“603c0d80b4ff59487af33477e2ac7be113538161”上不存在“Documentation/DocBook/media/dvb/frontend.xml”
- 29 5月, 2014 10 次提交
-
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Since the ability to split pages into subpage requests has been added, nfs_pgio_header->rpc_list only ever has one pgio data. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
The read and write paths do exactly the same thing for the rpc_prepare rpc_op. This patch combines them together into a single function. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
I create a new struct nfs_rw_ops to decide the differences between reads and writes. This struct will be set when initializing a new nfs_pgio_descriptor, and then passed on to the nfs_rw_header when a new header is allocated. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
The header had a pointer to the verifier that was set from the old write data struct. We don't need to keep the pointer around now that we have shared structures. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
The only difference is the write verifier field, but we can keep that for a little bit longer. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
At this point, the only difference between nfs_read_data and nfs_write_data is the write verifier. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
Reads and writes have very similar results. This patch combines the two structs together with comments to show where the differing fields are used. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
Reads and writes have very similar arguments. This patch combines them together and documents the few fields used only by write. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The read_pageio_init method is just a very convoluted way to grab the right nfs_pageio_ops vector. The vector to chose is not a choice of protocol version, but just a pNFS vs MDS I/O choice that can simply be done inside nfs_pageio_init_read based on the presence of a layout driver, and a new force_mds flag to the special case of falling back to MDS I/O on a pNFS-capable volume. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The write_pageio_init method is just a very convoluted way to grab the right nfs_pageio_ops vector. The vector to chose is not a choice of protocol version, but just a pNFS vs MDS I/O choice that can simply be done inside nfs_pageio_init_write based on the presence of a layout driver, and a new force_mds flag to the special case of falling back to MDS I/O on a pNFS-capable volume. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 18 3月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Now that nfs_rename uses the async infrastructure, we can remove this. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Tested-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
The async rename code is currently "polluted" with some parts that are really just for sillyrenames. Add a new "complete" operation vector to the nfs_renamedata to separate out the stuff that just needs to be done for a sillyrename. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Tested-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 02 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
nfs4_release_lockowner needs to set the rpc_message reply to point to the nfs4_sequence_res in order to avoid another Oopsable situation in nfs41_assign_slot. Fixes: fbd4bfd1 (NFS: Add nfs4_sequence calls for RELEASE_LOCKOWNER) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.12+ Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 02 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
nfs41_wake_and_assign_slot() relies on the task->tk_msg.rpc_argp and task->tk_msg.rpc_resp always pointing to the session sequence arguments. nfs4_proc_open_confirm tries to pull a fast one by reusing the open sequence structure, thus causing corruption of the NFSv4 slot table. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.12+ Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 29 10月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
This patch adds support for multiple security options which can be specified using a colon-delimited list of security flavors (the same syntax as nfsd's exports file). This is useful, for instance, when NFSv4.x mounts cross SECINFO boundaries. With this patch a user can use "sec=krb5i,krb5p" to mount a remote filesystem using krb5i, but can still cross into krb5p-only exports. New mounts will try all security options before failing. NFSv4.x SECINFO results will be compared against the sec= flavors to find the first flavor in both lists or if no match is found will return -EPERM. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
When filling parsed_mount_data, store the parsed sec= mount option in the new struct nfs_auth_info and the chosen flavor in selected_flavor. This patch lays the groundwork for supporting multiple sec= options. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Introduce a mechanism for probing a server to determine if an FSID is present or absent. The on-the-wire compound is different between minor version 0 and 1. Minor version 0 appends a RENEW operation to identify which client ID is probing. Minor version 1 has a SEQUENCE operation in the compound which effectively carries the same information. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The nfs4_proc_fs_locations() function is invoked during referral processing to perform a GETATTR(fs_locations) on an object's parent directory in order to discover the target of the referral. It performs a LOOKUP in the compound, so the client needs to know the parent's file handle a priori. Unfortunately this function is not adequate for handling migration recovery. We need to probe fs_locations information on an FSID, but there's no parent directory available for many operations that can return NFS4ERR_MOVED. Another subtlety: recovering from NFS4ERR_LEASE_MOVED is a process of walking over a list of known FSIDs that reside on the server, and probing whether they have migrated. Once the server has detected that the client has probed all migrated file systems, it stops returning NFS4ERR_LEASE_MOVED. A minor version zero server needs to know what client ID is requesting fs_locations information so it can clear the flag that forces it to continue returning NFS4ERR_LEASE_MOVED. This flag is set per client ID and per FSID. However, the client ID is not an argument of either the PUTFH or GETATTR operations. Later minor versions have client ID information embedded in the compound's SEQUENCE operation. Therefore, by convention, minor version zero clients send a RENEW operation in the same compound as the GETATTR(fs_locations), since RENEW's one argument is a clientid4. This allows a minor version zero server to identify correctly the client that is probing for a migration. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 26 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Determine if we've created a new file by examining the directory change attribute and/or the O_EXCL flag. This fixes a regression when doing a non-exclusive create of a new file. If the FILE_CREATED flag is not set, the atomic_open() command will perform full file access permissions checks instead of just checking for MAY_OPEN. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 05 9月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
