Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 161
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 13 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  3. 12 7月, 2016 3 次提交
  5. 08 7月, 2016 6 次提交
  7. 05 7月, 2016 3 次提交
  9. 04 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 01 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  13. 29 6月, 2016 2 次提交
  15. 28 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • K
      ASoC: hdmi-codec: callback function will be called with private data · efc9194b
      由 Kuninori Morimoto 提交于 
      Current hdmi-codec driver is assuming that it will be registered
from HDMI driver. Because of this assumption, each callback function
has struct device pointer which is parent device (= HDMI).
Then, it can use dev_get_drvdata() to get private data.

OTOH, on some SoC/HDMI case, SoC has VIDEO/SOUND and HDMI IPs.
This case, it needs SoC VIDEO, SoC SOUND and HDMI video, HDMI codec
driver. In DesignWare HDMI IP case, SoC VIDEO (= DRM/KMS) driver tries
to bind DesignWare HDMI video driver, and HDMI codec driver
(= hdmi-codec). This case, above "parent device" of HDMI codec driver
is DRM/KMS driver and its "device" already has private data.

And, from DT and ASoC CPU/Codec/Card binding point of view, HDMI codec
(= hdmi-codec) needs to have "parent device" (= DRM/KMS), otherwise,
it never detect sound card.

Because of these reasons, some driver can't use dev_get_drvdata() to
get private data on hdmi-codec driver. This patch add new void pointer
on hdmi_codec_pdata for private data, and callback function will be
called with it.
Signed-off-by: NKuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
      efc9194b
  17. 25 6月, 2016 4 次提交
    • K
      Revert "mm: make faultaround produce old ptes" · 315d09bf
      由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于 
      This reverts commit 5c0a85fa.

The commit causes ~6% regression in unixbench.

Let's revert it for now and consider other solution for reclaim problem
later.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465893750-44080-2-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: N"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      315d09bf
    • A
      mm: mempool: kasan: don't poot mempool objects in quarantine · 9b75a867
      由 Andrey Ryabinin 提交于 
      Currently we may put reserved by mempool elements into quarantine via
kasan_kfree().  This is totally wrong since quarantine may really free
these objects.  So when mempool will try to use such element,
use-after-free will happen.  Or mempool may decide that it no longer
need that element and double-free it.

So don't put object into quarantine in kasan_kfree(), just poison it.
Rename kasan_kfree() to kasan_poison_kfree() to respect that.

Also, we shouldn't use kasan_slab_alloc()/kasan_krealloc() in
kasan_unpoison_element() because those functions may update allocation
stacktrace.  This would be wrong for the most of the remove_element call
sites.

(The only call site where we may want to update alloc stacktrace is
 in mempool_alloc(). Kmemleak solves this by calling
 kmemleak_update_trace(), so we could make something like that too.
 But this is out of scope of this patch).

Fixes: 55834c59 ("mm: kasan: initial memory quarantine implementation")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/575977C3.1010905@virtuozzo.comSigned-off-by: NAndrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Reported-by: NKuthonuzo Luruo <kuthonuzo.luruo@hpe.com>
Acked-by: NAlexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9b75a867
    • L
      fix up initial thread stack pointer vs thread_info confusion · 7f1a00b6
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      The INIT_TASK() initializer was similarly confused about the stack vs
thread_info allocation that the allocators had, and that were fixed in
commit b235beea ("Clarify naming of thread info/stack allocators").

The task ->stack pointer only incidentally ends up having the same value
as the thread_info, and in fact that will change.

So fix the initial task struct initializer to point to 'init_stack'
instead of 'init_thread_info', and make sure the ia64 definition for
that exists.

This actually makes the ia64 tsk->stack pointer be sensible for the
initial task, but not for any other task.  As mentioned in commit
b235beea, that whole pointer isn't actually used on ia64, since
task_stack_page() there just points to the (single) allocation.

