- 27 10月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
The dirty_ratio was silently limited in global_dirty_limits() to >= 5%. This is not a user expected behavior. And it's inconsistent with calc_period_shift(), which uses the plain vm_dirty_ratio value. Let's remove the internal bound. At the same time, fix balance_dirty_pages() to work with the dirty_thresh=0 case. This allows applications to proceed when dirty+writeback pages are all cleaned. And ">" fits with the name "exceeded" better than ">=" does. Neil thinks it is an aesthetic improvement as well as a functional one :) Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Proposed-by: NCon Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Michael Rubin 提交于
To help developers and applications gain visibility into writeback behaviour adding two entries to vm_stat_items and /proc/vmstat. This will allow us to track the "written" and "dirtied" counts. # grep nr_dirtied /proc/vmstat nr_dirtied 3747 # grep nr_written /proc/vmstat nr_written 3618 Signed-off-by: NMichael Rubin <mrubin@google.com> Reviewed-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Michael Rubin 提交于
To help developers and applications gain visibility into writeback behaviour this patch adds two counters to /proc/vmstat. # grep nr_dirtied /proc/vmstat nr_dirtied 3747 # grep nr_written /proc/vmstat nr_written 3618 These entries allow user apps to understand writeback behaviour over time and learn how it is impacting their performance. Currently there is no way to inspect dirty and writeback speed over time. It's not possible for nr_dirty/nr_writeback. These entries are necessary to give visibility into writeback behaviour. We have /proc/diskstats which lets us understand the io in the block layer. We have blktrace for more in depth understanding. We have e2fsprogs and debugsfs to give insight into the file systems behaviour, but we don't offer our users the ability understand what writeback is doing. There is no way to know how active it is over the whole system, if it's falling behind or to quantify it's efforts. With these values exported users can easily see how much data applications are sending through writeback and also at what rates writeback is processing this data. Comparing the rates of change between the two allow developers to see when writeback is not able to keep up with incoming traffic and the rate of dirty memory being sent to the IO back end. This allows folks to understand their io workloads and track kernel issues. Non kernel engineers at Google often use these counters to solve puzzling performance problems. Patch #4 adds a pernode vmstat file with nr_dirtied and nr_written Patch #5 add writeback thresholds to /proc/vmstat Currently these values are in debugfs. But they should be promoted to /proc since they are useful for developers who are writing databases and file servers and are not debugging the kernel. The output is as below: # grep threshold /proc/vmstat nr_pages_dirty_threshold 409111 nr_pages_dirty_background_threshold 818223 This patch: This allows code outside of the mm core to safely manipulate page writeback state and not worry about the other accounting. Not using these routines means that some code will lose track of the accounting and we get bugs. Modify nilfs2 to use interface. Signed-off-by: NMichael Rubin <mrubin@google.com> Reviewed-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: KONISHI Ryusuke <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Jiro SEKIBA <jir@unicus.jp> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 24 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Chinner 提交于
I noticed XFS writeback in 2.6.36-rc1 was much slower than it should have been. Enabling writeback tracing showed: flush-253:16-8516 [007] 1342952.351608: wbc_writepage: bdi 253:16: towrt=1024 skip=0 mode=0 kupd=0 bgrd=1 reclm=0 cyclic=1 more=0 older=0x0 start=0x0 end=0x0 flush-253:16-8516 [007] 1342952.351654: wbc_writepage: bdi 253:16: towrt=1023 skip=0 mode=0 kupd=0 bgrd=1 reclm=0 cyclic=1 more=0 older=0x0 start=0x0 end=0x0 flush-253:16-8516 [000] 1342952.369520: wbc_writepage: bdi 253:16: towrt=0 skip=0 mode=0 kupd=0 bgrd=1 reclm=0 cyclic=1 more=0 older=0x0 start=0x0 end=0x0 flush-253:16-8516 [000] 1342952.369542: wbc_writepage: bdi 253:16: towrt=-1 skip=0 mode=0 kupd=0 bgrd=1 reclm=0 cyclic=1 more=0 older=0x0 start=0x0 end=0x0 flush-253:16-8516 [000] 1342952.369549: wbc_writepage: bdi 253:16: towrt=-2 skip=0 mode=0 kupd=0 bgrd=1 reclm=0 cyclic=1 more=0 older=0x0 start=0x0 end=0x0 Writeback is not terminating in background writeback if ->writepage is returning with wbc->nr_to_write == 0, resulting in sub-optimal single page writeback on XFS. Fix the write_cache_pages loop to terminate correctly when this situation occurs and so prevent this sub-optimal background writeback pattern. This improves sustained sequential buffered write performance from around 250MB/s to 750MB/s for a 100GB file on an XFS filesystem on my 8p test VM. Cc:<stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
