1. 08 7月, 2010 1 次提交
    • H
      x86, alternatives: Use 16-bit numbers for cpufeature index · 83a7a2ad
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      We already have cpufeature indicies above 255, so use a 16-bit number
      for the alternatives index.  This consumes a padding field and so
      doesn't add any size, but it means that abusing the padding field to
      create assembly errors on overflow no longer works.  We can retain the
      test simply by redirecting it to the .discard section, however.
      
      [ v3: updated to include open-coded locations ]
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      LKML-Reference: <tip-f88731e3068f9d1392ba71cc9f50f035d26a0d4f@git.kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      83a7a2ad
  2. 07 7月, 2010 6 次提交
  3. 06 7月, 2010 23 次提交
  4. 05 7月, 2010 10 次提交