- 26 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
This reverts commit 69624913. The cleaner thread can block freezing when there's a snapshot cleaning in progress and the other threads get suspended first. From the logs provided by Martin we're waiting for reading extent pages: kernel: PM: Syncing filesystems ... done. kernel: Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.015 seconds) done. kernel: Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... kernel: Freezing of tasks failed after 20.003 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0): kernel: btrfs-cleaner D ffff88033dd13bc0 0 152 2 0x00000000 kernel: ffff88032ebc2e00 ffff88032e750000 ffff88032e74fa50 7fffffffffffffff kernel: ffffffff814a58df 0000000000000002 ffffea000934d580 ffffffff814a5451 kernel: 7fffffffffffffff ffffffff814a6e8f 0000000000000000 0000000000000020 kernel: Call Trace: kernel: [<ffffffff814a58df>] ? bit_wait+0x2c/0x2c kernel: [<ffffffff814a5451>] ? schedule+0x6f/0x7c kernel: [<ffffffff814a6e8f>] ? schedule_timeout+0x2f/0xd8 kernel: [<ffffffff81076f94>] ? timekeeping_get_ns+0xa/0x2e kernel: [<ffffffff81077603>] ? ktime_get+0x36/0x44 kernel: [<ffffffff814a4f6c>] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x94/0xf2 kernel: [<ffffffff814a4f6c>] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x94/0xf2 kernel: [<ffffffff814a590b>] ? bit_wait_io+0x2c/0x30 kernel: [<ffffffff814a5694>] ? __wait_on_bit+0x41/0x73 kernel: [<ffffffff8109eba8>] ? wait_on_page_bit+0x6d/0x72 kernel: [<ffffffff8105d718>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x2a/0x2a kernel: [<ffffffff811a02d7>] ? read_extent_buffer_pages+0x1bd/0x203 kernel: [<ffffffff8117d9e9>] ? free_root_pointers+0x4c/0x4c kernel: [<ffffffff8117e831>] ? btree_read_extent_buffer_pages.constprop.57+0x5a/0xe9 kernel: [<ffffffff8117f4f3>] ? read_tree_block+0x2d/0x45 kernel: [<ffffffff8116782a>] ? read_block_for_search.isra.34+0x22a/0x26b kernel: [<ffffffff811656c3>] ? btrfs_set_path_blocking+0x1e/0x4a kernel: [<ffffffff8116919b>] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x648/0x736 kernel: [<ffffffff81170559>] ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0xb7/0x2c7 kernel: [<ffffffff81170ee5>] ? walk_down_proc+0x9c/0x1ae kernel: [<ffffffff81171c9d>] ? walk_down_tree+0x40/0xa4 kernel: [<ffffffff8117375f>] ? btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x2da/0x664 kernel: [<ffffffff8104ff21>] ? finish_task_switch+0x126/0x167 kernel: [<ffffffff811850f8>] ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xa6/0xb0 kernel: [<ffffffff8117eaba>] ? cleaner_kthread+0x13e/0x17b kernel: [<ffffffff8117e97c>] ? btrfs_item_end+0x33/0x33 kernel: [<ffffffff8104d256>] ? kthread+0x95/0x9d kernel: [<ffffffff8104d1c1>] ? kthread_parkme+0x16/0x16 kernel: [<ffffffff814a7b5f>] ? ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70 kernel: [<ffffffff8104d1c1>] ? kthread_parkme+0x16/0x16 As this affects a released kernel (4.4) we need a minimal fix for stable kernels. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108361Reported-by: NMartin Ziegler <ziegler@uni-freiburg.de> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4 CC: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 20 1月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Enhance btrfs_check_super_valid() function by the following points: 1) Restrict sector/node size check Not the old max/min valid check, but also check if it's a power of 2. So some bogus number like 12K node size won't pass now. 2) Super flag check For now, there is still some inconsistency between kernel and btrfs-progs super flags. And considering btrfs-progs may add new flags for super block, this check will only output warning. 3) Better root alignment check Now root bytenr is checked against sector size. 4) Move some check into btrfs_check_super_valid(). Like node size vs leaf size check, and PAGESIZE vs sectorsize check. And magic number check. Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
While running a stress test I ran into a deadlock when running the delayed iputs at transaction time, which produced the following report and trace: [ 886.399989] ============================================= [ 886.400871] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 886.401663] 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 Not tainted [ 886.402384] --------------------------------------------- [ 886.403182] fio/8277 is trying to acquire lock: [ 886.403568] (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] but task is already holding lock: [ 886.403568] (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] other info that might help us debug this: [ 886.403568] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] CPU0 [ 886.403568] ---- [ 886.403568] lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem); [ 886.403568] lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem); [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] 3 locks held by fio/8277: [ 886.403568] #0: (sb_writers#11){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81174c4c>] __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0 [ 886.403568] #1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa054620d>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x73/0x408 [btrfs] [ 886.403568] #2: (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] stack backtrace: [ 886.403568] CPU: 6 PID: 8277 Comm: fio Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 [ 886.403568] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [ 886.403568] 0000000000000000 ffff88009f80f770 ffffffff8125d4fd ffffffff82af1fc0 [ 886.403568] ffff88009f80f830 ffffffff8108e5f9 0000000200000000 ffff88009fd92290 [ 886.403568] 0000000000000000 ffffffff82af1fc0 ffffffff829cfb01 00042b216d008804 [ 886.403568] Call Trace: [ 886.403568] [<ffffffff8125d4fd>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x79 [ 886.403568] [<ffffffff8108e5f9>] __lock_acquire+0xd42/0xf0b [ 886.403568] [<ffffffff810c22db>] ? __module_address+0xdf/0x108 [ 886.403568] [<ffffffff8108eb77>] lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194 [ 886.403568] [<ffffffff8108eb77>] ? lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194 [ 886.403568] [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff8148556b>] down_read+0x3e/0x4d [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0521d7a>] flush_space+0x435/0x44a [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa052218b>] ? reserve_metadata_bytes+0x26a/0x384 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa05221ae>] reserve_metadata_bytes+0x28d/0x384 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa052256c>] ? btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x58/0x96 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0522584>] btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x70/0x96 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa053d747>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x394/0x55a [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff81188e31>] evict+0xa7/0x15c [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff81189878>] iput+0x1d3/0x266 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa053887c>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x8f/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff81085096>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0521191>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1d7/0x288 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f [ 1081.852335] INFO: task fio:8244 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 1081.854348] Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 [ 1081.857560] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 1081.863227] fio D ffff880213f9bb28 0 8244 8240 0x00000000 [ 1081.868719] ffff880213f9bb28 00ffffff810fc6b0 ffffffff0000000a ffff88023ed55240 [ 1081.872499] ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9c000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff880206b5d400 [ 1081.876834] ffffffff00000001 ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9bb40 ffffffff81482ba4 [ 1081.880782] Call Trace: [ 1081.881793] [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97 [ 1081.883340] [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325 [ 1081.895525] [<ffffffff8108d48d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16/0x1ab [ 1081.897419] [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20 [ 1081.899251] [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20 [ 1081.901063] [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21 [ 1081.902365] [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57 [ 1081.903846] [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs] [ 1081.906078] [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs] [ 1081.908846] [<ffffffff8108d461>] ? mark_held_locks+0x56/0x6c [ 1081.910409] [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs] [ 1081.912482] [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs] [ 1081.914597] [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs] [ 1081.919037] [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128 [ 1081.920754] [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs] [ 1081.922496] [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50 [ 1081.923922] [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5 [ 1081.925275] [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4 [ 1081.926584] [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e [ 1081.927968] [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f [ 1081.985293] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [ 1081.986132] INFO: task fio:8249 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 1081.987434] Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 [ 1081.988534] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 1081.990147] fio D ffff880218febbb8 0 8249 8240 0x00000000 [ 1081.991626] ffff880218febbb8 00ffffff81486b8e ffff88020000000b ffff88023ed75240 [ 1081.993258] ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218fec000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff8802120a9a00 [ 1081.994850] ffffffff00000001 ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218febbd0 ffffffff81482ba4 [ 1081.996485] Call Trace: [ 1081.997037] [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97 [ 1081.998017] [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325 [ 1081.999241] [<ffffffff810852a5>] ? finish_wait+0x6d/0x76 [ 1082.000306] [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20 [ 1082.001533] [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20 [ 1082.002776] [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21 [ 1082.003995] [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57 [ 1082.005000] [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs] [ 1082.007403] [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs] [ 1082.008988] [<ffffffffa0545064>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7c1/0xc2f [btrfs] [ 1082.010193] [<ffffffff8108a1ba>] ? percpu_down_read+0x4e/0x77 [ 1082.011280] [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0 [ 1082.012265] [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0 [ 1082.013021] [<ffffffff811712e4>] vfs_fallocate+0x170/0x1ff [ 1082.013738] [<ffffffff81181ebb>] ioctl_preallocate+0x89/0x9b [ 1082.014778] [<ffffffff811822d7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x40a/0x4ea [ 1082.015778] [<ffffffff81176ea7>] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e [ 1082.016806] [<ffffffff8118b4de>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71 [ 1082.017789] [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [ 1082.018706] [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f This happens because we can recursively acquire the semaphore fs_info->delayed_iput_sem when attempting to allocate space to satisfy a file write request as shown in the first trace above - when committing a transaction we acquire (down_read) the semaphore before running the delayed iputs, and when running a delayed iput() we can end up calling an inode's eviction handler, which in turn commits another transaction and attempts to acquire (down_read) again the semaphore to run more delayed iput operations. This results in a deadlock because if a task acquires multiple times a semaphore it should invoke down_read_nested() with a different lockdep class for each level of recursion. Fix this by simplifying the implementation and use a mutex instead that is acquired by the cleaner kthread before it runs the delayed iputs instead of always acquiring a semaphore before delayed references are run from anywhere. Fixes: d7c15171 (btrfs: Fix NO_SPACE bug caused by delayed-iput) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.1+ Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 16 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chandan Rajendra 提交于
