- 30 9月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Hirofumi Nakagawa 提交于
IS_ERR() macro already has unlikely(), so do not use constructions like 'if (unlikely(IS_ERR())'. Signed-off-by: NHirofumi Nakagawa <hnakagawa@miraclelinux.com> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
This commit adds a reserved pool size print and tweaks the prints to make them look nicer. It also fixes and cleans-up some comments. Additionally, it deletes some blank lines to make the code look a little nicer. In other words, nothing essential. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
- 29 9月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Balbir Singh 提交于
There's a race between mm->owner assignment and swapoff, more easily seen when task slab poisoning is turned on. The condition occurs when try_to_unuse() runs in parallel with an exiting task. A similar race can occur with callers of get_task_mm(), such as /proc/<pid>/<mmstats> or ptrace or page migration. CPU0 CPU1 try_to_unuse looks at mm = task0->mm increments mm->mm_users task 0 exits mm->owner needs to be updated, but no new owner is found (mm_users > 1, but no other task has task->mm = task0->mm) mm_update_next_owner() leaves mmput(mm) decrements mm->mm_users task0 freed dereferencing mm->owner fails The fix is to notify the subsystem via mm_owner_changed callback(), if no new owner is found, by specifying the new task as NULL. Jiri Slaby: mm->owner was set to NULL prior to calling cgroup_mm_owner_callbacks(), but must be set after that, so as not to pass NULL as old owner causing oops. Daisuke Nishimura: mm_update_next_owner() may set mm->owner to NULL, but mem_cgroup_from_task() and its callers need to take account of this situation to avoid oops. Hugh Dickins: Lockdep warning and hang below exec_mmap() when testing these patches. exit_mm() up_reads mmap_sem before calling mm_update_next_owner(), so exec_mmap() now needs to do the same. And with that repositioning, there's now no point in mm_need_new_owner() allowing for NULL mm. Reported-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: NBalbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
The VFS interface for the 'd_compare()' is a bit special (read: 'odd'), because it really just essentially replaces a memcmp(). The filesystem is supposed to just compare the two names with whatever case-independent or other function. And when I say 'is supposed to', I obviously mean that 'procfs does odd things, and actually looks at the dentry that we don't even pass down, rather than just the name'. Which results in problems, because we actually call d_compare before we have even verified that the dentry is still hashed at all. And that causes a problm since the inode that procfs looks at may have been free'd and the d_inode pointer is NULL. procfs just assumes that all dentries are positive, since procfs itself never generates a negative one. But memory pressure will still result in the dentry getting torn down, and as it is removed by RCU, it still remains visible on some lists - and to d_compare. If the filesystem just did a name comparison, we wouldn't care. And we could just fix procfs to know about negative dentries too. But rather than have the low-level filesystems know about internal VFS details, just move the check for a unhashed dentry up a bit, so that we will only call d_compare on dentries that are still active. The actual oops this caused didn't look like a NULL pointer dereference because procfs did a 'container_of(inode, struct proc_inode, vfs_inode)' to get at its internal proc_inode information from the inode pointer, and accessed a field below the inode. So the oops would look something like BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffffffffffff0 IP: [<ffffffff802bc6c6>] proc_sys_compare+0x36/0x50 and was seen on both x86-64 (Alexey Dobriyan and Hugh Dickins) and ppc64 (Hugh Dickins). Reported-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Acked-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-of-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 26 9月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Lachlan McIlroy 提交于
Yet another bug was found in xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() and while the source of the bug was found it wasn't an easy task to track it down because the conditions are very difficult to reproduce. A HUGE thank-you goes to Russell Cattelan and Eric Sandeen for their significant effort in tracking down the source of this corruption. xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() and xfs_iext_irec_compact_pages() are almost identical - they both compact indirect extent lists by moving extents from subsequent buffers into earlier ones. xfs_iext_irec_compact_pages() only moves extents if all of the extents in the next buffer will fit into the empty space in the buffer before it. xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() will go a step further and move part of the next buffer if all the extents wont fit. It will then shift the remaining extents in the next buffer up to the start of the buffer. The bug here was that we did not update er_extoff and this caused extent list corruption. It does not appear that this extra functionality gains us much. Calling xfs_iext_irec_compact_pages() instead will do a good enough job at compacting the indirect list and will be quicker too. For the case in xfs_iext_indirect_to_direct() the total number of extents in the indirect list will fit into one buffer so we will never need the extra functionality of xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() there. Also xfs_iext_irec_compact_pages() doesn't need to do a memmove() (the buffers will never overlap) so we don't want the performance hit that can incur. SGI-PV: 987159 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32166a Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
