Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 161
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 31 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  3. 23 11月, 2015 1 次提交
    • P
      treewide: Remove old email address · 90eec103
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      There were still a number of references to my old Red Hat email
address in the kernel source. Remove these while keeping the
Red Hat copyright notices intact.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      90eec103
  5. 29 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 14 9月, 2014 1 次提交
    • F
      irq_work: Force raised irq work to run on irq work interrupt · 76a33061
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      The nohz full kick, which restarts the tick when any resource depend
on it, can't be executed anywhere given the operation it does on timers.
If it is called from the scheduler or timers code, chances are that
we run into a deadlock.

This is why we run the nohz full kick from an irq work. That way we make
sure that the kick runs on a virgin context.

However if that's the case when irq work runs in its own dedicated
self-ipi, things are different for the big bunch of archs that don't
support the self triggered way. In order to support them, irq works are
also handled by the timer interrupt as fallback.

Now when irq works run on the timer interrupt, the context isn't blank.
More precisely, they can run in the context of the hrtimer that runs the
tick. But the nohz kick cancels and restarts this hrtimer and cancelling
an hrtimer from itself isn't allowed. This is why we run in an endless
loop:

	Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 2
	CPU: 2 PID: 7538 Comm: kworker/u8:8 Not tainted 3.16.0+ #34
	Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write normal_work_helper [btrfs]
	 ffff880244c06c88 000000001b486fe1 ffff880244c06bf0 ffffffff8a7f1e37
	 ffffffff8ac52a18 ffff880244c06c78 ffffffff8a7ef928 0000000000000010
	 ffff880244c06c88 ffff880244c06c20 000000001b486fe1 0000000000000000
	Call Trace:
	 <NMI[<ffffffff8a7f1e37>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x7a
	 [<ffffffff8a7ef928>] panic+0xd4/0x207
	 [<ffffffff8a1450e8>] watchdog_overflow_callback+0x118/0x120
	 [<ffffffff8a186b0e>] __perf_event_overflow+0xae/0x350
	 [<ffffffff8a184f80>] ? perf_event_task_disable+0xa0/0xa0
	 [<ffffffff8a01a4cf>] ? x86_perf_event_set_period+0xbf/0x150
	 [<ffffffff8a187934>] perf_event_overflow+0x14/0x20
	 [<ffffffff8a020386>] intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x206/0x410
	 [<ffffffff8a01937b>] perf_event_nmi_handler+0x2b/0x50
	 [<ffffffff8a007b72>] nmi_handle+0xd2/0x390
	 [<ffffffff8a007aa5>] ? nmi_handle+0x5/0x390
	 [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0
	 [<ffffffff8a008062>] default_do_nmi+0x72/0x1c0
	 [<ffffffff8a008268>] do_nmi+0xb8/0x100
	 [<ffffffff8a7ff66a>] end_repeat_nmi+0x1e/0x2e
	 [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0
	 [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0
	 [<ffffffff8a0cb7f8>] ? match_held_lock+0x8/0x1b0
	 <<EOE><IRQ[<ffffffff8a0ccd2f>] lock_acquired+0xaf/0x450
	 [<ffffffff8a0f74c5>] ? lock_hrtimer_base.isra.20+0x25/0x50
	 [<ffffffff8a7fc678>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x78/0x90
	 [<ffffffff8a0f74c5>] ? lock_hrtimer_base.isra.20+0x25/0x50
	 [<ffffffff8a0f74c5>] lock_hrtimer_base.isra.20+0x25/0x50
	 [<ffffffff8a0f7723>] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x33/0x1e0
	 [<ffffffff8a0f78ea>] hrtimer_cancel+0x1a/0x30
	 [<ffffffff8a109237>] tick_nohz_restart+0x17/0x90
	 [<ffffffff8a10a213>] __tick_nohz_full_check+0xc3/0x100
	 [<ffffffff8a10a25e>] nohz_full_kick_work_func+0xe/0x10
	 [<ffffffff8a17c884>] irq_work_run_list+0x44/0x70
	 [<ffffffff8a17c8da>] irq_work_run+0x2a/0x50
	 [<ffffffff8a0f700b>] update_process_times+0x5b/0x70
	 [<ffffffff8a109005>] tick_sched_handle.isra.21+0x25/0x60
	 [<ffffffff8a109b81>] tick_sched_timer+0x41/0x60
	 [<ffffffff8a0f7aa2>] __run_hrtimer+0x72/0x470
	 [<ffffffff8a109b40>] ? tick_sched_do_timer+0xb0/0xb0
	 [<ffffffff8a0f8707>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x117/0x270
	 [<ffffffff8a034357>] local_apic_timer_interrupt+0x37/0x60
	 [<ffffffff8a80010f>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x3f/0x50
	 [<ffffffff8a7fe52f>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80

To fix this we force non-lazy irq works to run on irq work self-IPIs
when available. That ability of the arch to trigger irq work self IPIs
is available with arch_irq_work_has_interrupt().
Reported-by: NCatalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@gmail.com>
Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      76a33061
  9. 27 8月, 2014 1 次提交
  11. 05 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  13. 16 6月, 2014 2 次提交
    • F
      irq_work: Implement remote queueing · 47885016
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      irq work currently only supports local callbacks. However its code
is mostly ready to run remote callbacks and we have some potential user.

