1. 30 5月, 2014 2 次提交
  2. 27 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 20 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  4. 05 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 22 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  6. 21 2月, 2014 3 次提交
  7. 16 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / dock: Dispatch dock notifications from the global notify handler · 1e2380cd
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The ACPI dock station code carries out an extra namespace scan
      before the main one in order to find and register all of the dock
      device objects.  Then, it registers a notify handler for each of
      them for handling dock events.
      
      However, dock device objects need not be scanned for upfront.  They
      very well can be enumerated and registered during the first phase
      of the main namespace scan, before attaching scan handlers and ACPI
      drivers to ACPI device objects.  Then, the dependent devices can be
      added to the in the second phase.  That makes it possible to drop
      the extra namespace scan, so do it.
      
      Moreover, it is not necessary to register notify handlers for all
      of the dock stations' namespace nodes, becuase notifications may
      be dispatched from the global notify handler for them.  Do that and
      drop two functions used for dock notify handling, acpi_dock_deferred_cb()
      and dock_notify_handler(), that aren't necessary any more.
      
      Finally, some dock station objects have _HID objects matching the
      ACPI container scan handler which causes it to claim those objects
      and try to handle their hotplug, but that is not a good idea,
      because those objects have their own special hotplug handling anyway.
      For this reason, the hotplug_notify flag should not be set for ACPI
      device objects representing dock stations and the container scan
      handler should be made ignore those objects, so make that happen.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      1e2380cd
  8. 11 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / scan: Add bind/unbind callbacks to struct acpi_scan_handler · 9cb32acf
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      In some cases it may be necessary to perform certain setup/cleanup
      operations on a device object representing a physical device after
      it has been associated with an ACPI companion by acpi_bind_one() or
      before disassociating it from that companion by acpi_unbind_one(),
      respectively.  If there is a struct acpi_bus_type object for the
      given device's bus type, the .setup()/.cleanup() callbacks from there
      are executed for these purposes.  However, an analogous mechanism will
      be necessary for devices whose bus types don't have corresponding
      struct acpi_bus_type objects and that have specific ACPI scan handlers.
      
      For those devices, add new .bind() and .unbind() callbacks to struct
      acpi_scan_handler that will be executed by acpi_platform_notify()
      right after the given device has been associated with an ACPI
      comapnion and by acpi_platform_notify_remove() right before calling
      acpi_unbind_one() for that device, respectively.
      
      To make that work for scan handlers registering new devices in their
      .attach() callbacks, modify acpi_scan_attach_handler() to set the
      ACPI device object's handler field before calling .attach() from the
      scan handler at hand.
      
      This changeset includes a fix from Mika Westerberg.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      9cb32acf
  9. 07 2月, 2014 3 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Hotplug notifications from acpi_bus_notify() · 1a699476
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Since acpi_bus_notify() is executed on all notifications for all
      devices anyway, make it execute acpi_device_hotplug() for all
      hotplug events instead of installing notify handlers pointing to
      the same function for all hotplug devices.
      
      This change reduces both the size and complexity of ACPI-based device
      hotplug code.  Moreover, since acpi_device_hotplug() only does
      significant things for devices that have either an ACPI scan handler,
      or a hotplug context with .eject() defined, and those devices
      had notify handlers pointing to acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() installed
      before anyway, this modification shouldn't change functionality.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      1a699476
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Simplify acpi_install_hotplug_notify_handler() · 5e6f236c
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Since acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() does not use its data argument any
      more, the second argument of acpi_install_hotplug_notify_handler()
      can be dropped, so do that and update its callers accordingly.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      5e6f236c
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Consolidate ACPIPHP with ACPI core hotplug · 3c2cc7ff
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code currently attaches its
      hotplug context objects directly to ACPI namespace nodes representing
      hotplug devices.  However, after recent changes causing struct
      acpi_device to be created for every namespace node representing a
      device (regardless of its status), that is not necessary any more.
      Moreover, it's vulnerable to the theoretical issue that the ACPI
      handle passed in the context between handle_hotplug_event() and
      hotplug_event_work() may become invalid in the meantime (as a
      result of a concurrent table unload).
      
