Signed-off-by: NAlex Lyakas <alex@zadarastorage.com>
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Xfstests btrfs/011 complains about a deadlock warning,

[ 1226.649039] =========================================================
[ 1226.649039] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
[ 1226.649039] 4.1.0+ #270 Not tainted
[ 1226.649039] ---------------------------------------------------------
[ 1226.652955] kswapd0/46 just changed the state of lock:
[ 1226.652955]  (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0
[ 1226.652955] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past:
[ 1226.652955]  (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.}

and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.

[ 1226.652955]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1226.652955] Chain exists of:
  &delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock

[ 1226.652955]  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:

[ 1226.652955]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 1226.652955]        ----                    ----
[ 1226.652955]   lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock);
[ 1226.652955]                                local_irq_disable();
[ 1226.652955]                                lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
[ 1226.652955]                                lock(&found->groups_sem);
[ 1226.652955]   <Interrupt>
[ 1226.652955]     lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
[ 1226.652955]
 *** DEADLOCK ***

Commit 084b6e7c ("btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning when running xfstest.") tried
to fix a similar one that has the exactly same warning, but with that, we still
run to this.

The above lock chain comes from
btrfs_commit_transaction
  ->btrfs_run_delayed_items
    ...
    ->__btrfs_update_delayed_inode
      ...
      ->__btrfs_cow_block
         ...
         ->find_free_extent
            ->cache_block_group
              ->load_free_space_cache
                ->btrfs_readpages
                  ->submit_one_bio
                    ...
                    ->__btrfs_map_block
                      ->btrfs_dev_replace_lock

However, with high memory pressure, tasks which hold dev_replace.lock can
be interrupted by kswapd and then kswapd is intended to release memory occupied
by superblock, inodes and dentries, where we may call evict_inode, and it comes
to

[ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0
[ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff81459e74>] btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x24/0x30
[ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff8140c5fe>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x34e/0x700

delayed_node->mutex may be acquired in __btrfs_release_delayed_node(), and it leads
to a ABBA deadlock.

To fix this, we can use "blocking rwlock" used in the case of extent_buffer, but
things are simpler here since we only needs read's spinlock to blocking lock.

With this, btrfs/011 no more produces warnings in dmesg.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Cleanup.

kmem_cache_destroy has support NULL argument checking,
so drop the double null testing before calling it.
Signed-off-by: NKinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Reada creates 2 works for each level of tree recursively.

In case of a tree having many levels, the number of created works
is 2^level_of_tree.
Actually we don't need so many works in parallel, this patch limits
max works to BTRFS_MAX_MIRRORS * 2.

The per-fs works_counter will be also used for btrfs_reada_wait() to
check is there are background workers.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

What __readahead_hook() need exactly is fs_info, no need to convert
fs_info to root in caller and convert back in __readahead_hook()
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Introduce a new mount option "nologreplay" to co-operate with "ro" mount
option to get real readonly mount, like "norecovery" in ext* and xfs.

Since the new parse_options() need to check new flags at remount time,
so add a new parameter for parse_options().
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: NAustin S. Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Current "recovery" mount option will only try to use backup root.
However the word "recovery" is too generic and may be confusing for some
users.

Here introduce a new and more specific mount option, "usebackuproot" to
replace "recovery" mount option.
"Recovery" will be kept for compatibility reason, but will be
deprecated.

Also, since "usebackuproot" will only affect mount behavior and after
open_ctree() it has nothing to do with the filesystem, so clear the flag
after mount succeeded.

This provides the basis for later unified "norecovery" mount option.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
[ dropped usebackuproot from show_mount, added note about 'recovery' to
  docs ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

We don't need to use GFP_NOFS in all contexts, eg. during mount or for
dummy root tree, but we might for the the log tree creation.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This reverts commit 69624913. The
cleaner thread can block freezing when there's a snapshot cleaning in
progress and the other threads get suspended first. From the logs
provided by Martin we're waiting for reading extent pages:

kernel: PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
kernel: Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.015 seconds) done.
kernel: Freezing remaining freezable tasks ...
kernel: Freezing of tasks failed after 20.003 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
kernel: btrfs-cleaner   D ffff88033dd13bc0     0   152      2 0x00000000
kernel: ffff88032ebc2e00 ffff88032e750000 ffff88032e74fa50 7fffffffffffffff
kernel: ffffffff814a58df 0000000000000002 ffffea000934d580 ffffffff814a5451
kernel: 7fffffffffffffff ffffffff814a6e8f 0000000000000000 0000000000000020
kernel: Call Trace:
kernel: [<ffffffff814a58df>] ? bit_wait+0x2c/0x2c
kernel: [<ffffffff814a5451>] ? schedule+0x6f/0x7c
kernel: [<ffffffff814a6e8f>] ? schedule_timeout+0x2f/0xd8
kernel: [<ffffffff81076f94>] ? timekeeping_get_ns+0xa/0x2e
kernel: [<ffffffff81077603>] ? ktime_get+0x36/0x44
kernel: [<ffffffff814a4f6c>] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x94/0xf2
kernel: [<ffffffff814a4f6c>] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x94/0xf2
kernel: [<ffffffff814a590b>] ? bit_wait_io+0x2c/0x30
kernel: [<ffffffff814a5694>] ? __wait_on_bit+0x41/0x73
kernel: [<ffffffff8109eba8>] ? wait_on_page_bit+0x6d/0x72
kernel: [<ffffffff8105d718>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x2a/0x2a
kernel: [<ffffffff811a02d7>] ? read_extent_buffer_pages+0x1bd/0x203
kernel: [<ffffffff8117d9e9>] ? free_root_pointers+0x4c/0x4c
kernel: [<ffffffff8117e831>] ? btree_read_extent_buffer_pages.constprop.57+0x5a/0xe9
kernel: [<ffffffff8117f4f3>] ? read_tree_block+0x2d/0x45
kernel: [<ffffffff8116782a>] ? read_block_for_search.isra.34+0x22a/0x26b
kernel: [<ffffffff811656c3>] ? btrfs_set_path_blocking+0x1e/0x4a
kernel: [<ffffffff8116919b>] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x648/0x736
kernel: [<ffffffff81170559>] ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0xb7/0x2c7
kernel: [<ffffffff81170ee5>] ? walk_down_proc+0x9c/0x1ae
kernel: [<ffffffff81171c9d>] ? walk_down_tree+0x40/0xa4
kernel: [<ffffffff8117375f>] ? btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x2da/0x664
kernel: [<ffffffff8104ff21>] ? finish_task_switch+0x126/0x167
kernel: [<ffffffff811850f8>] ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xa6/0xb0
kernel: [<ffffffff8117eaba>] ? cleaner_kthread+0x13e/0x17b
kernel: [<ffffffff8117e97c>] ? btrfs_item_end+0x33/0x33
kernel: [<ffffffff8104d256>] ? kthread+0x95/0x9d
kernel: [<ffffffff8104d1c1>] ? kthread_parkme+0x16/0x16
kernel: [<ffffffff814a7b5f>] ? ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
kernel: [<ffffffff8104d1c1>] ? kthread_parkme+0x16/0x16

As this affects a released kernel (4.4) we need a minimal fix for
stable kernels.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108361Reported-by: NMartin Ziegler <ziegler@uni-freiburg.de>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4
CC: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Enhance btrfs_check_super_valid() function by the following points:
1) Restrict sector/node size check
   Not the old max/min valid check, but also check if it's a power of 2.
   So some bogus number like 12K node size won't pass now.

2) Super flag check
   For now, there is still some inconsistency between kernel and
   btrfs-progs super flags.
   And considering btrfs-progs may add new flags for super block, this
   check will only output warning.

3) Better root alignment check
   Now root bytenr is checked against sector size.

4) Move some check into btrfs_check_super_valid().
   Like node size vs leaf size check, and PAGESIZE vs sectorsize check.
   And magic number check.
Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

While running a stress test I ran into a deadlock when running the delayed
iputs at transaction time, which produced the following report and trace:

[  886.399989] =============================================
[  886.400871] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[  886.401663] 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 Not tainted
[  886.402384] ---------------------------------------------
[  886.403182] fio/8277 is trying to acquire lock:
[  886.403568]  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568] but task is already holding lock:
[  886.403568]  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568] other info that might help us debug this:
[  886.403568]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568]        CPU0
[  886.403568]        ----
[  886.403568]   lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem);
[  886.403568]   lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem);
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568] 3 locks held by fio/8277:
[  886.403568]  #0:  (sb_writers#11){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81174c4c>] __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[  886.403568]  #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa054620d>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x73/0x408 [btrfs]
[  886.403568]  #2:  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568] stack backtrace:
[  886.403568] CPU: 6 PID: 8277 Comm: fio Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
[  886.403568] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[  886.403568]  0000000000000000 ffff88009f80f770 ffffffff8125d4fd ffffffff82af1fc0
[  886.403568]  ffff88009f80f830 ffffffff8108e5f9 0000000200000000 ffff88009fd92290
[  886.403568]  0000000000000000 ffffffff82af1fc0 ffffffff829cfb01 00042b216d008804
[  886.403568] Call Trace:
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8125d4fd>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x79
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108e5f9>] __lock_acquire+0xd42/0xf0b
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffff810c22db>] ? __module_address+0xdf/0x108
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108eb77>] lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108eb77>] ? lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8148556b>] down_read+0x3e/0x4d
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521d7a>] flush_space+0x435/0x44a [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa052218b>] ? reserve_metadata_bytes+0x26a/0x384 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05221ae>] reserve_metadata_bytes+0x28d/0x384 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa052256c>] ? btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x58/0x96 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0522584>] btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x70/0x96 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053d747>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x394/0x55a [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81188e31>] evict+0xa7/0x15c
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81189878>] iput+0x1d3/0x266
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053887c>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x8f/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81085096>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521191>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1d7/0x288 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[ 1081.852335] INFO: task fio:8244 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[ 1081.854348]       Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
[ 1081.857560] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[ 1081.863227] fio        D ffff880213f9bb28     0  8244   8240 0x00000000
[ 1081.868719]  ffff880213f9bb28 00ffffff810fc6b0 ffffffff0000000a ffff88023ed55240
[ 1081.872499]  ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9c000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff880206b5d400
[ 1081.876834]  ffffffff00000001 ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9bb40 ffffffff81482ba4
[ 1081.880782] Call Trace:
[ 1081.881793]  [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97
[ 1081.883340]  [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325
[ 1081.895525]  [<ffffffff8108d48d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16/0x1ab
[ 1081.897419]  [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
[ 1081.899251]  [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
[ 1081.901063]  [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21
[ 1081.902365]  [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57
[ 1081.903846]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
[ 1081.906078]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
[ 1081.908846]  [<ffffffff8108d461>] ? mark_held_locks+0x56/0x6c
[ 1081.910409]  [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs]
[ 1081.912482]  [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs]
[ 1081.914597]  [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs]
[ 1081.919037]  [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
[ 1081.920754]  [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs]
[ 1081.922496]  [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50
[ 1081.923922]  [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5
[ 1081.925275]  [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4
[ 1081.926584]  [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e
[ 1081.927968]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[ 1081.985293] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[ 1081.986132] INFO: task fio:8249 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[ 1081.987434]       Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
[ 1081.988534] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[ 1081.990147] fio        D ffff880218febbb8     0  8249   8240 0x00000000
[ 1081.991626]  ffff880218febbb8 00ffffff81486b8e ffff88020000000b ffff88023ed75240
[ 1081.993258]  ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218fec000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff8802120a9a00
[ 1081.994850]  ffffffff00000001 ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218febbd0 ffffffff81482ba4
[ 1081.996485] Call Trace:
[ 1081.997037]  [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97
[ 1081.998017]  [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325
[ 1081.999241]  [<ffffffff810852a5>] ? finish_wait+0x6d/0x76
[ 1082.000306]  [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
[ 1082.001533]  [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
[ 1082.002776]  [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21
[ 1082.003995]  [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57
[ 1082.005000]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
[ 1082.007403]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
[ 1082.008988]  [<ffffffffa0545064>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7c1/0xc2f [btrfs]
[ 1082.010193]  [<ffffffff8108a1ba>] ? percpu_down_read+0x4e/0x77
[ 1082.011280]  [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[ 1082.012265]  [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[ 1082.013021]  [<ffffffff811712e4>] vfs_fallocate+0x170/0x1ff
[ 1082.013738]  [<ffffffff81181ebb>] ioctl_preallocate+0x89/0x9b
[ 1082.014778]  [<ffffffff811822d7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x40a/0x4ea
[ 1082.015778]  [<ffffffff81176ea7>] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e
[ 1082.016806]  [<ffffffff8118b4de>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71
[ 1082.017789]  [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[ 1082.018706]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f

This happens because we can recursively acquire the semaphore
fs_info->delayed_iput_sem when attempting to allocate space to satisfy
a file write request as shown in the first trace above - when committing
a transaction we acquire (down_read) the semaphore before running the
delayed iputs, and when running a delayed iput() we can end up calling
an inode's eviction handler, which in turn commits another transaction
and attempts to acquire (down_read) again the semaphore to run more
delayed iput operations.
This results in a deadlock because if a task acquires multiple times a
semaphore it should invoke down_read_nested() with a different lockdep
class for each level of recursion.

