- 04 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Kodanev 提交于
Move commonly used pattern of ip6_dst_store() usage to a separate function - ip6_sk_dst_store_flow(), which will check the addresses for equality using the flow information, before saving them. There is no functional changes in this patch. In addition, it will be used in the next patch, in ip6_sk_dst_lookup_flow(). Signed-off-by: NAlexey Kodanev <alexey.kodanev@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 31 3月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
Donald reported that IPv6 route leaking between VRFs is not working. The root cause is the strict argument in the call to rt6_lookup when validating the nexthop spec. ip6_route_check_nh validates the gateway and device (if given) of a route spec. It in turn could call rt6_lookup (e.g., lookup in a given table did not succeed so it falls back to a full lookup) and if so sets the strict argument to 1. That means if the egress device is given, the route lookup needs to return a result with the same device. This strict requirement does not work with VRFs (IPv4 or IPv6) because the oif in the flow struct is overridden with the index of the VRF device to trigger a match on the l3mdev rule and force the lookup to its table. The right long term solution is to add an l3mdev index to the flow struct such that the oif is not overridden. That solution will not backport well, so this patch aims for a simpler solution to relax the strict argument if the route spec device is an l3mdev slave. As done in other places, use the FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF to know that the RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE flag needs to be removed. Fixes: ca254490 ("net: Add VRF support to IPv6 stack") Reported-by: NDonald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Lorenzo Bianconi 提交于
Do not allow setting ipv6 routes from userspace if disable_ipv6 has been enabled. The issue can be triggered using the following reproducer: - sysctl net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 - ip -6 route add a:b:c:d::/64 dev em1 - ip -6 route show a:b:c:d::/64 dev em1 metric 1024 pref medium Fix it checking disable_ipv6 value in ip6_route_info_create routine Signed-off-by: NLorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 28 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kirill Tkhai 提交于
Synchronous pernet_operations are not allowed anymore. All are asynchronous. So, drop the structure member. Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Prefer the direct use of octal for permissions. Done with checkpatch -f --types=SYMBOLIC_PERMS --fix-inplace and some typing. Miscellanea: o Whitespace neatening around these conversions. Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 24 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
syzbot reported a LOCKDEP splat [1] in rt6_age_examine_exception() rt6_age_examine_exception() is called while rt6_exception_lock is held. This lock is the lower one in the lock hierarchy, thus we can not call dst_neigh_lookup() function, as it can fallback to neigh_create() We should instead do a pure RCU lookup. As a bonus we avoid a pair of atomic operations on neigh refcount. [1] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.16.0-rc4+ #277 Not tainted syz-executor7/4015 is trying to acquire lock: (&ndev->lock){++--}, at: [<00000000416dce19>] __ipv6_dev_mc_dec+0x45/0x350 net/ipv6/mcast.c:928 but task is already holding lock: (&tbl->lock){++-.}, at: [<00000000b5cb1d65>] neigh_ifdown+0x3d/0x250 net/core/neighbour.c:292 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&tbl->lock){++-.}: __raw_write_lock_bh include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h:203 [inline] _raw_write_lock_bh+0x31/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:312 __neigh_create+0x87e/0x1d90 net/core/neighbour.c:528 neigh_create include/net/neighbour.h:315 [inline] ip6_neigh_lookup+0x9a7/0xba0 net/ipv6/route.c:228 dst_neigh_lookup include/net/dst.h:405 [inline] rt6_age_examine_exception net/ipv6/route.c:1609 [inline] rt6_age_exceptions+0x381/0x660 net/ipv6/route.c:1645 fib6_age+0xfb/0x140 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2033 fib6_clean_node+0x389/0x580 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1919 fib6_walk_continue+0x46c/0x8a0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1845 fib6_walk+0x91/0xf0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1893 fib6_clean_tree+0x1e6/0x340 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1970 __fib6_clean_all+0x1f4/0x3a0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1986 fib6_clean_all net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1997 [inline] fib6_run_gc+0x16b/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2053 