- 23 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Rubin 提交于
This allows code outside of the mm core to safely manipulate page state and not worry about the other accounting. Not using these routines means that some code will lose track of the accounting and we get bugs. This has happened once already. Signed-off-by: NMichael Rubin <mrubin@google.com> Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
-
- 21 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When radix_tree_maxindex() is ~0UL, it can happen that scanning overflows index and tree traversal code goes astray reading memory until it hits unreadable memory. Check for overflow and exit in that case. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 15 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Remove leading /** from non-kernel-doc function comments to prevent kernel-doc warnings. Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 12 8月, 2010 4 次提交
-
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
Document global_dirty_limits() and bdi_dirty_limit(). Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
Split get_dirty_limits() into global_dirty_limits()+bdi_dirty_limit(), so that the latter can be avoided when under global dirty background threshold (which is the normal state for most systems). Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
Reducing the number of times balance_dirty_pages calls global_page_state reduces the cache references and so improves write performance on a variety of workloads. 'perf stats' of simple fio write tests shows the reduction in cache access. Where the test is fio 'write,mmap,600Mb,pre_read' on AMD AthlonX2 with 3Gb memory (dirty_threshold approx 600 Mb) running each test 10 times, dropping the fasted & slowest values then taking the average & standard deviation average (s.d.) in millions (10^6) 2.6.31-rc8 648.6 (14.6) +patch 620.1 (16.5) Achieving this reduction is by dropping clip_bdi_dirty_limit as it rereads the counters to apply the dirty_threshold and moving this check up into balance_dirty_pages where it has already read the counters. Also by rearrange the for loop to only contain one copy of the limit tests allows the pdflush test after the loop to use the local copies of the counters rather than rereading them. In the common case with no throttling it now calls global_page_state 5 fewer times and bdi_stat 2 fewer. Fengguang: This patch slightly changes behavior by replacing clip_bdi_dirty_limit() with the explicit check (nr_reclaimable + nr_writeback >= dirty_thresh) to avoid exceeding the dirty limit. Since the bdi dirty limit is mostly accurate we don't need to do routinely clip. A simple dirty limit check would be enough. The check is necessary because, in principle we should throttle everything calling balance_dirty_pages() when we're over the total limit, as said by Peter. We now set and clear dirty_exceeded not only based on bdi dirty limits, but also on the global dirty limit. The global limit check is added in place of clip_bdi_dirty_limit() for safety and not intended as a behavior change. The bdi limits should be tight enough to keep all dirty pages under the global limit at most time; occasional small exceeding should be OK though. The change makes the logic more obvious: the global limit is the ultimate goal and shall be always imposed. We may now start background writeback work based on outdated conditions. That's safe because the bdi flush thread will (and have to) double check the states. It reduces overall overheads because the test based on old states still have good chance to be right. [akpm@linux-foundation.org] fix uninitialized dirty_exceeded Signed-off-by: NRichard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Fix a fatal kernel-doc error due to a #define coming between a function's kernel-doc notation and the function signature. (kernel-doc cannot handle this) Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 10 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
We try to avoid livelocks of writeback when some steadily creates dirty pages in a mapping we are writing out. For memory-cleaning writeback, using nr_to_write works reasonably well but we cannot really use it for data integrity writeback. This patch tries to solve the problem. The idea is simple: Tag all pages that should be written back with a special tag (TOWRITE) in the radix tree. This can be done rather quickly and thus livelocks should not happen in practice. Then we start doing the hard work of locking pages and sending them to disk only for those pages that have TOWRITE tag set. Note: Adding new radix tree tag grows radix tree node from 288 to 296 bytes for 32-bit archs and from 552 to 560 bytes for 64-bit archs. However, the number of slab/slub items per page remains the same (13 and 7 respectively). Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 08 8月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Chinner 提交于