Fix this by simplifying the implementation and use a mutex instead that
is acquired by the cleaner kthread before it runs the delayed iputs
instead of always acquiring a semaphore before delayed references are
run from anywhere.

Fixes: d7c15171 (btrfs: Fix NO_SPACE bug caused by delayed-iput)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org   # 4.1+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The following call trace is seen when btrfs/031 test is executed in a loop,

[  158.661848] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  158.662634] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 890 at /home/chandan/repos/linux/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:558 create_subvol+0x3d1/0x6ea()
[  158.664102] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
[  158.664774] Modules linked in:
[  158.665266] CPU: 2 PID: 890 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-g511711af #2
[  158.666251] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[  158.667392]  ffffffff81c0a6b0 ffff8806c7c4f8e8 ffffffff81431fc8 ffff8806c7c4f930
[  158.668515]  ffff8806c7c4f920 ffffffff81051aa1 ffff880c85aff000 ffff8800bb44d000
[  158.669647]  ffff8808863b5c98 0000000000000000 00000000fffffffe ffff8806c7c4f980
[  158.670769] Call Trace:
[  158.671153]  [<ffffffff81431fc8>] dump_stack+0x44/0x5c
[  158.671884]  [<ffffffff81051aa1>] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xc0
[  158.672769]  [<ffffffff81051b27>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x47/0x50
[  158.673620]  [<ffffffff813bc98d>] create_subvol+0x3d1/0x6ea
[  158.674440]  [<ffffffff813777c9>] btrfs_mksubvol.isra.30+0x369/0x520
[  158.675376]  [<ffffffff8108a4aa>] ? percpu_down_read+0x1a/0x50
[  158.676235]  [<ffffffff81377a81>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x101/0x180
[  158.677268]  [<ffffffff81377b52>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x52/0x70
[  158.678183]  [<ffffffff8137afb4>] btrfs_ioctl+0x474/0x2f90
[  158.678975]  [<ffffffff81144b8e>] ? vma_merge+0xee/0x300
[  158.679751]  [<ffffffff8115be31>] ? alloc_pages_vma+0x91/0x170
[  158.680599]  [<ffffffff81123f62>] ? lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable+0x22/0x70
[  158.681686]  [<ffffffff813d99cf>] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0xff/0x1d0
[  158.682581]  [<ffffffff8117b791>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2c1/0x490
[  158.683399]  [<ffffffff813d3cde>] ? security_file_ioctl+0x3e/0x60
[  158.684297]  [<ffffffff8117b9d4>] SyS_ioctl+0x74/0x80
[  158.685051]  [<ffffffff819b2bd7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6a
[  158.685958] ---[ end trace 4b63312de5a2cb76 ]---
[  158.686647] BTRFS: error (device loop0) in create_subvol:558: errno=-2 No such entry
[  158.709508] BTRFS info (device loop0): forced readonly
[  158.737113] BTRFS info (device loop0): disk space caching is enabled
[  158.738096] BTRFS error (device loop0): Remounting read-write after error is not allowed
[  158.851303] BTRFS error (device loop0): cleaner transaction attach returned -30

This occurs because,

Mount filesystem
Create subvol with ID 257
Unmount filesystem
Mount filesystem
Delete subvol with ID 257
  btrfs_drop_snapshot()
    Add root corresponding to subvol 257 into
    btrfs_transaction->dropped_roots list
Create new subvol (i.e. create_subvol())
  257 is returned as the next free objectid
  btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name()
    Finds the btrfs_root instance corresponding to the old subvol with ID 257
    in btrfs_fs_info->fs_roots_radix.
    Returns error since btrfs_root_item->refs has the value of 0.

To fix the issue the commit initializes tree root's and subvolume root's
highest_objectid when loading the roots from disk.
Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

We use many constants to represent size and offset value.  And to make
code readable we use '256 * 1024 * 1024' instead of '268435456' to
represent '256MB'.  However we can make far more readable with 'SZ_256MB'
which is defined in the 'linux/sizes.h'.

So this patch replaces 'xxx * 1024 * 1024' kind of expression with
single 'SZ_xxxMB' if 'xxx' is a power of 2 then 'xxx * SZ_1M' if 'xxx' is
not a power of 2. And I haven't touched to '4096' & '8192' because it's
more intuitive than 'SZ_4KB' & 'SZ_8KB'.
Signed-off-by: NByongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Looks like oversight, call brelse() when checksum fails. Further down the
code, in the non error path, we do call brelse() and so we don't see
brelse() in the goto error paths.
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This is a short term solution to make sure btrfs_run_delayed_refs()
doesn't change the extent tree while we are scanning it to create the
free space tree.