-
由 Lachlan McIlroy 提交于
If we don't move all the records from the next buffer into the current buffer then we need to update the er_extoff field of the next buffer as we shift the remaining records to the start of the buffer. SGI-PV: 987159 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32165a Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net> Signed-off-by: NRussell Cattelan <cattelan@thebarn.com>
-
- 25 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Julien Brunel 提交于
In case of error, the function p9_client_walk returns an ERR pointer, but never returns a NULL pointer. So a NULL test that comes after an IS_ERR test should be deleted. The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/) // <smpl> @match_bad_null_test@ expression x, E; statement S1,S2; @@ x = p9_client_walk(...) ... when != x = E * if (x != NULL) S1 else S2 // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulien Brunel <brunel@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: NEric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 18 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Beregalov 提交于
fs/ubifs/dir.c:428: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'long unsigned int' fs/ubifs/debug.c:541: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'long unsigned int' Signed-off-by: NAlexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
- 17 9月, 2008 10 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
The assert was not valid because one of the variables 'taken_empty_lebs' has transient values out of sync with the other variables. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
- update GC sequence number if any nodes may have been moved even if GC did not finish the LEB - don't ignore error return when reading Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Sebastian Siewior 提交于
If the ubifs partition is mounted RO and then remounted RW we end up with no thread name in ubifs_remount_rw() and the thread appears nameless. Signed-off-by: NSebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Lachlan McIlroy 提交于
When unreserving space with boundaries that are not block aligned we round up the start and round down the end boundaries and then use this function, xfs_zero_remaining_bytes(), to zero the parts of the blocks that got dropped during the rounding. The problem is we don't consider if these blocks are beyond eof. Worse still is if we encounter delayed allocations beyond eof we will try to use the magic delayed allocation block number as a real block number. If the file size is ever extended to expose these blocks then we'll go through xfs_zero_eof() to zero them anyway. SGI-PV: 983683 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32055a Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
-
由 Lachlan McIlroy 提交于
We have a use-after-free issue where log completions access buffers via the buffer log item and the buffer has already been freed. Fix this by taking a reference on the buffer when attaching the buffer log item and release the hold when the buffer log item is detached and we no longer need the buffer. Also create a new function xfs_buf_item_free() to combine some common code. SGI-PV: 985757 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32025a Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
-
由 David Chinner 提交于
If we call xfs_lock_two_inodes() to grab both the iolock and the ilock, then drop the ilocks on both inodes, then grab them again (as xfs_swap_extents() does) then lockdep will report a locking order problem. This is a false positive. To avoid this, disallow xfs_lock_two_inodes() fom locking both inode locks at once - force calers to make two separate calls. This means that nested dropping and regaining of the ilocks will retain the same lockdep subclass and so lockdep will not see anything wrong with this code. SGI-PV: 986238 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31999a Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Leckie <pleckie@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
-
由 David Chinner 提交于
The current code in xlog_iodone() uses the wrong macro to check if the barrier has been cleared due to an EOPNOTSUPP error form the lower layer. SGI-PV: 986143 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31984a Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Signed-off-by: NNathaniel W. Turner <nate@houseofnate.net> Signed-off-by: NPeter Leckie <pleckie@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
-
由 Lachlan McIlroy 提交于
With the help from some tracing I found that we try to map extents beyond eof when doing a direct I/O read. It appears that the way to inform the generic direct I/O path (ie do_direct_IO()) that we have breached eof is to return an unmapped buffer from xfs_get_blocks_direct(). This will cause do_direct_IO() to jump to the hole handling code where is will check for eof and then abort. This problem was found because a direct I/O read was trying to map beyond eof and was encountering delayed allocations. The delayed allocations beyond eof are speculative allocations and they didn't get converted when the direct I/O flushed the file because there was only enough space in the current AG to convert and write out the dirty pages within eof. Note that xfs_iomap_write_allocate() wont necessarily convert all the delayed allocation passed to it - it will return