      In principle, this issue might be addressed by adding a non-empty
      release handler for ACPIPHP hotplug context objects analogous to
      acpi_scan_drop_device(), but that would duplicate the code in that
      function and in acpi_device_del_work_fn().  For this reason, it's
      better to modify ACPIPHP to attach its device hotplug contexts to
      struct device objects representing hotplug devices and make it
      use acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() as its notify handler.  At the same
      time, acpi_device_hotplug() can be modified to dispatch the new
      .hp.event() callback pointing to acpiphp_hotplug_event() from ACPI
      device objects associated with PCI devices or use the generic
      ACPI device hotplug code for device objects with matching scan
      handlers.
      
      This allows the existing code duplication between ACPIPHP and the
      ACPI core to be reduced too and makes further ACPI-based device
      hotplug consolidation possible.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      3c2cc7ff
  10. 06 2月, 2014 2 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Define hotplug context lock in the core · e525506f
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Subsequent changes will require the ACPI core to acquire the lock
      protecting the ACPIPHP hotplug contexts, so move the definition of
      the lock to the core and change its name to be more generic.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      e525506f
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug: Fix potential race in acpi_bus_notify() · 78ea4639
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      There is a slight possibility for the ACPI device object pointed to
      by adev in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to become invalid between the
      acpi_bus_get_device() that it comes from and the subsequent dereference
      of that pointer under get_device().  Namely, if acpi_scan_drop_device()
      runs in parallel with acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), acpi_device_del_work_fn()
      queued up by it may delete the device object in question right after
      a successful execution of acpi_bus_get_device() in acpi_bus_notify().
      
      An analogous problem is present in acpi_bus_notify() where the device
      pointer coming from acpi_bus_get_device() may become invalid before
      it subsequent dereference in the "if" block.
      
      To prevent that from happening, introduce a new function,
      acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(), working analogously to acpi_bus_get_device()
      except that it will grab a reference to the ACPI device object returned
      by it and it will do that under the ACPICA's namespace mutex.  Then,
      make both acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() and acpi_bus_notify() use
      acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() instead of acpi_bus_get_device() so as to
      ensure that the pointers used by them will not become stale at one
      point.
      
      In addition to that, introduce acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() as a wrapper
      around put_device() to be used along with acpi_bus_get_acpi_device()
      and make the (new) users of the latter use acpi_bus_put_acpi_device()
      too.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      78ea4639
  11. 05 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  12. 31 12月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPIPHP / radeon / nouveau: Fix VGA switcheroo problem related to hotplug · f244d8b6
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The changes in the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) subsystem made
      during the 3.12 development cycle uncovered a problem with VGA
      switcheroo that on some systems, when the device-specific method
      (ATPX in the radeon case, _DSM in the nouveau case) is used to turn
      off the discrete graphics, the BIOS generates ACPI hotplug events for
      that device and those events cause ACPIPHP to attempt to remove the
      device from the system (they are events for a device that was present
      previously and is not present any more, so that's what should be done
      according to the spec).  Then, the system stops functioning correctly.
      
      Since the hotplug events in question were simply silently ignored
      previously, the least intrusive way to address that problem is to
      make ACPIPHP ignore them again.  For this purpose, introduce a new
      ACPI device flag, no_hotplug, and modify ACPIPHP to ignore hotplug
      events for PCI devices whose ACPI companions have that flag set.
      Next, make the radeon and nouveau switcheroo detection code set the
      no_hotplug flag for the discrete graphics' ACPI companion.
      
      Fixes: bbd34fcd (ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Register all devices under the given bridge)
      References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61891
      References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64891Reported-and-tested-by: NMike Lothian <mike@fireburn.co.uk>
      Reported-and-tested-by: <madcatx@atlas.cz>
      Reported-and-tested-by: NJoaquín Aramendía <samsagax@gmail.com>
      Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
      Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Cc: 3.12+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12+
      f244d8b6
  13. 29 12月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug: Add demand_offline hotplug profile flag · d22ddcbc
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Add a new ACPI hotplug profile flag, demand_offline, such that if
      set for the given ACPI device object's scan handler, it will cause
      acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if that device object's physical
      companions are offline upfront and fail the hot removal if that
      is not the case.
      