The following call trace is seen when btrfs/031 test is executed in a loop, [ 158.661848] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 158.662634] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 890 at /home/chandan/repos/linux/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:558 create_subvol+0x3d1/0x6ea() [ 158.664102] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2) [ 158.664774] Modules linked in: [ 158.665266] CPU: 2 PID: 890 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-g511711af #2 [ 158.666251] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 [ 158.667392] ffffffff81c0a6b0 ffff8806c7c4f8e8 ffffffff81431fc8 ffff8806c7c4f930 [ 158.668515] ffff8806c7c4f920 ffffffff81051aa1 ffff880c85aff000 ffff8800bb44d000 [ 158.669647] ffff8808863b5c98 0000000000000000 00000000fffffffe ffff8806c7c4f980 [ 158.670769] Call Trace: [ 158.671153] [<ffffffff81431fc8>] dump_stack+0x44/0x5c [ 158.671884] [<ffffffff81051aa1>] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xc0 [ 158.672769] [<ffffffff81051b27>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x47/0x50 [ 158.673620] [<ffffffff813bc98d>] create_subvol+0x3d1/0x6ea [ 158.674440] [<ffffffff813777c9>] btrfs_mksubvol.isra.30+0x369/0x520 [ 158.675376] [<ffffffff8108a4aa>] ? percpu_down_read+0x1a/0x50 [ 158.676235] [<ffffffff81377a81>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x101/0x180 [ 158.677268] [<ffffffff81377b52>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x52/0x70 [ 158.678183] [<ffffffff8137afb4>] btrfs_ioctl+0x474/0x2f90 [ 158.678975] [<ffffffff81144b8e>] ? vma_merge+0xee/0x300 [ 158.679751] [<ffffffff8115be31>] ? alloc_pages_vma+0x91/0x170 [ 158.680599] [<ffffffff81123f62>] ? lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable+0x22/0x70 [ 158.681686] [<ffffffff813d99cf>] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0xff/0x1d0 [ 158.682581] [<ffffffff8117b791>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2c1/0x490 [ 158.683399] [<ffffffff813d3cde>] ? security_file_ioctl+0x3e/0x60 [ 158.684297] [<ffffffff8117b9d4>] SyS_ioctl+0x74/0x80 [ 158.685051] [<ffffffff819b2bd7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6a [ 158.685958] ---[ end trace 4b63312de5a2cb76 ]--- [ 158.686647] BTRFS: error (device loop0) in create_subvol:558: errno=-2 No such entry [ 158.709508] BTRFS info (device loop0): forced readonly [ 158.737113] BTRFS info (device loop0): disk space caching is enabled [ 158.738096] BTRFS error (device loop0): Remounting read-write after error is not allowed [ 158.851303] BTRFS error (device loop0): cleaner transaction attach returned -30 This occurs because, Mount filesystem Create subvol with ID 257 Unmount filesystem Mount filesystem Delete subvol with ID 257 btrfs_drop_snapshot() Add root corresponding to subvol 257 into btrfs_transaction->dropped_roots list Create new subvol (i.e. create_subvol()) 257 is returned as the next free objectid btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name() Finds the btrfs_root instance corresponding to the old subvol with ID 257 in btrfs_fs_info->fs_roots_radix. Returns error since btrfs_root_item->refs has the value of 0. To fix the issue the commit initializes tree root's and subvolume root's highest_objectid when loading the roots from disk. Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 07 1月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Byongho Lee 提交于
We use many constants to represent size and offset value. And to make code readable we use '256 * 1024 * 1024' instead of '268435456' to represent '256MB'. However we can make far more readable with 'SZ_256MB' which is defined in the 'linux/sizes.h'. So this patch replaces 'xxx * 1024 * 1024' kind of expression with single 'SZ_xxxMB' if 'xxx' is a power of 2 then 'xxx * SZ_1M' if 'xxx' is not a power of 2. And I haven't touched to '4096' & '8192' because it's more intuitive than 'SZ_4KB' & 'SZ_8KB'. Signed-off-by: NByongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Looks like oversight, call brelse() when checksum fails. Further down the code, in the non error path, we do call brelse() and so we don't see brelse() in the goto error paths. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 30 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
This is a short term solution to make sure btrfs_run_delayed_refs() doesn't change the extent tree while we are scanning it to create the free space tree. Longer term we need to synchronize scanning the block groups one by one, similar to what happens during a balance. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 18 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
Now we can finally hook up everything so we can actually use free space tree. The free space tree is enabled by passing the space_cache=v2 mount option. On the first mount with the this option set, the free space tree will be created and the FREE_SPACE_TREE read-only compat bit will be set. Any time the filesystem is mounted from then on, we must use the free space tree. The clear_cache option will also clear the free space tree. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 07 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 03 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We've always passed 0. Stack usage will slightly decrease. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 07 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd __GFP_WAIT has been used to identify atomic context in callers that hold spinlocks or are in interrupts. They are expected to be high priority and have access one of two watermarks lower than "min" which can be referred to as the "atomic reserve". __GFP_HIGH users get access to the first lower watermark and can be called the "high priority reserve". Over time, callers had a requirement to not block when fallback options were available. Some have abused __GFP_WAIT leading to a situation where an optimisitic allocation with a fallback option can access atomic reserves. This patch uses __GFP_ATOMIC to identify callers that are truely atomic, cannot sleep and have no alternative. High priority users continue to use __GFP_HIGH. __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM identifies callers that can sleep and are willing to enter direct reclaim. __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to identify callers that want to wake kswapd for background reclaim. __GFP_WAIT is redefined as a caller that is willing to enter direct reclaim and wake kswapd for background reclaim. This patch then converts a number of sites o __GFP_ATOMIC is used by callers that are high priority and have memory pools for those requests. GFP_ATOMIC uses this flag. o Callers that have a limited mempool to guarantee forward progress clear __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM but keep __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. bio allocations fall into this category where kswapd will still be woken but atomic reserves are not used as there is a one-entry mempool to guarantee progress. o Callers that are checking if they are non-blocking should use the helper gfpflags_allow_blocking() where possible. This is because checking for __GFP_WAIT as was done historically now can trigger false positives. Some exceptions like dm-crypt.c exist where the code intent is clearer if __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is used instead of the helper due to flag manipulations. o Callers that built their own GFP flags instead of starting with GFP_KERNEL and friends now also need to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. The first key hazard to watch out for is callers that removed __GFP_WAIT and was depending on access to atomic reserves for inconspicuous reasons. In some cases it may be appropriate for them to use __GFP_HIGH. The second key hazard is callers that assembled their own combination of GFP flags instead of starting with something like GFP_KERNEL. They may now wish to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. It's almost certainly harmless if it's missed in most cases as other activity will wake kswapd. Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 05 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Justin Maggard 提交于
I was hitting a consistent NULL pointer dereference during shutdown that showed the trace running through end_workqueue_bio(). I traced it back to the endio_meta_workers workqueue being poked after it had already been destroyed. Eventually I found that the root cause was a qgroup rescan that was still in progress while we were stopping all the btrfs workers. Currently we explicitly pause balance and scrub operations in close_ctree(), but we do nothing to stop the qgroup rescan. We should probably be doing the same for qgroup rescan, but that's a much larger change. This small change is good enough to allow me to unmount without crashing. Signed-off-by: NJustin Maggard <jmaggard@netgear.com> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
-
- 27 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Kosina 提交于
cleaner_kthread() kthread calls try_to_freeze() at the beginning of every cleanup attempt. This operation can't ever succeed though, as the kthread hasn't marked itself as freezable. Before (hopefully eventually) kthread freezing gets converted to fileystem freezing, we'd rather mark cleaner_kthread() freezable (as my understanding is that it can generate filesystem I/O during suspend). Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 22 10月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have a mechanism to make sure we don't lose updates for ordered extents that were logged in the transaction that is currently running. We add the ordered extent to a transaction list and then the transaction waits on all the ordered extents in that list. However are substantially large file systems this list can be extremely large, and can give us soft lockups, since the ordered extents don't remove themselves from the list when they do complete. To fix this we simply add a counter to the transaction that is incremented any time we have a logged extent that needs to be completed in the current transaction. Then when the ordered extent finally completes it decrements the per transaction counter and wakes up the transaction if we are the last ones. This will eliminate the softlockup. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Introduce new functions btrfs_qgroup_reserve/free_meta() to reserve/free metadata reserved space. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
btrfs_raid_array[] is used to define all raid attributes, use it to get tolerated_failures in btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(), instead of complex condition in function. It can make code simple and auto-support other possible raid-type in future. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 11 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
There are atomic operations that imply the barrier for waitqueue_active mixed in an if-condition. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 08 10月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Convert the simple cases, not all functions provide a way to reach the fs_info. Also skipped debugging messages (print-tree, integrity checker and pr_debug) and messages that are printed from possibly unfinished mount. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 06 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 chandan 提交于
After reading one of chunk or tree root tree's root node from disk, if the root node does not have EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE flag set, we fail to release the memory used by the root node. Fix this. Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 01 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
This uses a chunk of code from btrfs_read_dev_super() and creates a function called btrfs_read_dev_one_super() so that next patch can use it for scratch superblock. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> [renamed bufhead to bh] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 29 9月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
