- 10 10月, 2007 40 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
LOOKUP returns the directory post-op attributes whether or not the operation was successful. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Why bother, since the call to nfs4_atomic_open() will do it for us. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We don't need to call nfs_revalidate_inode() on the directory if we already know that the verifiers don't match. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Otherwise set it to nfsi->read_cache_jiffies in order to prevent jiffy wraparound issues. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The lower level routines in fs/nfs/proc.c, fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c and fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c should already be dealing with the revalidation issues. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We have no more users... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The fact that we're in the process of modifying the inode does not mean that we should not invalidate the attribute and data caches. The defensive thing is to always invalidate when we're confronted with inode mtime/ctime or change_attribute updates that we do not immediately recognise. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The parent of the newly materialised dentry has just been revalidated... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the ->lookup() call causes the directory verifier to change, then there is still no need to use the old verifier, since our dentry has been verified. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Just let the subsequent inode revalidation do the update... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If nfs_post_op_update_inode fails because the server didn't return any attributes, then we let the subsequent inode revalidation update cache_change_attribute. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We only need to look at the mtime changes... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The attribute revalidation code will already have taken care of resetting nfsi->cache_change_attribute. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We want to set the verifier when the call to nfs4_open_revalidate() _succeeds_. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We don't want to leave an unverified hashed negative dentry if the exclusive create fails to complete. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
That will also allow us to remove the calls in mknod and mkdir. In addition it will ensure that symlinks set it correctly. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Also ensure that it drops the dentry in this case. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We don't care about whether or not some other process on our client is changing the directory while we're in nfs_lookup_revalidate(), because the dcache will take care of ensuring local atomicity. We can therefore remove the test for nfs_caches_unstable(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Also fix up the comments. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
NFSv2 and v4 don't offer weak cache consistency attributes on WRITE calls. In NFSv3, returning wcc data is optional. In all cases, we want to prevent the client from invalidating our cached data whenever ->write_done() attempts to update the inode attributes. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Remove the bogus 'data_stable' check in nfs_update_inode. The cache_change_attribute tells you if the directory changed on the server, and should have nothing to do with the file length. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
For one thing, the test NFS_ATTRTIMEO() == 0 makes no sense: we're testing whether or not the cache timeout length is zero, which is totally unrelated to the issue of whether or not we trust the file staleness. Secondly, we do not want to retry the GETATTR once a file has been declared stale by the server: we rather want to discard that inode as soon as possible, since there are broken servers still in use out there that reuse filehandles on new files. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
NFSv3 will correctly update atime on a read() call, so there is no need to set the NFS_INO_INVALID_ATIME flag unless the call to nfs_refresh_inode() fails. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
NFSv3 will correctly update atime on a readdir call, so there is no need to set the NFS_INO_INVALID_ATIME flag unless the call to nfs_refresh_inode() fails. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In NFSv4 we should only be looking at the change attribute. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The reason is that if the weak cache consistency update was successful, then we know that our client must be the only one that changed the directory, and we've already updated the dcache to reflect the change. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We must ensure that the readdir data is always invalidated whether or not the weak cache consistency data update succeeds. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We don't need to force a dentry lookup just because we're making changes to the directory. Don't update nfsi->cache_change_attribute in nfs_end_data_update: that overrides the NFSv3/v4 weak consistency checking that tells us our update was the only one, and that tells us the dcache is still valid. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We always want to check that the verifier and directory cache_change_attribute match. This also allows us to remove the 'wraparound hack' for the cache_change_attribute. If we're only checking for equality, then we don't care about wraparound issues. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure that we don't clobber the results from a more recent getattr call... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We should always be declaring the attribute cache as valid after having updated it. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
It doesn't really make sense to cache an access call without also revalidating the attributes. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Currently, _nfs4_do_access() is just a copy of nfs_do_access() with added conversion of the open flags into an access mask. This patch merges the duplicate functionality. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
nfs_set_verifier() and nfs_refresh_verifier() do exactly the same thing, so replace one with the other. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The nfs_renew_times() function plants the current time in jiffies in dentry->d_time. But a call to nfs_renew_times() is always followed by another call that overwrites dentry->d_time. Get rid of the nfs_renew_times() calls. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-