Longer term we need to synchronize scanning the block groups one by one,
similar to what happens during a balance.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Those are stupid and code should use static_cpu_has_safe() or
boot_cpu_has() instead. Kill the least used and unused ones.

The remaining ones need more careful inspection before a conversion can
happen. On the TODO.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449481182-27541-4-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Now we can finally hook up everything so we can actually use free space
tree. The free space tree is enabled by passing the space_cache=v2 mount
option. On the first mount with the this option set, the free space tree
will be created and the FREE_SPACE_TREE read-only compat bit will be
set. Any time the filesystem is mounted from then on, we must use the
free space tree. The clear_cache option will also clear the free space
tree.
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

We've always passed 0. Stack usage will slightly decrease.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd

__GFP_WAIT has been used to identify atomic context in callers that hold
spinlocks or are in interrupts.  They are expected to be high priority and
have access one of two watermarks lower than "min" which can be referred
to as the "atomic reserve".  __GFP_HIGH users get access to the first
lower watermark and can be called the "high priority reserve".

Over time, callers had a requirement to not block when fallback options
were available.  Some have abused __GFP_WAIT leading to a situation where
an optimisitic allocation with a fallback option can access atomic
reserves.

This patch uses __GFP_ATOMIC to identify callers that are truely atomic,
cannot sleep and have no alternative.  High priority users continue to use
__GFP_HIGH.  __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM identifies callers that can sleep and
are willing to enter direct reclaim.  __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to identify
callers that want to wake kswapd for background reclaim.  __GFP_WAIT is
redefined as a caller that is willing to enter direct reclaim and wake
kswapd for background reclaim.

This patch then converts a number of sites

o __GFP_ATOMIC is used by callers that are high priority and have memory
  pools for those requests. GFP_ATOMIC uses this flag.

o Callers that have a limited mempool to guarantee forward progress clear
  __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM but keep __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. bio allocations fall
  into this category where kswapd will still be woken but atomic reserves
  are not used as there is a one-entry mempool to guarantee progress.

o Callers that are checking if they are non-blocking should use the
  helper gfpflags_allow_blocking() where possible. This is because
  checking for __GFP_WAIT as was done historically now can trigger false
  positives. Some exceptions like dm-crypt.c exist where the code intent
  is clearer if __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is used instead of the helper due to
  flag manipulations.

o Callers that built their own GFP flags instead of starting with GFP_KERNEL
  and friends now also need to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM.

The first key hazard to watch out for is callers that removed __GFP_WAIT
and was depending on access to atomic reserves for inconspicuous reasons.
In some cases it may be appropriate for them to use __GFP_HIGH.

The second key hazard is callers that assembled their own combination of
GFP flags instead of starting with something like GFP_KERNEL.  They may
now wish to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM.  It's almost certainly harmless
if it's missed in most cases as other activity will wake kswapd.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

I was hitting a consistent NULL pointer dereference during shutdown that
showed the trace running through end_workqueue_bio().  I traced it back to
the endio_meta_workers workqueue being poked after it had already been
destroyed.

Eventually I found that the root cause was a qgroup rescan that was still
in progress while we were stopping all the btrfs workers.

Currently we explicitly pause balance and scrub operations in
close_ctree(), but we do nothing to stop the qgroup rescan.  We should
probably be doing the same for qgroup rescan, but that's a much larger
change.  This small change is good enough to allow me to unmount without
crashing.
Signed-off-by: NJustin Maggard <jmaggard@netgear.com>
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

cleaner_kthread() kthread calls try_to_freeze() at the beginning of every
cleanup attempt. This operation can't ever succeed though, as the kthread
hasn't marked itself as freezable.

Before (hopefully eventually) kthread freezing gets converted to fileystem
freezing, we'd rather mark cleaner_kthread() freezable (as my
understanding is that it can generate filesystem I/O during suspend).
Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We have a mechanism to make sure we don't lose updates for ordered extents that
were logged in the transaction that is currently running.  We add the ordered
extent to a transaction list and then the transaction waits on all the ordered
extents in that list.  However are substantially large file systems this list
can be extremely large, and can give us soft lockups, since the ordered extents
don't remove themselves from the list when they do complete.