btrfs_error() and btrfs_std_error() does the same thing and calls _btrfs_std_error(), so consolidate them together. And the main motivation is that btrfs_error() is closely named with btrfs_err(), one handles error action the other is to log the error, so don't closely name them. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Suggested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
This will return EIO when __bread() fails to read SB, instead of EINVAL. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 10 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
After commmit e44163e1 ("btrfs: explictly delete unused block groups in close_ctree and ro-remount"), added in the 4.3 merge window, we have calls to btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() while holding the cleaner_mutex. This can cause a deadlock with a concurrent block group relocation (when a filesystem balance or shrink operation is in progress for example) because btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() locks delete_unused_bgs_mutex and the relocation path locks first delete_unused_bgs_mutex and then it locks cleaner_mutex, resulting in a classic ABBA deadlock: CPU 0 CPU 1 lock fs_info->cleaner_mutex __btrfs_balance() || btrfs_shrink_device() lock fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex btrfs_relocate_chunk() btrfs_relocate_block_group() lock fs_info->cleaner_mutex btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() lock fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex Fix this by not taking the cleaner_mutex before calling btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() because it's no longer needed after commit 67c5e7d4 ("Btrfs: fix race between balance and unused block group deletion"). The mutex fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex, the spinlock fs_info->unused_bgs_lock and a block group's spinlock are enough to get correct serialization between tasks running relocation and unused block group deletion (as well as between multiple tasks concurrently calling btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()). This issue was discussed (in the mailing list) during the review of the patch titled "btrfs: explictly delete unused block groups in close_ctree and ro-remount" and it was agreed that acquiring the cleaner mutex had to be dropped after the patch titled "Btrfs: fix race between balance and unused block group deletion" got merged (both patches were submitted at about the same time, but one landed in kernel 4.2 and the other in the 4.3 merge window). Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
-
- 01 9月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in btrfs_balance Code for updating fs_info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in btrfs_balance() lacks raid56 support. Reason: Above code was wroten in 2012-08-01, together with btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures()'s first version. Then, btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures() got updated later to support raid56, but code in btrfs_balance() was not updated together. Fix: Merge above similar code to a common function: btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures() and make it support both case. It can fix this bug with a bonus of cleanup, and make these code never in above no-sync state from now on. Suggested-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
1: Use ARRAY_SIZE(types) to replace a static-value variant: int num_types = 4; 2: Use 'continue' on condition to reduce one level tab if (!XXX) { code; ... } -> if (XXX) continue; code; ... 3: Put setting 'num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 2' to (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 2) condition to make make logic neat. if (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 0 && XXX) num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 0; else if (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 1) { if (XXX) num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 1; else if (XXX) num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 2; -> if (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 0 && XXX) num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 0; if (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 1 && XXX) num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = ; if (num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures > 2 && XXX) num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = 2; 4: Remove comment of: num_mirrors - 1: if RAID1 or RAID10 is configured and more than 2 mirrors are used. which is not fit with code. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 09 8月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
This attaches accounting information to bios as we submit them so the new blkio controllers can throttle on btrfs filesystems. Not much is required, we're just associating bios with blkcgs during clone, calling wbc_init_bio()/wbc_account_io() during writepages submission, and attaching the bios to the current context during direct IO. Finally if we are splitting bios during btrfs_map_bio, this attaches accounting information to the split. The end result is able to throttle nicely on single disk filesystems. A little more work is required for multi-device filesystems. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Byongho Lee 提交于
The code using 'ordered_extent_flush_mutex' mutex has removed by below commit. - 8d875f95 btrfs: disable strict file flushes for renames and truncates But the mutex still lives in struct 'btrfs_fs_info'. So, this patch removes the mutex from struct 'btrfs_fs_info' and its initialization code. Signed-off-by: NByongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
