- 28 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christian Hitz 提交于
Make it is safe to assign the return value of this function to u8/u16 variables. Signed-off-by: NChristian Hitz <christian.hitz@aizo.com> Signed-off-by: NNicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
-
- 05 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nicolas Ferre 提交于
The recently modified nand buswitth configuration is not aligned with board reality: the double footprint on boards is always populated with 8bits buswidth nand flashes. So we have to consider that without particular configuration the 8bits buswidth is selected by default. Moreover, the previous logic was always using !board_have_nand_8bit(), we change it to a simpler: board_have_nand_16bit(). Signed-off-by: NNicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Tested-by: NLudovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
-
- 25 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
no board configure it as 'n' and it's an issue to merge all defconfigs in one On AT91SAM926x boards both types of NAND flash can be present (8 and 16 bit data bus width). so will pass it via system_rev Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Acked-by: NNicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Cc: Patrice Vilchez <patrice.vilchez@atmel.com>
-