- 20 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
Add support for inetaddr_validator and inet6addr_validator. The notifiers provide a means for validating ipv4 and ipv6 addresses before the addresses are installed and on failure the error is propagated back to the user. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 10月, 2017 5 次提交
-
-
由 Petr Machata 提交于
Formerly, IPIP entries were created lazily by next hops that referenced an offloadable IP-in-IP netdevice. However now that they are created eagerly as a reaction to events on such netdevices, the reference counting is useless. Hence drop it. The routes whose next hops reference an offloaded IP-in-IP netdevice actually linger around a bit after their device is unregistered. However, mlxsw_sp_ipip_entry_destroy() also destroys the backing loopback, and mlxsw_sp_rif_destroy() transitively (via mlxsw_sp_nexthop_rif_gone_sync()) calls mlxsw_sp_nexthop_ipip_fini(), which unlinks the IPIP entry from a next hop. Thus no dangling pointers are left behind for the brief window after netdevice is gone, but routes not yet. Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Petr Machata 提交于
IPIP entries are created as soon as an offloadable device is created. That means that when such a device is later moved to a different VRF, the loopback device that backs the tunnel is wrong. Thus when an offloadable encapsulating netdevice moves from one VRF to another, make sure that the loopback is updated as necessary. Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Petr Machata 提交于
Current code for offloading IP-in-IP tunneling assumes that there is no decap without encap. But that's never true for IPv6 overlays, and is not true for IPv4 ones either, if net.ipv4.conf.*.rp_filter is unset. To support decap-only tunnels, an IPIP entry is now created as soon as an offloadable tunneling device is created. When that netdevice is up'd, a decap route is looked up and possibly offloaded. Thus decap is not handled implicitly as part of mlxsw_sp_ipip_entry_get() call anymore, but needs to be done explicitly after the get, if desired. Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Petr Machata 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Petr Machata 提交于
So far, all netdevice notifications that the driver cared about were related to its own ports, and mlxsw_sp could be retrieved from the netdevice's private data. For IP-in-IP offloading however, the driver cares about events on foreign netdevices, and getting at mlxsw_sp or router data structures from the handler is inconvenient. Therefore move the netdevice notifier blocks from global scope to struct mlxsw_sp to allow retrieval from the notifier block pointer itself. Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 10 10月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 Yotam Gigi 提交于
Support the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_MROUTER port attribute switchdev notification. To do that, add the mrouter flag to struct mlxsw_sp_bridge_device, which indicates whether the bridge device was set to be mrouter port. This field is set when: - A new bridge is created, where the value is taken from the kernel bridge value. - A switchdev SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_MROUTER notification is sent. In addition, change the bridge MID entries to include the router port when the bridge device is configured to be mrouter port. The MID entries are updated in the following cases: - When a new MID entry is created, update the router port according to the bridge mrouter state. - When a SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_MROUTER notification is sent, update all the bridge's MID entries. This is aligned with the case where a bridge slave is configured to be mrouter port. Signed-off-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NNogah Frankel <nogahf@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Yotam Gigi 提交于
In Spectrum, MDB entries point to MID entries, that indicate which ports a packet should be forwarded to. Add the support in creating MID entries that forward the packet to the Spectrum router port. This will be later used to handle the bridge mrouter port switchdev notifications. Signed-off-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NNogah Frankel <nogahf@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Yotam Gigi 提交于
In Spectrum hardware, the router port is a virtual port that is the gateway to the routing mechanism. Hence, in order for a packet to be L3 forwarded, it must first be L2 forwarded to the router port inside the hardware. Further patches in this patchset are going to introduce support in bridge device used as an mrouter port. In this case, the router port index will be needed in order to update the MDB entries to include the router port. Thus, export the mlxsw_sp_router_port function, which returns the index of the Spectrum router port. Signed-off-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NNogah Frankel <nogahf@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 10月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The code that actually takes care of bridge offload introduces a few more non-trivial constraints with regards to bridge enslavements. Propagate extack there to indicate the reason. $ ip link add link enp1s0np1 name enp1s0np1.10 type vlan id 10 $ ip link add link enp1s0np1 name enp1s0np1.20 type vlan id 20 $ ip link add name br0 type bridge $ ip link set dev enp1s0np1.10 master br0 $ ip link set dev enp1s0np1.20 master br0 Error: spectrum: Can not bridge VLAN uppers of the same port. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Similar to physical ports, enslavement of VLAN devices can also fail. Use extack to indicate why the enslavement failed. $ ip link add link enp1s0np1 name enp1s0np1.10 type vlan id 10 $ ip link add name bond0 type bond mode 802.3ad $ ip link set dev enp1s0np1.10 master bond0 Error: spectrum: VLAN devices only support bridge and VRF uppers. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In commit fc922bb0 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Use one LPM tree for all virtual routers") I increased the scale of supported VRFs by having all of them share the same LPM tree. In order to avoid look-ups for prefix lengths that don't exist, each route removal would trigger an aggregation across all the active virtual routers to see which prefix lengths are in use and which aren't and structure the tree accordingly. With the way the data structures are currently laid out, this is a very expensive operation. When preformed repeatedly - due to the invocation of the abort mechanism - and with enough VRFs, this can result in a hung task. For now, avoid this optimization until it can be properly re-added in net-next. Fixes: fc922bb0 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Use one LPM tree for all virtual routers") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reported-by: NDavid Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> Tested-by: NDavid Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