after allocating the first extent - so if the delayed allocation extends beyond eof then it will stay that way. SGI-PV: 983683 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31929a Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Logically we would return an error in xfs_fs_remount code to prevent users from believing they might have changed mount options using remount which can't be changed. But unfortunately mount(8) adds all options from mtab and fstab to the mount arguments in some cases so we can't blindly reject options, but have to check for each specified option if it actually differs from the currently set option and only reject it if that's the case. Until that is implemented we return success for every remount request, and silently ignore all options that we can't actually change. SGI-PV: 985710 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31908a Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
-
由 Lachlan McIlroy 提交于
Memory allocations for log->l_grant_trace and iclog->ic_trace are done on demand when the first event is logged. In xlog_state_get_iclog_space() we call xlog_trace_iclog() under a spinlock and allocating memory here can cause us to sleep with a spinlock held and deadlock the system. For the log grant tracing we use KM_NOSLEEP but that means we can lose trace entries. Since there is no locking to serialize the log grant tracing we could race and have multiple allocations and leak memory. So move the allocations to where we initialize the log/iclog structures. Use KM_NOFS to avoid recursing into the filesystem and drop log->l_trace since it's not even used. SGI-PV: 983738 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31896a Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
-
- 14 9月, 2008 4 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
Herton Krzesinski reports that the error-checking changes in 04ebd4ae ("block/ioctl.c and fs/partition/check.c: check value returned by add_partition") cause his buggy USB camera to no longer mount. "The camera is an Olympus X-840. The original issue comes from the camera itself: its format program creates a partition with an off by one error". Buggy devices happen. It is better for the kernel to warn and to proceed with the mount. Reported-by: NHerton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br> Cc: Abdel Benamrouche <draconux@gmail.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Hugh Dickins 提交于
A "Quicklists: 0 kB" line has just started appearing in /proc/meminfo, but most architectures (including x86) don't have them configured, so #ifdef it, like the highmem lines. And those architectures which do have quicklists configured are using them for page tables: so let's place it next to PageTables. Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Acked-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Eric Sesterhenn 提交于
This fixes: ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 2.6.27-rc5-00283-g70bb0896 #68 --------------------------------------------- touch/6855 is trying to acquire lock: (&info->bfs_lock){--..}, at: [<c02262f5>] bfs_delete_inode+0x9e/0x18c but task is already holding lock: (&info->bfs_lock){--..}, at: [<c0226c00>] bfs_create+0x45/0x187 other info that might help us debug this: 2 locks held by touch/6855: #0: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#5){--..}, at: [<c018ad13>] do_filp_open+0x10b/0x62f #1: (&info->bfs_lock){--..}, at: [<c0226c00>] bfs_create+0x45/0x187 stack backtrace: Pid: 6855, comm: touch Not tainted 2.6.27-rc5-00283-g70bb0896 #68 [<c013e769>] validate_chain+0x458/0x9f4 [<c013bece>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [<c013f36b>] __lock_acquire+0x666/0x6e0 [<c013f440>] lock_acquire+0x5b/0x77 [<c02262f5>] ? bfs_delete_inode+0x9e/0x18c [<c06aab74>] mutex_lock_nested+0xbc/0x234 [<c02262f5>] ? bfs_delete_inode+0x9e/0x18c [<c02262f5>] ? bfs_delete_inode+0x9e/0x18c [<c02262f5>] bfs_delete_inode+0x9e/0x18c [<c0226257>] ? bfs_delete_inode+0x0/0x18c [<c01925e1>] generic_delete_inode+0x94/0xfe [<c019265d>] generic_drop_inode+0x12/0x12f [<c0191b7e>] iput+0x4b/0x4e [<c0226d1e>] bfs_create+0x163/0x187 [<c0188b42>] vfs_create+0xa6/0x114 [<c018adb5>] do_filp_open+0x1ad/0x62f [<c0107cdc>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [<c06ac309>] ? _spin_unlock+0x27/0x3c [<c019379e>] ? alloc_fd+0xbf/0xc9 [<c06ae2f4>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x9d/0xab [<c019379e>] ? alloc_fd+0xbf/0xc9 [<c0180391>] do_sys_open+0x42/0xb8 [<c041d564>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0xc/0x10 [<c0180449>] sys_open+0x1e/0x26 [<c01038bd>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31 ======================= The problem is that we don't unlock the bfs->lock mutex before calling iput (we do in the other cases). Signed-off-by: NEric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de> Cc: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
Print parent directory name as well. The aim is to catch non-creation of parent directory when proc_mkdir will return NULL and all subsequent registrations go directly in /proc instead of intended directory. Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> [ Fixed insane printk string while at it. - Linus ] Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 10 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
