Currently, we're printing gadget driver name when
registering and UDC name when unregistering. Standardize
on always printing gadget driver name.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

We know that our udc points to our gadget and our
gadget_driver, simplify the interface by passing
a single argument.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The drivers should use dmaengine_terminate_all() or dmaengine_slave_config()
API instead of accessing the device_control which will be deprecated soon
Signed-off-by: NVinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>