Add a trace event to the ->writepage loop in write_cache_pages to give visibility into how the ->writepage call is changing variables within the writeback control structure. Of most interest is how wbc->nr_to_write changes from call to call, especially with filesystems that write multiple pages in ->writepage. Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Dave Chinner 提交于
Tracing high level background writeback events is good, but it doesn't give the entire picture. Add visibility into write throttling to catch IO dispatched by foreground throttling of processing dirtying lots of pages. Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
- 06 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
This was just an odd wrapper around writeback_inodes_wb. Removing this also allows to get rid of the bdi member of struct writeback_control which was rather out of place there. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
- 11 6月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
bdi_start_writeback now never gets a superblock passed, so we can just remove that case. And to further untangle the code and flatten the call stack split it into two trivial helpers for it's two callers. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
- 09 6月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Chinner 提交于
sync can currently take a really long time if a concurrent writer is extending a file. The problem is that the dirty pages on the address space grow in the same direction as write_cache_pages scans, so if the writer keeps ahead of writeback, the writeback will not terminate until the writer stops adding dirty pages. For a data integrity sync, we only need to write the pages dirty at the time we start the writeback, so we can stop scanning once we get to the page that was at the end of the file at the time the scan started. This will prevent operations like copying a large file preventing sync from completing as it will not write back pages that were dirtied after the sync was started. This does not impact the existing integrity guarantees, as any dirty page (old or new) within the EOF range at the start of the scan will still be captured. This patch will not prevent sync from blocking on large writes into holes. That requires more complex intervention while this patch only addresses the common append-case of this sync holdoff. Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Dave Chinner 提交于
If a filesystem writes more than one page in ->writepage, write_cache_pages fails to notice this and continues to attempt writeback when wbc->nr_to_write has gone negative - this trace was captured from XFS: wbc_writeback_start: towrt=1024 wbc_writepage: towrt=1024 wbc_writepage: towrt=0 wbc_writepage: towrt=-1 wbc_writepage: towrt=-5 wbc_writepage: towrt=-21 wbc_writepage: towrt=-85 This has adverse effects on filesystem writeback behaviour. write_cache_pages() needs to terminate after a certain number of pages are written, not after a certain number of calls to ->writepage are made. This is a regression introduced by 17bc6c30 ("vfs: Add no_nrwrite_index_update writeback control flag"), but cannot be reverted directly due to subsequent bug fixes that have gone in on top of it. Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 01 6月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
This reverts commit e913fc82. We are investigating a hang associated with the WB_SYNC_NONE changes, so revert them for now. Conflicts: fs/fs-writeback.c mm/page-writeback.c Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
- 22 5月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
The laptop mode timer had the nr_pages and sb_locked arguments mixed up. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
When CONFIG_BLOCK isn't enabled: mm/page-writeback.c: In function 'laptop_mode_timer_fn': mm/page-writeback.c:708: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type mm/page-writeback.c:709: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type Fix this by essentially eliminating the laptop sync handlers when CONFIG_BLOCK isn't set, as most are only used from the block layer code. The exception is laptop_sync_completion() which is used from sys_sync(), make that an empty declaration in that case. Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Commit 69b62d01 fixed up most of the places where we would enter busy schedule() spins when disabling the periodic background writeback. This fixes up the sb timer so that it doesn't get hammered on with the delay disabled, and ensures that it gets rearmed if needed when /proc/sys/vm/dirty_writeback_centisecs gets modified. bdi_forker_task() also needs to check for !dirty_writeback_centisecs and use schedule() appropriately, fix that up too. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 17 5月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