      That flag will be useful to overcome a problem with containers on
      some system where they can only be hot-removed after some cleanup
      operations carried out by user space, which needs to be notified
      of the container hot-removal before the kernel attempts to offline
      devices in the container.  In those cases the current implementation
      of acpi_scan_hot_remove() is not sufficient, because it first tries
      to offline the devices in the container and only if that is
      suffcessful it tries to offline the container itself.  As a result,
      the container hot-removal notification is not delivered to user space
      at the right time.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      d22ddcbc
  14. 07 12月, 2013 6 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / bind: Move acpi_get_child() to drivers/ide/ide-acpi.c · bfecc2b3
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Since drivers/ide/ide-acpi.c is the only remaining user of
      acpi_get_child(), move that function into that file as a static
      routine.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      bfecc2b3
    • R
      ACPI / bind: Rework struct acpi_bus_type · e3f02c52
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Replace the .find_device function pointer in struct acpi_bus_type
      with a new one, .find_companion, that is supposed to point to a
      function returning struct acpi_device pointer (instead of an int)
      and takes one argument (instead of two).  This way the role of
      this callback is more clear and the implementation of it can
      be more straightforward.
      
      Update all of the users of struct acpi_bus_type (PCI, PNP/ACPI and
      USB) to reflect the structure change.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Tested-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> # for USB/ACPI
      e3f02c52
    • R
      ACPI / bind: Redefine acpi_preset_companion() · 9c5ad36d
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Modify acpi_preset_companion() to take a struct acpi_device pointer
      instead of an ACPI handle as its second argument and redefine it as
      a static inline wrapper around ACPI_COMPANION_SET() passing the
      return value of acpi_find_child_device() directly as the second
      argument to it.  Update its users to pass struct acpi_device
      pointers instead of ACPI handles to it.
      
      This allows some unnecessary acpi_bus_get_device() calls to be
      avoided.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
      Tested-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> # for ATA binding
      9c5ad36d
    • R
      ACPI / bind: Redefine acpi_get_child() · 11dcc75d
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Since acpi_get_child() is the only user of acpi_find_child() now,
      drop the static inline definition of the former and redefine the
      latter as new acpi_get_child().
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
      Tested-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> # for ATA binding
      11dcc75d
    • R
      ACPI / bind: Simplify child device lookups · d9fef0c4
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Now that we create a struct acpi_device object for every ACPI
      namespace node representing a device, it is not necessary to
      use acpi_walk_namespace() for child device lookup in
      acpi_find_child() any more.  Instead, we can simply walk the
      list of children of the given struct acpi_device object and
      return the matching one (or the one which is the best match if
      there are more of them).  The checks done during the matching
      loop can be simplified too so that the secondary namespace walks
      in find_child_checks() are not necessary any more.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
      d9fef0c4
    • L
      ACPI: Clean up inclusions of ACPI header files · 8b48463f
      Lv Zheng 提交于
      Replace direct inclusions of <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and
      <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>, which are incorrect, with <linux/acpi.h>
      inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't
      necessary.
      
      First of all, <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
      should not be included directly from any files that are built for
      CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about
      undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds.  For CONFIG_ACPI set,
      <linux/acpi.h> includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it
      provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case.
      
      Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always
      have to be met.  Namely, it is required that <acpi/acpi_bus.h> be included
      prior to <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the
      latter depends on are always there.  And <acpi/acpi.h> which provides
      basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other
      ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds.  That also is taken care of including
      <linux/acpi.h> as appropriate.
      Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
      Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (drivers/pci stuff)
      Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (Xen stuff)
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      8b48463f
  15. 23 11月, 2013 5 次提交
    • R
      ACPI: Introduce acpi_set_device_status() · 25db115b
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Introduce a static inline function for setting the status field
      of struct acpi_device on the basis of a supplied u32 number,
      acpi_set_device_status(), and use it instead of the horrible
      horrible STRUCT_TO_INT() macro wherever applicable.  Having done
      that, drop STRUCT_TO_INT() (and pretend that it has never existed).
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      25db115b
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core · 46394fd0
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Move container-specific uevents from the core hotplug code to the
      container scan handler's .attach() and .detach() callbacks.
      
      This way the core will not have to special-case containers and
      the uevents will be guaranteed to happen every time a container
      is either scanned or trimmed as appropriate.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      46394fd0
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug: Make ACPI PCI root hotplug use common hotplug code · 3338db00
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Rework the common ACPI device hotplug code so that it is suitable
      for PCI host bridge hotplug and switch the PCI host bridge scan
      handler to using the common hotplug code.
      
