- 30 5月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Only certain types of ACPI device objects can be enumerated as platform devices, so in order to distinguish them from the others introduce a new ACPI device PNP type flag, platform_id, and set it for devices with a valid _HID to start with. This change is based on a Zhang Rui's prototype. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Introduce a .match() callback for ACPI scan handlers to allow them to use more elaborate matching algorithms if necessary. That is needed for the upcoming PNP scan handler in particular. This change is based on a Zhang Rui's prototype. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 27 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lan Tianyu 提交于
There is already acpi_bus_get_private_data() to get ACPI handle data which is associated with acpi_bus_private_data_handler(). This patch is to add acpi_bus_attach_private_data() to make a pair and facilitate to attach and get data to/from ACPI handle. Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 20 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Rework the ACPI PM domain's PM callbacks to avoid resuming devices during system suspend (in order to modify their wakeup settings etc.) if that isn't necessary. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 05 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since the only function executed by acpi_hotplug_execute() is acpi_device_hotplug() and it only is called by the ACPI core, simplify its definition so that it only takes two arguments, the ACPI device object pointer and event code, rename it to acpi_hotplug_schedule() and move its header from acpi_bus.h to the ACPI core's internal header file internal.h. Modify the definition of acpi_device_hotplug() so that its first argument is an ACPI device object pointer and modify the definition of struct acpi_hp_work accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 22 2月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Replace acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() with acpi_evaluate_ost() everywhere and drop the ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST symbol so that hotplug _OST is supported unconditionally. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify the SATA subsystem to add hotplug contexts to ACPI companions of SATA devices and ports instead of registering special ACPI dock operations using register_hotplug_dock_device(). That change will allow the entire code handling those special ACPI dock operations to be dropped in the next commit. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
- 21 2月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In order to avoid the need to register special ACPI dock operations for SATA devices add a .uevent() callback pointer to struct acpi_hotplug_context and make dock_hotplug_event() use that callback if available. Also rename the existing .event() callback in struct acpi_hotplug_context to .notify() to avoid possible confusion in the future. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In order for the ACPI dock station code to be able to use the callbacks pointed to by the ACPI device objects' hotplug contexts add a .fixup() callback pointer to struct acpi_hotplug_context. That callback will be useful to handle PCI devices located in dock stations. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Rename acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() to acpi_evaluate_ost() for later resue. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 16 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI dock station code carries out an extra namespace scan before the main one in order to find and register all of the dock device objects. Then, it registers a notify handler for each of them for handling dock events. However, dock device objects need not be scanned for upfront. They very well can be enumerated and registered during the first phase of the main namespace scan, before attaching scan handlers and ACPI drivers to ACPI device objects. Then, the dependent devices can be added to the in the second phase. That makes it possible to drop the extra namespace scan, so do it. Moreover, it is not necessary to register notify handlers for all of the dock stations' namespace nodes, becuase notifications may be dispatched from the global notify handler for them. Do that and drop two functions used for dock notify handling, acpi_dock_deferred_cb() and dock_notify_handler(), that aren't necessary any more. Finally, some dock station objects have _HID objects matching the ACPI container scan handler which causes it to claim those objects and try to handle their hotplug, but that is not a good idea, because those objects have their own special hotplug handling anyway. For this reason, the hotplug_notify flag should not be set for ACPI device objects representing dock stations and the container scan handler should be made ignore those objects, so make that happen. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 11 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In some cases it may be necessary to perform certain setup/cleanup operations on a device object representing a physical device after it has been associated with an ACPI companion by acpi_bind_one() or before disassociating it from that companion by acpi_unbind_one(), respectively. If there is a struct acpi_bus_type object for the given device's bus type, the .setup()/.cleanup() callbacks from there are executed for these purposes. However, an analogous mechanism will be necessary for devices whose bus types don't have corresponding struct acpi_bus_type objects and that have specific ACPI scan handlers. For those devices, add new .bind() and .unbind() callbacks to struct acpi_scan_handler that will be executed by acpi_platform_notify() right after the given device has been associated with an ACPI comapnion and by acpi_platform_notify_remove() right before calling acpi_unbind_one() for that device, respectively. To make that work for scan handlers registering new devices in their .attach() callbacks, modify acpi_scan_attach_handler() to set the ACPI device object's handler field before calling .attach() from the scan handler at hand. This changeset includes a fix from Mika Westerberg. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 07 2月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since acpi_bus_notify() is executed on all notifications for all devices anyway, make it execute acpi_device_hotplug() for all hotplug events instead of installing notify handlers pointing to the same function for all hotplug devices. This change reduces both the size and complexity of ACPI-based device hotplug code. Moreover, since acpi_device_hotplug() only does significant things for devices that have either an ACPI scan handler, or a hotplug context with .eject() defined, and those devices had notify handlers pointing to acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() installed before anyway, this modification shouldn't change functionality. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() does not use its data argument any more, the second argument of acpi_install_hotplug_notify_handler() can be dropped, so do that and update its callers accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code currently attaches its hotplug context objects directly to ACPI namespace nodes representing hotplug devices. However, after recent changes causing struct acpi_device to be created for every namespace node representing a device (regardless of its status), that is not necessary any more. Moreover, it's vulnerable to the theoretical issue that the ACPI handle passed in the context between handle_hotplug_event() and hotplug_event_work() may become invalid in the meantime (as a result of a concurrent table unload). In principle, this issue might be addressed by adding a non-empty release handler for ACPIPHP hotplug context objects analogous to acpi_scan_drop_device(), but that would duplicate the code in that function and in acpi_device_del_work_fn(). For this reason, it's better to modify ACPIPHP to attach its device hotplug contexts to struct device objects representing hotplug devices and make it use acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() as its notify handler. At the same time, acpi_device_hotplug() can be modified to dispatch the new .hp.event() callback pointing to acpiphp_hotplug_event() from ACPI device objects associated with PCI devices or use the generic ACPI device hotplug code for device objects with matching scan handlers. This allows the existing code duplication between ACPIPHP and the ACPI core to be reduced too and makes further ACPI-based device hotplug consolidation possible. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 06 2月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Subsequent changes will require the ACPI core to acquire the lock protecting the ACPIPHP hotplug contexts, so move the definition of the lock to the core and change its name to be more generic. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There is a slight possibility for the ACPI device object pointed to by adev in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to become invalid between the acpi_bus_get_device() that it comes from and the subsequent dereference of that pointer under get_device(). Namely, if acpi_scan_drop_device() runs in parallel with acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), acpi_device_del_work_fn() queued up by it may delete the device object in question right after a successful execution of acpi_bus_get_device() in acpi_bus_notify(). An analogous problem is present in acpi_bus_notify() where the device pointer coming from acpi_bus_get_device() may become invalid before it subsequent dereference in the "if" block. To prevent that from happening, introduce a new function, acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(), working analogously to acpi_bus_get_device() except that it will grab a reference to the ACPI device object returned by it and it will do that under the ACPICA's namespace mutex. Then, make both acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() and acpi_bus_notify() use acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() instead of acpi_bus_get_device() so as to ensure that the pointers used by them will not become stale at one point. In addition to that, introduce acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() as a wrapper around put_device() to be used along with acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() and make the (new) users of the latter use acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() too. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 05 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