ocfs2 will become read-only if we try to read the bytes which pass the end of i_size. This can be easily reproduced by following steps: 1. mkfs a ocfs2 volume with bs=4k cs=4k and nosparse. 2. create a small file(say less than 100 bytes) and we will create the file which is allocated 1 cluster. 3. read 8196 bytes from the kernel using O_DIRECT which exceeds the limit. 4. The ocfs2 volume becomes read-only and dmesg shows: OCFS2: ERROR (device sda13): ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks: Inode 66010 has a hole at block 1 File system is now read-only due to the potential of on-disk corruption. Please run fsck.ocfs2 once the file system is unmounted. So suppress the ERROR message. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
- 09 9月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Automounter maps can contain mount options valid for other NFS implementations but not for Linux. The Linux automounter uses the mount command's "-s" command line option ("s" for "sloppy") so that mount requests containing such options are not rejected. Commit f45663ce attempted to address a known regression with text-based NFS mount option parsing. Unrecognized mount options would cause mount requests to fail, even if the "-s" option was used on the mount command line. Unfortunately, this commit was not complete as submitted. It adds a new mount option, "sloppy". But it is missing a hunk, so it now allows NFS mounts with unrecognized mount options, even if the "sloppy" option is not present. This could be a problem if a required critical mount option such as "sync" is misspelled, for example, and is considered a regression from 2.6.26. This patch restores the missing hunk. Now, the default behavior of text-based NFS mount options is as before: any unrecognized mount option will cause the mount to fail. Please include this in 2.6.27-rc. Thanks to Neil Brown for reporting this. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Acked-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
UDF currently doesn't set a llseek method for regular files, which means it will fall back to default_llseek. This means no one can seek beyond 2 Gigabytes on udf, and that there's not protection vs the i_size updates from writers. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 06 9月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
UBIFS does not really work correctly when fanout is 2, because of the way we manage the indexing tree. It may just become a list and UBIFS screws up. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
If fanout is 3, we have division by zero in 'ubifs_read_superblock()': divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Pid: 28744, comm: mount Not tainted (2.6.27-rc4-ubifs-2.6 #23) EIP: 0060:[<f8f9e3ef>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 EIP is at ubifs_reported_space+0x2d/0x69 [ubifs] EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000 ESI: 00000000 EDI: f0ae64b0 EBP: f1f9fcf4 ESP: f1f9fce0 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Balbir Singh 提交于
Spencer reported a problem where utime and stime were going negative despite the fixes in commit b27f03d4. The suspected reason for the problem is that signal_struct maintains it's own utime and stime (of exited tasks), these are not updated using the new task_utime() routine, hence sig->utime can go backwards and cause the same problem to occur (sig->utime, adds tsk->utime and not task_utime()). This patch fixes the problem TODO: using max(task->prev_utime, derived utime) works for now, but a more generic solution is to implement cputime_max() and use the cputime_gt() function for comparison. Reported-by: spencer@bluehost.com Signed-off-by: NBalbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 03 9月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
David Woodhouse suggested to be consistent with other FSes and xor the beginning and the end of the UUID. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
Quicklists can consume several GB of memory. We should provide a means of monitoring this. After this patch is applied, /proc/meminfo will output the following: % cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 7715392 kB MemFree: 5401600 kB Buffers: 80384 kB Cached: 300800 kB SwapCached: 0 kB Active: 235584 kB Inactive: 262656 kB SwapTotal: 2031488 kB SwapFree: 2031488 kB Dirty: 3520 kB Writeback: 0 kB AnonPages: 117696 kB Mapped: 38528 kB Slab: 1589952 kB SReclaimable: 23104 kB SUnreclaim: 1566848 kB PageTables: 14656 kB NFS_Unstable: 0 kB Bounce: 0 kB WritebackTmp: 0 kB CommitLimit: 5889152 kB Committed_AS: 393152 kB VmallocTotal: 17592177655808 kB VmallocUsed: 29056 kB VmallocChunk: 17592177626432 kB Quicklists: 130944 kB HugePages_Total: 0 HugePages_Free: 0 HugePages_Rsvd: 0 HugePages_Surp: 0 Hugepagesize: 262144 kB Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Keiichiro Tokunaga <tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
Update the location of the NTFS homepage in several files. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 02 9月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The array we kmalloc() here is not large enough. Thanks to Johann Dahm and David Richter for bug report and testing. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Cc: David Richter <richterd@citi.umich.edu> Tested-by: NJohann Dahm <jdahm@umich.edu>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Move the cstate_alloc call so that if it fails, the response is setup to encode the NFS error. The out label now means that the nfsd4_compound_state has not been allocated. Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
-
- 31 8月, 2008 7 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
