1. 23 2月, 2012 5 次提交
  2. 22 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 21 2月, 2012 6 次提交
  4. 20 2月, 2012 3 次提交
  5. 19 2月, 2012 6 次提交
  6. 17 2月, 2012 9 次提交
  7. 15 2月, 2012 7 次提交
    • J
      Bluetooth: Implement Read Supported Commands commands for mgmt · e70bb2e8
      Johan Hedberg 提交于
      This patch implements the Read Supported Commands mgmt command which was
      recently added to the API specification. It returns a list of supported
      commands and events to user space.
      Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      e70bb2e8
    • U
      Bluetooth: Remove usage of __cancel_delayed_work() · 6de32750
      Ulisses Furquim 提交于
      __cancel_delayed_work() is being used in some paths where we cannot
      sleep waiting for the delayed work to finish. However, that function
      might return while the timer is running and the work will be queued
      again. Replace the calls with safer cancel_delayed_work() version
      which spins until the timer handler finishes on other CPUs and
      cancels the delayed work.
      Signed-off-by: NUlisses Furquim <ulisses@profusion.mobi>
      Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      6de32750
    • A
      Bluetooth: Fix potential deadlock · a51cd2be
      Andre Guedes 提交于
      We don't need to use the _sync variant in hci_conn_hold and
      hci_conn_put to cancel conn->disc_work delayed work. This way
      we avoid potential deadlocks like this one reported by lockdep.
      
      ======================================================
      [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
      3.2.0+ #1 Not tainted
      -------------------------------------------------------
      kworker/u:1/17 is trying to acquire lock:
       (&hdev->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0041155>] hci_conn_timeout+0x62/0x158 [bluetooth]
      
      but task is already holding lock:
       ((&(&conn->disc_work)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81035751>] process_one_work+0x11a/0x2bf
      
      which lock already depends on the new lock.
      
      the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      
      -> #2 ((&(&conn->disc_work)->work)){+.+...}:
             [<ffffffff81057444>] lock_acquire+0x8a/0xa7
             [<ffffffff81034ed1>] wait_on_work+0x3d/0xaa
             [<ffffffff81035b54>] __cancel_work_timer+0xac/0xef
             [<ffffffff81035ba4>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0xd/0xf
             [<ffffffffa00554b0>] smp_chan_create+0xde/0xe6 [bluetooth]
             [<ffffffffa0056160>] smp_conn_security+0xa3/0x12d [bluetooth]
             [<ffffffffa0053640>] l2cap_connect_cfm+0x237/0x2e8 [bluetooth]
             [<ffffffffa004239c>] hci_proto_connect_cfm+0x2d/0x6f [bluetooth]
             [<ffffffffa0046ea5>] hci_event_packet+0x29d1/0x2d60 [bluetooth]
             [<ffffffffa003dde3>] hci_rx_work+0xd0/0x2e1 [bluetooth]
             [<ffffffff810357af>] process_one_work+0x178/0x2bf
             [<ffffffff81036178>] worker_thread+0xce/0x152
             [<ffffffff81039a03>] kthread+0x95/0x9d
             [<ffffffff812e7754>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
      
      -> #1 (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP){+.+...}:
             [<ffffffff81057444>] lock_acquire+0x8a/0xa7
             [<ffffffff812e553a>] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x36/0x6a
             [<ffffffff81244d56>] lock_sock_nested+0x24/0x7f
             [<ffffffffa004d96f>] lock_sock+0xb/0xd [bluetooth]
             [<ffffffffa0052906>] l2cap_chan_connect+0xa9/0x26f [bluetooth]
             [<ffffffffa00545f8>] l2cap_sock_connect+0xb3/0xff [bluetooth]
             [<ffffffff81243b48>] sys_connect+0x69/0x8a
             [<ffffffff812e6579>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      
      -> #0 (&hdev->lock){+.+.+.}:
             [<ffffffff81056d06>] __lock_acquire+0xa80/0xd74
             [<ffffffff81057444>] lock_acquire+0x8a/0xa7
             [<ffffffff812e3870>] __mutex_lock_common+0x48/0x38e
             [<ffffffff812e3c75>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2a/0x31
             [<ffffffffa0041155>] hci_conn_timeout+0x62/0x158 [bluetooth]
             [<ffffffff810357af>] process_one_work+0x178/0x2bf
             [<ffffffff81036178>] worker_thread+0xce/0x152
             [<ffffffff81039a03>] kthread+0x95/0x9d
             [<ffffffff812e7754>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
      
      other info that might help us debug this:
      