ndisc_netdev_event+0x3c2/0x4a0 net/ipv6/ndisc.c:1781 notifier_call_chain+0x136/0x2c0 kernel/notifier.c:93 __raw_notifier_call_chain kernel/notifier.c:394 [inline] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x2d/0x40 kernel/notifier.c:401 call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x32/0x70 net/core/dev.c:1707 call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:1725 [inline] __dev_notify_flags+0x262/0x430 net/core/dev.c:6960 dev_change_flags+0xf5/0x140 net/core/dev.c:6994 devinet_ioctl+0x126a/0x1ac0 net/ipv4/devinet.c:1080 inet_ioctl+0x184/0x310 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:919 sock_do_ioctl+0xef/0x390 net/socket.c:957 sock_ioctl+0x36b/0x610 net/socket.c:1081 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline] do_vfs_ioctl+0x1b1/0x1520 fs/ioctl.c:686 SYSC_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:701 [inline] SyS_ioctl+0x8f/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:692 do_syscall_64+0x281/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7 -> #2 (rt6_exception_lock){+.-.}: __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:135 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x31/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:168 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:315 [inline] rt6_flush_exceptions+0x21/0x210 net/ipv6/route.c:1367 fib6_del_route net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1677 [inline] fib6_del+0x624/0x12c0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1761 __ip6_del_rt+0xc7/0x120 net/ipv6/route.c:2980 ip6_del_rt+0x132/0x1a0 net/ipv6/route.c:2993 __ipv6_dev_ac_dec+0x3b1/0x600 net/ipv6/anycast.c:332 ipv6_dev_ac_dec net/ipv6/anycast.c:345 [inline] ipv6_sock_ac_close+0x2b4/0x3e0 net/ipv6/anycast.c:200 inet6_release+0x48/0x70 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:433 sock_release+0x8d/0x1e0 net/socket.c:594 sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1149 __fput+0x327/0x7e0 fs/file_table.c:209 ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:243 task_work_run+0x199/0x270 kernel/task_work.c:113 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:22 [inline] do_exit+0x9bb/0x1ad0 kernel/exit.c:865 do_group_exit+0x149/0x400 kernel/exit.c:968 get_signal+0x73a/0x16d0 kernel/signal.c:2469 do_signal+0x90/0x1e90 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:809 exit_to_usermode_loop+0x258/0x2f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:162 prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:196 [inline] syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:265 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x6ec/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:292 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7 -> #1 (&(&tb->tb6_lock)->rlock){+.-.}: __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:135 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x31/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:168 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:315 [inline] __ip6_ins_rt+0x56/0x90 net/ipv6/route.c:1007 ip6_route_add+0x141/0x190 net/ipv6/route.c:2955 addrconf_prefix_route+0x44f/0x620 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:2359 fixup_permanent_addr net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3368 [inline] addrconf_permanent_addr net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3391 [inline] addrconf_notify+0x1ad2/0x2310 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3460 notifier_call_chain+0x136/0x2c0 kernel/notifier.c:93 __raw_notifier_call_chain kernel/notifier.c:394 [inline] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x2d/0x40 kernel/notifier.c:401 call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x32/0x70 net/core/dev.c:1707 call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:1725 [inline] __dev_notify_flags+0x15d/0x430 net/core/dev.c:6958 dev_change_flags+0xf5/0x140 net/core/dev.c:6994 do_setlink+0xa22/0x3bb0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:2357 rtnl_newlink+0xf37/0x1a50 net/core/rtnetlink.c:2965 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x57f/0xb10 net/core/rtnetlink.c:4641 netlink_rcv_skb+0x14b/0x380 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2444 rtnetlink_rcv+0x1c/0x20 net/core/rtnetlink.c:4659 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1308 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x4c4/0x6b0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1334 netlink_sendmsg+0xa4a/0xe60 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1897 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:629 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 net/socket.c:639 ___sys_sendmsg+0x767/0x8b0 net/socket.c:2047 __sys_sendmsg+0xe5/0x210 