The full nohz subsystem currently open codes its own remote irq work
on top of the scheduler ipi when it wants a CPU to reevaluate its next
tick. However this ad hoc solution bloats the scheduler IPI.

Lets just extend the irq work subsystem to support remote queuing on top
of the generic SMP IPI to handle this kind of user. This shouldn't add
noticeable overhead.
Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      47885016
    • F
      irq_work: Split raised and lazy lists · b93e0b8f
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      An irq work can be handled from two places: from the tick if the work
carries the "lazy" flag and the tick is periodic, or from a self IPI.

We merge all these works in a single list and we use some per cpu latch
to avoid raising a self-IPI when one is already pending.

Now we could do away with this ugly latch if only the list was only made of
non-lazy works. Just enqueueing a work on the empty list would be enough
to know if we need to raise an IPI or not.

Also we are going to implement remote irq work queuing. Then the per CPU
latch will need to become atomic in the global scope. That's too bad
because, here as well, just enqueueing a work on an empty list of
non-lazy works would be enough to know if we need to raise an IPI or not.

So lets take a way out of this: split the works in two distinct lists,
one for the works that can be handled by the next tick and another
one for those handled by the IPI. Just checking if the latter is empty
when we queue a new work is enough to know if we need to raise an IPI.
Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      b93e0b8f
  15. 22 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  17. 04 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  19. 18 11月, 2012 4 次提交
    • F
      irq_work: Make self-IPIs optable · bc6679ae
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      On irq work initialization, let the user choose to define it
as "lazy" or not. "Lazy" means that we don't want to send
an IPI (provided the arch can anyway) when we enqueue this
work but we rather prefer to wait for the next timer tick
to execute our work if possible.

This is going to be a benefit for non-urgent enqueuers
(like printk in the future) that may prefer not to raise
an IPI storm in case of frequent enqueuing on short periods
of time.
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      bc6679ae
    • S
      irq_work: Warn if there's still work on cpu_down · 8aa2acce
      由 Steven Rostedt 提交于 
      If we are in nohz and there's still irq_work to be done when the idle
task is about to go offline, give a nasty warning. Everything should
have been flushed from the CPU_DYING notifier already. Further attempts
to enqueue an irq_work are buggy because irqs are disabled by
__cpu_disable(). The best we can do is to report the issue to the user.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      8aa2acce
    • S
      irq_work: Flush work on CPU_DYING · c0e980a4
      由 Steven Rostedt 提交于 
      In order not to offline a CPU with pending irq works, flush the
queue from CPU_DYING. The notifier is called by stop_machine on
the CPU that is going down. The code will not be called from irq context
(so things like get_irq_regs() wont work) but I'm not sure what the
requirements are for irq_work in that regard (Peter?). But irqs are
disabled and the CPU is about to go offline. Might as well flush the work.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      c0e980a4
    • F
      irq_work: Don't stop the tick with pending works · 00b42959
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      Don't stop the tick if we have pending irq works on the
queue, otherwise if the arch can't raise self-IPIs, we may not
find an opportunity to execute the pending works for a while.
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      00b42959
  21. 15 11月, 2012 2 次提交
    • F
      irq_work: Fix racy check on work pending flag · e0bbe2d8
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      Work claiming wants to be SMP-safe.

And by the time we try to claim a work, if it is already executing
concurrently on another CPU, we want to succeed the claiming and queue
the work again because the other CPU may have missed the data we wanted
to handle in our work if it's about to complete there.

This scenario is summarized below:

        CPU 1                                   CPU 2
        -----                                   -----
        (flags = 0)
        cmpxchg(flags, 0, IRQ_WORK_FLAGS)
        (flags = 3)
        [...]
        xchg(flags, IRQ_WORK_BUSY)
        (flags = 2)
        func()
                                                if (flags & IRQ_WORK_PENDING)
                                                        (not true)
                                                cmpxchg(flags, flags, IRQ_WORK_FLAGS)
                                                (flags = 3)
                                                [...]
        cmpxchg(flags, IRQ_WORK_BUSY, 0);
        (fail, pending on CPU 2)

This state machine is synchronized using [cmp]xchg() on the flags.
As such, the early IRQ_WORK_PENDING check in CPU 2 above is racy.
By the time we check it, we may be dealing with a stale value because
we aren't using an atomic accessor. As a result, CPU 2 may "see"
that the work is still pending on another CPU while it may be
actually completing the work function exection already, leaving
our data unprocessed.