      Chain exists of:
        &hdev->lock --> slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP --> (&(&conn->disc_work)->work)
      
       Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      
             CPU0                    CPU1
             ----                    ----
        lock((&(&conn->disc_work)->work));
                                     lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP);
                                     lock((&(&conn->disc_work)->work));
        lock(&hdev->lock);
      
       *** DEADLOCK ***
      
      2 locks held by kworker/u:1/17:
       #0:  (hdev->name){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81035751>] process_one_work+0x11a/0x2bf
       #1:  ((&(&conn->disc_work)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81035751>] process_one_work+0x11a/0x2bf
      
      stack backtrace:
      Pid: 17, comm: kworker/u:1 Not tainted 3.2.0+ #1
      Call Trace:
       [<ffffffff812e06c6>] print_circular_bug+0x1f8/0x209
       [<ffffffff81056d06>] __lock_acquire+0xa80/0xd74
       [<ffffffff81021ef2>] ? arch_local_irq_restore+0x6/0xd
       [<ffffffff81022bc7>] ? vprintk+0x3f9/0x41e
       [<ffffffff81057444>] lock_acquire+0x8a/0xa7
       [<ffffffffa0041155>] ? hci_conn_timeout+0x62/0x158 [bluetooth]
       [<ffffffff812e3870>] __mutex_lock_common+0x48/0x38e
       [<ffffffffa0041155>] ? hci_conn_timeout+0x62/0x158 [bluetooth]
       [<ffffffff81190fd6>] ? __dynamic_pr_debug+0x6d/0x6f
       [<ffffffffa0041155>] ? hci_conn_timeout+0x62/0x158 [bluetooth]
       [<ffffffff8105320f>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf
       [<ffffffff812e3c75>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2a/0x31
       [<ffffffffa0041155>] hci_conn_timeout+0x62/0x158 [bluetooth]
       [<ffffffff810357af>] process_one_work+0x178/0x2bf
       [<ffffffff81035751>] ? process_one_work+0x11a/0x2bf
       [<ffffffff81055af3>] ? lock_acquired+0x1d0/0x1df
       [<ffffffffa00410f3>] ? hci_acl_disconn+0x65/0x65 [bluetooth]
       [<ffffffff81036178>] worker_thread+0xce/0x152
       [<ffffffff810407ed>] ? finish_task_switch+0x45/0xc5
       [<ffffffff810360aa>] ? manage_workers.isra.25+0x16a/0x16a
       [<ffffffff81039a03>] kthread+0x95/0x9d
       [<ffffffff812e7754>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
       [<ffffffff812e5db4>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
       [<ffffffff8103996e>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x55/0x55
       [<ffffffff812e7750>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
      Signed-off-by: NAndre Guedes <andre.guedes@openbossa.org>
      Signed-off-by: NVinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>
      Reviewed-by: NUlisses Furquim <ulisses@profusion.mobi>
      Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      a51cd2be
    • O
      Bluetooth: silence lockdep warning · b5a30dda
      Octavian Purdila 提交于
      Since bluetooth uses multiple protocols types, to avoid lockdep
      warnings, we need to use different lockdep classes (one for each
      protocol type).
      