UBIFS stores 16-bit UUID in the superblock, and it is a good idea to return part of it in 'f_fsid' filed of kstatfs structure. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Since free space we report in statfs is file size which should fit to the FS - change the way we calculate free space and use leb_overhead instead of dark_wm in calculations. Results of "freespace" test (120MiB volume, 16KiB LEB size, 512 bytes page size). Before the change: freespace: Test 1: fill the space we have 3 times freespace: was free: 85204992 bytes 81.3 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 11284480 bytes 10.8 MiB, wrote 13.2% more than predicted freespace: was free: 83554304 bytes 79.7 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 12935168 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 15.5% more than predicted freespace: was free: 83554304 bytes 79.7 MiB, wrote: 96493568 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 12939264 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 15.5% more than predicted freespace: Test 1 finished freespace: Test 2: gradually lessen amount of free space and fill the FS freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 7596218 bytes 7.2 MiB each time freespace: was free: 78675968 bytes 75.0 MiB, wrote: 88903680 bytes 84.8 MiB, delta: 10227712 bytes 9.8 MiB, wrote 13.0% more than predicted freespace: was free: 72015872 bytes 68.7 MiB, wrote: 81514496 bytes 77.7 MiB, delta: 9498624 bytes 9.1 MiB, wrote 13.2% more than predicted freespace: was free: 63938560 bytes 61.0 MiB, wrote: 72589312 bytes 69.2 MiB, delta: 8650752 bytes 8.2 MiB, wrote 13.5% more than predicted freespace: was free: 56127488 bytes 53.5 MiB, wrote: 63762432 bytes 60.8 MiB, delta: 7634944 bytes 7.3 MiB, wrote 13.6% more than predicted freespace: was free: 48336896 bytes 46.1 MiB, wrote: 54935552 bytes 52.4 MiB, delta: 6598656 bytes 6.3 MiB, wrote 13.7% more than predicted freespace: was free: 40587264 bytes 38.7 MiB, wrote: 46157824 bytes 44.0 MiB, delta: 5570560 bytes 5.3 MiB, wrote 13.7% more than predicted freespace: was free: 32841728 bytes 31.3 MiB, wrote: 37384192 bytes 35.7 MiB, delta: 4542464 bytes 4.3 MiB, wrote 13.8% more than predicted freespace: was free: 25100288 bytes 23.9 MiB, wrote: 28618752 bytes 27.3 MiB, delta: 3518464 bytes 3.4 MiB, wrote 14.0% more than predicted freespace: was free: 17342464 bytes 16.5 MiB, wrote: 19841024 bytes 18.9 MiB, delta: 2498560 bytes 2.4 MiB, wrote 14.4% more than predicted freespace: was free: 9605120 bytes 9.2 MiB, wrote: 11063296 bytes 10.6 MiB, delta: 1458176 bytes 1.4 MiB, wrote 15.2% more than predicted freespace: Test 2 finished freespace: Test 3: gradually lessen amount of free space by trashing and fill the FS freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 7606272 bytes 7.3 MiB each time freespace: trashing: was free: 83668992 bytes 79.8 MiB, need free: 7606272 bytes 7.3 MiB, files created: 248297, delete 225724 (90.9% of them) freespace: was free: 70803456 bytes 67.5 MiB, wrote: 82485248 bytes 78.7 MiB, delta: 11681792 bytes 11.1 MiB, wrote 16.5% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 81080320 bytes 77.3 MiB, need free: 15212544 bytes 14.5 MiB, files created: 248711, delete 202047 (81.2% of them) freespace: was free: 59867136 bytes 57.1 MiB, wrote: 71897088 bytes 68.6 MiB, delta: 12029952 bytes 11.5 MiB, wrote 20.1% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 82243584 bytes 78.4 MiB, need free: 22818816 bytes 21.8 MiB, files created: 248866, delete 179817 (72.3% of them) freespace: was free: 50905088 bytes 48.5 MiB, wrote: 63168512 bytes 60.2 MiB, delta: 12263424 bytes 11.7 MiB, wrote 24.1% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 83402752 bytes 79.5 MiB, need free: 30425088 bytes 29.0 MiB, files created: 248920, delete 158114 (63.5% of them) freespace: was free: 42651648 bytes 40.7 MiB, wrote: 55406592 bytes 52.8 MiB, delta: 12754944 bytes 12.2 MiB, wrote 29.9% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 84402176 bytes 80.5 MiB, need free: 38031360 bytes 36.3 MiB, files created: 248709, delete 136641 (54.9% of them) freespace: was free: 35233792 bytes 33.6 MiB, wrote: 48250880 bytes 46.0 MiB, delta: 13017088 bytes 12.4 MiB, wrote 36.9% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 82530304 bytes 78.7 MiB, need free: 45637632 bytes 43.5 MiB, files created: 248778, delete 111208 (44.7% of them) freespace: was free: 27287552 bytes 26.0 MiB, wrote: 40267776 bytes 38.4 MiB, delta: 12980224 bytes 12.4 MiB, wrote 47.6% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 85114880 bytes 81.2 MiB, need free: 53243904 bytes 50.8 MiB, files created: 248508, delete 93052 (37.4% of them) freespace: was free: 22437888 bytes 21.4 MiB, wrote: 35328000 bytes 33.7 MiB, delta: 12890112 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 57.4% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 84103168 bytes 80.2 MiB, need free: 60850176 bytes 58.0 MiB, files created: 248637, delete 68743 (27.6% of them) freespace: was free: 15536128 bytes 14.8 MiB, wrote: 28319744 bytes 27.0 MiB, delta: 12783616 bytes 12.2 MiB, wrote 82.3% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 84357120 bytes 80.4 MiB, need free: 68456448 bytes 65.3 MiB, files created: 248567, delete 46852 (18.8% of them) freespace: was free: 9015296 bytes 8.6 MiB, wrote: 22044672 bytes 21.0 MiB, delta: 13029376 bytes 12.4 MiB, wrote 144.5% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 84942848 bytes 81.0 MiB, need free: 76062720 bytes 72.5 MiB, files created: 248636, delete 25993 (10.5% of them) freespace: was free: 6086656 bytes 5.8 MiB, wrote: 8331264 bytes 7.9 MiB, delta: 2244608 bytes 2.1 MiB, wrote 36.9% more than predicted freespace: Test 3 finished freespace: finished successfully After the change: freespace: Test 1: fill the