net/socket.c:2081 SYSC_sendmsg net/socket.c:2092 [inline] SyS_sendmsg+0x2d/0x50 net/socket.c:2088 do_syscall_64+0x281/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7 -> #0 (&ndev->lock){++--}: lock_acquire+0x1d5/0x580 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3920 __raw_write_lock_bh include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h:203 [inline] _raw_write_lock_bh+0x31/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:312 __ipv6_dev_mc_dec+0x45/0x350 net/ipv6/mcast.c:928 ipv6_dev_mc_dec+0x110/0x1f0 net/ipv6/mcast.c:961 pndisc_destructor+0x21a/0x340 net/ipv6/ndisc.c:392 pneigh_ifdown net/core/neighbour.c:695 [inline] neigh_ifdown+0x149/0x250 net/core/neighbour.c:294 rt6_disable_ip+0x537/0x700 net/ipv6/route.c:3874 addrconf_ifdown+0x14b/0x14f0 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3633 addrconf_notify+0x5f8/0x2310 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3557 notifier_call_chain+0x136/0x2c0 kernel/notifier.c:93 __raw_notifier_call_chain kernel/notifier.c:394 [inline] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x2d/0x40 kernel/notifier.c:401 call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x32/0x70 net/core/dev.c:1707 call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:1725 [inline] __dev_notify_flags+0x262/0x430 net/core/dev.c:6960 dev_change_flags+0xf5/0x140 net/core/dev.c:6994 devinet_ioctl+0x126a/0x1ac0 net/ipv4/devinet.c:1080 inet_ioctl+0x184/0x310 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:919 packet_ioctl+0x1ff/0x310 net/packet/af_packet.c:4066 sock_do_ioctl+0xef/0x390 net/socket.c:957 sock_ioctl+0x36b/0x610 net/socket.c:1081 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline] do_vfs_ioctl+0x1b1/0x1520 fs/ioctl.c:686 SYSC_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:701 [inline] SyS_ioctl+0x8f/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:692 do_syscall_64+0x281/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &ndev->lock --> rt6_exception_lock --> &tbl->lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&tbl->lock); lock(rt6_exception_lock); lock(&tbl->lock); lock(&ndev->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by syz-executor7/4015: #0: (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<00000000a2f16daa>] rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20 net/core/rtnetlink.c:74 #1: (&tbl->lock){++-.}, at: [<00000000b5cb1d65>] neigh_ifdown+0x3d/0x250 net/core/neighbour.c:292 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 4015 Comm: syz-executor7 Not tainted 4.16.0-rc4+ #277 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline] dump_stack+0x194/0x24d lib/dump_stack.c:53 print_circular_bug.isra.38+0x2cd/0x2dc kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1223 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1863 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1976 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2417 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x30a8/0x3e00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3431 lock_acquire+0x1d5/0x580 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3920 __raw_write_lock_bh include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h:203 [inline] _raw_write_lock_bh+0x31/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:312 __ipv6_dev_mc_dec+0x45/0x350 net/ipv6/mcast.c:928 ipv6_dev_mc_dec+0x110/0x1f0 net/ipv6/mcast.c:961 pndisc_destructor+0x21a/0x340 net/ipv6/ndisc.c:392 pneigh_ifdown net/core/neighbour.c:695 [inline] neigh_ifdown+0x149/0x250 net/core/neighbour.c:294 rt6_disable_ip+0x537/0x700 net/ipv6/route.c:3874 addrconf_ifdown+0x14b/0x14f0 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3633 addrconf_notify+0x5f8/0x2310 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3557 notifier_call_chain+0x136/0x2c0 kernel/notifier.c:93 __raw_notifier_call_chain kernel/notifier.c:394 [inline] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x2d/0x40 kernel/notifier.c:401 call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x32/0x70 net/core/dev.c:1707 call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:1725 [inline] __dev_notify_flags+0x262/0x430 net/core/dev.c:6960 dev_change_flags+0xf5/0x140 net/core/dev.c:6994 devinet_ioctl+0x126a/0x1ac0 net/ipv4/devinet.c:1080 inet_ioctl+0x184/0x310 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:919 packet_ioctl+0x1ff/0x310 net/packet/af_packet.c:4066 sock_do_ioctl+0xef/0x390 net/socket.c:957 sock_ioctl+0x36b/0x610 net/socket.c:1081 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline] do_vfs_ioctl+0x1b1/0x1520 fs/ioctl.c:686 SYSC_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:701 [inline] SyS_ioctl+0x8f/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:692 do_syscall_64+0x281/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7 Fixes: c757faa8 ("ipv6: prepare fib6_age() for exception table") Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 23 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
