1. 29 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  2. 20 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  3. 19 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  4. 18 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  5. 22 11月, 2014 5 次提交
  6. 07 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 08 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  8. 22 5月, 2014 2 次提交
  9. 16 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  10. 09 5月, 2014 5 次提交
  11. 24 4月, 2014 6 次提交
  12. 24 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      ARM: mvebu: fix some sparse warnings · b12634e3
      Jisheng Zhang 提交于
      This patch fixes conflicting types for 'set_cpu_coherent' and fixes the
      following sparse warnings.
      
      arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c:42:38:
      warning: symbol 'armada_370_xp_system_controller' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c:49:38:
      warning: symbol 'orion_system_controller' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c:67:6:
      warning: symbol 'mvebu_restart' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c:31:15:
      warning: symbol 'coherency_phys_base' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c:48:5:
      warning: symbol 'set_cpu_coherent' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c:123:12:
      warning: symbol 'coherency_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pmsu.c:38:5: warning:
      symbol 'armada_xp_boot_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pmsu.c:61:12: warning:
      symbol 'armada_370_xp_pmsu_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c:49:13: warning:
      symbol 'set_secondary_cpus_clock' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c:97:13: warning:
      symbol 'armada_xp_smp_prepare_cpus' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-mvebu/hotplug.c:24:12: warning:
      symbol 'armada_xp_cpu_die' was not declared. Should it be static?
      Signed-off-by: NJisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
      Acked-by: NGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
      b12634e3
  13. 19 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  14. 15 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • P
      arm: delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from all ARM users · 8bd26e3a
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
      some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
      do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
      commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
      is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
      with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
      
      After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
      the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
      we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
      
      Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
      notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
      and are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
      the arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
      As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
      related content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get
      rid of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
      
      This removes all the ARM uses of the __cpuinit macros from C code,
      and all __CPUINIT from assembly code.  It also had two ".previous"
      section statements that were paired off against __CPUINIT
      (aka .section ".cpuinit.text") that also get removed here.
      
      [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
      
      Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      8bd26e3a
  15. 20 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  16. 14 6月, 2013 3 次提交
  17. 22 11月, 2012 1 次提交
    • G
      arm: mvebu: Add hardware I/O Coherency support · e60304f8
      Gregory CLEMENT 提交于
      Armada 370 and XP come with an unit called coherency fabric. This unit
      allows to use the Armada 370/XP as a nearly coherent architecture. The
      coherency mechanism uses snoop filters to ensure the coherency between
      caches, DRAM and devices. This mechanism needs a synchronization
      barrier which guarantees that all the memory writes initiated by the
      devices have reached their target and do not reside in intermediate
      write buffers. That's why the architecture is not totally coherent and
      we need to provide our own functions for some DMA operations.
      
      Beside the use of the coherency fabric, the device units will have to
      set the attribute flag of the decoding address window to select the
      accurate coherency process for the memory transaction. This is done
      each device driver programs the DRAM address windows. The value of the
      attribute set by the driver is retrieved through the
      orion_addr_map_cfg struct filled during the early initialization of
      the platform.
      Signed-off-by: NGregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
      Reviewed-by: NYehuda Yitschak <yehuday@marvell.com>
      Acked-by: NMarek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
      e60304f8
  18. 21 11月, 2012 1 次提交