To fix this we simply add a counter to the transaction that is incremented any
time we have a logged extent that needs to be completed in the current
transaction.  Then when the ordered extent finally completes it decrements the
per transaction counter and wakes up the transaction if we are the last ones.
This will eliminate the softlockup.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Introduce new functions btrfs_qgroup_reserve/free_meta() to reserve/free
metadata reserved space.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

btrfs_raid_array[] is used to define all raid attributes, use it
to get tolerated_failures in btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(),
instead of complex condition in function.

It can make code simple and auto-support other possible raid-type in
future.
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

There are atomic operations that imply the barrier for waitqueue_active
mixed in an if-condition.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Convert the simple cases, not all functions provide a way to reach the
fs_info. Also skipped debugging messages (print-tree, integrity
checker and pr_debug) and messages that are printed from possibly
unfinished mount.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

After reading one of chunk or tree root tree's root node from disk, if the
root node does not have EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE flag set, we fail to release
the memory used by the root node. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This uses a chunk of code from btrfs_read_dev_super() and creates
a function called btrfs_read_dev_one_super() so that next patch
can use it for scratch superblock.
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
[renamed bufhead to bh]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs_error() and btrfs_std_error() does the same thing
and calls _btrfs_std_error(), so consolidate them together.
And the main motivation is that btrfs_error() is closely
named with btrfs_err(), one handles error action the other
is to log the error, so don't closely name them.
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Suggested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This will return EIO when __bread() fails to read SB,
instead of EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

After commmit e44163e1 ("btrfs: explictly delete unused block groups
in close_ctree and ro-remount"), added in the 4.3 merge window, we have
calls to btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() while holding the cleaner_mutex.
This can cause a deadlock with a concurrent block group relocation (when
a filesystem balance or shrink operation is in progress for example)
because btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() locks delete_unused_bgs_mutex and the
relocation path locks first delete_unused_bgs_mutex and then it locks
cleaner_mutex, resulting in a classic ABBA deadlock:

         CPU 0                                        CPU 1

lock fs_info->cleaner_mutex

                                           __btrfs_balance() || btrfs_shrink_device()
                                             lock fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex
                                             btrfs_relocate_chunk()
                                               btrfs_relocate_block_group()
                                                 lock fs_info->cleaner_mutex
btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()
  lock fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex

Fix this by not taking the cleaner_mutex before calling
btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() because it's no longer needed after
commit 67c5e7d4 ("Btrfs: fix race between balance and unused block
group deletion"). The mutex fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex, the
spinlock fs_info->unused_bgs_lock and a block group's spinlock are
enough to get correct serialization between tasks running relocation
and unused block group deletion (as well as between multiple tasks
concurrently calling btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()).

This issue was discussed (in the mailing list) during the review of
the patch titled "btrfs: explictly delete unused block groups in
close_ctree and ro-remount" and it was agreed that acquiring the
cleaner mutex had to be dropped after the patch titled
"Btrfs: fix race between balance and unused block group deletion"
got merged (both patches were submitted at about the same time, but
one landed in kernel 4.2 and the other in the 4.3 merge window).
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

 num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in btrfs_balance

Code for updating fs_info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in
btrfs_balance() lacks raid56 support.

Reason:
 Above code was wroten in 2012-08-01, together with
 btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures()'s first version.

 Then, btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures() got updated
 later to support raid56, but code in btrfs_balance() was not
 updated together.

Fix:
 Merge above similar code to a common function:
 btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures()
 and make it support both case.

 It can fix this bug with a bonus of cleanup, and make these code
 never in above no-sync state from now on.
Suggested-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

1: Use ARRAY_SIZE(types) to replace a static-value variant:
   int num_types = 4;

2: Use 'continue' on condition to reduce one level tab
   if (!XXX) {
       code;
       ...
   }
   ->
   if (XXX)
       continue;
   code;
   ...

3: Put setting 'num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 2' to
   (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 2) condition to make
   make logic neat.
   if (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 0 && XXX)
       num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 0;
   else if (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 1) {
       if (XXX)
           num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 1;
       else if (XXX)
           num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 2;
   ->
   if (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 0 && XXX)
       num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 0;
   if (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 1 && XXX)
       num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = ;
   if (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 2 && XXX)
       num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 2;

4: Remove comment of:
   num_mirrors - 1: if RAID1 or RAID10 is configured and more
   than 2 mirrors are used.
   which is not fit with code.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>