There are several drivers making use of ACPI _DSM method to detect and invoke device specific methods. Currently every driver has implemented its private version to support ACPI _DSM method. So this patch introduces three helper functions to support ACPI _DSM method, which will be used to replace open-coded versions. It helps to simplify code and improve code readability. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 31 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The changes in the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) subsystem made during the 3.12 development cycle uncovered a problem with VGA switcheroo that on some systems, when the device-specific method (ATPX in the radeon case, _DSM in the nouveau case) is used to turn off the discrete graphics, the BIOS generates ACPI hotplug events for that device and those events cause ACPIPHP to attempt to remove the device from the system (they are events for a device that was present previously and is not present any more, so that's what should be done according to the spec). Then, the system stops functioning correctly. Since the hotplug events in question were simply silently ignored previously, the least intrusive way to address that problem is to make ACPIPHP ignore them again. For this purpose, introduce a new ACPI device flag, no_hotplug, and modify ACPIPHP to ignore hotplug events for PCI devices whose ACPI companions have that flag set. Next, make the radeon and nouveau switcheroo detection code set the no_hotplug flag for the discrete graphics' ACPI companion. Fixes: bbd34fcd (ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Register all devices under the given bridge) References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61891 References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64891Reported-and-tested-by: NMike Lothian <mike@fireburn.co.uk> Reported-and-tested-by: <madcatx@atlas.cz> Reported-and-tested-by: NJoaquín Aramendía <samsagax@gmail.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: 3.12+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12+
-
- 29 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Add a new ACPI hotplug profile flag, demand_offline, such that if set for the given ACPI device object's scan handler, it will cause acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if that device object's physical companions are offline upfront and fail the hot removal if that is not the case. That flag will be useful to overcome a problem with containers on some system where they can only be hot-removed after some cleanup operations carried out by user space, which needs to be notified of the container hot-removal before the kernel attempts to offline devices in the container. In those cases the current implementation of acpi_scan_hot_remove() is not sufficient, because it first tries to offline the devices in the container and only if that is suffcessful it tries to offline the container itself. As a result, the container hot-removal notification is not delivered to user space at the right time. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 07 12月, 2013 6 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since drivers/ide/ide-acpi.c is the only remaining user of acpi_get_child(), move that function into that file as a static routine. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Replace the .find_device function pointer in struct acpi_bus_type with a new one, .find_companion, that is supposed to point to a function returning struct acpi_device pointer (instead of an int) and takes one argument (instead of two). This way the role of this callback is more clear and the implementation of it can be more straightforward. Update all of the users of struct acpi_bus_type (PCI, PNP/ACPI and USB) to reflect the structure change. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> # for USB/ACPI
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify acpi_preset_companion() to take a struct acpi_device pointer instead of an ACPI handle as its second argument and redefine it as a static inline wrapper around ACPI_COMPANION_SET() passing the return value of acpi_find_child_device() directly as the second argument to it. Update its users to pass struct acpi_device pointers instead of ACPI handles to it. This allows some unnecessary acpi_bus_get_device() calls to be avoided. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Tested-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> # for ATA binding
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since acpi_get_child() is the only user of acpi_find_child() now, drop the static inline definition of the former and redefine the latter as new acpi_get_child(). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Tested-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> # for ATA binding
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Now that we create a struct acpi_device object for every ACPI namespace node representing a device, it is not necessary to use acpi_walk_namespace() for child device lookup in acpi_find_child() any more. Instead, we can simply walk the list of children of the given struct acpi_device object and return the matching one (or the one which is the best match if there are more of them). The checks done during the matching loop can be simplified too so that the secondary namespace walks in find_child_checks() are not necessary any more. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