      This allows quite a few lines of code that are not necessary any more
      to be dropped from the PCI host bridge scan handler and removes
      arbitrary differences in behavior between PCI host bridge hotplug
      and ACPI-based hotplug of other components, like CPUs and memory.
      
      Also acpi_device_hotplug() can be static now.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      3338db00
    • R
      ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace · 202317a5
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Modify the ACPI namespace scanning code to register a struct
      acpi_device object for every namespace node representing a device,
      processor and so on, even if the device represented by that namespace
      node is reported to be not present and not functional by _STA.
      
      There are multiple reasons to do that.  First of all, it avoids
      quite a lot of overhead when struct acpi_device objects are
      deleted every time acpi_bus_trim() is run and then added again
      by a subsequent acpi_bus_scan() for the same scope, although the
      namespace objects they correspond to stay in memory all the time
      (which always is the case on a vast majority of systems).
      
      Second, it will allow user space to see that there are namespace
      nodes representing devices that are not present at the moment and may
      be added to the system.  It will also allow user space to evaluate
      _SUN for those nodes to check what physical slots the "missing"
      devices may be put into and it will make sense to add a sysfs
      attribute for _STA evaluation after this change (that will be
      useful for thermal management on some systems).
      
      Next, it will help to consolidate the ACPI hotplug handling among
      subsystems by making it possible to store hotplug-related information
      in struct acpi_device objects in a standard common way.
      
      Finally, it will help to avoid a race condition related to the
      deletion of ACPI namespace nodes.  Namely, namespace nodes may be
      deleted as a result of a table unload triggered by _EJ0 or _DCK.
      If a hotplug notification for one of those nodes is triggered
      right before the deletion and it executes a hotplug callback
      via acpi_hotplug_execute(), the ACPI handle passed to that
      callback may be stale when the callback actually runs.  One way
      to work around that is to always pass struct acpi_device pointers
      to hotplug callbacks after doing a get_device() on the objects in
      question which eliminates the use-after-free possibility (the ACPI
      handles in those objects are invalidated by acpi_scan_drop_device(),
      so they will trigger ACPICA errors on attempts to use them).
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      202317a5
    • R
      ACPI / scan: Define non-empty device removal handler · d783156e
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      If an ACPI namespace node is removed (usually, as a result of a
      table unload), and there is a data object attached to that node,
      acpi_ns_delete_node() executes the removal handler submitted to
      acpi_attach_data() for that object.  That handler is currently empty
      for struct acpi_device objects, so it is necessary to detach those
      objects from the corresponding ACPI namespace nodes in advance every
      time a table unload may happen.  That is cumbersome and inefficient
      and leads to some design constraints that turn out to be quite
      inconvenient (in particular, struct acpi_device objects cannot be
      registered for namespace nodes representing devices that are not
      reported as present or functional by _STA).
      
      For this reason, introduce a non-empty removal handler for ACPI
      device objects that will unregister them when their ACPI namespace
      nodes go away.
      
      This code modification alone should not change functionality except
      for the ordering of the ACPI hotplug workqueue which should not
      matter (without subsequent code changes).
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      d783156e
  16. 20 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • T
      ACPI / hotplug: Fix conflicted PCI bridge notify handlers · ca499fc8
      Toshi Kani 提交于
      The PCI host bridge scan handler installs its own notify handler,
      handle_hotplug_event_root(), by itself.  Nevertheless, the ACPI
      hotplug framework also installs the common notify handler,
      acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), for PCI root bridges.  This causes
      acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to call _OST method with unsupported
      error as hotplug.enabled is not set.
      
      To address this issue, introduce hotplug.ignore flag, which
      indicates that the scan handler installs its own notify handler by
      itself.  The ACPI hotplug framework does not install the common
      notify handler when this flag is set.
      Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      [rjw: Changed the name of the new flag]
      Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      ca499fc8
  17. 15 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / driver core: Store an ACPI device pointer in struct acpi_dev_node · 7b199811
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Modify struct acpi_dev_node to contain a pointer to struct acpi_device
      associated with the given device object (that is, its ACPI companion
      device) instead of an ACPI handle corresponding to it.  Introduce two
      new macros for manipulating that pointer in a CONFIG_ACPI-safe way,
      ACPI_COMPANION() and ACPI_COMPANION_SET(), and rework the
      ACPI_HANDLE() macro to take the above changes into account.
      Drop the ACPI_HANDLE_SET() macro entirely and rework its users to
      use ACPI_COMPANION_SET() instead.  For some of them who used to
      pass the result of acpi_get_child() directly to ACPI_HANDLE_SET()
      introduce a helper routine acpi_preset_companion() doing an
      equivalent thing.
      
