1. 09 9月, 2017 6 次提交
  2. 04 9月, 2017 5 次提交
  3. 17 8月, 2017 1 次提交
    • P
      ipc: Replace spin_unlock_wait() with lock/unlock pair · e0892e08
      Paul E. McKenney 提交于
      There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
      and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
      pair.  This commit therefore replaces the spin_unlock_wait() call in
      exit_sem() with spin_lock() followed immediately by spin_unlock().
      This should be safe from a performance perspective because exit_sem()
      is rarely invoked in production.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
      Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
      Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Acked-by: NManfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
      e0892e08
  4. 03 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 16 7月, 2017 11 次提交
  6. 13 7月, 2017 16 次提交