When umount calls sync_filesystem(), we first do a WB_SYNC_NONE writeback to kick off writeback of pending dirty inodes, then follow that up with a WB_SYNC_ALL to wait for it. Since umount already holds the sb s_umount mutex, WB_SYNC_NONE ends up doing nothing and all writeback happens as WB_SYNC_ALL. This can greatly slow down umount, since WB_SYNC_ALL writeback is a data integrity operation and thus a bigger hammer than simple WB_SYNC_NONE. For barrier aware file systems it's a lot slower. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 06 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Garrett 提交于
One of the features of laptop-mode is that it forces a writeout of dirty pages if something else triggers a physical read or write from a device. The current implementation flushes pages on all devices, rather than only the one that triggered the flush. This patch alters the behaviour so that only the recently accessed block device is flushed, preventing other disks being spun up for no terribly good reason. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 03 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
- no one is calling wb_writeback and write_cache_pages with wbc.nonblocking=1 any more - lumpy pageout will want to do nonblocking writeback without the congestion wait So remove the congestion checks as suggested by Chris. Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net> Cc: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 09 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
It makes sense to do IOWAIT when someone is blocked due to IO throttle, as suggested by Kame and Peter. There is an old comment for not doing IOWAIT on throttle, however it has been mismatching the code for a long time. If we stop accounting IOWAIT for 2.6.32, it could be an undesirable behavior change. So restore the io_schedule. CC: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 26 9月, 2009 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Sometimes we only want to write pages from a specific super_block, so allow that to be passed in. This fixes a problem with commit 56a131dc causing writeback on all super_blocks on a bdi, where we only really want to sync a specific sb from writeback_inodes_sb(). Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
Treat bdi_start_writeback(0) as a special request to do background write, and stop such work when we are below the background dirty threshold. Also simplify the (nr_pages <= 0) checks. Since we already pass in nr_pages=LONG_MAX for WB_SYNC_ALL and background writes, we don't need to worry about it being decreased to zero. Reported-by: NRichard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk> CC: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
Some filesystem may choose to write much more than ratelimit_pages before calling balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(). So it is safer to determine number to write based on real number of dirtied pages. Otherwise it is possible that loop { btrfs_file_write(): dirty 1024 pages balance_dirty_pages(): write up to 48 pages (= ratelimit_pages * 1.5) } in which the writeback rate cannot keep up with dirty rate, and the dirty pages go all the way beyond dirty_thresh. The increased write_chunk may make the dirtier more bumpy. So filesystems shall be take care not to dirty too much at a time (eg. > 4MB) without checking the ratelimit. Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 24 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
It's unused. It isn't needed -- read or write flag is already passed and sysctl shouldn't care about the rest. It _was_ used in two places at arch/frv for some reason. Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 22 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
global_lru_pages() / zone_lru_pages() can be used in two ways: - to estimate max reclaimable pages in determine_dirtyable_memory() - to calculate the slab scan ratio When swap is full or not present, the anon lru lists are not reclaimable and also won't be scanned. So the anon pages shall not be counted in both usage scenarios. Also rename to _reclaimable_pages: now they are counting the possibly reclaimable lru pages. It can greatly (and correctly) increase the slab scan rate under high memory pressure (when most file pages have been reclaimed and swap is full/absent), thus reduce false OOM kills. Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Li, Ming Chun" <macli@brc.ubc.ca> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 21 9月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Currently it just sleeps for a very short time, just 1 jiffy. If we keep looping in there, continually delay for a little longer of up to 100msec in total. That was the old limit for congestion wait. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Just use schedule_timeout_interruptible(), saves a call to set_current_state(). Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 16 9月, 2009 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
