- 21 6月, 2016 9 次提交
-
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
We can easily enable ibs for guest 2, so he can use it for guest 3. Acked-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
We can easily enable cei for guest 2, so he can use it for guest 3. Acked-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
We can easily enable intervention bypass for guest 2, so it can use it for guest 3. Acked-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
We can easily forward guest-storage-limit-suppression if available. One thing to care about is keeping the prefix properly mapped when gsls in toggled on/off or the mso changes in between. Therefore we better remap the prefix on any mso changes just like we already do with the prefix. Acked-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
We can easily forward the guest-PER-enhancement facility to guest 2 if available. Acked-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
As we forward the whole SCA provided by guest 2, we can directly forward SIIF if available. Acked-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's provide the 64-bit-SCAO facility to guest 2, so he can set up a SCA for guest 3 that has a 64 bit address. Please note that we already require the 64 bit SCAO for our vsie implementation, in order to forward the SCA directly (by pinning the page). Acked-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
As soon as guest 2 is allowed to use the vector facility (indicated via STFLE), it can also enable it for guest 3. We have to take care of the sattellite block that might be used when not relying on lazy vector copying (not the case for KVM). Acked-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
This patch adds basic support for nested virtualization on s390x, called VSIE (virtual SIE) and allows it to be used by the guest if the necessary facilities are supported by the hardware and enabled for the guest. In order to make this work, we have to shadow the sie control block provided by guest 2. In order to gain some performance, we have to reuse the same shadow blocks as good as possible. For now, we allow as many shadow blocks as we have VCPUs (that way, every VCPU can run the VSIE concurrently). We have to watch out for the prefix getting unmapped out of our shadow gmap and properly get the VCPU out of VSIE in that case, to fault the prefix pages back in. We use the PROG_REQUEST bit for that purpose. This patch is based on an initial prototype by Tobias Elpelt. Acked-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
- 20 6月, 2016 15 次提交
-
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Acked-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Nested virtualization will have to enable own gmaps. Current code would enable the wrong gmap whenever scheduled out and back in, therefore resulting in the wrong gmap being enabled. This patch reenables the last enabled gmap, therefore avoiding having to touch vcpu->arch.gmap when enabling a different gmap. Acked-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
It will be very helpful to have a mechanism to check without any locks if a given gmap shadow is still valid and matches the given properties. Acked-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
For nested virtualization, we want to know if we are handling a protection exception, because these can directly be forwarded to the guest without additional checks. Acked-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
We can easily support real-space designation just like EDAT1 and EDAT2. So guest2 can provide for guest3 an asce with the real-space control being set. We simply have to allocate the biggest page table possible and fake all levels. There is no protection to consider. If we exceed guest memory, vsie code will inject an addressing exception (via program intercept). In the future, we could limit the fake table level to the gmap page table. As the top level page table can never go away, such gmap shadows will never get unshadowed, we'll have to come up with another way to limit the number of kept gmap shadows. Acked-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
If the guest is enabled for EDAT2, we can easily create shadows for guest2 -> guest3 provided tables that make use of EDAT2. If guest2 references a 2GB page, this memory looks consecutive for guest2, but it does not have to be so for us. Therefore we have to create fake segment and page tables. This works just like EDAT1 support, so page tables are removed when the parent table (r3t table entry) is changed. We don't hve to care about: - ACCF-Validity Control in RTTE - Access-Control Bits in RTTE - Fetch-Protection Bit in RTTE - Common-Region Bit in RTTE Just like for EDAT1, all bits might be dropped and there is no guaranteed that they are active. Acked-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
If the guest is enabled for EDAT1, we can easily create shadows for guest2 -> guest3 provided tables that make use of EDAT1. If guest2 references a 1MB page, this memory looks consecutive for guest2, but it might not be so for us. Therefore we have to create fake page tables. We can easily add that to our existing infrastructure. The invalidation mechanism will make sure that fake page tables are removed when the parent table (sgt table entry) is changed. As EDAT1 also introduced protection on all page table levels, we have to also shadow these correctly. We don't have to care about: - ACCF-Validity Control in STE - Access-Control Bits in STE - Fetch-Protection Bit in STE - Common-Segment Bit in STE As all bits might be dropped and there is no guaranteed that they are active ("unpredictable whether the CPU uses these bits", "may be used"). Without using EDAT1 in the shadow ourselfes (STE-format control == 0), simply shadowing these bits would not be enough. They would be ignored. Please note that we are using the "fake" flag to make this look consistent with further changes (EDAT2, real-space designation support) and don't let the shadow functions handle fc=1 stes. In the future, with huge pages in the host, gmap_shadow_pgt() could simply try to map a huge host page if "fake" is set to one and indicate via return value that no lower fake tables / shadow ptes are required. Acked-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
In preparation for EDAT1/EDAT2 support for gmap shadows, we have to store the requested edat level in the gmap shadow. The edat level used during shadow translation is a property of the gmap shadow. Depending on that level, the gmap shadow will look differently for the same guest tables. We have to store it internally in order to support it later. Acked-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Before any thread is allowed to use a gmap_shadow, it has to be fully initialized. However, for invalidation to work properly, we have to register the new gmap_shadow before we protect the parent gmap table. Because locking is tricky, and we have to avoid duplicate gmaps, let's introduce an initialized field, that signalizes other threads if that gmap_shadow can already be used or if they have to retry. Let's properly return errors using ERR_PTR() instead of simply returning NULL, so a caller can properly react on the error. Acked-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