For multipath routes the ONLINK flag can be specified per nexthop in rtnh_flags or globally in rtm_flags. Update ip6_route_multipath_add to consider the ONLINK setting coming from rtnh_flags. Each loop over nexthops the config for the sibling route is initialized to the global config and then per nexthop settings overlayed. The flag is 'or'ed into fib6_config to handle the ONLINK flag coming from either rtm_flags or rtnh_flags. Fixes: fc1e64e1 ("net/ipv6: Add support for onlink flag") Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 16 3月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
ipv6_chk_addr_and_flags determines if an address is a local address and optionally if it is an address on a specific device. For example, it is called by ip6_route_info_create to determine if a given gateway address is a local address. The address check currently does not consider L3 domains and as a result does not allow a route to be added in one VRF if the nexthop points to an address in a second VRF. e.g., $ ip route add 2001:db8:1::/64 vrf r2 via 2001:db8:102::23 Error: Invalid gateway address. where 2001:db8:102::23 is an address on an interface in vrf r1. ipv6_chk_addr_and_flags needs to allow callers to always pass in a device with a separate argument to not limit the address to the specific device. The device is used used to determine the L3 domain of interest. To that end add an argument to skip the device check and update callers to always pass a device where possible and use the new argument to mean any address in the domain. Update a handful of users of ipv6_chk_addr with a NULL dev argument. This patch handles the change to these callers without adding the domain check. ip6_validate_gw needs to handle 2 cases - one where the device is given as part of the nexthop spec and the other where the device is resolved. There is at least 1 VRF case where deferring the check to only after the route lookup has resolved the device fails with an unintuitive error "RTNETLINK answers: No route to host" as opposed to the preferred "Error: Gateway can not be a local address." The 'no route to host' error is because of the fallback to a full lookup. The check is done twice to avoid this error. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
Move gateway validation code from ip6_route_info_create into ip6_validate_gw. Code move plus adjustments to handle the potential reset of dev and idev and to make checkpatch happy. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Make use of the new helper. Suggested-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stefano Brivio 提交于
Currently, administrative MTU changes on a given netdevice are not reflected on route exceptions for MTU-less routes, with a set PMTU value, for that device: # ip -6 route get 2001:db8::b 2001:db8::b from :: dev vti_a proto kernel src 2001:db8::a metric 256 pref medium # ping6 -c 1 -q -s10000 2001:db8::b > /dev/null # ip netns exec a ip -6 route get 2001:db8::b 2001:db8::b from :: dev vti_a src 2001:db8::a metric 0 cache expires 571sec mtu 4926 pref medium # ip link set dev vti_a mtu 3000 # ip -6 route get 2001:db8::b 2001:db8::b from :: dev vti_a src 2001:db8::a metric 0 cache expires 571sec mtu 4926 pref medium # ip link set dev vti_a mtu 9000 # ip -6 route get 2001:db8::b 2001:db8::b from :: dev vti_a src 2001:db8::a metric 0 cache expires 571sec mtu 4926 pref medium The first issue is that since commit fb56be83 ("net-ipv6: on device mtu change do not add mtu to mtu-less routes") we don't call rt6_exceptions_update_pmtu() from rt6_mtu_change_route(), which handles administrative MTU changes, if the regular route is MTU-less. However, PMTU exceptions should be always updated, as long as RTAX_MTU is not locked. Keep the check for MTU-less main route, as introduced by that commit, but, for exceptions, call rt6_exceptions_update_pmtu() regardless of that check. Once that is fixed, one problem remains: MTU changes are not reflected if the new MTU is higher than the previous one, because rt6_exceptions_update_pmtu() doesn't allow that. We should instead allow PMTU increase if the old PMTU matches the local MTU, as that implies that the old MTU was the lowest in the path, and PMTU discovery might lead to different results. The existing check in rt6_mtu_change_route() correctly took that case into account (for regular routes only), so factor it out and re-use it also in rt6_exceptions_update_pmtu(). While at it, fix comments style and grammar, and try to be a bit more descriptive. Reported-by: NXiumei Mu <xmu@redhat.com> Fixes: fb56be83 ("net-ipv6: on device mtu change do not add mtu to mtu-less routes") Fixes: f5bbe7ee ("ipv6: prepare rt6_mtu_change() for exception table") Signed-off-by: NStefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> Acked-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 3月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
