- 25 1月, 2013 5 次提交
-
-
由 Laurent Pinchart 提交于
Signed-off-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> Acked-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSimon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
-
由 Laurent Pinchart 提交于
Signed-off-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> Acked-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSimon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
-
由 Laurent Pinchart 提交于
Signed-off-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> Acked-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSimon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
-
由 Laurent Pinchart 提交于
The PFC core calls the gpio module gpiochip registration in its register_sh_pfc() function, itself called at arch initialization time. If the gpio module isn't present then the gpiochip will never be registered. As the gpio module can only be present at arch initialization time if it's builtin, there's no point in allowing to build it as a module. Make it a boolean option, and initialize it synchronously with the core if selected. Signed-off-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> Acked-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSimon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
-
由 Laurent Pinchart 提交于
The PFC core is only used by the pinctrl and gpio modules. As the gpio module depends on the pinctrl module, the pinctrl module will always be present if the core gets used. There is thus no point in keeping core and pinctrl in two seperate modules. Merge them. Signed-off-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> Acked-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSimon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
-
- 20 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
This implements simple support for adjusting the pin config value via the pinctrl API. The pinconf-generic code is abandoned for now until we've got a chance to revamp the pinmux_type state tracking that's needed by legacy code. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
- 10 7月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
This begins the migration of the PFC core to the pinctrl subsystem. Initial support is very basic, with the bulk of the implementation simply being nopped out in such a way to allow registration with the pinctrl core to succeed. The gpio chip driver is stripped down considerably now relying purely on pinctrl API calls to manage the bulk of its operations. This provides a basis for further PFC refactoring, including decoupling pin functions from the GPIO API, establishing pin groups, and so forth. These will all be dealt with incrementally so as to introduce as few growing and migratory pains to tree-wide PFC pinmux users today. When the interfaces have been well established and in-tree users have been migrated off of the legacy interfaces it will be possible to strip down the core considerably, leading to eventual drivers/pinctrl rehoming. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
This follows the intc/clk changes and shuffles the PFC support code under its own directory. This will facilitate better code sharing, and allow us to trim down the exported interface by quite a margin. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
- 20 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
This implements some Kconfig knobs for ensuring that the PFC gpio chip can be disabled or built as a module in the cases where it's optional, or forcibly enabled in cases where it's not. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
- 05 10月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
This splits up the sh intc core in to something more vaguely resembling a subsystem. Most of the functionality was alread fairly well compartmentalized, and there were only a handful of interdependencies that needed to be resolved in the process. This also serves as future-proofing for the genirq and sparseirq rework, which will make some of the split out functionality wholly generic, allowing things to be killed off in place with minimal migration pain. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
This implements a scheme roughly analogous to the PowerPC virtual to hardware IRQ mapping, which we use for IRQ to per-controller ID mapping. This makes it possible for drivers to use the IDs directly for lookup instead of hardcoding the vector. The main motivation for this work is as a building block for dynamically allocating virtual IRQs for demuxing INTC events sharing a single INTEVT in addition to a common masking source. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
- 02 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
This adds in hardware IRQ auto-distribution support for SH-X3 proto CPUs, following the SH7786 support. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
- 15 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
This implements support for hardware-managed IRQ balancing as implemented by SH-X3 cores (presently only hooked up for SH7786, but can probably be carried over to other SH-X3 cores, too). CPUs need to specify their distribution register along with the mask definitions, as these follow the same format. Peripheral IRQs that don't opt out of balancing will be automatically distributed at the whim of the hardware block, while each CPU needs to verify whether it is handling the IRQ or not, especially before clearing the mask. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
- 13 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
This adds support for hardware-assisted userspace irq masking for special priority levels. Due to the SR.IMASK interactivity, only some platforms implement this in hardware (including but not limited to SH-4A interrupt controllers, and ARM-based SH-Mobile CPUs). Each CPU needs to wire this up on its own, for now only SH7786 is wired up as an example. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-