When mount failed because missing device, we can see following dmesg: [ 1060.267743] BTRFS: too many missing devices, writeable mount is not allowed [ 1060.273158] BTRFS: open_ctree failed This patch add missing_device_number and tolerated_missing_device_number to above output, to let user know what really happened, and helps bug-report and debug. dmesg after patch: [ 127.050367] BTRFS: missing devices(1) exceeds the limit(0), writeable mount is not allowed [ 127.056099] BTRFS: open_ctree failed Changelog v1->v2: 1: Changed to more clear description, suggested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Suggested-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 29 7月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
The cleaner thread may already be sleeping by the time we enter close_ctree. If that's the case, we'll skip removing any unused block groups queued for removal, even during a normal umount. They'll be cleaned up automatically at next mount, but users expect a umount to be a clean synchronization point, especially when used on thin-provisioned storage with -odiscard. We also explicitly remove unused block groups in the ro-remount path for the same reason. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Currently we have two different ways to signal an I/O error on a BIO: (1) by clearing the BIO_UPTODATE flag (2) by returning a Linux errno value to the bi_end_io callback The first one has the drawback of only communicating a single possible error (-EIO), and the second one has the drawback of not beeing persistent when bios are queued up, and are not passed along from child to parent bio in the ever more popular chaining scenario. Having both mechanisms available has the additional drawback of utterly confusing driver authors and introducing bugs where various I/O submitters only deal with one of them, and the others have to add boilerplate code to deal with both kinds of error returns. So add a new bi_error field to store an errno value directly in struct bio and remove the existing mechanisms to clean all this up. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NHannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
- 23 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
When read_tree_block() failed, we can see following dmesg: [ 134.371389] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000063 [ 134.372236] IP: [<ffffffff813a4a51>] free_extent_buffer+0x21/0x90 [ 134.372236] PGD 0 [ 134.372236] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 134.372236] Modules linked in: [ 134.372236] CPU: 0 PID: 2289 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.2.0-rc1_HEAD_c65b99f0_+ #115 [ 134.372236] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5.1-0-g8936dbb-20141113_115728-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014 [ 134.372236] task: ffff88003b6e1a00 ti: ffff880011e60000 task.ti: ffff880011e60000 [ 134.372236] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813a4a51>] [<ffffffff813a4a51>] free_extent_buffer+0x21/0x90 ... [ 134.372236] Call Trace: [ 134.372236] [<ffffffff81379aa1>] free_root_extent_buffers+0x91/0xb0 [ 134.372236] [<ffffffff81379c3d>] free_root_pointers+0x17d/0x190 [ 134.372236] [<ffffffff813801b0>] open_ctree+0x1ca0/0x25b0 [ 134.372236] [<ffffffff8144d017>] ? disk_name+0x97/0xb0 [ 134.372236] [<ffffffff813558aa>] btrfs_mount+0x8fa/0xab0 ... Reason: read_tree_block() changed to return error number on fail, and this value(not NULL) is set to tree_root->node, then subsequent code will run to: free_root_pointers() ->free_root_extent_buffers() ->free_extent_buffer() ->atomic_read((extent_buffer *)(-E_XXX)->refs); and trigger above error. Fix: Set tree_root->node to NULL on fail to make error_handle code happy. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 01 7月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
Often when running fstests btrfs/079 I was running into the following trace during umount on one of my qemu/kvm test vms: [ 8245.682441] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 25064 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:138 btrfs_put_block_group+0x51/0x69 [btrfs]() [ 8245.685039] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse parport_pc i2c_piix4 acpi_cpufreq processor psmouse i2c_core thermal_sys parport evdev serio_raw button pcspkr microcode ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata floppy virtio_pci virtio_ring scsi_mod virtio e1000 [last unloaded: btrfs] [ 8245.693860] CPU: 8 PID: 25064 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 4.1.0-rc5-btrfs-next-10+ #1 [ 8245.695081] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014 [ 8245.697583] 0000000000000009 ffff88020d047ce8 ffffffff8145eec7 ffffffff81095dce [ 8245.699234] 0000000000000000 ffff88020d047d28 ffffffff8104b399 0000000000000028 [ 8245.700995] ffffffffa04db07b ffff8801c6036c00 ffff8801c6036d68 ffff880202eb40b0 [ 8245.702510] Call Trace: [ 8245.703006] [<ffffffff8145eec7>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b [ 8245.705393] [<ffffffff81095dce>] ? console_unlock+0x356/0x3a2 [ 8245.706569] [<ffffffff8104b399>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb [ 8245.707747] [<ffffffffa04db07b>] ? btrfs_put_block_group+0x51/0x69 [btrfs] [ 8245.709101] [<ffffffff8104b456>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [ 8245.710274] [<ffffffffa04db07b>] btrfs_put_block_group+0x51/0x69 [btrfs] [ 8245.711823] [<ffffffffa04e3473>] btrfs_free_block_groups+0x145/0x322 [btrfs] [ 8245.713251] [<ffffffffa04ef31a>] close_ctree+0x1ef/0x325 [btrfs] [ 8245.714448] [<ffffffff8117d26e>] ? evict_inodes+0xdc/0xeb [ 8245.715539] [<ffffffffa04cb3ad>] btrfs_put_super+0x19/0x1b [btrfs] [ 8245.716835] [<ffffffff81167607>] generic_shutdown_super+0x73/0xef [ 8245.718015] [<ffffffff81167a3a>] kill_anon_super+0x13/0x1e [ 8245.719101] [<ffffffffa04cb1b6>] btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x23 [btrfs] [ 8245.720316] [<ffffffff81167544>] deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0x68 [ 8245.721517] [<ffffffff81167dd6>] deactivate_super+0x3f/0x43 [ 8245.722581] [<ffffffff8117fbb9>] cleanup_mnt+0x59/0x78 [ 8245.723538] [<ffffffff8117fc18>] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x14 [ 8245.724572] [<ffffffff81065371>] task_work_run+0x8f/0xbc [ 8245.725598] [<ffffffff810028fb>] do_notify_resume+0x45/0x53 [ 8245.726892] [<ffffffff814651ac>] int_signal+0x12/0x17 [ 8245.737887] ---[ end trace a01d038397e99b92 ]--- [ 8245.769363] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 8245.770737] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse parport_pc