bdi_start_writeback() is currently split into two paths, one for WB_SYNC_NONE and one for WB_SYNC_ALL. Add bdi_sync_writeback() for WB_SYNC_ALL writeback and let bdi_start_writeback() handle only WB_SYNC_NONE. Push down the writeback_control allocation and only accept the parameters that make sense for each function. This cleans up the API considerably. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Now that bdi_writeback_all() no longer handles integrity writeback, it doesn't have to block anymore. This means that we can switch bdi_list reader side protection to RCU. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
It's only set, it's never checked. Kill it. Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
The dirtying of page and set_page_dirty() can be moved into the page lock. - In shmem_write_end(), the page was dirtied while the page lock was held, but it's being marked dirty just after dropping the page lock. - In shmem_symlink(), both dirtying and marking can be moved into page lock. It's valuable for the hwpoison code to know whether one bad page can be dropped without losing data. It mainly judges by testing the PG_dirty bit after taking the page lock. So it becomes important that the dirtying of page and the marking of dirtiness are both done inside the page lock. Which is a common practice, but sadly not a rule. The noticeable exceptions are - mapped pages - pages with buffer_heads The above pages could go dirty at any time. Fortunately the hwpoison will unmap the page and release the buffer_heads beforehand anyway. Many other types of pages (eg. metadata pages) can also be dirtied at will by their owners, the hwpoison code cannot do meaningful things to them anyway. Only the dirtiness of pagecache pages owned by regular files are interested. v2: AK: Add comment about set_page_dirty rules (suggested by Peter Zijlstra) Acked-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NWANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
-
- 11 9月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
This gets rid of pdflush for bdi writeout and kupdated style cleaning. pdflush writeout suffers from lack of locality and also requires more threads to handle the same workload, since it has to work in a non-blocking fashion against each queue. This also introduces lumpy behaviour and potential request starvation, since pdflush can be starved for queue access if others are accessing it. A sample ffsb workload that does random writes to files is about 8% faster here on a simple SATA drive during the benchmark phase. File layout also seems a LOT more smooth in vmstat: r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 1 0 608848 2652 375372 0 0 0 71024 604 24 1 10 48 42 0 1 0 549644 2712 433736 0 0 0 60692 505 27 1 8 48 44 1 0 0 476928 2784 505192 0 0 4 29540 553 24 0 9 53 37 0 1 0 457972 2808 524008 0 0 0 54876 331 16 0 4 38 58 0 1 0 366128 2928 614284 0 0 4 92168 710 58 0 13 53 34 0 1 0 295092 3000 684140 0 0 0 62924 572 23 0 9 53 37 0 1 0 236592 3064 741704 0 0 4 58256 523 17 0 8 48 44 0 1 0 165608 3132 811464 0 0 0 57460 560 21 0 8 54 38 0 1 0 102952 3200 873164 0 0 4 74748 540 29 1 10 48 41 0 1 0 48604 3252 926472 0 0 0 53248 469 29 0 7 47 45 where vanilla tends to fluctuate a lot in the creation phase: r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 1 1 0 678716 5792 303380 0 0 0 74064 565 50 1 11 52 36 1 0 0 662488 5864 319396 0 0 4 352 302 329 0 2 47 51 0 1 0 599312 5924 381468 0 0 0 78164 516 55 0 9 51 40 0 1 0 519952 6008 459516 0 0 4 78156 622 56 1 11 52 37 1 1 0 436640 6092 541632 0 0 0 82244 622 54 0 11 48 41 0 1 0 436640 6092 541660 0 0 0 8 152 39 0 0 51 49 0 1 0 332224 6200 644252 0 0 4 102800 728 46 1 13 49 36 1 0 0 274492 6260 701056 0 0 4 12328 459 49 0 7 50 43 0 1 0 211220 6324 763356 0 0 0 106940 515 37 1 10 51 39 1 0 0 160412 6376 813468 0 0 0 8224 415 43 0 6 49 45 1 1 0 85980 6452 886556 0 0 4 113516 575 39 1 11 54 34 0 2 0 85968 6452 886620 0 0 0 1640 158 211 0 0 46 54 A 10 disk test with btrfs performs 26% faster with per-bdi flushing. A SSD based writeback test on XFS performs over 20% better as well, with the throughput being very stable around 1GB/sec, where pdflush only manages 750MB/sec and fluctuates wildly while doing so. Random buffered writes to many files behave a lot better as well, as does random mmap'ed writes. A separate thread is added to sync the super blocks. In the long term, adding sync_supers_bdi() functionality could get rid of this thread again. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
This is a first step at introducing per-bdi flusher threads. We should have no change in behaviour, although sb_has_dirty_inodes() is now ridiculously expensive, as there's no easy way to answer that question. Not a huge problem, since it'll be deleted in subsequent patches. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-