and the
trick of setting ->numpages (and hence the region size) to zero to
track regions that should not be freed in efi_free_boot_services()
meant that we never mapped those regions in efi_map_regions(). Instead
we were relying solely on the existing kernel mappings.

Now that we have separate page tables we need to make sure the EFI
boot services regions are mapped correctly, even if someone else has
already called memblock_reserve(). Instead of stashing a tag in
->numpages, set the EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME bit of ->attribute. Since it
generally makes no sense to mark a boot services region as required at
runtime, it's pretty much guaranteed the firmware will not have
already set this bit.

For the record, the specific circumstances under which Alexis
triggered this bug was that an EFI runtime driver on his machine was
responding to the EVT_SIGNAL_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_CHANGE event during
SetVirtualAddressMap().

The event handler for this driver looks like this,

  sub rsp,0x28
  lea rdx,[rip+0x2445] # 0xaa948720
  mov ecx,0x4
  call func_aa9447c0  ; call to ConvertPointer(4, & 0xaa948720)
  mov r11,QWORD PTR [rip+0x2434] # 0xaa948720
  xor eax,eax
  mov BYTE PTR [r11+0x1],0x1
  add rsp,0x28
  ret

Which is pretty typical code for an EVT_SIGNAL_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_CHANGE
handler. The "mov r11, QWORD PTR [rip+0x2424]" was the faulting
instruction because ConvertPointer() was being called to convert the
address 0x0000000000000000, which when converted is left unchanged and
remains 0x0000000000000000.

The output of the oops trace gave the impression of a standard NULL
pointer dereference bug, but because we're accessing physical
addresses during ConvertPointer(), it wasn't. EFI boot services code
is stored at that address on Alexis' machine.
Reported-by: NAlexis Murzeau <amurzeau@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
Cc: Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1457695163-29632-2-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk
Link: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815125Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      452308de
  35. 29 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      objtool: Mark non-standard object files and directories · c0dd6716
      由 Josh Poimboeuf 提交于 
      Code which runs outside the kernel's normal mode of operation often does
unusual things which can cause a static analysis tool like objtool to
emit false positive warnings:

 - boot image
 - vdso image
 - relocation
 - realmode
 - efi
 - head
 - purgatory
 - modpost

Set OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD for their related files and directories,
which will tell objtool to skip checking them.  It's ok to skip them
because they don't affect runtime stack traces.

Also skip the following code which does the right thing with respect to
frame pointers, but is too "special" to be validated by a tool:

 - entry
 - mcount

Also skip the test_nx module because it modifies its exception handling
table at runtime, which objtool can't understand.  Fortunately it's
just a test module so it doesn't matter much.

Currently objtool is the only user of OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD, but it
might eventually be useful for other tools.
Signed-off-by: NJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@canonical.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/366c080e3844e8a5b6a0327dc7e8c2b90ca3baeb.1456719558.git.jpoimboe@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      c0dd6716
  37. 24 2月, 2016 2 次提交
  39. 23 2月, 2016 2 次提交
  41. 22 2月, 2016 3 次提交
    • S
      x86/efi: Only map kernel text for EFI mixed mode · 2ad510dc
      由 Sai Praneeth 提交于 
      The correct symbol to use when figuring out the size of the kernel
text is '_etext', not '_end' which is the symbol for the entire kernel
image includes data and debug sections.
Signed-off-by: NSai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ravi Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455712566-16727-14-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.ukSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      2ad510dc
    • S
      x86/efi: Map EFI_MEMORY_{XP,RO} memory region bits to EFI page tables · 6d0cc887
      由 Sai Praneeth 提交于 
      Now that we have EFI memory region bits that indicate which regions do
not need execute permission or read/write permission in the page tables,
let's use them.

We also check for EFI_NX_PE_DATA and only enforce the restrictive
mappings if it's present (to allow us to ignore buggy firmware that sets
bits it didn't mean to and to preserve backwards compatibility).

Instead of assuming that firmware would set appropriate attributes in
memory descriptor like EFI_MEMORY_RO for code and EFI_MEMORY_XP for
data, we can expect some firmware out there which might only set *type*
in memory descriptor to be EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE or
EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA leaving away attribute. This will lead to
improper mappings of EFI runtime regions. In order to avoid it, we check
attribute and type of memory descriptor to update mappings and moreover
Windows works this way.
Signed-off-by: NSai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@suse.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ravi Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455712566-16727-13-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.ukSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      6d0cc887
    • S
      x86/mm/pat: Don't implicitly allow _PAGE_RW in kernel_map_pages_in_pgd() · 15f003d2
      由 Sai Praneeth 提交于 
      As part of the preparation for the EFI_MEMORY_RO flag added in the UEFI
2.5 specification, we need the ability to map pages in kernel page
tables without _PAGE_RW being set.

Modify kernel_map_pages_in_pgd() to require its callers to pass _PAGE_RW
if the pages need to be mapped read/write. Otherwise, we'll map the
pages as read-only.
Signed-off-by: NSai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@suse.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ravi Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455712566-16727-12-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.ukSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      15f003d2
  43. 18 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  45. 16 2月, 2016 4 次提交