To fix this, we start by speculating about the value we wish to be
in the work->flags but we only make any conclusion after the value
returned by the cmpxchg() call that either claims the work or let
the current owner handle the pending work for us.
Changelog-heavily-inspired-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Anish Kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com>
      e0bbe2d8
    • F
      irq_work: Fix racy IRQ_WORK_BUSY flag setting · c8446b75
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      The IRQ_WORK_BUSY flag is set right before we execute the
work. Once this flag value is set, the work enters a
claimable state again.

So if we have specific data to compute in our work, we ensure it's
either handled by another CPU or locally by enqueuing the work again.
This state machine is guanranteed by atomic operations on the flags.

So when we set IRQ_WORK_BUSY without using an xchg-like operation,
we break this guarantee as in the following summarized scenario:

        CPU 1                                   CPU 2
        -----                                   -----
                                                (flags = 0)
                                                old_flags = flags;
        (flags = 0)
        cmpxchg(flags, old_flags,
                old_flags | IRQ_WORK_FLAGS)
        (flags = 3)
        [...]
        flags = IRQ_WORK_BUSY
        (flags = 2)
        func()
                                                (sees flags = 3)
                                                cmpxchg(flags, old_flags,
                                                        old_flags | IRQ_WORK_FLAGS)
                                                (give up)

        cmpxchg(flags, 2, 0);
        (flags = 0)

CPU 1 claims a work and executes it, so it sets IRQ_WORK_BUSY and
the work is again in a claimable state. Now CPU 2 has new data to process
and try to claim that work but it may see a stale value of the flags
and think the work is still pending somewhere that will handle our data.
This is because CPU 1 doesn't set IRQ_WORK_BUSY atomically.

As a result, the data expected to be handle by CPU 2 won't get handled.

To fix this, use xchg() to set IRQ_WORK_BUSY, this way we ensure the CPU 2
will see the correct value with cmpxchg() using the expected ordering.
Changelog-heavily-inspired-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Anish Kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com>
      c8446b75
  23. 14 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  25. 02 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  27. 31 10月, 2011 2 次提交
    • P
      kernel: fix two implicit header assumptions in irq_work.c · 967d1f90
      由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于 
      Up until now, this file was getting percpu.h because nearly every
file was implicitly getting module.h (and all its sub-includes).
But we want to clean that up, so call out percpu.h explicitly.
Otherwise we'll get things like this on an ARM build:

kernel/irq_work.c:48: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'irq_work_list'
kernel/irq_work.c:48: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'DEFINE_PER_CPU'

The same thing was happening for builds on ARM for asm/processor.h

kernel/irq_work.c: In function 'irq_work_sync':
kernel/irq_work.c:166: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_relax'
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      967d1f90
    • P
      kernel: Map most files to use export.h instead of module.h · 9984de1a
      由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于 
      The changed files were only including linux/module.h for the
EXPORT_SYMBOL infrastructure, and nothing else.  Revector them
onto the isolated export header for faster compile times.

Nothing to see here but a whole lot of instances of:

  -#include <linux/module.h>
  +#include <linux/export.h>

This commit is only changing the kernel dir; next targets
will probably be mm, fs, the arch dirs, etc.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      9984de1a
  29. 04 10月, 2011 2 次提交
  31. 18 12月, 2010 1 次提交
    • C
      irq_work: Use per cpu atomics instead of regular atomics · 20b87691
      由 Christoph Lameter 提交于 
      The irq work queue is a per cpu object and it is sufficient for
synchronization if per cpu atomics are used. Doing so simplifies
the code and reduces the overhead of the code.

Before:

christoph@linux-2.6$ size kernel/irq_work.o
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
    451	      8	      1	    460	    1cc	kernel/irq_work.o

After:

christoph@linux-2.6$ size kernel/irq_work.o 
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
    438	      8	      1	    447	    1bf	kernel/irq_work.o

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
      20b87691
  33. 18 11月, 2010 1 次提交
  35. 19 10月, 2010 1 次提交
    • P
      irq_work: Add generic hardirq context callbacks · e360adbe
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is
most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the
system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers.

Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as
a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also
benefit.

The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where
possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the
built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately.

Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a
callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call
irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such
work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in
processing the work.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: NKyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>
Acked-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
[ various fixes ]
Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      e360adbe