Replace direct inclusions of <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>, which are incorrect, with <linux/acpi.h> inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't necessary. First of all, <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> should not be included directly from any files that are built for CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds. For CONFIG_ACPI set, <linux/acpi.h> includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case. Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always have to be met. Namely, it is required that <acpi/acpi_bus.h> be included prior to <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the latter depends on are always there. And <acpi/acpi.h> which provides basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds. That also is taken care of including <linux/acpi.h> as appropriate. Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (drivers/pci stuff) Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (Xen stuff) Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 23 11月, 2013 5 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Introduce a static inline function for setting the status field of struct acpi_device on the basis of a supplied u32 number, acpi_set_device_status(), and use it instead of the horrible horrible STRUCT_TO_INT() macro wherever applicable. Having done that, drop STRUCT_TO_INT() (and pretend that it has never existed). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Move container-specific uevents from the core hotplug code to the container scan handler's .attach() and .detach() callbacks. This way the core will not have to special-case containers and the uevents will be guaranteed to happen every time a container is either scanned or trimmed as appropriate. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Rework the common ACPI device hotplug code so that it is suitable for PCI host bridge hotplug and switch the PCI host bridge scan handler to using the common hotplug code. This allows quite a few lines of code that are not necessary any more to be dropped from the PCI host bridge scan handler and removes arbitrary differences in behavior between PCI host bridge hotplug and ACPI-based hotplug of other components, like CPUs and memory. Also acpi_device_hotplug() can be static now. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify the ACPI namespace scanning code to register a struct acpi_device object for every namespace node representing a device, processor and so on, even if the device represented by that namespace node is reported to be not present and not functional by _STA. There are multiple reasons to do that. First of all, it avoids quite a lot of overhead when struct acpi_device objects are deleted every time acpi_bus_trim() is run and then added again by a subsequent acpi_bus_scan() for the same scope, although the namespace objects they correspond to stay in memory all the time (which always is the case on a vast majority of systems). Second, it will allow user space to see that there are namespace nodes representing devices that are not present at the moment and may be added to the system. It will also allow user space to evaluate _SUN for those nodes to check what physical slots the "missing" devices may be put into and it will make sense to add a sysfs attribute for _STA evaluation after this change (that will be useful for thermal management on some systems). Next, it will help to consolidate the ACPI hotplug handling among subsystems by making it possible to store hotplug-related information in struct acpi_device objects in a standard common way. Finally, it will help to avoid a race condition related to the deletion of ACPI namespace nodes. Namely, namespace nodes may be deleted as a result of a table unload triggered by _EJ0 or _DCK. If a hotplug notification for one of those nodes is triggered right before the deletion and it executes a hotplug callback via acpi_hotplug_execute(), the ACPI handle passed to that callback may be stale when the callback actually runs. One way to work around that is to always pass struct acpi_device pointers to hotplug callbacks after doing a get_device() on the objects in question which eliminates the use-after-free possibility (the ACPI handles in those objects are invalidated by acpi_scan_drop_device(), so they will trigger ACPICA errors on attempts to use them). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If an ACPI namespace node is removed (usually, as a result of a table unload), and there is a data object attached to that node, acpi_ns_delete_node() executes the removal handler submitted to acpi_attach_data() for that object. That handler is currently empty for struct acpi_device objects, so it is necessary to detach those objects from the corresponding ACPI namespace nodes in advance every time a table unload may happen. That is cumbersome and inefficient and leads to some design constraints that turn out to be quite inconvenient (in particular, struct acpi_device objects cannot be registered for namespace nodes representing devices that are not reported as present or functional by _STA). For this reason, introduce a non-empty removal handler for ACPI device objects that will unregister them when their ACPI namespace nodes go away. This code modification alone should not change functionality except for the ordering of the ACPI hotplug workqueue which should not matter (without subsequent code changes). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 20 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Toshi Kani 提交于