We really want to avoid manually handling protection for nested virtualization. By shadowing pages with the protection the guest asked us for, the SIE can handle most protection-related actions for us (e.g. special handling for MVPG) and we can directly forward protection exceptions to the guest. PTEs will now always be shadowed with the correct _PAGE_PROTECT flag. Unshadowing will take care of any guest changes to the parent PTE and any host changes to the host PTE. If the host PTE doesn't have the fitting access rights or is not available, we have to fix it up. Acked-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 Martin Schwidefsky 提交于
For a nested KVM guest the outer KVM host needs to create shadow page tables for the nested guest. This patch adds the basic support to the guest address space (gmap) code. For each guest address space the inner KVM host creates, the first outer KVM host needs to create shadow page tables. The address space is identified by the ASCE loaded into the control register 1 at the time the inner SIE instruction for the second nested KVM guest is executed. The outer KVM host creates the shadow tables starting with the table identified by the ASCE on a on-demand basis. The outer KVM host will get repeated faults for all the shadow tables needed to run the second KVM guest. While a shadow page table for the second KVM guest is active the access to the origin region, segment and page tables needs to be restricted for the first KVM guest. For region and segment and page tables the first KVM guest may read the memory, but write attempt has to lead to an unshadow. This is done using the page invalid and read-only bits in the page table of the first KVM guest. If the first guest re-accesses one of the origin pages of a shadow, it gets a fault and the affected parts of the shadow page table hierarchy needs to be removed again. PGSTE tables don't have to be shadowed, as all interpretation assist can't deal with the invalid bits in the shadow pte being set differently than the original ones provided by the first KVM guest. Many bug fixes and improvements by David Hildenbrand. Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 Martin Schwidefsky 提交于
Let's use a reference counter mechanism to control the lifetime of gmap structures. This will be needed for further changes related to gmap shadows. Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 Martin Schwidefsky 提交于
The current gmap pte notifier forces a pte into to a read-write state. If the pte is invalidated the gmap notifier is called to inform KVM that the mapping will go away. Extend this approach to allow read-write, read-only and no-access as possible target states and call the pte notifier for any change to the pte. This mechanism is used to temporarily set specific access rights for a pte without doing the heavy work of a true mprotect call. Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 Martin Schwidefsky 提交于
The gmap notifier list and the gmap list in the mm_struct change rarely. Use RCU to optimize the reader of these lists. Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 Martin Schwidefsky 提交于
Pass an address range to the page table invalidation notifier for KVM. This allows to notify changes that affect a larger virtual memory area, e.g. for 1MB pages. Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
- 10 6月, 2016 16 次提交
-
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Without the storage-key facility, SIE won't interpret SSKE, ISKE and RRBE for us. So let's add proper interception handlers that will be called if lazy sske cannot be enabled. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's correctly detect that facility. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
We already indicate that facility but don't implement it in our pfmf interception handler. Let's add a new storage key handling function for conditionally setting the guest storage key. As we will reuse this function later on, let's directly implement returning the old key via parameter and indicating if any change happened via rc. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's just split returning the key and reporting errors. This makes calling code easier and avoids bugs as happened already. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Commit 1e133ab2 ("s390/mm: split arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c") changed the return value of get_guest_storage_key to an unsigned char, resulting in -EFAULT getting interpreted as a valid storage key. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.6+ Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's detect that facility. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's detect that facility. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's detect if we have that facility. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's detect if we have the intervention bypass facility installed. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
If guest-storage-limit-suppression is not available, we would for now have a valid guest address space with size 0. So let's simply set the origin to 0 and the limit to hamax. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's detect that facility. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's detect the Collaborative-memory-management-interpretation facility, aka CMM assist, so we can correctly enable cmma later. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's detect that facility, so we can correctly handle its abscence. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's correctly detect that facility, so we can correctly handle its abscence later on. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
We have certain instructions that indicate available subfunctions via a query subfunction (crypto functions and ptff), or via a test bit function (plo). By exposing these "subfunction blocks" to user space, we allow user space to 1) query available subfunctions and make sure subfunctions won't get lost during migration - e.g. properly indicate them via a CPU model 2) change the subfunctions to be reported to the guest (even adding unavailable ones) This mechanism works just like the way we indicate the stfl(e) list to user space. This way, user space could even emulate some subfunctions in QEMU in the future. If this is ever applicable, we have to make sure later on, that unsupported subfunctions result in an intercept to QEMU. Please note that support to indicate them to the guest is still missing and requires hardware support. Usually, the IBC takes already care of these subfunctions for migration safety. QEMU should make sure to always set these bits properly according to the machine generation to be emulated. Available subfunctions are only valid in combination with STFLE bits retrieved via KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE and enabled via KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR. If the applicable bits are available, the indicated subfunctions are guaranteed to be correct. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
KVM will have to query these functions, let's add at least the query capabilities. PCKMO has RRE format, as bit 16-31 are ignored, we can still use the existing function. As PCKMO won't touch the cc, let's force it to 0 upfront. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NIngo Tuchscherer <ingo.tuchscherer@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-