      This is already done in bt_sock_create but it misses a couple of cases
      when new connections are created. This patch corrects that to fix the
      following warning:
      
      <4>[ 1864.732366] =======================================================
      <4>[ 1864.733030] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
      <4>[ 1864.733544] 3.0.16-mid3-00007-gc9a0f62 #3
      <4>[ 1864.733883] -------------------------------------------------------
      <4>[ 1864.734408] t.android.btclc/4204 is trying to acquire lock:
      <4>[ 1864.734869]  (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c14970ea>] rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15/0x30
      <4>[ 1864.735541]
      <4>[ 1864.735549] but task is already holding lock:
      <4>[ 1864.736045]  (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1498bf7>] lock_sock+0xa/0xc
      <4>[ 1864.736732]
      <4>[ 1864.736740] which lock already depends on the new lock.
      <4>[ 1864.736750]
      <4>[ 1864.737428]
      <4>[ 1864.737437] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      <4>[ 1864.738016]
      <4>[ 1864.738023] -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.+.}:
      <4>[ 1864.738549]        [<c1062273>] lock_acquire+0x104/0x140
      <4>[ 1864.738977]        [<c13d35c1>] lock_sock_nested+0x58/0x68
      <4>[ 1864.739411]        [<c1493c33>] l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x76
      <4>[ 1864.739858]        [<c13d06c3>] __sock_sendmsg+0x50/0x59
      <4>[ 1864.740279]        [<c13d0ea2>] sock_sendmsg+0x94/0xa8
      <4>[ 1864.740687]        [<c13d0ede>] kernel_sendmsg+0x28/0x37
      <4>[ 1864.741106]        [<c14969ca>] rfcomm_send_frame+0x30/0x38
      <4>[ 1864.741542]        [<c1496a2a>] rfcomm_send_ua+0x58/0x5a
      <4>[ 1864.741959]        [<c1498447>] rfcomm_run+0x441/0xb52
      <4>[ 1864.742365]        [<c104f095>] kthread+0x63/0x68
      <4>[ 1864.742742]        [<c14d5182>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd
      <4>[ 1864.743187]
      <4>[ 1864.743193] -> #0 (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}:
      <4>[ 1864.743667]        [<c1061ada>] __lock_acquire+0x988/0xc00
      <4>[ 1864.744100]        [<c1062273>] lock_acquire+0x104/0x140
      <4>[ 1864.744519]        [<c14d2c70>] __mutex_lock_common+0x3b/0x33f
      <4>[ 1864.744975]        [<c14d303e>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2d/0x36
      <4>[ 1864.745412]        [<c14970ea>] rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15/0x30
      <4>[ 1864.745842]        [<c14990d9>] __rfcomm_sock_close+0x5f/0x6b
      <4>[ 1864.746288]        [<c1499114>] rfcomm_sock_shutdown+0x2f/0x62
      <4>[ 1864.746737]        [<c13d275d>] sys_socketcall+0x1db/0x422
      <4>[ 1864.747165]        [<c14d42f0>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
      Signed-off-by: NOctavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      b5a30dda
    • V
      Bluetooth: Fix using an absolute timeout on hci_conn_put() · 33166063
      Vinicius Costa Gomes 提交于
      queue_delayed_work() expects a relative time for when that work
      should be scheduled.
      Signed-off-by: NVinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>
      Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      33166063
    • A
      Bluetooth: l2cap_set_timer needs jiffies as timeout value · 6e1da683
      Andrzej Kaczmarek 提交于
      After moving L2CAP timers to workqueues l2cap_set_timer expects timeout
      value to be specified in jiffies but constants defined in miliseconds
      are used. This makes timeouts unreliable when CONFIG_HZ is not set to
      1000.
      
      __set_chan_timer macro still uses jiffies as input to avoid multiple
      conversions from/to jiffies for sk_sndtimeo value which is already
      specified in jiffies.
      Signed-off-by: NAndrzej Kaczmarek <andrzej.kaczmarek@tieto.com>
      Ackec-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      6e1da683
    • J
      Bluetooth: Remove bogus inline declaration from l2cap_chan_connect · 4aa832c2
      Johan Hedberg 提交于
      As reported by Dan Carpenter this function causes a Sparse warning and
      shouldn't be declared inline:
      
      include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h:837:30 error: marked inline, but without a
      definition"
      Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      4aa832c2
  8. 13 2月, 2012 3 次提交