Some operators prefer IPv6 path selection to use a standard 5-tuple hash rather than just an L3 hash with the flow the label. To that end add support to IPv6 for multipath hash policy similar to bf4e0a3d ("net: ipv4: add support for ECMP hash policy choice"). The default is still L3 which covers source and destination addresses along with flow label and IPv6 protocol. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Tested-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
IPv6 does path selection for multipath routes deep in the lookup functions. The next patch adds L4 hash option and needs the skb for the forward path. To get the skb to the relevant FIB lookup functions it needs to go through the fib rules layer, so add a lookup_data argument to the fib_lookup_arg struct. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
Make rt6_multipath_hash more of a direct parallel to fib_multipath_hash and reduce stack and overhead in the process: get_hash_from_flowi6 is just a wrapper around __get_hash_from_flowi6 with another stack allocation for flow_keys. Move setting the addresses, protocol and label into rt6_multipath_hash and allow it to make the call to flow_hash_from_keys. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
Symmetry is good and allows easy comparison that ipv4 and ipv6 are doing the same thing. To that end, change ip_multipath_l3_keys to set addresses at the end after the icmp compares, and move the initialization of ipv6 flow keys to rt6_multipath_hash. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Roopa Prabhu 提交于
Dissect flow in fwd path if fib rules require it. Controlled by a flag to avoid penatly for the common case. Flag is set when fib rules with sport, dport and proto match that require flow dissect are installed. Also passes the dissected hash keys to the multipath hash function when applicable to avoid dissecting the flow again. icmp packets will continue to use inner header for hash calculations. Signed-off-by: NRoopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Acked-by: NPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Acked-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 2月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Kirill Tkhai 提交于
net->ipv6.peers is dereferenced in three places via inet_getpeer_v6(), and it's used to handle skb. All the users of inet_getpeer_v6() do not look like be able to be called from foreign net pernet_operations, so we may mark them as async. Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Kirill Tkhai 提交于
net: Convert raw6_net_ops, udplite6_net_ops, ipv6_proc_ops, if6_proc_net_ops and ip6_route_net_late_ops These pernet_operations create and destroy /proc entries and safely may be converted and safely may be mark as async. Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 16 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Xin Long 提交于
In early time, when freeing a xdst, it would be inserted into dst_garbage.list first. Then if it's refcnt was still held somewhere, later it would be put into dst_busy_list in dst_gc_task(). When one dev was being unregistered, the dev of these dsts in dst_busy_list would be set with loopback_dev and put this dev. So that this dev's removal wouldn't get blocked, and avoid the kmsg warning: kernel:unregister_netdevice: waiting for veth0 to become \ free. Usage count = 2 However after Commit 52df157f ("xfrm: take refcnt of dst when creating struct xfrm_dst bundle"), the xdst will not be freed with dst gc, and this warning happens. To fix it, we need to find these xdsts that are still held by others when removing the dev, and free xdst's dev and set it with loopback_dev. But unfortunately after flow_cache for xfrm was deleted, no list tracks them anymore. So we need to save these xdsts somewhere to release the xdst's dev later. To make this easier, this patch is to reuse uncached_list to track xdsts, so that the dev refcnt can be released in the event NETDEV_UNREGISTER process of fib_netdev_notifier. Thanks to Florian, we could move forward this fix quickly. Fixes: 52df157f ("xfrm: take refcnt of dst when creating struct xfrm_dst bundle") Reported-by: NJianlin Shi <jishi@redhat.com> Reported-by: NHangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com> Tested-by: NEyal Birger <eyal.birger@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NXin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
