1. 18 12月, 2017 1 次提交
  2. 23 11月, 2016 1 次提交
    • R
      Revert "arm: move exports to definitions" · 8478132a
      Russell King 提交于
      This reverts commit 4dd1837d.
      
      Moving the exports for assembly code into the assembly files breaks
      KSYM trimming, but also breaks modversions.
      
      While fixing the KSYM trimming is trivial, fixing modversions brings
      us to a technically worse position that we had prior to the above
      change:
      
      - We end up with the prototype definitions divorsed from everything
        else, which means that adding or removing assembly level ksyms
        become more fragile:
        * if adding a new assembly ksyms export, a missed prototype in
          asm-prototypes.h results in a successful build if no module in
          the selected configuration makes use of the symbol.
        * when removing a ksyms export, asm-prototypes.h will get forgotten,
          with armksyms.c, you'll get a build error if you forget to touch
          the file.
      
      - We end up with the same amount of include files and prototypes,
        they're just in a header file instead of a .c file with their
        exports.
      
      As for lines of code, we don't get much of a size reduction:
       (original commit)
       47 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 208 deletions(-)
       (fix for ksyms trimming)
       7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
       (two fixes for modversions)
       1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
       3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
      which results in a net total of only 25 lines deleted.
      
      As there does not seem to be much benefit from this change of approach,
      revert the change.
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
      8478132a
  3. 08 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 27 8月, 2015 1 次提交
    • R
      ARM: software-based priviledged-no-access support · a5e090ac
      Russell King 提交于
      Provide a software-based implementation of the priviledged no access
      support found in ARMv8.1.
      
      Userspace pages are mapped using a different domain number from the
      kernel and IO mappings.  If we switch the user domain to "no access"
      when we enter the kernel, we can prevent the kernel from touching
      userspace.
      
      However, the kernel needs to be able to access userspace via the
      various user accessor functions.  With the wrapping in the previous
      patch, we can temporarily enable access when the kernel needs user
      access, and re-disable it afterwards.
      
      This allows us to trap non-intended accesses to userspace, eg, caused
      by an inadvertent dereference of the LIST_POISON* values, which, with
      appropriate user mappings setup, can be made to succeed.  This in turn
      can allow use-after-free bugs to be further exploited than would
      otherwise be possible.
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      a5e090ac
  5. 30 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  6. 26 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 21 4月, 2010 1 次提交
    • R
      ARM: fix build error in arch/arm/kernel/process.c · 4260415f
      Russell King 提交于
      /tmp/ccJ3ssZW.s: Assembler messages:
      /tmp/ccJ3ssZW.s:1952: Error: can't resolve `.text' {.text section} - `.LFB1077'
      
      This is caused because:
      
      	.section .data
      	.section .text
      	.section .text
      	.previous
      
      does not return us to the .text section, but the .data section; this
      makes use of .previous dangerous if the ordering of previous sections
      is not known.
      
      Fix up the other users of .previous; .pushsection and .popsection are
      a safer pairing to use than .section and .previous.
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      4260415f
  8. 24 7月, 2009 1 次提交
  9. 01 9月, 2008 2 次提交
  10. 13 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  11. 10 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  12. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4