mlxsw fails device enslavement for a number of reasons. Use the extack facility to return an error message to the user stating why the enslave is failing. Messages are prefixed with "spectrum" so users know it is a constraint imposed by the hardware driver. For example: $ ip li add br0.11 link br0 type vlan id 11 $ ip li set swp11 master br0 Error: spectrum: Enslaving a port to a device that already has an upper device is not supported. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Tested-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 10月, 2017 6 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
We accidentally return success if the kmalloc_array() call fails. Fixes: 0e14c777 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Add the multicast routing hardware logic") Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Acked-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
mlxsw_afa_block_create() doesn't return error pointers, it returns NULL on error. Fixes: 0e14c777 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Add the multicast routing hardware logic") Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Acked-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Yotam Gigi 提交于
Add the support of trap-and-forward route action in the multicast routing offloading logic. A route will be set to trap-and-forward action if one (or more) of its output interfaces is not offload-able, i.e. does not have a valid Spectrum RIF. This way, a route with mixed output VIFs list, which contains both offload-able and un-offload-able devices can go through partial offloading in hardware, and the rest will be done in the kernel ipmr module. Signed-off-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Yotam Gigi 提交于
In addition to the current multicast route actions, which include trap route action and a forward route action, add the trap-and-forward multicast route action, and implement it in the multicast routing hardware logic. To implement that, add a trap-and-forward ACL action as the last action in the route flexible action set. The used trap is the ACL2 trap, which marks the packets with offload_mr_forward_mark, to prevent the packet from being forwarded again by the kernel. Note: At that stage the offloading logic does not support trap-and-forward multicast routes. This patch adds the support only in the hardware logic. Signed-off-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Yotam Gigi 提交于
When a multicast route is configured with trap-and-forward action, the packets should be marked with skb->offload_mr_fwd_mark, in order to prevent the packets from being forwarded again by the kernel ipmr module. Due to this, it is not possible to use the already existing multicast trap (MLXSW_TRAP_ID_ACL1) as the packet should be marked differently. Add the MLXSW_TRAP_ID_ACL2 which is for trap-and-forward multicast routes, and set the offload_mr_fwd_mark skb field in its handler. Signed-off-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Yotam Gigi 提交于
Use trap/discard flex action to implement trap and forward. The action will later be used for multicast routing, as the multicast routing mechanism is done using ACL flexible actions in Spectrum hardware. Using that action, it will be possible to implement a trap-and-forward route. Signed-off-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 10月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 Petr Machata 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Petr Machata 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Petr Machata 提交于
When considering whether to set RTNH_F_OFFLOAD flag on an IPv6 route, mlxsw_sp_fib6_entry_offload_set() looks up the mlxsw_sp_nexthop corresponding to a given route, and decides based on whether the next hop's offloaded flag was set. When looking for the matching next hop, it also takes into account the device of the route, which must match next hop's RIF. IPIP next hops however hitherto didn't set the RIF. As a result, IPv6 routes forwarding traffic to IP-in-IP netdevices are never marked as offloaded, even when they actually are. Thus track RIF of IPIP next hops the same way as that of ETHERNET next hops. Fixes: 8f28a309 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Support IPv6 overlay encap") Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Petr Machata 提交于
When creating a new RIF, bumping RIF count of the containing VR is the last thing to be done. Symmetrically, when destroying a RIF, RIF count is first dropped and only then the rest of the cleanup proceeds. That's a problem for loopback RIFs. Those hold two VR references: one for overlay and one for underlay. mlxsw_sp_rif_destroy() releases the overlay one, and the deconfigure() callback the underlay one. But if both overlay and underlay are the same, and if there are no other artifacts holding the VR alive, this put actually destroys the VR. Later on, when mlxsw_sp_rif_destroy() calls mlxsw_sp_vr_put() for the same VR, the VR will already have been released and the kernel crashes with NULL pointer dereference. The underlying problem is that the RIF under destruction ends up referencing the overlay VR much longer than it claims: all the way until the call to mlxsw_sp_vr_put(). So line up the reference counting properly to reflect this. Make corresponding changes in mlxsw_sp_rif_create() as well for symmetry. Fixes: 6ddb7426 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Introduce loopback RIFs") Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 02 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Colin Ian King 提交于