This is a minimal client side implementation of SP4_MACH_CRED. It will attempt to negotiate SP4_MACH_CRED iff the EXCHANGE_ID is using krb5i or krb5p auth. SP4_MACH_CRED will be used if the server supports the minimal operations: BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION EXCHANGE_ID CREATE_SESSION DESTROY_SESSION DESTROY_CLIENTID This patch only includes the EXCHANGE_ID negotiation code because the client will already use the machine cred for these operations. If the server doesn't support SP4_MACH_CRED or doesn't support the minimal operations, the exchange id will be resent with SP4_NONE. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When an NFSv4 client loses contact with the server it can lose any locks that it holds. Currently when it reconnects to the server it simply tries to reclaim those locks. This might succeed even though some other client has held and released a lock in the mean time. So the first client might think the file is unchanged, but it isn't. This isn't good. If, when recovery happens, the locks cannot be claimed because some other client still holds the lock, then we get a message in the kernel logs, but the client can still write. So two clients can both think they have a lock and can both write at the same time. This is equally not good. There was a patch a while ago http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/41917 which tried to address some of this, but it didn't seem to go anywhere. That patch would also send a signal to the process. That might be useful but for now this patch just causes writes to fail. For NFSv4 (unlike v2/v3) there is a strong link between the lock and the write request so we can fairly easily fail any IO of the lock is gone. While some applications might not expect this, it is still safer than allowing the write to succeed. Because this is a fairly big change in behaviour a module parameter, "recover_locks", is introduced which defaults to true (the current behaviour) but can be set to "false" to tell the client not to try to recover things that were lost. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 08 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 09 6月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Quigley 提交于
After looking at all of the nfsv4 operations the label structure has been added to the prototypes of the functions which can transmit label data. Signed-off-by: NMatthew N. Dodd <Matthew.Dodd@sparta.com> Signed-off-by: NMiguel Rodel Felipe <Rodel_FM@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NPhua Eu Gene <PHUA_Eu_Gene@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NKhin Mi Mi Aung <Mi_Mi_AUNG@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Steve Dickson 提交于
In order to mimic the way that NFSv4 ACLs are implemented we have created a structure to be used to pass label data up and down the call chain. This patch adds the new structure and new members to the required NFSv4 call structures. Signed-off-by: NMatthew N. Dodd <Matthew.Dodd@sparta.com> Signed-off-by: NMiguel Rodel Felipe <Rodel_FM@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NPhua Eu Gene <PHUA_Eu_Gene@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NKhin Mi Mi Aung <Mi_Mi_AUNG@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 David Quigley 提交于
This patch adds several new flags to allow the NFS client and server to determine if this attribute is supported and if it is being sent over the wire. Signed-off-by: NMatthew N. Dodd <Matthew.Dodd@sparta.com> Signed-off-by: NMiguel Rodel Felipe <Rodel_FM@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NPhua Eu Gene <PHUA_Eu_Gene@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NKhin Mi Mi Aung <Mi_Mi_AUNG@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 07 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure that we use the same credential for layoutget, layoutcommit and layoutreturn. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 07 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The main reason for doing this is will be to allow for an asynchronous RPC mode that we can use for freeing lock stateids as per section 8.2.4 of RFC5661. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 17 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we're doing NFSv4.1 against a server that has persistent sessions, then we should not need to call SETATTR in order to reset the file attributes immediately after doing an exclusive create. Note that since the create mode depends on the type of session that has been negotiated with the server, we should not choose the mode until after we've got a session slot. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 30 3月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The NFSv4 SECINFO procedure returns a list of security flavors. Any GSS flavor also has a GSS tuple containing an OID, a quality-of- protection value, and a service value, which specifies a particular GSS pseudoflavor. For simplicity and efficiency, I'd like to return each GSS tuple from the NFSv4 SECINFO XDR decoder and pass it straight into the RPC client. Define a data structure that is visible to both the NFS client and the RPC client. Take structure and field names from the relevant standards to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
I've built with NFSv4 enabled and disabled. This forward declaration does not seem to be required. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 26 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we replay a READ or WRITE call, we should not be changing the stateid. Currently, we may end up doing so, because the stateid is only selected at xdr encode time. This patch ensures that we select the stateid after we get an NFSv4.1 session slot, and that we keep that same stateid across retries. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 01 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
The client will currently try LAYOUTGETs forever if a server is returning NFS4ERR_LAYOUTTRYLATER or NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT - even if the client no longer needs the layout (ie process killed, unmounted). This patch uses the DS timeout value (module parameter 'dataserver_timeo' via rpc layer) to set an upper limit of how long the client tries LATOUTGETs in this situation. Once the timeout is reached, IO is redirected to the MDS. This also changes how the client checks if a layout is on the clp list to avoid a double list_add. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 13 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
- 16 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Shave a few bytes off the slot table size by moving the RPC timestamp into the sequence results. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 06 12月, 2012 6 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Pre-condition for optimising the slot allocation and reintroducing FIFO behaviour. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Privileged rpc calls are those that are run by the state recovery thread, in cases where we're trying to recover the system after a server reboot or a network partition. In those cases, we want to fence off all other rpc calls (see nfs4_begin_drain_session()) so that they don't end up using stateids or clientids that are in the process of being recovered. Prior to this patch, we had to set up special callback functions in order to declare an rpc call as being privileged. By adding a new field to the sequence arguments, this patch simplifies things considerably, and allows us to declare the rpc call as privileged before it is run. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Clean up. Gather NFSv4.1 slot definitions in fs/nfs/nfs4session.h. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Instead of an array of slots, use a singly linked list of slots that can be dynamically appended to or shrunk. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When the server tells us that it is dynamically resizing the session replay cache, we should reset the sequence number for those slots that have been deallocated. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Dynamic slot allocation in NFSv4.1 depends on the client being able to track the server's target value for the highest slotid in the slot table. See the reference in Section 2.10.6.1 of RFC5661. To avoid ordering problems in the case where 2 SEQUENCE replies contain conflicting updates to this target value, we also introduce a generation counter, to track whether or not an RPC containing a SEQUENCE operation was launched before or after the last update. Also rename the nfs4_slot_table target_max_slots field to 'target_highest_slotid' to avoid confusion with a slot table size or number of slots. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-