      The main motivation for doing this is that there are things
      represented by struct acpi_device objects that don't have valid
      ACPI handles (so called fixed ACPI hardware features, such as
      power and sleep buttons) and we would like to create platform
      device objects for them and "glue" them to their ACPI companions
      in the usual way (which currently is impossible due to the
      lack of valid ACPI handles).  However, there are more reasons
      why it may be useful.
      
      First, struct acpi_device pointers allow of much better type checking
      than void pointers which are ACPI handles, so it should be more
      difficult to write buggy code using modified struct acpi_dev_node
      and the new macros.  Second, the change should help to reduce (over
      time) the number of places in which the result of ACPI_HANDLE() is
      passed to acpi_bus_get_device() in order to obtain a pointer to the
      struct acpi_device associated with the given "physical" device,
      because now that pointer is returned by ACPI_COMPANION() directly.
      Finally, the change should make it easier to write generic code that
      will build both for CONFIG_ACPI set and unset without adding explicit
      compiler directives to it.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> # on Haswell
      Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> # for ATA and SDIO part
      7b199811
  18. 08 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug: Consolidate deferred execution of ACPI hotplug routines · 7b98118a
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      There are two different interfaces for queuing up work items on the
      ACPI hotplug workqueue, alloc_acpi_hp_work() used by PCI and PCI host
      bridge hotplug code and acpi_os_hotplug_execute() used by the common
      ACPI hotplug code and docking stations.  They both are somewhat
      cumbersome to use and work slightly differently.
      
      The users of alloc_acpi_hp_work() have to submit a work function that
      will extract the necessary data items from a struct acpi_hp_work
      object allocated by alloc_acpi_hp_work() and then will free that
      object, while it would be more straightforward to simply use a work
      function with one more argument and let the interface take care of
      the execution details.
      
      The users of acpi_os_hotplug_execute() also have to deal with the
      fact that it takes only one argument in addition to the work function
      pointer, although acpi_os_execute_deferred() actually takes care of
      the allocation and freeing of memory, so it would have been able to
      pass more arguments to the work function if it hadn't been
      constrained by the connection with acpi_os_execute().
      
      Moreover, while alloc_acpi_hp_work() makes GFP_KERNEL memory
      allocations, which is correct, because hotplug work items are
      always queued up from process context, acpi_os_hotplug_execute()
      uses GFP_ATOMIC, as that is needed by acpi_os_execute().  Also,
      acpi_os_execute_deferred() queued up by it waits for the ACPI event
      workqueues to flush before executing the work function, whereas
      alloc_acpi_hp_work() can't do anything similar.  That leads to
      somewhat arbitrary differences in behavior between various ACPI
      hotplug code paths and has to be straightened up.
      
      For this reason, replace both alloc_acpi_hp_work() and
      acpi_os_hotplug_execute() with a single interface,
      acpi_hotplug_execute(), combining their behavior and being more
      friendly to its users than any of the two.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      7b98118a
  19. 07 11月, 2013 2 次提交
  20. 17 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  21. 11 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • M
      ACPI / PM: allow child devices to ignore parent power state · 644f17ad
      Mika Westerberg 提交于
      Some serial buses like I2C and SPI don't require that the parent device is
      in D0 before any of its children transitions to D0, but instead the parent
      device can control its own power independently from the children.
      
      This does not follow the ACPI specification as it requires the parent to be
      powered on before its children. However, Windows seems to ignore this
      requirement so I think we can do the same in Linux.
      
      Implement this by adding a new power flag 'ignore_parent' to struct
      acpi_device.  If this flag is set the ACPI core ignores checking of the
      parent device power state when the device is powered on/off.
      Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      644f17ad
  22. 30 8月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug: Remove containers synchronously · f943db40
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The current protocol for handling hot remove of containers is very
      fragile and causes acpi_eject_store() to acquire acpi_scan_lock
      which may deadlock with the removal of the device that it is called
      for (the reason is that device sysfs attributes cannot be removed
      while their callbacks are being executed and ACPI device objects
      are removed under acpi_scan_lock).
      