space we have 3 times freespace: was free: 94048256 bytes 89.7 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 2441216 bytes 2.3 MiB, wrote 2.6% more than predicted freespace: was free: 92246016 bytes 88.0 MiB, wrote: 96493568 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 4247552 bytes 4.1 MiB, wrote 4.6% more than predicted freespace: was free: 92254208 bytes 88.0 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 4235264 bytes 4.0 MiB, wrote 4.6% more than predicted freespace: Test 1 finished freespace: Test 2: gradually lessen amount of free space and fill the FS freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 8386001 bytes 8.0 MiB each time freespace: was free: 86605824 bytes 82.6 MiB, wrote: 88252416 bytes 84.2 MiB, delta: 1646592 bytes 1.6 MiB, wrote 1.9% more than predicted freespace: was free: 78667776 bytes 75.0 MiB, wrote: 80715776 bytes 77.0 MiB, delta: 2048000 bytes 2.0 MiB, wrote 2.6% more than predicted freespace: was free: 69615616 bytes 66.4 MiB, wrote: 71630848 bytes 68.3 MiB, delta: 2015232 bytes 1.9 MiB, wrote 2.9% more than predicted freespace: was free: 61018112 bytes 58.2 MiB, wrote: 62783488 bytes 59.9 MiB, delta: 1765376 bytes 1.7 MiB, wrote 2.9% more than predicted freespace: was free: 52424704 bytes 50.0 MiB, wrote: 53968896 bytes 51.5 MiB, delta: 1544192 bytes 1.5 MiB, wrote 2.9% more than predicted freespace: was free: 43880448 bytes 41.8 MiB, wrote: 45199360 bytes 43.1 MiB, delta: 1318912 bytes 1.3 MiB, wrote 3.0% more than predicted freespace: was free: 35332096 bytes 33.7 MiB, wrote: 36425728 bytes 34.7 MiB, delta: 1093632 bytes 1.0 MiB, wrote 3.1% more than predicted freespace: was free: 26771456 bytes 25.5 MiB, wrote: 27643904 bytes 26.4 MiB, delta: 872448 bytes 852.0 KiB, wrote 3.3% more than predicted freespace: was free: 18231296 bytes 17.4 MiB, wrote: 18878464 bytes 18.0 MiB, delta: 647168 bytes 632.0 KiB, wrote 3.5% more than predicted freespace: was free: 9674752 bytes 9.2 MiB, wrote: 10088448 bytes 9.6 MiB, delta: 413696 bytes 404.0 KiB, wrote 4.3% more than predicted freespace: Test 2 finished freespace: Test 3: gradually lessen amount of free space by trashing and fill the FS freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 8397544 bytes 8.0 MiB each time freespace: trashing: was free: 92372992 bytes 88.1 MiB, need free: 8397552 bytes 8.0 MiB, files created: 248296, delete 225723 (90.9% of them) freespace: was free: 71909376 bytes 68.6 MiB, wrote: 82472960 bytes 78.7 MiB, delta: 10563584 bytes 10.1 MiB, wrote 14.7% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 88989696 bytes 84.9 MiB, need free: 16795096 bytes 16.0 MiB, files created: 248794, delete 201838 (81.1% of them) freespace: was free: 60354560 bytes 57.6 MiB, wrote: 71782400 bytes 68.5 MiB, delta: 11427840 bytes 10.9 MiB, wrote 18.9% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 90304512 bytes 86.1 MiB, need free: 25192640 bytes 24.0 MiB, files created: 248733, delete 179342 (72.1% of them) freespace: was free: 51187712 bytes 48.8 MiB, wrote: 62943232 bytes 60.0 MiB, delta: 11755520 bytes 11.2 MiB, wrote 23.0% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 91209728 bytes 87.0 MiB, need free: 33590184 bytes 32.0 MiB, files created: 248779, delete 157160 (63.2% of them) freespace: was free: 42704896 bytes 40.7 MiB, wrote: 55050240 bytes 52.5 MiB, delta: 12345344 bytes 11.8 MiB, wrote 28.9% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 92700672 bytes 88.4 MiB, need free: 41987728 bytes 40.0 MiB, files created: 248848, delete 136135 (54.7% of them) freespace: was free: 35250176 bytes 33.6 MiB, wrote: 48115712 bytes 45.9 MiB, delta: 12865536 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 36.5% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 93986816 bytes 89.6 MiB, need free: 50385272 bytes 48.1 MiB, files created: 248723, delete 115385 (46.4% of them) freespace: was free: 29995008 bytes 28.6 MiB, wrote: 41582592 bytes 39.7 MiB, delta: 11587584 bytes 11.1 MiB, wrote 38.6% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 91881472 bytes 87.6 MiB, need free: 58782816 bytes 56.1 MiB, files created: 248645, delete 89569 (36.0% of them) freespace: was free: 22511616 bytes 21.5 MiB, wrote: 34705408 bytes 33.1 MiB, delta: 12193792 bytes 11.6 MiB, wrote 54.2% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 91774976 bytes 87.5 MiB, need free: 67180360 bytes 64.1 MiB, files created: 248580, delete 66616 (26.8% of them) freespace: was free: 16908288 bytes 16.1 MiB, wrote: 26898432 bytes 25.7 MiB, delta: 9990144 bytes 9.5 MiB, wrote 59.1% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 92450816 bytes 88.2 MiB, need free: 75577904 bytes 72.1 MiB, files created: 248654, delete 45381 (18.3% of them) freespace: was free: 10170368 bytes 9.7 MiB, wrote: 19111936 bytes 18.2 MiB, delta: 8941568 bytes 8.5 MiB, wrote 87.9% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 93282304 bytes 89.0 MiB, need free: 83975448 bytes 80.1 MiB, files created: 248513, delete 24794 (10.0% of them) freespace: was free: 3911680 bytes 3.7 MiB, wrote: 7872512 bytes 7.5 MiB, delta: 3960832 bytes 3.8 MiB, wrote 101.3% more than predicted freespace: Test 3 finished freespace: finished successfully Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
This is a preparational patch for the following statfs() report fix. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
We add this component at other similar places, but not in this one. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