The PCI host bridge scan handler installs its own notify handler, handle_hotplug_event_root(), by itself. Nevertheless, the ACPI hotplug framework also installs the common notify handler, acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), for PCI root bridges. This causes acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to call _OST method with unsupported error as hotplug.enabled is not set. To address this issue, introduce hotplug.ignore flag, which indicates that the scan handler installs its own notify handler by itself. The ACPI hotplug framework does not install the common notify handler when this flag is set. Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> [rjw: Changed the name of the new flag] Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 15 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify struct acpi_dev_node to contain a pointer to struct acpi_device associated with the given device object (that is, its ACPI companion device) instead of an ACPI handle corresponding to it. Introduce two new macros for manipulating that pointer in a CONFIG_ACPI-safe way, ACPI_COMPANION() and ACPI_COMPANION_SET(), and rework the ACPI_HANDLE() macro to take the above changes into account. Drop the ACPI_HANDLE_SET() macro entirely and rework its users to use ACPI_COMPANION_SET() instead. For some of them who used to pass the result of acpi_get_child() directly to ACPI_HANDLE_SET() introduce a helper routine acpi_preset_companion() doing an equivalent thing. The main motivation for doing this is that there are things represented by struct acpi_device objects that don't have valid ACPI handles (so called fixed ACPI hardware features, such as power and sleep buttons) and we would like to create platform device objects for them and "glue" them to their ACPI companions in the usual way (which currently is impossible due to the lack of valid ACPI handles). However, there are more reasons why it may be useful. First, struct acpi_device pointers allow of much better type checking than void pointers which are ACPI handles, so it should be more difficult to write buggy code using modified struct acpi_dev_node and the new macros. Second, the change should help to reduce (over time) the number of places in which the result of ACPI_HANDLE() is passed to acpi_bus_get_device() in order to obtain a pointer to the struct acpi_device associated with the given "physical" device, because now that pointer is returned by ACPI_COMPANION() directly. Finally, the change should make it easier to write generic code that will build both for CONFIG_ACPI set and unset without adding explicit compiler directives to it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> # on Haswell Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> # for ATA and SDIO part
-
- 08 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There are two different interfaces for queuing up work items on the ACPI hotplug workqueue, alloc_acpi_hp_work() used by PCI and PCI host bridge hotplug code and acpi_os_hotplug_execute() used by the common ACPI hotplug code and docking stations. They both are somewhat cumbersome to use and work slightly differently. The users of alloc_acpi_hp_work() have to submit a work function that will extract the necessary data items from a struct acpi_hp_work object allocated by alloc_acpi_hp_work() and then will free that object, while it would be more straightforward to simply use a work function with one more argument and let the interface take care of the execution details. The users of acpi_os_hotplug_execute() also have to deal with the fact that it takes only one argument in addition to the work function pointer, although acpi_os_execute_deferred() actually takes care of the allocation and freeing of memory, so it would have been able to pass more arguments to the work function if it hadn't been constrained by the connection with acpi_os_execute(). Moreover, while alloc_acpi_hp_work() makes GFP_KERNEL memory allocations, which is correct, because hotplug work items are always queued up from process context, acpi_os_hotplug_execute() uses GFP_ATOMIC, as that is needed by acpi_os_execute(). Also, acpi_os_execute_deferred() queued up by it waits for the ACPI event workqueues to flush before executing the work function, whereas alloc_acpi_hp_work() can't do anything similar. That leads to somewhat arbitrary differences in behavior between various ACPI hotplug code paths and has to be straightened up. For this reason, replace both alloc_acpi_hp_work() and acpi_os_hotplug_execute() with a single interface, acpi_hotplug_execute(), combining their behavior and being more friendly to its users than any of the two. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 07 11月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Notice that handle_root_bridge_removal() is the only user of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), so it doesn't have to be exported any more and can be made internal to the ACPI core. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Simplify handle_root_bridge_removal() and acpi_eject_store() by getting rid of struct acpi_eject_event and passing device objects directly to async routines executed via acpi_os_hotplug_execute(). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 17 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Two functions defined in device_pm.c, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent() and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), have no callers and may be dropped, so drop them. Moreover, they are the only functions adding entries to and removing entries from the power_dependent list in struct acpi_device, so drop that list too. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 11 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Some serial buses like I2C and SPI don't require that the parent device is in D0 before any of its children transitions to D0, but instead the parent device can control its own power independently from the children. This does not follow the ACPI specification as it requires the parent to be powered on before its children. However, Windows seems to ignore this requirement so I think we can do the same in Linux. Implement this by adding a new power flag 'ignore_parent' to struct acpi_device. If this flag is set the ACPI core ignores checking of the parent device power state when the device is powered on/off. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The current protocol for handling hot remove of containers is very fragile and causes acpi_eject_store() to acquire acpi_scan_lock which may deadlock with the removal of the device that it is called for (the reason is that device sysfs attributes cannot be removed while their callbacks are being executed and ACPI device objects are removed under acpi_scan_lock). The problem is related to the fact that containers are handled by acpi_bus_device_eject() in a special way, which is to emit an offline uevent instead of just removing the container. Then, user space is expected to handle that uevent and use the container's "eject" attribute to actually remove it. That is fragile, because user space may fail to complete the ejection (for example, by not using the container's "eject" attribute at all) leaving the BIOS kind of in a limbo. Moreover, if the eject event is not signaled for a container itself, but for its parent device object (or generally, for an ancestor above it in the ACPI namespace), the container will be removed straight away without doing that whole dance. For this reason, modify acpi_bus_device_eject() to remove containers synchronously like any other objects (user space will get its uevent anyway in case it does some other things in response to it) and remove the eject_pending ACPI device flag that is not used any more. This way acpi_eject_store() doesn't have a reason to acquire acpi_scan_lock any more and one possible deadlock scenario goes away (plus the code is simplified a bit). Reported-and-tested-by: NGu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 08 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In theory, under a given ACPI namespace node there should be only one child device object with _ADR whose value matches a given bus address exactly. In practice, however, there are systems in which multiple child device objects under a given parent have _ADR matching exactly the same address. In those cases we use _STA to determine which of the multiple matching devices is enabled, since some systems are known to indicate which ACPI device object to associate with the given physical (usually PCI) device this way. Unfortunately, as it turns out, there are systems in which many device objects under the same parent have _ADR matching exactly the same bus address and none of them has _STA, in which case they all should be regarded as enabled according to the spec. Still, if those device objects are supposed to represent bridges (e.g. this is the case for device objects corresponding to PCIe ports), we can try harder and skip the ones that have no child device objects in the ACPI namespace. With luck, we can avoid using device objects that we are not expected to use this way. Although this only works for bridges whose children also have ACPI namespace representation, it is sufficient to address graphics adapter detection issues on some systems, so rework the code finding a matching device ACPI handle for a given bus address to implement this idea. Introduce a new function, acpi_find_child(), taking three arguments: the ACPI handle of the device's parent, a bus address suitable for the device's bus type and a bool indicating if the device is a bridge and make it work as outlined above. Reimplement the function currently used for this purpose, acpi_get_child(), as a call to acpi_find_child() with the last argument set to 'false' and make the PCI subsystem use acpi_find_child() with the bridge information passed as the last argument to it. [Lan Tianyu notices that it is not sufficient to use pci_is_bridge() for that, because the device's subordinate pointer hasn't been set yet at this point, so use hdr_type instead.] This change fixes a regression introduced inadvertently by commit 33f767d7 (ACPI: Rework acpi_get_child() to be more efficient) which overlooked the fact that for acpi_walk_namespace() "post-order" means "after all children have been visited" rather than "on the way back", so for device objects without children and for namespace walks of depth 1, as in the acpi_get_child() case, the "post-order" callbacks ordering is actually the same as the ordering of "pre-order" ones. Since that commit changed the namespace walk in acpi_get_child() to terminate after finding the first matching object instead of going through all of them and returning the last one, it effectively changed the result returned by that function in some rare cases and that led to problems (the switch from a "pre-order" to a "post-order" callback was supposed to prevent that from happening, but it was ineffective). As it turns out, the systems where the change made by commit 33f767d7 actually matters are those where there are multiple ACPI device objects representing the same PCIe port (which effectively is a bridge). Moreover, only one of them, and the one we are expected to use, has child device objects in the ACPI namespace, so the regression can be addressed as described above. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60561Reported-by: NPeter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com> Tested-by: NVladimir Lalov <mail@vlalov.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
-