In the unlikely event that mfc->mfc_un.res.ttls[i] is 255 for all values of i from 0 to MAXIVS-1, the err is not set at all and hence has a garbage value on the error return at the end of the function, so initialize it to 0. Also, the error return check on err and goto to err: inside the for loop makes it impossible for err to be zero at the end of the for loop, so we can remove the redundant err check at the end of the loop. Detected by CoverityScan CID#1457207 ("Unitialized scalar value") Fixes: c011ec1b ("mlxsw: spectrum: Add the multicast routing offloading logic") Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 28 9月, 2017 6 次提交
-
-
由 Yotam Gigi 提交于
Make the Spectrum router logic not ignore the RTNL_FAMILY_IPMR FIB notifications. Past commits added the IPMR VIF and MFC add/del notifications via the fib_notifier chain. In addition, a code for handling these notifications in the Spectrum router logic was added. Make the Spectrum router logic not ignore these notifications and forward the requests to the Spectrum multicast router offloading logic. Signed-off-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Yotam Gigi 提交于
Due to the fact that multicast routes hold the minimum MTU of all the egress RIFs and trap packets that don't meet it, notify the mulitcast router code on RIF MTU changes. Signed-off-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Yotam Gigi 提交于
Add functionality for calling the multicast routing offloading logic upon MFC and VIF add and delete notifications. In addition, call the multicast routing upon RIF addition and deletion events. As the multicast routing offload logic may sleep, the actual calls are done in a deferred work. To ensure the MFC object is not freed in that interval, a reference is held to it. In case of a failure, the abort mechanism is used, which ejects all the routes from the hardware and triggers the traffic to flow through the kernel. Note: At that stage, the FIB notifications are still ignored, and will be enabled in a further patch. Signed-off-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Yotam Gigi 提交于
Currently, the mlxsw Spectrum driver offloads only either the RT_TABLE_MAIN FIB table or the VRF tables, so the RT_TABLE_LOCAL table is squashed to the RT_TABLE_MAIN table to allow local routes to be offloaded too. By default, multicast MFC routes which are not assigned to any user requested table are put in the RT_TABLE_DEFAULT table. Due to the fact that offloading multicast MFC routes support in Spectrum router logic is going to be introduced soon, squash the default table to MAIN too. Signed-off-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Yotam Gigi 提交于
Implement the multicast routing hardware API introduced in previous patch for the specific spectrum hardware. The spectrum hardware multicast routes are written using the RMFT2 register and point to an ACL flexible action set. The actions used for multicast routes are: - Counter action, which allows counting bytes and packets on multicast routes. - Multicast route action, which provide RPF check and do the actual packet duplication to a list of RIFs. - Trap action, in the case the route action specified by the called is trap. Signed-off-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Yotam Gigi 提交于
Add the multicast router offloading logic, which is in charge of handling the VIF and MFC notifications and translating it to the hardware logic API. The offloading logic has to overcome several obstacles in order to safely comply with the kernel multicast router user API: - It must keep track of the mapping between VIFs to netdevices. The user can add an MFC cache entry pointing to a VIF, delete the VIF and add re-add it with a different netdevice. The offloading logic has to handle this in order to be compatible with the kernel logic. - It must keep track of the mapping between netdevices to spectrum RIFs, as the current hardware implementation assume having a RIF for every port in a multicast router. - It must handle routes pointing to pimreg device to be trapped to the kernel, as the packet should be delivered to userspace. - It must handle routes pointing tunnel VIFs. The current implementation does not support multicast forwarding to tunnels, thus routes that point to a tunnel should be trapped to the kernel. - It must be aware of proxy multicast routes, which include both (*,*) routes and duplicate routes. Currently proxy routes are not offloaded and trigger the abort mechanism: removal of all routes from hardware and triggering the traffic to go through the kernel. The multicast routing offloading logic also updates the counters of the offloaded MFC routes in a periodic work. Signed-off-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 9月, 2017 10 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
If action is "gact_ok", offload it to HW. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Propagate error instead of doing WARN_ON right away. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Add support for controlling nexthop counters via dpipe. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Add support for adjacency table dump. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Add support for setting counters on nexthops based on dpipe's adjacency table counter status. This patch also adds the ability for getting the counter value, which will be used by the dpipe adjacency table dump implementation in the next patches. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
In order to add the ability for setting counters on nexthops the RATR register should be extended. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Add initial support for router adjacency table. The table does lookup based on the nexthop-group index and the local nexthop offset. After locating the nexthop entry it sets the destination MAC address and the egress RIF. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
This is done as a preparation before introducing the ability to dump the adjacency table via dpipe, and to count the table size. The current table implementation avoids tunnel entries, thus a helper for checking if the nexthop group contains tunnel entries is also provided. The mlxsw's nexthop representative struct stays private to the router module. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Use list_is_last helper to check for last neighbor. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Keep nexthops in a linked list for easy access. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-