- 15 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
IPv4 uses set_lwt_redirect to set the lwtunnel redirect functions as needed. Move it to lwtunnel.h as lwtunnel_set_redirect and change IPv6 to also use it. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 2月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
Because of differences in how ipv4 and ipv6 handle fib lookups, verification of nexthops with onlink flag need to default to the main table rather than the local table used by IPv4. As it stands an address within a connected route on device 1 can be used with onlink on device 2. Updating the table properly rejects the route due to the egress device mismatch. Update the extack message as well to show it could be a device mismatch for the nexthop spec. Fixes: fc1e64e1 ("net/ipv6: Add support for onlink flag") Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
Verification of nexthops with onlink flag need to handle unreachable routes. The lookup is only intended to validate the gateway address is not a local address and if the gateway resolves the egress device must match the given device. Hence, hitting any default reject route is ok. Fixes: fc1e64e1 ("net/ipv6: Add support for onlink flag") Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
In current route cache aging logic, if a route has both RTF_EXPIRE and RTF_GATEWAY set, the route will only be removed if the neighbor cache has no NTF_ROUTER flag. Otherwise, even if the route has expired, it won't get deleted. Fix this logic to always check if the route has expired first and then do the gateway neighbor cache check if previous check decide to not remove the exception entry. Fixes: 1859bac0 ("ipv6: remove from fib tree aged out RTF_CACHE dst") Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: NPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 1月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
Similar to IPv4 allow routes to be added with the RTNH_F_ONLINK flag. The onlink option requires a gateway and a nexthop device. Any unicast gateway is allowed (including IPv4 mapped addresses and unresolved ones) as long as the gateway is not a local address and if it resolves it must match the given device. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
onlink verification needs to do a lookup in potentially different table than the table in fib6_config and without the RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE flag. Change ip6_nh_lookup_table to take table id and flags as input arguments. Both verifications want to ignore link state, so add that flag can stay in the lookup helper. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
Move existing code to validate nexthop into a helper. Follow on patch adds support for nexthops marked with onlink, and this helper keeps the complexity of ip6_route_info_create in check. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
IPv6 allows routes to be installed when the device is not up (admin up). Worse, it does not mark it as LINKDOWN. IPv4 does not allow it and really there is no reason for IPv6 to allow it, so check the flags and deny if device is admin down. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NRoopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
/proc has been ignoring struct file_operations::owner field for 10 years. Specifically, it started with commit 786d7e16 ("Fix rmmod/read/write races in /proc entries"). Notice the chunk where inode->i_fop is initialized with proxy struct file_operations for regular files: - if (de->proc_fops) - inode->i_fop = de->proc_fops; + if (de->proc_fops) { + if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) + inode->i_fop = &proc_reg_file_ops; + else + inode->i_fop = de->proc_fops; + } VFS stopped pinning module at this point. Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 16 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Emil reported the following compiler errors: net/ipv6/route.c: In function `rt6_sync_up`: net/ipv6/route.c:3586: error: unknown field `nh_flags` specified in initializer net/ipv6/route.c:3586: warning: missing braces around initializer net/ipv6/route.c:3586: warning: (near initialization for `arg.<anonymous>`) net/ipv6/route.c: In function `rt6_sync_down_dev`: net/ipv6/route.c:3695: error: unknown field `event` specified in initializer net/ipv6/route.c:3695: warning: missing braces around initializer net/ipv6/route.c:3695: warning: (near initialization for `arg.