The assertion was incorrect, because it did not take into account free space. This patch also amends the comments correspondingly, and cleans them up a little. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Make free space calculation less pessimistic and more realistic, which in turn improves 'statfs()' reports. Now it lies by 10%-20%, instead of 20%-30% (10% more honest). Results of "freespace" test (120MiB volume, 16KiB LEB size, 512 bytes page size). Before the change: freespace: Test 1: fill the space we have 3 times freespace: was free: 78274560 bytes 74.6 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 18214912 bytes 17.4 MiB, wrote 23.3% more than predicted freespace: was free: 76754944 bytes 73.2 MiB, wrote: 96493568 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 19738624 bytes 18.8 MiB, wrote 25.7% more than predicted freespace: was free: 76759040 bytes 73.2 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 19730432 bytes 18.8 MiB, wrote 25.7% more than predicted freespace: Test 1 finished freespace: Test 2: gradually lessen amount of free space and fill the FS freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 6977722 bytes 6.7 MiB each time freespace: was free: 72273920 bytes 68.9 MiB, wrote: 88891392 bytes 84.8 MiB, delta: 16617472 bytes 15.8 MiB, wrote 23.0% more than predicted freespace: was free: 66154496 bytes 63.1 MiB, wrote: 81506304 bytes 77.7 MiB, delta: 15351808 bytes 14.6 MiB, wrote 23.2% more than predicted freespace: was free: 58732544 bytes 56.0 MiB, wrote: 72572928 bytes 69.2 MiB, delta: 13840384 bytes 13.2 MiB, wrote 23.6% more than predicted freespace: was free: 51552256 bytes 49.2 MiB, wrote: 63754240 bytes 60.8 MiB, delta: 12201984 bytes 11.6 MiB, wrote 23.7% more than predicted freespace: was free: 44404736 bytes 42.3 MiB, wrote: 54943744 bytes 52.4 MiB, delta: 10539008 bytes 10.1 MiB, wrote 23.7% more than predicted freespace: was free: 37285888 bytes 35.6 MiB, wrote: 46161920 bytes 44.0 MiB, delta: 8876032 bytes 8.5 MiB, wrote 23.8% more than predicted freespace: was free: 30171136 bytes 28.8 MiB, wrote: 37384192 bytes 35.7 MiB, delta: 7213056 bytes 6.9 MiB, wrote 23.9% more than predicted freespace: was free: 23048192 bytes 22.0 MiB, wrote: 28606464 bytes 27.3 MiB, delta: 5558272 bytes 5.3 MiB, wrote 24.1% more than predicted freespace: was free: 15941632 bytes 15.2 MiB, wrote: 19828736 bytes 18.9 MiB, delta: 3887104 bytes 3.7 MiB, wrote 24.4% more than predicted freespace: was free: 8830976 bytes 8.4 MiB, wrote: 11063296 bytes 10.6 MiB, delta: 2232320 bytes 2.1 MiB, wrote 25.3% more than predicted freespace: Test 2 finished freespace: Test 3: gradually lessen amount of free space by trashing and fill the FS freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 6985541 bytes 6.7 MiB each time freespace: trashing: was free: 76840960 bytes 73.3 MiB, need free: 6985550 bytes 6.7 MiB, files created: 248311, delete 225737 (90.9% of them) freespace: was free: 65228800 bytes 62.2 MiB, wrote: 82530304 bytes 78.7 MiB, delta: 17301504 bytes 16.5 MiB, wrote 26.5% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 74485760 bytes 71.0 MiB, need free: 13971091 bytes 13.3 MiB, files created: 248712, delete 202061 (81.2% of them) freespace: was free: 55025664 bytes 52.5 MiB, wrote: 71925760 bytes 68.6 MiB, delta: 16900096 bytes 16.1 MiB, wrote 30.7% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 75550720 bytes 72.1 MiB, need free: 20956632 bytes 20.0 MiB, files created: 248849, delete 179822 (72.3% of them) freespace: was free: 46669824 bytes 44.5 MiB, wrote: 63197184 bytes 60.3 MiB, delta: 16527360 bytes 15.8 MiB, wrote 35.4% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 76214272 bytes 72.7 MiB, need free: 27942173 bytes 26.6 MiB, files created: 248789, delete 157576 (63.3% of them) freespace: was free: 39129088 bytes 37.3 MiB, wrote: 55164928 bytes 52.6 MiB, delta: 16035840 bytes 15.3 MiB, wrote 41.0% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 77398016 bytes 73.8 MiB, need free: 34927714 bytes 33.3 MiB, files created: 248711, delete 136474 (54.9% of them) freespace: was free: 32325632 bytes 30.8 MiB, wrote: 48234496 bytes 46.0 MiB, delta: 15908864 bytes 15.2 MiB, wrote 49.2% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 75796480 bytes 72.3 MiB, need free: 41913255 bytes 40.0 MiB, files created: 248674, delete 111164 (44.7% of them) freespace: was free: 25079808 bytes 23.9 MiB, wrote: 40775680 bytes 38.9 MiB, delta: 15695872 bytes 15.0 MiB, wrote 62.6% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 78209024 bytes 74.6 MiB, need free: 48898796 bytes 46.6 MiB, files created: 248708, delete 93207 (37.5% of them) freespace: was free: 20582400 bytes 19.6 MiB, wrote: 34844672 bytes 33.2 MiB, delta: 14262272 bytes 13.6 MiB, wrote 69.3% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 77328384 bytes 73.7 MiB, need free: 55884337 bytes 53.3 MiB, files created: 248644, delete 68951 (27.7% of them) freespace: was free: 14368768 bytes 13.7 MiB, wrote: 28278784 bytes 27.0 MiB, delta: 13910016 bytes 13.3 MiB, wrote 96.8% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 77434880 bytes 73.8 MiB, need free: 62869878 bytes 60.0 MiB, files created: 248640, delete 46767 (18.8% of them) freespace: was free: 8286208 bytes 7.9 MiB, wrote: 21811200 bytes 20.8 MiB, delta: 13524992 bytes 12.9 MiB, wrote 163.2% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 77856768 bytes 74.2 MiB, need free: 69855419 bytes 66.6 MiB, files created: 248576, delete 25546 (10.3% of them) freespace: was free: 5570560 bytes 5.3 MiB, wrote: 8187904 bytes 7.8 MiB, delta: 2617344 bytes 2.5 MiB, wrote 47.0% more than predicted freespace: Test 3 finished freespace: finished successfully After the change: freespace: Test 1: fill the space we have 3 times freespace: was free: 85204992 bytes 81.3 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 11284480 bytes 10.8 MiB, wrote 13.2% more than predicted freespace: was free: 83554304 bytes 79.7 MiB, wrote: 96489472 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 12935168 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 15.5% more than predicted freespace: was free: 83554304 bytes 79.7 MiB, wrote: 96493568 bytes 92.0 MiB, delta: 12939264 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 15.5% more than predicted freespace: Test 1 finished freespace: Test 2: gradually lessen amount of free space and fill the FS freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 7596218 bytes 7.2 MiB each time freespace: was free: 78675968 bytes 75.0 MiB, wrote: 88903680 bytes 84.8 MiB, delta: 10227712 bytes 9.8 MiB, wrote 13.0% more than predicted freespace: was free: 72015872 bytes 68.7 MiB, wrote: 81514496 bytes 77.7 MiB, delta: 9498624 bytes 9.1 MiB, wrote 13.2% more than predicted freespace: was free: 63938560 bytes 61.0 MiB, wrote: 72589312 bytes 69.2 MiB, delta: 8650752 bytes 8.2 MiB, wrote 13.5% more than predicted freespace: was free: 56127488 bytes 53.5 MiB, wrote: 63762432 bytes 60.8 MiB, delta: 7634944 bytes 7.3 MiB, wrote 13.6% more than predicted freespace: was free: 48336896 bytes 46.1 MiB, wrote: 54935552 bytes 52.4 MiB, delta: 6598656 bytes 6.3 MiB, wrote 13.7% more than predicted freespace: was free: 40587264 bytes 38.7 MiB, wrote: 46157824 bytes 44.0 MiB, delta: 5570560 bytes 5.3 MiB, wrote 13.7% more than predicted freespace: was free: 32841728 bytes 31.3 MiB, wrote: 37384192 bytes 35.7 MiB, delta: 4542464 bytes 4.3 MiB, wrote 13.8% more than predicted freespace: was free: 25100288 bytes 23.9 MiB, wrote: 28618752 bytes 27.3 MiB, delta: 3518464 bytes 3.4 MiB, wrote 14.0% more than predicted freespace: was free: 17342464 bytes 16.5 MiB, wrote: 19841024 bytes 18.9 MiB, delta: 2498560 bytes 2.4 MiB, wrote 14.4% more than predicted freespace: was free: 9605120 bytes 9.2 MiB, wrote: 11063296 bytes 10.6 MiB, delta: 1458176 bytes 1.4 MiB, wrote 15.2% more than predicted freespace: Test 2 finished freespace: Test 3: gradually lessen amount of free space by trashing and fill the FS freespace: do 10 steps, lessen free space by 7606272 bytes 7.3 MiB each time freespace: trashing: was free: 83668992 bytes 79.8 MiB, need free: 7606272 bytes 7.3 MiB, files created: 248297, delete 225724 (90.9% of them) freespace: was free: 70803456 bytes 67.5 MiB, wrote: 82485248 bytes 78.7 MiB, delta: 11681792 bytes 11.1 MiB, wrote 16.5% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 81080320 bytes 77.3 MiB, need free: 15212544 bytes 14.5 MiB, files created: 248711, delete 202047 (81.2% of them) freespace: was free: 59867136 bytes 57.1 MiB, wrote: 71897088 bytes 68.6 MiB, delta: 12029952 bytes 11.5 MiB, wrote 20.1% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 82243584 bytes 78.4 MiB, need free: 22818816 bytes 21.8 MiB, files created: 248866, delete 179817 (72.3% of them) freespace: was free: 50905088 bytes 48.5 MiB, wrote: 63168512 bytes 60.2 MiB, delta: 12263424 bytes 11.7 MiB, wrote 24.1% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 83402752 bytes 79.5 MiB, need free: 30425088 bytes 29.0 MiB, files created: 248920, delete 158114 (63.5% of them) freespace: was free: 42651648 bytes 40.7 MiB, wrote: 55406592 bytes 52.8 MiB, delta: 12754944 bytes 12.2 MiB, wrote 29.9% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 84402176 bytes 80.5 MiB, need free: 38031360 bytes 36.3 MiB, files created: 248709, delete 136641 (54.9% of them) freespace: was free: 35233792 bytes 33.6 MiB, wrote: 48250880 bytes 46.0 MiB, delta: 13017088 bytes 12.4 MiB, wrote 36.9% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 82530304 bytes 78.7 MiB, need free: 45637632 bytes 43.5 MiB, files created: 248778, delete 111208 (44.7% of them) freespace: was free: 27287552 bytes 26.0 MiB, wrote: 40267776 bytes 38.4 MiB, delta: 12980224 bytes 12.4 MiB, wrote 47.6% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 85114880 bytes 81.2 MiB, need free: 53243904 bytes 50.8 MiB, files created: 248508, delete 93052 (37.4% of them) freespace: was free: 22437888 bytes 21.4 MiB, wrote: 35328000 bytes 33.7 MiB, delta: 12890112 bytes 12.3 MiB, wrote 57.4% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 84103168 bytes 80.2 MiB, need free: 60850176 bytes 58.0 MiB, files created: 248637, delete 68743 (27.6% of them) freespace: was free: 15536128 bytes 14.8 MiB, wrote: 28319744 bytes 27.0 MiB, delta: 12783616 bytes 12.2 MiB, wrote 82.3% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 84357120 bytes 80.4 MiB, need free: 68456448 bytes 65.3 MiB, files created: 248567, delete 46852 (18.8% of them) freespace: was free: 9015296 bytes 8.6 MiB, wrote: 22044672 bytes 21.0 MiB, delta: 13029376 bytes 12.4 MiB, wrote 144.5% more than predicted freespace: trashing: was free: 84942848 bytes 81.0 MiB, need free: 76062720 bytes 72.5 MiB, files created: 248636, delete 25993 (10.5% of them) freespace: was free: 6086656 bytes 5.8 MiB, wrote: 8331264 bytes 7.9 MiB, delta: 2244608 bytes 2.1 MiB, wrote 36.9% more than predicted freespace: Test 3 finished freespace: finished successfully Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
When we report free space to user-space, we should not report 0 if the amount of empty LEBs is too low, because they would be produced by GC when needed. Thus, just call 'ubifs_calc_available()' straight away which would take 'min_idx_lebs' into account anyway. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-