Commit b2d35fa5 ("selftests: add headers_install to lib.mk")
introduced a requirement that Makefiles more than one level below the
selftests directory need to define top_srcdir, but it didn't update
any of the powerpc Makefiles.

This broke building all the powerpc selftests with eg:

  make[1]: Entering directory '/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc'
  BUILD_TARGET=/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment; mkdir -p $BUILD_TARGET; make OUTPUT=$BUILD_TARGET -k -C alignment all
  make[2]: Entering directory '/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment'
  ../../lib.mk:20: ../../../../scripts/subarch.include: No such file or directory
  make[2]: *** No rule to make target '../../../../scripts/subarch.include'.
  make[2]: Failed to remake makefile '../../../../scripts/subarch.include'.
  Makefile:38: recipe for target 'alignment' failed

Fix it by setting top_srcdir in the affected Makefiles.

Fixes: b2d35fa5 ("selftests: add headers_install to lib.mk")
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

Currently, kselftest use TEST_PROGS, TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED, TEST_FILES to
indicate the test program, extended test program and test files. It is
easy to understand the purpose of these files. But mix of compiled and
uncompiled files lead to duplicated "all" and "clean" targets.

In order to remove the duplicated targets, introduce TEST_GEN_PROGS,
TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED, TEST_GEN_FILES to indicate the compiled
objects.

Also, the later patch will make use of TEST_GEN_XXX to redirect these
files to output directory indicated by KBUILD_OUTPUT or O.

And add this changes to "Contributing new tests(details)" of
Documentation/kselftest.txt.
Signed-off-by: NBamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NShuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>

These tests were merged in parallel to the install support, update them
now to use it.

This also adds cross compile support for the VPHN test which was missing
it.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

The goal is to verify vphn_unpack_associativity() parses VPHN numbers
correctly. We feed it with a variety of input values and compare with
expected results.

PAPR+ does not say much about VPHN parsing: I came up with a list of
tests that check many simple cases and some corner ones. I wouldn't
dare to say the list is exhaustive though.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[mpe: Rework harness logic, rename to test-vphn, add -m64]
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reviewed-by: NGreg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>