<anonymous>`) Problem is with the named initializers for the anonymous union members. Fix this by adding curly braces around the initialization. Fixes: 4c981e28 ("ipv6: Prepare to handle multiple netdev events") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reported-by: NEmil S Tantilov <emils.tantilov@gmail.com> Tested-by: NEmil S Tantilov <emils.tantilov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 1月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The use of hash-threshold instead of modulo-N makes it trivial to add support for non-equal-cost multipath. Instead of dividing the multipath hash function's output space equally between the nexthops, each nexthop is assigned a region size which is proportional to its weight. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Now that each nexthop stores its region boundary in the multipath hash function's output space, we can use hash-threshold instead of modulo-N in multipath selection. This reduces the number of checks we need to perform during lookup, as dead and linkdown nexthops are assigned a negative region boundary. In addition, in contrast to modulo-N, only flows near region boundaries are affected when a nexthop is added or removed. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The hash thresholds assigned to IPv6 nexthops are in the range of [-1, 2^31 - 1], where a negative value is assigned to nexthops that should not be considered during multipath selection. Therefore, in a similar fashion to IPv4, we need to use the upper 31-bits of the multipath hash for multipath selection. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Before we convert IPv6 to use hash-threshold instead of modulo-N, we first need each nexthop to store its region boundary in the hash function's output space. The boundary is calculated by dividing the output space equally between the different active nexthops. That is, nexthops that are not dead or linkdown. The boundaries are rebalanced whenever a nexthop is added or removed to a multipath route and whenever a nexthop becomes active or inactive. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 1月, 2018 7 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
By default, IPv6 deletes nexthops from a multipath route when the nexthop device is put administratively down. This differs from IPv4 where the nexthops are kept, but marked with the RTNH_F_DEAD flag. A multipath route is flushed when all of its nexthops become dead. Align IPv6 with IPv4 and have it conform to the same guidelines. In case the multipath route needs to be flushed, its siblings are flushed one by one. Otherwise, the nexthops are marked with the appropriate flags and the tree walker is instructed to skip all the siblings. As explained in previous patches, care is taken to update the sernum of the affected tree nodes, so as to prevent the use of wrong dst entries. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The next patch is going to allow dead routes to remain in the FIB tree in certain situations. When this happens we need to be sure to bump the sernum of the nodes where these are stored so that potential copies cached in sockets are invalidated. The function that performs this update assumes the table lock is not taken when it is invoked, but that will not be the case when it is invoked by the tree walker. Have the function assume the lock is taken and make the single caller take the lock itself. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Up until now the RTNH_F_DEAD flag was only reported in route dump when the 'ignore_routes_with_linkdown' sysctl was set. This is expected as dead routes were flushed otherwise. The reliance on this sysctl is going to be removed, so we need to report the flag regardless of the sysctl's value. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Currently, dead routes are only present in the routing tables in case the 'ignore_routes_with_linkdown' sysctl is set. Otherwise, they are flushed. Subsequent patches are going to remove the reliance on this sysctl and make IPv6 more consistent with IPv4. Before this is done, we need to make sure dead routes are skipped during route lookup, so as to not cause packet loss. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Similar to previous patch, there is no need to check for the carrier of the nexthop device when dumping the route and we can instead check for the presence of the RTNH_F_LINKDOWN flag. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Now that the RTNH_F_LINKDOWN flag is set in nexthops, we can avoid the need to dereference the nexthop device and check its carrier and instead check for the presence of the flag. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
It is valid to install routes with a nexthop device that does not have a carrier, so we need to make sure they're marked accordingly. As explained in the previous patch, host and anycast routes are never marked with the 'linkdown' flag. Note that reject routes are unaffected, as these use the loopback device which always has a carrier. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-