      The problem is related to the fact that containers are handled by
      acpi_bus_device_eject() in a special way, which is to emit an
      offline uevent instead of just removing the container.  Then, user
      space is expected to handle that uevent and use the container's
      "eject" attribute to actually remove it.  That is fragile, because
      user space may fail to complete the ejection (for example, by not
      using the container's "eject" attribute at all) leaving the BIOS
      kind of in a limbo.  Moreover, if the eject event is not signaled
      for a container itself, but for its parent device object (or
      generally, for an ancestor above it in the ACPI namespace), the
      container will be removed straight away without doing that whole
      dance.
      
      For this reason, modify acpi_bus_device_eject() to remove containers
      synchronously like any other objects (user space will get its uevent
      anyway in case it does some other things in response to it) and
      remove the eject_pending ACPI device flag that is not used any more.
      This way acpi_eject_store() doesn't have a reason to acquire
      acpi_scan_lock any more and one possible deadlock scenario goes
      away (plus the code is simplified a bit).
      Reported-and-tested-by: NGu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      f943db40
  23. 08 8月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI: Try harder to resolve _ADR collisions for bridges · 60f75b8e
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      In theory, under a given ACPI namespace node there should be only
      one child device object with _ADR whose value matches a given bus
      address exactly.  In practice, however, there are systems in which
      multiple child device objects under a given parent have _ADR matching
      exactly the same address.  In those cases we use _STA to determine
      which of the multiple matching devices is enabled, since some systems
      are known to indicate which ACPI device object to associate with the
      given physical (usually PCI) device this way.
      
      Unfortunately, as it turns out, there are systems in which many
      device objects under the same parent have _ADR matching exactly the
      same bus address and none of them has _STA, in which case they all
      should be regarded as enabled according to the spec.  Still, if
      those device objects are supposed to represent bridges (e.g. this
      is the case for device objects corresponding to PCIe ports), we can
      try harder and skip the ones that have no child device objects in the
      ACPI namespace.  With luck, we can avoid using device objects that we
      are not expected to use this way.
      
      Although this only works for bridges whose children also have ACPI
      namespace representation, it is sufficient to address graphics
      adapter detection issues on some systems, so rework the code finding
      a matching device ACPI handle for a given bus address to implement
      this idea.
      
      Introduce a new function, acpi_find_child(), taking three arguments:
      the ACPI handle of the device's parent, a bus address suitable for
      the device's bus type and a bool indicating if the device is a
      bridge and make it work as outlined above.  Reimplement the function
      currently used for this purpose, acpi_get_child(), as a call to
      acpi_find_child() with the last argument set to 'false' and make
      the PCI subsystem use acpi_find_child() with the bridge information
      passed as the last argument to it.  [Lan Tianyu notices that it is
      not sufficient to use pci_is_bridge() for that, because the device's
      subordinate pointer hasn't been set yet at this point, so use
      hdr_type instead.]
      
      This change fixes a regression introduced inadvertently by commit
      33f767d7 (ACPI: Rework acpi_get_child() to be more efficient) which
      overlooked the fact that for acpi_walk_namespace() "post-order" means
      "after all children have been visited" rather than "on the way back",
      so for device objects without children and for namespace walks of
      depth 1, as in the acpi_get_child() case, the "post-order" callbacks
      ordering is actually the same as the ordering of "pre-order" ones.
      Since that commit changed the namespace walk in acpi_get_child() to
      terminate after finding the first matching object instead of going
      through all of them and returning the last one, it effectively
      changed the result returned by that function in some rare cases and
      that led to problems (the switch from a "pre-order" to a "post-order"
      callback was supposed to prevent that from happening, but it was
      ineffective).
      
      As it turns out, the systems where the change made by commit
      33f767d7 actually matters are those where there are multiple ACPI
      device objects representing the same PCIe port (which effectively
      is a bridge).  Moreover, only one of them, and the one we are
      expected to use, has child device objects in the ACPI namespace,
      so the regression can be addressed as described above.
      
      References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60561Reported-by: NPeter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com>
      Tested-by: NVladimir Lalov <mail@vlalov.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
      Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
      60f75b8e