i2c_piix4 acpi_cpufreq processor psmouse i2c_core thermal_sys parport evdev serio_raw button pcspkr microcode ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata floppy virtio_pci virtio_ring scsi_mod virtio e1000 [last unloaded: btrfs] [ 8245.772641] CPU: 2 PID: 25064 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 4.1.0-rc5-btrfs-next-10+ #1 [ 8245.772641] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014 [ 8245.772641] task: ffff880013005810 ti: ffff88020d044000 task.ti: ffff88020d044000 [ 8245.772641] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa051c8e6>] [<ffffffffa051c8e6>] btrfs_queue_work+0x2c/0x14d [btrfs] [ 8245.772641] RSP: 0018:ffff88020d0478b8 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 8245.772641] RAX: 0000000000000004 RBX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RCX: ffffffffa0581488 [ 8245.772641] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff880194b7bf48 RDI: ffff880144b6a7a0 [ 8245.772641] RBP: ffff88020d0478d8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000ffff [ 8245.772641] R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000005 R12: ffff880194b7bf48 [ 8245.772641] R13: ffff880194b7bf48 R14: 0000000000000410 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 8245.772641] FS: 00007f991e77d840(0000) GS:ffff88023e280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 8245.772641] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [ 8245.772641] CR2: 00007fbbd325ee68 CR3: 000000021de8e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 8245.772641] Stack: [ 8245.772641] ffff880194b7bf00 ffff880202eb4000 ffff880194b7bf48 0000000000000410 [ 8245.772641] ffff88020d047958 ffffffffa04ec6d5 ffff8801629b2ee8 0000000082987570 [ 8245.772641] 0000000000a5813f 0000000000000001 ffff880013006100 0000000000000002 [ 8245.772641] Call Trace: [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffffa04ec6d5>] btrfs_wq_submit_bio+0xe1/0x17b [btrfs] [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff81086bff>] ? check_irq_usage+0x76/0x87 [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffffa04ec825>] btree_submit_bio_hook+0xb6/0xd9 [btrfs] [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffffa04ebb7c>] ? btree_csum_one_bio+0xad/0xad [btrfs] [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffffa04eb1a6>] ? btree_io_failed_hook+0x5e/0x5e [btrfs] [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffffa050a6e7>] submit_one_bio+0x8c/0xc7 [btrfs] [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffffa050d75b>] submit_extent_page.isra.18+0x9d/0x186 [btrfs] [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffffa050d95b>] write_one_eb+0x117/0x1ae [btrfs] [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffffa050a79b>] ? end_extent_buffer_writeback+0x21/0x21 [btrfs] [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffffa0510510>] btree_write_cache_pages+0x2ab/0x385 [btrfs] [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffffa04eb2b8>] btree_writepages+0x23/0x5c [btrfs] [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff8111c661>] do_writepages+0x23/0x2c [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff81189cd4>] __writeback_single_inode+0xda/0x5bd [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff8118aa60>] ? writeback_single_inode+0x2b/0x173 [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff8118aafd>] writeback_single_inode+0xc8/0x173 [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff8118ac95>] write_inode_now+0x8a/0x95 [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff81247bf0>] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x30/0x4e [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff8117cc5e>] iput+0x17d/0x26a [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffffa04ef355>] close_ctree+0x22a/0x325 [btrfs] [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff8117d26e>] ? evict_inodes+0xdc/0xeb [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffffa04cb3ad>] btrfs_put_super+0x19/0x1b [btrfs] [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff81167607>] generic_shutdown_super+0x73/0xef [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff81167a3a>] kill_anon_super+0x13/0x1e [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffffa04cb1b6>] btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x23 [btrfs] [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff81167544>] deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0x68 [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff81167dd6>] deactivate_super+0x3f/0x43 [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff8117fbb9>] cleanup_mnt+0x59/0x78 [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff8117fc18>] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x14 [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff81065371>] task_work_run+0x8f/0xbc [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff810028fb>] do_notify_resume+0x45/0x53 [ 8245.772641] [<ffffffff814651ac>] int_signal+0x12/0x17 [ 8245.772641] Code: 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41 56 41 55 41 54 53 49 89 f4 48 8b 46 70 a8 04 74 09 48 8b 5f 08 48 85 db 75 03 48 8b 1f 49 89 5c 24 68 <83> 7b 5c ff 74 04 f0 ff 43 50 49 83 7c 24 08 00 74 2c 4c 8d 6b [ 8245.772641] RIP [<ffffffffa051c8e6>] btrfs_queue_work+0x2c/0x14d [btrfs] [ 8245.772641] RSP <ffff88020d0478b8> [ 8245.845040] ---[ end trace a01d038397e99b93 ]--- For logical reasons such as the phase of the moon, this happened more often with "-o inode_cache" than without any mount options. After some debugging it turned out to be simple to understand what was happening: 1) close_ctree() is called; 2) It then stops the transaction kthread, which commits the current transaction; 3) It asks the cleaner kthread to stop, which is currently running btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(); 4) btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() finds an unused block group, starts a new transaction, deletes the block group, which implies COWing some tree nodes and leafs and dirtying their respective pages, and then finally it ends the transaction it started, without committing it; 5) The cleaner kthread stops; 6) close_ctree() releases (from memory) the block group objects, which produces the warning in the trace pasted above; 7) Then it invalidates all pages of the btree inode, by calling invalidate_inode_pages2(), which waits for any pages under writeback, and releases any non-dirty pages; 8) All work queues are destroyed (waiting first for their current tasks to finish execution); 9) A final iput() is called against the btree inode; 10) This iput triggers a writeback of the btree inode because it still has dirty pages; 11) This starts the whole chain of callbacks for the btree inode until it eventually reaches btrfs_wq_submit_bio() where it leads to a NULL pointer dereference because the work queues were already destroyed. Fix this by making the cleaner commit any transaction that it started after the transaction kthread was stopped. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
