- 28 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
- use pr_foo() throughout - remove a couple of duplicated KERN_WARNINGs, via WARN(KERN_WARNING "...") - nuke a few warnings which I've never seen happen, ever. Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 18 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Shevchenko 提交于
[yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn: remove duplicated include] Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 11 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dong Aisheng 提交于
prom_update_property() currently fails if the property doesn't actually exist yet which isn't what we want. Change to add-or-update instead of update-only, then we can remove a lot duplicated lines. Suggested-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Signed-off-by: NDong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org> Acked-by: NRob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 03 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Bolle 提交于
This message looks like an error (which it isn't) when booting with a flattened device tree. Remove the message from normal kernel builds. Signed-off-by: NPaul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
-
- 14 6月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Some bogus firmwares include properties with "/" in their name. This causes problems when creating the /proc/device-tree file system, because the slash is taken to indicate a directory. We don't care about those properties, and we don't want to encourage them, so just throw them away when creating /proc/device-tree. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Tested-by: NChristian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
-
- 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
-
- 14 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeremy Kerr 提交于
Commit e22f6283 introduced a build breakage for ARM devtree work: the THIS_MODULE macro was added, but we don't have module.h This change adds the necessary #include to get THIS_MODULE defined. While we could just replace it with NULL (PROC_FS is a bool, not a tristate), using THIS_MODULE will prevent unexpected breakage if we ever do compile this as a module. Signed-off-by: NJeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Acked-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Acked-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
- 09 2月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeremy Kerr 提交于
Currenly, proc_devtree.c depends on asm/prom.h to include linux/of.h, to provide some device-tree definitions (eg, struct property). Instead, include linux/of.h directly. We still need asm/prom.h for HAVE_ARCH_DEVTREE_FIXUPS. Signed-off-by: NJeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
-
由 Jeremy Kerr 提交于
We only need set_node_proc_entry in proc_devtree.c, so move it there. This fixes the !HAVE_ARCH_DEVTREE_FIXUPS build, as we can't make make the definition in linux/of.h conditional on this #define (definitions in asm/prom.h can't be exposed to linux/of.h, due to the enforced #include ordering). Signed-off-by: NJeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
-
- 30 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 19 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
CHECK fs/proc/proc_devtree.c fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:197:14: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:203:34: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:210:14: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:223:26: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:226:14: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 12 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 16 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anton Vorontsov 提交于
The `have_of' variable is a relic from the arch/ppc time, it isn't useful nowadays. Signed-off-by: NAnton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> Acked-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 23 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
-
- 13 4月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Rothwell 提交于
Signed-off-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 28 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Various dodgy firmware might give us nodes and/or properties in the device tree with conflicting names. That's generally ok, except for when we export the device tree via /proc, so check when we're creating the proc device tree and munge names accordingly. Tested on a faked device tree with kexec, would be good if someone with actual bogus firmware could try it, but just for completeness. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 27 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Steven Rostedt 提交于
It has been discovered that the remove_proc_entry has a race in the removing of entries in the proc file system that are siblings. There's no protection around the traversing and removing of elements that belong in the same subdirectory. This subdirectory list is protected in other areas by the BKL. So the BKL was at first used to protect this area too, but unfortunately, remove_proc_entry may be called with spinlocks held. The BKL may schedule, so this was not a solution. The final solution was to add a new global spin lock to protect this list, called proc_subdir_lock. This lock now protects the list in remove_proc_entry, and I also went around looking for other areas that this list is modified and added this protection there too. Care must be taken since these locations call several functions that may also schedule. Since I don't see any location that these functions that modify the subdirectory list are called by interrupts, the irqsave/restore versions of the spin lock was _not_ used. Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 13 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave C Boutcher 提交于
Add support to the proc_device_tree file for removing and updating properties. Remove just removes the proc file, update changes the data pointer within the proc file. The remainder of the device-tree changes occur elsewhere. Signed-off-by: NDave Boutcher <sleddog@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 08 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
This patch adds the ability to the SMU driver to recover missing calibration partitions from the SMU chip itself. It also adds some dynamic mecanism to /proc/device-tree so that new properties are visible to userland. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 01 6月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
This cleans up the /proc/device-tree representation of the Open Firmware device-tree on ppc and ppc64. It does the following things: - Workaround an issue in some Apple device-trees where a property may exist with the same name as a child node of the parent. We now simply "drop" the property instead of creating duplicate entries in /proc with random result... - Do not try to chop off the "@0" at the end of a node name whose unit address is 0. This is not useful, inconsistent, and the code was buggy and didn't always work anyway. - Do not create symlinks for the short name and unit address parts of a node. These were never really used, bloated the memory footprint of the device-tree with useless struct proc_dir_entry and their matching dentry and inode cache bloat. This results in smaller code, smaller memory footprint, and a more accurate view of the tree presented to userland. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-