1. 07 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  2. 01 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 31 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 13 8月, 2013 3 次提交
  5. 29 7月, 2013 8 次提交
  6. 25 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 18 6月, 2013 2 次提交
  8. 30 5月, 2013 5 次提交
  9. 24 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • A
      usb: phy: tegra: don't call into tegra-ehci directly · ee5d5499
      Arnd Bergmann 提交于
      Both phy-tegra-usb.c and ehci-tegra.c export symbols used by the other one,
      which does not work if one of them or both are loadable modules, resulting
      in an error like:
      
      drivers/built-in.o: In function `utmi_phy_clk_disable':
      drivers/usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.c:302: undefined reference to `tegra_ehci_set_phcd'
      drivers/built-in.o: In function `utmi_phy_clk_enable':
      drivers/usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.c:324: undefined reference to `tegra_ehci_set_phcd'
      drivers/built-in.o: In function `utmi_phy_power_on':
      drivers/usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.c:447: undefined reference to `tegra_ehci_set_pts'
      
      This turns the interface into a one-way dependency by letting the tegra ehci
      driver pass two function pointers for callbacks that need to be called by
      the phy driver.
      Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Cc: Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@nvidia.com>
      Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
      Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
      Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      ee5d5499
  10. 18 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 29 1月, 2013 6 次提交
  12. 06 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  13. 25 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  14. 16 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  15. 15 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  16. 05 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  17. 12 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  18. 26 4月, 2012 1 次提交
    • S
      ARM: tegra: add USB ULPI PHY reset GPIO to device tree · aa607ebf
      Stephen Warren 提交于
      ULPI PHYs have a reset signal, and different boards use a different GPIO
      for this task. Add a property to device tree to represent this.
      
      I'm not sure if adding this property to the EHCI controller node is
      entirely correct; perhaps eventually we should have explicit separate
      nodes for the various PHYs. However, we don't have that right now, so this
      binding seems like a reasonable choice.
      
      Cc: <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>
      Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Cc: <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
      aa607ebf
  19. 19 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  20. 05 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  21. 27 2月, 2012 1 次提交