All the other architectures seem to have copied the 'init_stack'
definition, even if it tended to be generally unusued.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      7f1a00b6
    • L
      Clarify naming of thread info/stack allocators · b235beea
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      We've had the thread info allocated together with the thread stack for
most architectures for a long time (since the thread_info was split off
from the task struct), but that is about to change.

But the patches that move the thread info to be off-stack (and a part of
the task struct instead) made it clear how confused the allocator and
freeing functions are.

Because the common case was that we share an allocation with the thread
stack and the thread_info, the two pointers were identical.  That
identity then meant that we would have things like

	ti = alloc_thread_info_node(tsk, node);
	...
	tsk->stack = ti;

which certainly _worked_ (since stack and thread_info have the same
value), but is rather confusing: why are we assigning a thread_info to
the stack? And if we move the thread_info away, the "confusing" code
just gets to be entirely bogus.

So remove all this confusion, and make it clear that we are doing the
stack allocation by renaming and clarifying the function names to be
about the stack.  The fact that the thread_info then shares the
allocation is an implementation detail, and not really about the
allocation itself.

This is a pure renaming and type fix: we pass in the same pointer, it's
just that we clarify what the pointer means.

The ia64 code that actually only has one single allocation (for all of
task_struct, thread_info and kernel thread stack) now looks a bit odd,
but since "tsk->stack" is actually not even used there, that oddity
doesn't matter.  It would be a separate thing to clean that up, I
intentionally left the ia64 changes as a pure brute-force renaming and
type change.
Acked-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b235beea
  19. 24 6月, 2016 2 次提交
    • L
      drm: Add helpers to turn off CRTCs · 6a0d9528
      由 Lukas Wunner 提交于 
      Turning off a single CRTC or all active CRTCs of a DRM device is a
fairly common pattern. Add helpers to avoid open coding this everywhere.

The name was chosen to be consistent with drm_plane_force_disable().

Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NLukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      6a0d9528
    • P
      locking/static_key: Fix concurrent static_key_slow_inc() · 4c5ea0a9
      由 Paolo Bonzini 提交于 
      The following scenario is possible:

    CPU 1                                   CPU 2
    static_key_slow_inc()
     atomic_inc_not_zero()
      -> key.enabled == 0, no increment
     jump_label_lock()
     atomic_inc_return()
      -> key.enabled == 1 now
                                            static_key_slow_inc()
                                             atomic_inc_not_zero()
                                              -> key.enabled == 1, inc to 2
                                             return
                                            ** static key is wrong!
     jump_label_update()
     jump_label_unlock()

Testing the static key at the point marked by (**) will follow the
wrong path for jumps that have not been patched yet.  This can
actually happen when creating many KVM virtual machines with userspace
LAPIC emulation; just run several copies of the following program:

    #include <fcntl.h>
    #include <unistd.h>
    #include <sys/ioctl.h>
    #include <linux/kvm.h>

    int main(void)
    {
        for (;;) {
            int kvmfd = open("/dev/kvm", O_RDONLY);
            int vmfd = ioctl(kvmfd, KVM_CREATE_VM, 0);
            close(ioctl(vmfd, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, 1));
            close(vmfd);
            close(kvmfd);
        }
        return 0;
    }

Every KVM_CREATE_VCPU ioctl will attempt a static_key_slow_inc() call.
The static key's purpose is to skip NULL pointer checks and indeed one
of the processes eventually dereferences NULL.

As explained in the commit that introduced the bug:

  706249c2 ("locking/static_keys: Rework update logic")

jump_label_update() needs key.enabled to be true.  The solution adopted
here is to temporarily make key.enabled == -1, and use go down the
slow path when key.enabled <= 0.
Reported-by: NDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.3+
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 706249c2 ("locking/static_keys: Rework update logic")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466527937-69798-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com
[ Small stylistic edits to the changelog and the code. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      4c5ea0a9
  21. 23 6月, 2016 3 次提交
  23. 22 6月, 2016 9 次提交
  25. 21 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  27. 19 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  29. 18 6月, 2016 2 次提交