1. 28 8月, 2010 2 次提交
  2. 26 8月, 2010 6 次提交
  3. 25 8月, 2010 3 次提交
  4. 17 8月, 2010 19 次提交
  5. 10 8月, 2010 3 次提交
  6. 08 8月, 2010 3 次提交
  7. 06 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  8. 05 8月, 2010 3 次提交
    • S
      ppp: make channel_ops const · d7100da0
      stephen hemminger 提交于
      The PPP channel ops structure should be const.
      Cleanup the declarations to use standard C99 format.
      Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d7100da0
    • D
      RxRPC: Fix a potential deadlock between the call resend_timer and state_lock · 3b5bac2b
      David Howells 提交于
      RxRPC can potentially deadlock as rxrpc_resend_time_expired() wants to get
      call->state_lock so that it can alter the state of an RxRPC call.  However, its
      caller (call_timer_fn()) has an apparent lock on the timer struct.
      
      The problem is that rxrpc_resend_time_expired() isn't permitted to lock
      call->state_lock as this could cause a deadlock against rxrpc_send_abort() as
      that takes state_lock and then attempts to delete the resend timer by calling
      del_timer_sync().
      
      The deadlock can occur because del_timer_sync() will sit there forever waiting
      for rxrpc_resend_time_expired() to return, but the latter may then wait for
      call->state_lock, which rxrpc_send_abort() holds around del_timer_sync()...
      
      This leads to a warning appearing in the kernel log that looks something like
      the attached.
      
      It should be sufficient to simply dispense with the locks.  It doesn't matter
      if we set the resend timer expired event bit and queue the event processor
      whilst we're changing state to one where the resend timer is irrelevant as the
      event can just be ignored by the processor thereafter.
      
      =======================================================
      [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
      2.6.35-rc3-cachefs+ #115
      -------------------------------------------------------
      swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock:
       (&call->state_lock){++--..}, at: [<ffffffffa00200d4>] rxrpc_resend_time_expired+0x56/0x96 [af_rxrpc]
      
      but task is already holding lock:
       (&call->resend_timer){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff8103b675>] run_timer_softirq+0x182/0x2a5
      
      which lock already depends on the new lock.
      
      the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      
      -> #1 (&call->resend_timer){+.-...}:
             [<ffffffff810560bc>] __lock_acquire+0x889/0x8fa
             [<ffffffff81056184>] lock_acquire+0x57/0x6d
             [<ffffffff8103bb9c>] del_timer_sync+0x3c/0x86
             [<ffffffffa002bb7a>] rxrpc_send_abort+0x50/0x97 [af_rxrpc]
             [<ffffffffa002bdd9>] rxrpc_kernel_abort_call+0xa1/0xdd [af_rxrpc]
             [<ffffffffa0061588>] afs_deliver_to_call+0x129/0x368 [kafs]
             [<ffffffffa006181b>] afs_process_async_call+0x54/0xff [kafs]
             [<ffffffff8104261d>] worker_thread+0x1ef/0x2e2
             [<ffffffff81045f47>] kthread+0x7a/0x82
             [<ffffffff81002cd4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
      
      -> #0 (&call->state_lock){++--..}:
             [<ffffffff81055237>] validate_chain+0x727/0xd23
             [<ffffffff810560bc>] __lock_acquire+0x889/0x8fa
             [<ffffffff81056184>] lock_acquire+0x57/0x6d
             [<ffffffff813e6b69>] _raw_read_lock_bh+0x34/0x43
             [<ffffffffa00200d4>] rxrpc_resend_time_expired+0x56/0x96 [af_rxrpc]
             [<ffffffff8103b6e6>] run_timer_softirq+0x1f3/0x2a5
             [<ffffffff81036828>] __do_softirq+0xa2/0x13e
             [<ffffffff81002dcc>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
             [<ffffffff810049f0>] do_softirq+0x38/0x80
             [<ffffffff810361a2>] irq_exit+0x45/0x47
             [<ffffffff81018fb3>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x88/0x96
             [<ffffffff81002893>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x13/0x20
             [<ffffffff810011ac>] cpu_idle+0x4d/0x83
             [<ffffffff813e06f3>] start_secondary+0x1bd/0x1c1
      
      other info that might help us debug this:
      
      1 lock held by swapper/0:
       #0:  (&call->resend_timer){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff8103b675>] run_timer_softirq+0x182/0x2a5
      
      stack backtrace:
      Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.35-rc3-cachefs+ #115
      Call Trace:
       <IRQ>  [<ffffffff81054414>] print_circular_bug+0xae/0xbd
       [<ffffffff81055237>] validate_chain+0x727/0xd23
       [<ffffffff810560bc>] __lock_acquire+0x889/0x8fa
       [<ffffffff810539a7>] ? mark_lock+0x42f/0x51f
       [<ffffffff81056184>] lock_acquire+0x57/0x6d
       [<ffffffffa00200d4>] ? rxrpc_resend_time_expired+0x56/0x96 [af_rxrpc]
       [<ffffffff813e6b69>] _raw_read_lock_bh+0x34/0x43
       [<ffffffffa00200d4>] ? rxrpc_resend_time_expired+0x56/0x96 [af_rxrpc]
       [<ffffffffa00200d4>] rxrpc_resend_time_expired+0x56/0x96 [af_rxrpc]
       [<ffffffff8103b6e6>] run_timer_softirq+0x1f3/0x2a5
       [<ffffffff8103b675>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x182/0x2a5
       [<ffffffffa002007e>] ? rxrpc_resend_time_expired+0x0/0x96 [af_rxrpc]
       [<ffffffff810367ef>] ? __do_softirq+0x69/0x13e
       [<ffffffff81036828>] __do_softirq+0xa2/0x13e
       [<ffffffff81002dcc>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
       [<ffffffff810049f0>] do_softirq+0x38/0x80
       [<ffffffff810361a2>] irq_exit+0x45/0x47
       [<ffffffff81018fb3>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x88/0x96
       [<ffffffff81002893>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x13/0x20
       <EOI>  [<ffffffff81049de1>] ? __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x0/0x86
       [<ffffffff8100955b>] ? mwait_idle+0x6e/0x78
       [<ffffffff81009552>] ? mwait_idle+0x65/0x78
       [<ffffffff810011ac>] cpu_idle+0x4d/0x83
       [<ffffffff813e06f3>] start_secondary+0x1bd/0x1c1
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      3b5bac2b
    • C
      sch_sfq: add sanity check for the packet length · f2f00981
      Changli Gao 提交于
      The packet length should be checked before the packet data is dereferenced.
      Signed-off-by: NChangli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f2f00981