We have a race between deleting an unused block group and balancing the same block group that leads to an assertion failure/BUG(), producing the following trace: [181631.208236] BTRFS: assertion failed: 0, file: fs/btrfs/volumes.c, line: 2622 [181631.220591] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [181631.222959] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:4062! [181631.223932] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [181631.224566] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse acpi_cpufreq parpor$ [181631.224566] CPU: 8 PID: 17451 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.1.0-rc5-btrfs-next-10+ #1 [181631.224566] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014 [181631.224566] task: ffff880127e09590 ti: ffff8800b5824000 task.ti: ffff8800b5824000 [181631.224566] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa03f19f6>] [<ffffffffa03f19f6>] assfail.constprop.50+0x1e/0x20 [btrfs] [181631.224566] RSP: 0018:ffff8800b5827ae8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [181631.224566] RAX: 0000000000000040 RBX: ffff8800109fc218 RCX: ffffffff81095dce [181631.224566] RDX: 0000000000005124 RSI: ffffffff81464819 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [181631.224566] RBP: ffff8800b5827ae8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [181631.224566] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8800109fc200 [181631.224566] R13: ffff880020095000 R14: ffff8800b1a13f38 R15: ffff880020095000 [181631.224566] FS: 00007f70ca0b0c80(0000) GS:ffff88013ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [181631.224566] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [181631.224566] CR2: 00007f2872ab6e68 CR3: 00000000a717c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [181631.224566] Stack: [181631.224566] ffff8800b5827ba8 ffffffffa03f3916 ffff8800b5827b38 ffffffffa03d080e [181631.224566] ffffffffa03d1423 ffff880020095000 ffff88001233c000 0000000000000001 [181631.224566] ffff880020095000 ffff8800b1a13f38 0000000a69c00000 0000000000000000 [181631.224566] Call Trace: [181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03f3916>] btrfs_remove_chunk+0xa4/0x6bb [btrfs] [181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03d080e>] ? join_transaction.isra.8+0xb9/0x3ba [btrfs] [181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03d1423>] ? wait_current_trans.isra.13+0x22/0xfc [btrfs] [181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03f3fbc>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.29+0x8f/0xa7 [btrfs] [181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03f54df>] btrfs_balance+0xaa4/0xc52 [btrfs] [181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03fd388>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x23f/0x2b0 [btrfs] [181631.224566] [<ffffffff810872f9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf [181631.224566] [<ffffffffa04019a3>] btrfs_ioctl+0xfe2/0x2220 [btrfs] [181631.224566] [<ffffffff812603ed>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x15 [181631.224566] [<ffffffff81084669>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [181631.224566] [<ffffffff81138def>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x834/0xcd2 [181631.224566] [<ffffffff81138def>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x834/0xcd2 [181631.224566] [<ffffffff8103e48c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x211/0x424 [181631.224566] [<ffffffff811755e6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x3c6/0x479 (...) The sequence of steps leading to this are: CPU 0 CPU 1 btrfs_balance() btrfs_relocate_chunk() btrfs_relocate_block_group(bg X) btrfs_lookup_block_group(bg X) cleaner_kthread locks fs_info->cleaner_mutex btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() finds bg X, which became unused in the previous transaction checks bg X ->ro == 0, so it proceeds sets bg X ->ro to 1 (btrfs_set_block_group_ro(bg X)) blocks on fs_info->cleaner_mutex btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X) unlocks fs_info->cleaner_mutex acquires fs_info->cleaner_mutex relocate_block_group() --> does nothing, no extents found in the extent tree from bg X unlocks fs_info->cleaner_mutex btrfs_relocate_block_group(bg X) returns btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X) extent map not found --> ASSERT(0) Fix this by using a new mutex to make sure these 2 operations, block group relocation and removal, are serialized. This issue is reproducible by running fstests generic/038 (which stresses chunk allocation and automatic removal of unused block groups) together with the following balance loop: while true; do btrfs balance start -dusage=0 <mountpoint> ; done Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 13 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
@log_root_tree should not be referenced after kfree. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Reported-by: NJulia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 11 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
This patch replace the rbtree used in ref_head to list. This has the following advantage: 1) Easier merge logic. With the new list implement, we only need to care merging the tail ref_node with the new ref_node. And this can be done quite easy at insert time, no need to do a indicated merge at run_delayed_refs(). Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-