Remove unused nvports argument.
Signed-off-by: NEli Cohen <eli@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: NOr Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Modify and query vport state commands share the same admin_state and
op_mod values, rename the enums to fit them both.

In addition, remove the esw prefix from the admin state enum as this
also applied for vnic.
Signed-off-by: NEran Ben Elisha <eranbe@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

New firmware has defined new HCA capability field called "max_num_eqs",
that is the number of available EQs after subtracting reserved FW EQs.

Before this capability the FW reported the EQ number in "log_max_eqs",
the reported value also contained FW reserved EQs, but the driver might
be failing to load on 320 cpus systems due to the fact that FW
reserved EQs were not available to the driver.

Now the driver has to obtain max_num_eqs value from new FW to get real
number of EQs available.
Signed-off-by: NDenis Drozdov <denisd@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Vesker <valex@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Add the missing unlock before return from function hwsim_add_one()
in the error handling case.

Fixes: f25da51f ("ieee802154: hwsim: add replacement for fakelb")
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NStefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The return value from kzalloc() is not checked correctly. The
test is done against a wrong variable. This patch fix it.

Fixes: f25da51f ("ieee802154: hwsim: add replacement for fakelb")
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NStefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This patch adds missing rcu_assign_pointer()/rcu_dereference() to used rcu
pointers. There was already a previous commit c5d99d2b ("ieee802154:
hwsim: fix rcu address annotation"), but there was more which was
pointed out on my side by using newest sparse version.

Cc: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
Fixes: f25da51f ("ieee802154: hwsim: add replacement for fakelb")
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Aring <aring@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: NStefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This patch fixes the problem below. The problem can be reproduced by the
following steps:
1) Connecting all HiNIC interfaces
2) On server side
    # sudo ifconfig eth0 192.168.100.1 up #Using MLX CX4 card
    # iperf -s
3) On client side
    # sudo ifconfig eth0 192.168.100.2 up #Using our HiNIC card
    # iperf -c 192.168.101.1 -P 10 -t 100000

after hours of testing, we will see errors:

    hinic 0000:05:00.0: No MGMT msg handler, mod = 0
    hinic 0000:05:00.0: No MGMT msg handler, mod = 0
    hinic 0000:05:00.0: No MGMT msg handler, mod = 0
    hinic 0000:05:00.0: No MGMT msg handler, mod = 0

The errors are caused by the following problem.
1) The hinic_get_wqe() checks the "wq->delta" to allocate new WQEs:

	if (atomic_sub_return(num_wqebbs, &wq->delta) <= 0) {
		atomic_add(num_wqebbs, &wq->delta);
		return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
	}

If the WQE occupies multiple pages, the shadow WQE will be used. Then the
hinic_xmit_frame() fills the WQE.

2) While in parallel with 1), the free_tx_poll() checks the "wq->delta"
to free old WQEs:

	if ((atomic_read(&wq->delta) + num_wqebbs) > wq->q_depth)
		return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);

There is a probability that the shadow WQE which hinic_xmit_frame() is
using will be damaged by copy_wqe_to_shadow():

	if (curr_pg != end_pg) {
		void *shadow_addr = &wq->shadow_wqe[curr_pg * wq->max_wqe_size];

		copy_wqe_to_shadow(wq, shadow_addr, num_wqebbs, *cons_idx);
		return shadow_addr;
	}

This can cause WQE data error and you will see the above error messages.
This patch fixes the problem.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Chen <zhaochen6@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The ret is modified after initalization, so just remove it and
return 0.
Signed-off-by: Nzhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

We will not use the variable 'err' after initalization, So remove it and
return 0.
Signed-off-by: Nzhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Get rid of unused struct member 'last_link'
Signed-off-by: NMoritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Gustavo A. R. Silva says:

====================
net: ethernet: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, this patchset aims
to add some annotations in order to mark switch cases where we are
expecting to fall through.
====================
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114813 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141440 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1384500 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357414 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357415 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114811 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1410181 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1410184 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1384501 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1398869 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1410182 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1410183 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comments with
a proper "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting
to find.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114809 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114810 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114808 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114802 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114796 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114804 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114806 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114801 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114800 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114799 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 200521 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114797 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114794 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114795 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114792 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114793 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114791 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114790 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114789 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114788 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114787 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114784 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114785 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114786 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114782 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114781 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114780 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114777 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114778 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114779 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114910 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 143135 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>